Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
#1
Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
do these electric blowers really work?? this is their site they supposedly dynoed a 2002 maxima here-> http://www.jmsproductsinc.com/
#4
Re: Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
Originally posted by mjk
do these electric blowers really work?? this is their site they supposedly dynoed a 2002 maxima here-> http://www.jmsproductsinc.com/
do these electric blowers really work?? this is their site they supposedly dynoed a 2002 maxima here-> http://www.jmsproductsinc.com/
That's cool, but if you want real power, try a leaf blower. I have a john deere rigged to a spare boat battery in the trunk that is wired to a throttle position switch. When I go wide open throttle it spins up and my boost guage registers a positive pressure of 3.5 psi
#5
Re: Re: Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
That's cool, but if you want real power, try a leaf blower. I have a john deere rigged to a spare boat battery in the trunk that is wired to a throttle position switch. When I go wide open throttle it spins up and my boost guage registers a positive pressure of 3.5 psi
That's cool, but if you want real power, try a leaf blower. I have a john deere rigged to a spare boat battery in the trunk that is wired to a throttle position switch. When I go wide open throttle it spins up and my boost guage registers a positive pressure of 3.5 psi
I could only find a desk fan and a cig. adapter plug so I have to manually plug mine in... and I couldn't figure out how to get the fan to stop oscillating so I only get boost every .8 seconds when it's aimed right down the intake
#7
Re: Re: Re: Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
Originally posted by 2k2wannabe
damn, man, that's a good idea...
I could only find a desk fan and a cig. adapter plug so I have to manually plug mine in... and I couldn't figure out how to get the fan to stop oscillating so I only get boost every .8 seconds when it's aimed right down the intake
damn, man, that's a good idea...
I could only find a desk fan and a cig. adapter plug so I have to manually plug mine in... and I couldn't figure out how to get the fan to stop oscillating so I only get boost every .8 seconds when it's aimed right down the intake
see, that's a fairly common problem with the desk fan FI guys. did you use urethane bushings on the brackets for the desk fan mounts? They should take up some of the vibration and stabilize it some. Also, if you empty a windex bottle and fill it with NO2, you can duct tape it behind the fan and you'll get DOUBLE the power! Have you ever rigged a pulley system? Get some twine, with two pulleys, if you're creative you can route a line through the firewall so you can just pull the string from inside the car and squeeze the trigger on your windex bottle. You can spray at will. Can you say 9's? WOOOOOOSH!
#8
Yes. I have done some beta testing with JMS Products. However, we found that the dyno results gave us 3.09 SAE HP and 10.91 SAE ft/lbs or torque using 2 blowers. However, they did produce HP and torque on vehicles such as SC/Turbo Cobras, Corvettes, and even a Toyota Corolla. It appears that while the system does work and the VQ35 engine can handle the extra forced air, the system itself doesn't produce the expected results on the VQ35 engine. And I have the dynos to back this up with too.
#10
Originally posted by studman
Yes. I have done some beta testing with JMS Products. However, we found that the dyno results gave us 1 HP and 19 ft/lbs or torque using 2 blowers. However, they did produce HP and torque on vehicles such as SC/Turbo Cobras, Corvettes, and even a Toyota Corolla. It appears that while the system does work and the VQ35 engine can handle the extra forced air, the system itself doesn't produce the expected results on the VQ35 engine. And I have the dynos to back this up with too.
Yes. I have done some beta testing with JMS Products. However, we found that the dyno results gave us 1 HP and 19 ft/lbs or torque using 2 blowers. However, they did produce HP and torque on vehicles such as SC/Turbo Cobras, Corvettes, and even a Toyota Corolla. It appears that while the system does work and the VQ35 engine can handle the extra forced air, the system itself doesn't produce the expected results on the VQ35 engine. And I have the dynos to back this up with too.
#11
Re: Re: Re: Has anyone tried the electric blowers?
Originally posted by 2k2wannabe
damn, man, that's a good idea...
I could only find a desk fan and a cig. adapter plug so I have to manually plug mine in... and I couldn't figure out how to get the fan to stop oscillating so I only get boost every .8 seconds when it's aimed right down the intake
damn, man, that's a good idea...
I could only find a desk fan and a cig. adapter plug so I have to manually plug mine in... and I couldn't figure out how to get the fan to stop oscillating so I only get boost every .8 seconds when it's aimed right down the intake
#12
can it be combined with a PR cai?
When we did the testing, I kept the upper tube of the PR CAI installed. The MAF was bolted to the upper tube, and we attached the blower(s) directly to the MAF. Yes... I was scared of another MAF failure. But I had changed my intake a few times without any problems, so I figured it would be a good test. The MAF model was 22680-AM600, which is the one being installed by the TSB and the one already installed on the 2003 models. So I guess it's good to know that these MAFs are gonna hold up to higher winds.
I also had to purchase a Greddy E-Manage (similar to APEXi S-AFC (II)) unit. My air/fuel curves were way off when I arrived there. Once the unit was installed, it was tuned for all runs. This means that I made multiple runs to tune the air/fuel under the condition that was tested. Once it was tuned for that setup, I then made a set of runs. Then, we changed setups, re-tuned the air/fuel curves, and made another set of runs. Then, we changed the setup again, re-tuned the air/fuel curves again, and made a final set of runs. After all the testing was over, I obviously re-tuned it to my normal configuration.
The testing resulted in the following:
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage ---> 211.59 HP and 223.36 ft/lbs Torque (SAE Corrected)
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage/Single Blower ---> 213.48 HP and 230.74 ft/lbs Torque (SAE Corrected)
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage/Double Blower ---> 214.68 HP and 234.27 ft/lbs Torque (SAE Corrected)
The SAE Correction Factor was high due to the weather, so I'll post the same runs uncorrected.
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage ---> 221.48 HP and 233.79 ft/lbs Torque (Uncorrected)
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage/Single Blower ---> 222.81 HP and 240.82 ft/lbs Torque (Uncorrected)
WAI/Y/B/Cat/Exhaust/E-Manage/Double Blower ---> 225.06 HP and 245.60 ft/lbs Torque (Uncorrected)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
04-02-2016 05:42 AM
CAN-Toronto FS: Basement cleaning
knight_yyz
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
12
11-01-2015 01:34 PM