5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Injection Cold Air Intake Vs Franken Air Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #1  
gene_vq03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 66
From: El Paso Tx
Injection Cold Air Intake Vs Franken Air Intake

I want to know why everybody is choosing Injenction Cold Air Intake over Franken intake for HP. I mean I have heard so many good things about Franken that is has good low and high end response. As for Injection its not really a cold air intake, the intake is right next to the radiator fans plus it has a pretty good chance of getting wet when driving in really bad raining days. As for Franken set-up I would consider it more safe for raining days. Has anybody tried to installed a second air tube connected to the stock air dam down under the car with a Franken set-up maybe by doing this it may help getting more cold air in the engine bay for a better acceleration responds . My question is which one is better for HP/TQ
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
jjames's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 702
do you mean injen?
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:39 AM
  #3  
2k2kev's Avatar
It's chrome alright...
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,999
Originally Posted by gene_vq03
I want to know why everybody is choosing Injenction Cold Air Intake over Franken intake for HP. I mean I have heard so many good things about Franken that is has good low and high end response. As for Injection its not really a cold air intake, the intake is right next to the radiator fans plus it has a pretty good chance of getting wet when driving in really bad raining days. As for Franken set-up I would consider it more safe for raining days. Has anybody tried to installed a second air tube connected to the stock air dam down under the car with a Franken set-up maybe by doing this it may help getting more cold air in the engine bay for a better acceleration responds . My question is which one is better for HP/TQ
READ READ READ

SEARCH SEARCH SEARCH

Threads with "I heard"

INJEN IS NOT RIGHT NEXT TO THE RADIATOR
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
kcowden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 968
I like the souind and look of my Injen but it makes my engine ping. I don't think driving through water will be a problem for you since you live in the desert. lots of thread about intakes here I'm sure a serch will give you most of your answers. Good luck and welcome to the org.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
Injen = Better low-end, not so much on the high-end
Franken = Better mid-range and top-end, heat soak issues (especially during summer) for the low-end.

However, the differences in power-gain between the two are minimal and i seroiusly doubt you can tell the difference by driving the car. Sure one intake may be louder than the other, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's getting more power.

With that said, the question on which one is better really boils down to aesthetic preference, some people like the mean look of the Franken while others like the polished look of the Injen.

As far as hydrolock is concerned. The only people who i know who actually had this happen to them are the same people who drove their car in deep puddles of water. (Think 2+ Feet of water). At which rate, you have more things to worry about than just hydrolocking your engine - whether you have an aftermarket intake or not.

I'd also like to add something about heat soaking. Even if you think that the Injen sits right behind the radiator you also have to remember that heat travels upwards.

With that in mind, now think of the heat coming from the radiator *And* the engine moving upwards towards the underside of the hood. Now think where all that heated air is going when you have a short-ram intake like the Frankencar.

I'm not saying the Frankencar intake is bad, i'm just clarifying certain issues about the heat issues.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 12:50 PM
  #6  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
Also, with regards to why CAI's tend to not perform as good at the top-end.

Think of CAI's (e.g. Intakes with longer tubes) as straws. The ratio of the amount of air that's sucked in slowly grows indirectly proportional to the amount of effort needed to suck it in the first place.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
skandalouz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,681
From: duluth, ga
ur friend probably thinks louder = faster.... there's NO WAY he can tell the difference in power between the two by just sitting in the car............
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 12:58 PM
  #8  
Rafe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Originally Posted by soundmike
Injen = Better low-end, not so much on the high-end
Franken = Better mid-range and top-end, heat soak issues (especially during summer) for the low-end.

However, the differences in power-gain between the two are minimal and i seroiusly doubt you can tell the difference by driving the car. Sure one intake may be louder than the other, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's getting more power.

With that said, the question on which one is better really boils down to aesthetic preference, some people like the mean look of the Franken while others like the polished look of the Injen.

As far as hydrolock is concerned. The only people who i know who actually had this happen to them are the same people who drove their car in deep puddles of water. (Think 2+ Feet of water). At which rate, you have more things to worry about than just hydrolocking your engine - whether you have an aftermarket intake or not.

I'd also like to add something about heat soaking. Even if you think that the Injen sits right behind the radiator you also have to remember that heat travels upwards.

With that in mind, now think of the heat coming from the radiator *And* the engine moving upwards towards the underside of the hood. Now think where all that heated air is going when you have a short-ram intake like the Frankencar.

I'm not saying the Frankencar intake is bad, i'm just clarifying certain issues about the heat issues.


WOW , the guy at my local race shop said the same thing. That heat moves upward and that the Franken would suck alot of hot air. He said they were decent intakes , but highly recomends a Injen intake system over it.He also said the sound diffrence is only because of the shape of the opening on both intakes .Its almost like blowing a horn,a trumpet is going to sound diffrent from a saxaphone, except instead of blowing there sucking in air.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Miket2006
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
Mar 1, 2021 03:55 AM
Fbana41
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
3
Aug 29, 2016 12:18 PM
hayne
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Oct 5, 2015 11:53 AM
msellas
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 23, 2015 09:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:30 AM.