Crappy Gas Mileage?
#1
Crappy Gas Mileage?
I don't know why but it seems like all of a sudden it took me twice as much gas to get somewhere I drive everyday as opposed to before...and the car felt a little slower as well? I have a 2k2 and just hit 24k, anyone have any ideas? I just got a recall letter for the crank sensor which is getting done hopefully end of this week but don't think that has anything to do with it?
Thanks
Thanks
#4
I have about the same mileage on my 2k2 and have not replaced the air filter yet. I have had the engine sensor recall performed and it did not change anything in the performance of my car. The recall was more of a safety issue with the possiblity of stalling the engine while driving on the highway.
#10
cold air makes it run very rich when its first started, combined with it taking longer to warm up, that means you get crappy mileage. Just wait till it warms up a lil, mileage will go up. Or go for a 50+ mile drive, you'll get mileage that is back to normal. Short (under 15 miles) drives in this cold weather ruin mileage
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by charliekilo3
I have about the same mileage on my 2k2 and have not replaced the air filter yet. I have had the engine sensor recall performed and it did not change anything in the performance of my car. The recall was more of a safety issue with the possiblity of stalling the engine while driving on the highway.
#13
oh and get a K&N, then ya can just clean it out. Works great too
BTW its nice learning about stuff here at college that I can apply to my car interest (like the running rich thing, along with god knows what else) I'm beginnin to feel like a guru hahaha
BTW its nice learning about stuff here at college that I can apply to my car interest (like the running rich thing, along with god knows what else) I'm beginnin to feel like a guru hahaha
#15
Originally Posted by 03maximan
I don't think cold air has anything to do with it, could be a bad tank of gas maybe? Winter gas sucks anyway. Charliekilo3: how many miles on original filter?
#16
Originally Posted by trey
Wow, don't you think its time to change the air filter yet? I thought changing it at 15k would be about right.
#17
I have been consistently getting about 19mi per gallon since well...since I bought it new in May. I know it can do better because I recall getting 22-24mpg during break in period. I'm sure alot has to do with manner driven, but honestly, I don't travel on freeway really that much at all. No peelouts at every traffic light....etc. I have a 37 mile drive to work about 4-5 times a week on a 55mph divided highway (usually driving 65-68mph depending on time). I usually let my car warm up for a few minutes, but in the morning sometimes will let it warm up until the temp needles moves off of C. (I did not know that it was not ideal to do this, however don't like just driving it off right after startup). Mildly aggressive driving style, and it's an auto. Now I know it's not a Prius, and has a sizeable V6, but I did expect at least equal mpg to my old 4 cyl auto that usually averaged at least 24mpg (and that had a 14gal tank!). Basically, I'm just wondering if anyone else gets these kind of figures regularly? It's not a huge deal to me, but I use 93 oct. all the time, and getting about 300 miles to the tank....well......makes me feel Hope I'm not the only one?
#18
Originally Posted by Maxceler8
I have been consistently getting about 19mi per gallon since well...since I bought it new in May. I know it can do better because I recall getting 22-24mpg during break in period. I'm sure alot has to do with manner driven, but honestly, I don't travel on freeway really that much at all. No peelouts at every traffic light....etc. I have a 37 mile drive to work about 4-5 times a week on a 55mph divided highway (usually driving 65-68mph depending on time). I usually let my car warm up for a few minutes, but in the morning sometimes will let it warm up until the temp needles moves off of C. (I did not know that it was not ideal to do this, however don't like just driving it off right after startup). Mildly aggressive driving style, and it's an auto. Now I know it's not a Prius, and has a sizeable V6, but I did expect at least equal mpg to my old 4 cyl auto that usually averaged at least 24mpg (and that had a 14gal tank!). Basically, I'm just wondering if anyone else gets these kind of figures regularly? It's not a huge deal to me, but I use 93 oct. all the time, and getting about 300 miles to the tank....well......makes me feel Hope I'm not the only one?
#19
You might also consider changing your the fuel filter. While there is no suggested maintenance schedule for it, many on the org have found their very dirty. http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=276627
#20
Hmm....I do usually baby it until it's fully warmed but I'll try not to let it sit so long and idle, hope that might help a bit. Guess I should try and avoid dipping in the gas more than necessary too too bad it's soo fun.....
Thanks for the help, will keep those in mind
Thanks for the help, will keep those in mind
#21
I've given up trying to get good gas mileage. If I get 300 miles to the tank, I'm happy. I dropped in some BG 44K, and it helped temporarily, but then the bad weather came in, and I am only getting 280 to the tank. The BG 44K, I'm more happy of the performance gains, car idles smoother, runs cooler. But back to the gas, I calculated my last tank, and I'm getting 18mpg. Atrocious!
3300lbs car + 245hp V6 + My lead foot +Winter gas/Winter weather = Crappy fuel economy.
Somebody give me a trophy for figuring that one out
Hopefully this Summer I can go back to 3xx mile between tanks of gas.
Fernando
3300lbs car + 245hp V6 + My lead foot +Winter gas/Winter weather = Crappy fuel economy.
Somebody give me a trophy for figuring that one out
Hopefully this Summer I can go back to 3xx mile between tanks of gas.
Fernando
#23
According to Chevron there can be as much as a 20% decrease in fuel efficiency.
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel.../fuel_economy/
I didn't know that.
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel.../fuel_economy/
I didn't know that.
#24
i know in CT they just stopped using the MTBE (is that right) fuel additive and swapped for something that I cant remember the name of. Anyways, the new additive reduces mileage by at least 2%, possibly more. Not sure if this is nation wide tho
#25
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,751
The 3.5's are fuel hungry engines( at least for a V6) cars I have to deal with 2 of them and they are thirsty, especially in the cold weather. Plus we have 2 lead feet! Guys over at th3 350Z forums and G35 forums are saying the same thing!
#26
Originally Posted by bigdo26
i know in CT they just stopped using the MTBE (is that right) fuel additive and swapped for something that I cant remember the name of. Anyways, the new additive reduces mileage by at least 2%, possibly more. Not sure if this is nation wide tho
#29
Originally Posted by maximaracer28
I don't know why but it seems like all of a sudden it took me twice as much gas to get somewhere I drive everyday as opposed to before...and the car felt a little slower as well? I have a 2k2 and just hit 24k, anyone have any ideas? I just got a recall letter for the crank sensor which is getting done hopefully end of this week but don't think that has anything to do with it?
Thanks
Thanks
Same thing happened to me about 2 weeks ago. All of a sudden, gas milege was in the "tank" so to speak. Yesterday my SES light came on, and presto went to my local mechanic because I am out of warranty and it was an Oxygen Sensor. Mechanic told me, chances are the fuel air mixture would have been all messed up. Funny thing is, I never noticed any performance difference.
My money says the "service engine soon" light comes on any day now,
Good luck
#30
I've got an '03 SE with the six speed manual. I've always been happy with my mileage and get a solid 28 mpg on the highway. Yeah in winter it has gone down a little bit but I think that has more to do with pushing through slop and not air temperature. On a recent run up from NJ I got 29 mpg when the temperature was in the low teens but the roads were dry. I've got about 25,000 miles on it. I figured not bad since that's just about what my '92 Maxima SE got and this car's got way more guts.
My girlfriend liked my car so much she bought one, an '02 GLE with 30,000 miles. She likes the softer ride of the GLE. Coincidentally, it's Majestic Blue like mine. Here's where it gets interesting. Since she bought the car she's been getting between 20 and 21 mpg. Her commute is to North Haven and is about 1/2 mile city, 40 miles highway, and then about 1 mile city. Her general highway speed is about 5 mph less than mine and I think I'm a little more agressive in accelleration. With her long commute this poor mileage is really bugging her and stealing her pleasure of owning the car. This is tough after getting about 32 mpg in her '95 four-cylinder, manual Mazda 626.
I've checked all the usual suspects, tire pressure, air cleaner. Have used Techron fuel injector cleaner but haven't yet tried BG44K.
This has really gotten me into the dog house. When she was considering the car I told her that with an automatic she couldn't get my 28 mpg. My best guess was about 25 mpg, about a 10% decrease in mileage. But 20 mpg?!. That's about 28% poorer than my manual. That doesn't seem right. There's no Check Engine light but something seems to be wrong except it sounds like, from this thread, others are experiencing the same thing.
We've got to bring both cars in for the Crank Sensor Recall. Doesn't sound like a likely culprit since from descriptions, when that goes you really know it and there's a Check Engine light. We will note the poor mileage with her car and see if there is something wrong. Want to catch anything before it goes out of warrantee soon.
My girlfriend liked my car so much she bought one, an '02 GLE with 30,000 miles. She likes the softer ride of the GLE. Coincidentally, it's Majestic Blue like mine. Here's where it gets interesting. Since she bought the car she's been getting between 20 and 21 mpg. Her commute is to North Haven and is about 1/2 mile city, 40 miles highway, and then about 1 mile city. Her general highway speed is about 5 mph less than mine and I think I'm a little more agressive in accelleration. With her long commute this poor mileage is really bugging her and stealing her pleasure of owning the car. This is tough after getting about 32 mpg in her '95 four-cylinder, manual Mazda 626.
I've checked all the usual suspects, tire pressure, air cleaner. Have used Techron fuel injector cleaner but haven't yet tried BG44K.
This has really gotten me into the dog house. When she was considering the car I told her that with an automatic she couldn't get my 28 mpg. My best guess was about 25 mpg, about a 10% decrease in mileage. But 20 mpg?!. That's about 28% poorer than my manual. That doesn't seem right. There's no Check Engine light but something seems to be wrong except it sounds like, from this thread, others are experiencing the same thing.
We've got to bring both cars in for the Crank Sensor Recall. Doesn't sound like a likely culprit since from descriptions, when that goes you really know it and there's a Check Engine light. We will note the poor mileage with her car and see if there is something wrong. Want to catch anything before it goes out of warrantee soon.
#32
[QUOTE=jreddington3]I've got an '03 SE with the six speed manual. I've always been happy with my mileage and get a solid 28 mpg on the highway. Yeah in winter it has gone down a little bit but I think that has more to do with pushing through slop and not air temperature. On a recent run up from NJ I got 29 mpg when the temperature was in the low teens but the roads were dry. I've got about 25,000 miles on it. I figured not bad since that's just about what my '92 Maxima SE got and this car's got way more guts.
My girlfriend liked my car so much she bought one, an '02 GLE with 30,000 miles. She likes the softer ride of the GLE. Coincidentally, it's Majestic Blue like mine. Here's where it gets interesting. Since she bought the car she's been getting between 20 and 21 mpg. Her commute is to North Haven and is about 1/2 mile city, 40 miles highway, and then about 1 mile city. Her general highway speed is about 5 mph less than mine and I think I'm a little more agressive in accelleration. With her long commute this poor mileage is really bugging her and stealing her pleasure of owning the car. This is tough after getting about 32 mpg in her '95 four-cylinder, manual Mazda 626.[QUOTE]
So what's your average hwy speed? If I got open road ahead of me I usually drive 80 mph. I drive about 300 miles a week back and forth from work and usuallly get 318 miles on a tank with the majority of the time spent on the hwy and I'm getting between 20-21 mpg. I'm wondering if driving 80 mph for a bit causes this poor gas mileage.
My girlfriend liked my car so much she bought one, an '02 GLE with 30,000 miles. She likes the softer ride of the GLE. Coincidentally, it's Majestic Blue like mine. Here's where it gets interesting. Since she bought the car she's been getting between 20 and 21 mpg. Her commute is to North Haven and is about 1/2 mile city, 40 miles highway, and then about 1 mile city. Her general highway speed is about 5 mph less than mine and I think I'm a little more agressive in accelleration. With her long commute this poor mileage is really bugging her and stealing her pleasure of owning the car. This is tough after getting about 32 mpg in her '95 four-cylinder, manual Mazda 626.[QUOTE]
So what's your average hwy speed? If I got open road ahead of me I usually drive 80 mph. I drive about 300 miles a week back and forth from work and usuallly get 318 miles on a tank with the majority of the time spent on the hwy and I'm getting between 20-21 mpg. I'm wondering if driving 80 mph for a bit causes this poor gas mileage.
#33
DallasFan
I'd say my average highway cruising speed is between 70 and 72 mph. Back here in the congested East I rarely feel comfortable running faster than that and I know if I started pushing 80 mph I'd be looking at some tickets. My girlfriend usually runs between 65-70.
Running 80 mph is certainly going to drop your mileage. Air resistance goes up the square of velocity so at 80 vs. 70 you're looking at about 30% more wind resistance so that difference in mileage is not out of the ballpark.
On another thread in this forum there's a discussion of a member who brought his Maxima to Germany and is running it on the autobahn. He's looking for a way to operate his cruise control past the 90 mph limit designed into that system. He also has problems using the wipers at 100+ mph. (Someone posted a reply asking why would you be running 100+ mph in the rain.) I don't even want to think what his mileage is (although there they caluculate it in liters consumption per 100 km). And at $5+ a gallon that's a lot of gas money no matter which currency you use.
I'd say my average highway cruising speed is between 70 and 72 mph. Back here in the congested East I rarely feel comfortable running faster than that and I know if I started pushing 80 mph I'd be looking at some tickets. My girlfriend usually runs between 65-70.
Running 80 mph is certainly going to drop your mileage. Air resistance goes up the square of velocity so at 80 vs. 70 you're looking at about 30% more wind resistance so that difference in mileage is not out of the ballpark.
On another thread in this forum there's a discussion of a member who brought his Maxima to Germany and is running it on the autobahn. He's looking for a way to operate his cruise control past the 90 mph limit designed into that system. He also has problems using the wipers at 100+ mph. (Someone posted a reply asking why would you be running 100+ mph in the rain.) I don't even want to think what his mileage is (although there they caluculate it in liters consumption per 100 km). And at $5+ a gallon that's a lot of gas money no matter which currency you use.
#35
Originally Posted by jreddington3
DallasFan
Running 80 mph is certainly going to drop your mileage. Air resistance goes up the square of velocity so at 80 vs. 70 you're looking at about 30% more wind resistance so that difference in mileage is not out of the ballpark.
Running 80 mph is certainly going to drop your mileage. Air resistance goes up the square of velocity so at 80 vs. 70 you're looking at about 30% more wind resistance so that difference in mileage is not out of the ballpark.
#36
on 27 dollars of gas @ $2.00/gal, i get like 210 miles driving around NYC in stop and go..
this is on my 2000 5spd
i think the sudden decrease in gas milage has a lot to do with the new winter gas that they use in the northern states.. very ****ty economy.. they mix it with methanol or something else and it burns faster... but the price of gas is still high and going up
this is on my 2000 5spd
i think the sudden decrease in gas milage has a lot to do with the new winter gas that they use in the northern states.. very ****ty economy.. they mix it with methanol or something else and it burns faster... but the price of gas is still high and going up
#38
Originally Posted by charliekilo3
Do you think the wind resistance factors more into fuel consumption than the engines demand for more fuel to go 80 vs 70? If you have an aerodynamic car, the wind is routed up and over as well as underneath. Not the same thing as driving a cabover tractor trailer w/o aerodynamics. They have to push a lot of air aside to travel on the highways.
These aren't actual numbers and there are other things that come into play such as tire rolling resistance, driveline losses, drag due to crosswinds, etc. However, there's no way around it, you go faster, your drag increases. The engine then consumes more fuel per mile to overcome this drag.
In fact, the Prius (or is it the Civic hybrid, I forget) has official EPA mileage numbers with the City mileage HIGHER than highway mileage. This is in large part due to the fact that the average speed in the city test cycle is lower than in the highway cycle. In all other traditional cars the city mileage is lower because energy lost during braking overcomes the energy savings by going slower. In the Prius regenerative braking recaptures that energy by pumping it back into the battery. This lets the low speed energy savings become evident in the test results.
If you have a trip computer, try it yourself. Reset the computer mpg and mph and make a good 40+ mile run at 55 mph (Yeah, I know, this is gonna hurt). Jot down the mpg and average mph. Then reset and make the same run at 70 mph or whatever you like. Make sure it's a relatively calm day because a 10 mph wind adds effectively 10 mph of drag in one direction and subracts it in the other. That 20 mph difference can have a significant impact on the outcome. If you live in Kansas or somewhere where the roads are pretty straight and flat for 80+ miles just reset and change your speed halfway through the trip. No cheating by drafting behind an 18 wheeler.
Compare the readings and I'll bet you'll be surprised at the difference in mileage.
#39
I roll 70-80 all the time and I just noticed somthing. I filled up at Kroger wit 93 and at 1/2 tank I was at 155 miles, gas light came on at 306 miles. NOW this week I filled up at SAM's wit 93 and at 1/2 tank I was at 190 miles. Can any one explain this. same driving habbits 70-80 even 90 at times. I seriously think they have done something with the gas additives or what ever!!
#40
Originally Posted by jreddington3
It doesn't really matter what you're driving whether it's an aerodynamic Honda Impact or Toyota Prius, or a slab sided Winnebago, the ratio stays realtively the same. It's just that the Impact or Prius will get say, 50 mpg at 55 mph but mid 30's at 70 mph, while the Winnebago will get 10 mpg at 55 mph and 6 mpg at 70 mph.
These aren't actual numbers and there are other things that come into play such as tire rolling resistance, driveline losses, drag due to crosswinds, etc. However, there's no way around it, you go faster, your drag increases. The engine then consumes more fuel per mile to overcome this drag.
In fact, the Prius (or is it the Civic hybrid, I forget) has official EPA mileage numbers with the City mileage HIGHER than highway mileage. This is in large part due to the fact that the average speed in the city test cycle is lower than in the highway cycle. In all other traditional cars the city mileage is lower because energy lost during braking overcomes the energy savings by going slower. In the Prius regenerative braking recaptures that energy by pumping it back into the battery. This lets the low speed energy savings become evident in the test results.
If you have a trip computer, try it yourself. Reset the computer mpg and mph and make a good 40+ mile run at 55 mph (Yeah, I know, this is gonna hurt). Jot down the mpg and average mph. Then reset and make the same run at 70 mph or whatever you like. Make sure it's a relatively calm day because a 10 mph wind adds effectively 10 mph of drag in one direction and subracts it in the other. That 20 mph difference can have a significant impact on the outcome. If you live in Kansas or somewhere where the roads are pretty straight and flat for 80+ miles just reset and change your speed halfway through the trip. No cheating by drafting behind an 18 wheeler.
Compare the readings and I'll bet you'll be surprised at the difference in mileage.
These aren't actual numbers and there are other things that come into play such as tire rolling resistance, driveline losses, drag due to crosswinds, etc. However, there's no way around it, you go faster, your drag increases. The engine then consumes more fuel per mile to overcome this drag.
In fact, the Prius (or is it the Civic hybrid, I forget) has official EPA mileage numbers with the City mileage HIGHER than highway mileage. This is in large part due to the fact that the average speed in the city test cycle is lower than in the highway cycle. In all other traditional cars the city mileage is lower because energy lost during braking overcomes the energy savings by going slower. In the Prius regenerative braking recaptures that energy by pumping it back into the battery. This lets the low speed energy savings become evident in the test results.
If you have a trip computer, try it yourself. Reset the computer mpg and mph and make a good 40+ mile run at 55 mph (Yeah, I know, this is gonna hurt). Jot down the mpg and average mph. Then reset and make the same run at 70 mph or whatever you like. Make sure it's a relatively calm day because a 10 mph wind adds effectively 10 mph of drag in one direction and subracts it in the other. That 20 mph difference can have a significant impact on the outcome. If you live in Kansas or somewhere where the roads are pretty straight and flat for 80+ miles just reset and change your speed halfway through the trip. No cheating by drafting behind an 18 wheeler.
Compare the readings and I'll bet you'll be surprised at the difference in mileage.