Anyone tried Ram Air?
#1
Anyone tried Ram Air?
I know there are a lot of mod happy people on the ORG...
But has anyone tried cutting a hole in the hood of their maxima and Added Ram Air Induction throough a hood scoop to see if it helps with horse power?
Yeah I know it sounds kinda odd...but surely somebody has tried it?
I always here debates as to wether a intake helps or not on the 5th gen max's
But has anyone tried cutting a hole in the hood of their maxima and Added Ram Air Induction throough a hood scoop to see if it helps with horse power?
Yeah I know it sounds kinda odd...but surely somebody has tried it?
I always here debates as to wether a intake helps or not on the 5th gen max's
#2
Originally Posted by Y2KXCLAN
I know there are a lot of mod happy people on the ORG...
But has anyone tried cutting a hole in the hood of their maxima and Added Ram Air Induction throough a hood scoop to see if it helps with horse power?
Yeah I know it sounds kinda odd...but surely somebody has tried it?
I always here debates as to wether a intake helps or not on the 5th gen max's
But has anyone tried cutting a hole in the hood of their maxima and Added Ram Air Induction throough a hood scoop to see if it helps with horse power?
Yeah I know it sounds kinda odd...but surely somebody has tried it?
I always here debates as to wether a intake helps or not on the 5th gen max's
A hole in the hood would give you good flow but there is miminal HP gain. Any cold air intake combined with a full exhaust for the best gains.
#4
well my main concern was of course more airflow.....but also I am concerned about the rain being sucked into the car from injen etc......My friend siezed a motor when i was in high school from this.....but i assume i would possibly get the same thing with a ram air if it werent designed properly?
#5
Originally Posted by 02icarus
mind elaborating this?
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
the way our front ends are built.. makes it virtually impossible to get a ram air effect.. since air hits the car it only travels about almost halfway on the hood and lifts and hits the windshield and travels from there..
plus .. ram air wont give you much performance anyways except circulate more air in the engine bay..
the intake can only suck in so much air..
plus .. ram air wont give you much performance anyways except circulate more air in the engine bay..
the intake can only suck in so much air..
#9
I had a ws6 ram air T/A, and it doesnt take hitting 150 mph to feel the effect. I will say that its not as big a deal, as some people might make it seem. It does let the car breath easier, but its not going to give you 30-40 hp, like some people like to think.
#10
Yeah I have had experience with ram air on a firebird i had previous to the max. and yeah it was affective. but the front of the firebird is designed differently and the scoops are more toward the fron of the car....and the cars aerodynaimcs were rather good
#12
Originally Posted by bigdo26
The phrase "ram air" indicates pressurized air due to high velocites of air entering the engine. I'll be happy to elaborate some more if anyone has further questions.
If you want this type of setup, I have seen some use the fog light hole and run a tube up from there.
As for water, I have the PR cai and I now have rust in the lower tube. I don't think it made it past the MAF, so now I have a short intake.
If we could design the perfect air intake it would offer minimal gains over the one currently on the market, especially with the same size throttle body and intake manifold. You are not going to force/ram/pressurize air into the intake, so the best you can do is to eliminate any restrictions.
#13
Originally Posted by soonerfan
ram air scoop is for looks only.
and on a 4 door sedan (family car) it would look ricey
and on a 4 door sedan (family car) it would look ricey
#14
Originally Posted by theMax
As for water, I have the PR cai and I now have rust in the lower tube. I don't think it made it past the MAF, so now I have a short intake.
Regards,
Bryan
#15
Originally Posted by kloogy
Really? I bet you if I raced you in my WS6 , I would rip you a hole so big, you would have to hire a crew of 20 guys to plaster it closed...
I WOULD BET that if you ran your WS6 and then ran it again with out the ram air (remove the hood maybe?) that the times would not vary significantly, proving that ram air is really not helping you.
As for the CAI I live in OH where we do have lots of rain and snow. I didn't drive through big puddles but if you look in the fender where the filter sits, dirt and water get in there and the filter sucked some of the moisture in. I've had it for a few years running the full thing for the first year.
#17
Kloogy; why are you getting mad, chill out.
P.S, if i raced you in my rocket ship, you would need infantecimally smalll nanite smart robots piece your seperated molecules togther (laugh)
ram air, and hood scoops are ghey. Obviously the ws6 package is partially cosmetic , and that is one of the options.
P.S, if i raced you in my rocket ship, you would need infantecimally smalll nanite smart robots piece your seperated molecules togther (laugh)
ram air, and hood scoops are ghey. Obviously the ws6 package is partially cosmetic , and that is one of the options.
#18
Well guyz....I get everyones point about it not being as affective as some think....but i can tell ya....my mom had a 76 camaro and it was modded big time.....anyways the ram air hood scoop and the HUUUGe air filter made huge difference . It sounded like a 747 and gave good horse power.
And Kloogy didnt appear to be getting mad to me....just Talking some well deserved smack
And Kloogy didnt appear to be getting mad to me....just Talking some well deserved smack
#19
Originally Posted by kloogy
Really? I bet you if I raced you in my WS6 , I would rip you a hole so big, you would have to hire a crew of 20 guys to plaster it closed...
im glad it would make you feel like a man to beat a 4 door family car with your WS6.
#20
http://www.vetteguru.com/ramair/
Ram air is a gimic. Can we please kill the thread? Please, please, pretty please.
Ram air is a gimic. Can we please kill the thread? Please, please, pretty please.
#21
Not going to debate whether or not ram air works.
1. Air pressure (and velocity) increase as air is forced through a smaller opening but air flow volume decreases. Duh. Whoever was using that ridiculous funnel analogy needs to check their science books -- or stick a funnel out the window while driving 65-70 MPH and tell me the air pressure isn't higher coming out the small end.
2. Any air you "ram into" the engine still has to get past the throttle plate/throttle body, which can only flow so much air at a given time. Also, the extra pressure generated by "ramming" the air is nowhere near the pressures generated by FI; therefore, whatever small pressure gains you get by Ram Air'ing a VQ would probably be offset by the flow capacity of the intake manifold and throttle body.
In addition to that, if too much air is being "rammed" into the engine, it might exceed the flow capacity of the intake manifold and heads, creating turbulence (the "extra" air.)
Not saying there's not some HP gains for Ram Air (numbers don't lie) but just saying it's not worth it when compared to FI. The Ram Air system on, say, a Trans Am, or a GTO, is built as part of a SYSTEM with heads, intake, TB, etc. all taken into configuration.
1. Air pressure (and velocity) increase as air is forced through a smaller opening but air flow volume decreases. Duh. Whoever was using that ridiculous funnel analogy needs to check their science books -- or stick a funnel out the window while driving 65-70 MPH and tell me the air pressure isn't higher coming out the small end.
2. Any air you "ram into" the engine still has to get past the throttle plate/throttle body, which can only flow so much air at a given time. Also, the extra pressure generated by "ramming" the air is nowhere near the pressures generated by FI; therefore, whatever small pressure gains you get by Ram Air'ing a VQ would probably be offset by the flow capacity of the intake manifold and throttle body.
In addition to that, if too much air is being "rammed" into the engine, it might exceed the flow capacity of the intake manifold and heads, creating turbulence (the "extra" air.)
Not saying there's not some HP gains for Ram Air (numbers don't lie) but just saying it's not worth it when compared to FI. The Ram Air system on, say, a Trans Am, or a GTO, is built as part of a SYSTEM with heads, intake, TB, etc. all taken into configuration.
#22
Originally Posted by Y2KXCLAN
Well guyz....I get everyones point about it not being as affective as some think....but i can tell ya....my mom had a 76 camaro and it was modded big time.....anyways the ram air hood scoop and the HUUUGe air filter made huge difference . It sounded like a 747 and gave good horse power.
MUSCLE CARS look good with hood scoops, it's part of "the look"....
as to the horsepower and sound....well, that's because it probably had a big-block V8 under the hood and straight pipes and all those goodies that typical muscle cars have. no matter what you do, your maxima will not be a muscle car, will not look like a muscle car, and will not have the beastly roar of a classic V8....
if hood scoop is your look, then get rid of the maxi and get a muscle car, or a subaru cuz MOST 4-door large sedans will look stupid with a hood scoop....unless you are totally pimped out for show, then it would be ok I guess...
bottom line is - ram air is a gimmick, it's just a CAI that pokes through the hood instead of out the front of the car or the wheel well..
#25
Originally Posted by wade2ksleeper
isn't posi-traction as lsd, wouldn't that make a difference
Posi-Traction is GM's patented name version of a LSD, just like Trak-Lock (or Trak-Lok...can't recall exactly) is Dodge/MOPAR's name version. Like I said, it's manufacturer specific. Ram Air is generally considered to be a Pontiac thing since the original GTO was the vehicle which first sported this particular performance name item. "Cowl Induction" is another GM/Chevy item...
#27
It could be argued that Olds started it in the '40s with the "Rocket", Chevy and Chrysler were quick to come up with "Firedomes" and "hemis" and "blue flames" -- but Posi-Traction (Trac-Lok is the Mopar btw) is an actual performance enhancer, not just a "gimmick name." It IS a LSD.
#28
I think he means how the "name" is gimmicky.....
instead of saying it has an LSD, they call it "Posi-Traction".....
instead of saying it has a hood-mounted cold air intake, they call it "Ram Air"
instead of saying it has an LSD, they call it "Posi-Traction".....
instead of saying it has a hood-mounted cold air intake, they call it "Ram Air"
#30
Originally Posted by irish44j
I think he means how the "name" is gimmicky.....
instead of saying it has an LSD, they call it "Posi-Traction".....
instead of saying it has a hood-mounted cold air intake, they call it "Ram Air"
instead of saying it has an LSD, they call it "Posi-Traction".....
instead of saying it has a hood-mounted cold air intake, they call it "Ram Air"
That is exactly my point and meaning. It's not a gimmick in that it's some sort of gussied up performance thing, but rather that it has such a fancy name
#31
its not just a fancy name
it is a gimmick because they try to say that "ram air" is better then other hood mounted cold air intakes.
people will say "i want a trans am. but i want the one with ram air" so they pay more and all the get is two hood scoops that say "ram air" on the side. granted i agree it looks mean as hell. but there are no benifits like they advertise.
it is a gimmick because they try to say that "ram air" is better then other hood mounted cold air intakes.
people will say "i want a trans am. but i want the one with ram air" so they pay more and all the get is two hood scoops that say "ram air" on the side. granted i agree it looks mean as hell. but there are no benifits like they advertise.
#32
This has turned into yet another one fo those name calling and smack talkin fests that i see so often ..... wish i hadnt asked.
Btw the purpose of asking about ram air had absolutely nothing related to looks.....just performance. I personally do not ask people what looks good on cars nor tell......its not my place. Just performance is my concern
Btw the purpose of asking about ram air had absolutely nothing related to looks.....just performance. I personally do not ask people what looks good on cars nor tell......its not my place. Just performance is my concern
#33
i think your question HAS been answered:
no, nobody has cut a hole in the OEM hood and put a scoop on it.....
or
no, it doesn't help
or
yes, it does
or
that looks gay
or
everyone likes to argue
or
ask a broad question, get a broad answer
no, nobody has cut a hole in the OEM hood and put a scoop on it.....
or
no, it doesn't help
or
yes, it does
or
that looks gay
or
everyone likes to argue
or
ask a broad question, get a broad answer
#34
Originally Posted by soonerfan
its not just a fancy name
it is a gimmick because they try to say that "ram air" is better then other hood mounted cold air intakes.
people will say "i want a trans am. but i want the one with ram air" so they pay more and all the get is two hood scoops that say "ram air" on the side. granted i agree it looks mean as hell. but there are no benifits like they advertise.
it is a gimmick because they try to say that "ram air" is better then other hood mounted cold air intakes.
people will say "i want a trans am. but i want the one with ram air" so they pay more and all the get is two hood scoops that say "ram air" on the side. granted i agree it looks mean as hell. but there are no benifits like they advertise.
#35
Originally Posted by P. Samson
"Ram" or ram air is real and is the physics of changing air flow or the speed of air into an increased air pressure. (above ambient) And you don't have to have a monster scoop or duct or some "150 mph" to make use of it. As soon as you start moving ahead the whole front of your car is subjected to ram air pressure which will be above the ambient air pressure; obviously the higher the speed the more "ram" pressure is being applied to the frontal areas of the car. Airspeed indicators (really just a pressure gauge) on aircraft use a forward faceing tube called the pitot tube or head with an inside diameter of about a 1/4' that senses the ram pressure and converts it to airspeed. The airspeed indicators on light aircraft usually react and are readable at about 50 mph and above. But this is just "dead end" pressure. There is no flow requirment. On your car there is a flow requirement obviously as the engine when running has a "demand" for air. The intake must meet the maximum airflow required by the engine. This is a volume measurement usually measured in so many "cubic feet per minute". (CFM). With our engines it is only so much, and it is a fixed volume. We cannot go more than WOT and we cannot change the volume of the cylinders etc. This is a "full feedback" type fuel metering/control system and it is air density sensitive. It will react POSITIVELY (i.e. produce more power for the same throttle position) if you can increase pressure and/or decrease air temperature to the cylinders. It will deliver more fuel. The stock scoop is in fact a cold air and a ram air scoop. Yeah I know it looks small. Yes I know the system is a bit of a trade off between noise and performance. But I believe that the stock system has enough flow capacity although possibly marginal at WOT and redline rpm. How long are you there?? This is not a gas turbine (jet) engine!!The stock ducting and the air filter housing/box will in fact change the airflow created by the fwd. motion of the car into a slightly higher pressure than ambient to the THROTTLE and therefore to the cylinders. Obviously more speed, more pressure. A ram air system to work must have a convergent duct (the "scoop" and fwd. ducting) and then a divergent (increase in area) duct or opening. In our case this is the airfilter housing. This slows the airflow down and there is an increase in pressure. ("Bournoulli's principle") This increase will be "felt" downstream. I am not drag or "dyno" racing and I'm not at WOT for very long. Probably either are you in fact. Other than installing a K&N filter I have basically left the intake alone. I have no issues and have never had any.The engine responds to the throttle instantly and is capable of pushing you back in the seat especially about that magical 4000 to 4500 rpm range. I know this is not good enough for a lot of you. If you change the intake at least PLEASE take the air from in front of the radiator support. I have said it before... in every day driving hot air is a power robber. You will have fuel delivery cutback and possibly also spark retarding. High intake air makes the engine more prone to detonation and can cause the "bogging down" snag that you have seen, along with some of the other issues related to some of the intake mods.
#36
Originally Posted by Y2KXCLAN
Btw the purpose of asking about ram air had absolutely nothing related to looks.....just performance.
NO PERFORMANCE GAINS
ALL LOOKS
#37
Sampson,better not bring up airplanes....Jason (soonerfan) is in the Air Force
as to "ram air" I think we can see that what works "in theory" doesn't always work in "reality" (and vice versa).....
as to "ram air" I think we can see that what works "in theory" doesn't always work in "reality" (and vice versa).....
#38
Originally Posted by irish44j
Sampson,better not bring up airplanes....Jason (soonerfan) is in the Air Force
as to "ram air" I think we can see that what works "in theory" doesn't always work in "reality" (and vice versa).....
as to "ram air" I think we can see that what works "in theory" doesn't always work in "reality" (and vice versa).....
ram air isnt a theory. it is a marketing gimick
to whoever thought of it, cause it works to sell cars.
#40
I'll try another route here to convince you to leave the stock intake basically intact..... I would like you to research for yourselves (as you won't believe me) the principle, operation and caveats of the "hot wire" type MAFs that are used on our cars. Then get back to me. I hope a lot of "light bulbs" come on after!!