2003 Stock Automatic SE 1/4 & 0-60 Times??
#1
2003 Stock Automatic SE 1/4 & 0-60 Times??
Does anyone know what these are? Ive searched for them but cannot seem to locate them. It seems that everyone lists for just the manual. I wanna know how bad us autos get beat from the manuals??
#3
theres a section for 1/4 mile times http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=45
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,751
Originally Posted by Gooey
i ran 14.7 stock.......with new hks exhaust on and frankencar i ran 14.8 constantly....took off frankencar...now my car will only run 15.0
this is all with a 2.1xx 60'
this is all with a 2.1xx 60'
Man i wonder whats up with it seems like it lost some top end someplace, with a 2.1** you should be right where you were before. Alot of 3.5's seem to perform better without mods than with for some weird reason. I ran a 2.1 when I hit my 14.62 in mine, low humidity about 85 that day.
#7
I ran a 14.9 with a 2.2 60' with just a cone filter intake...but traction was a bit of a problem...my pirelli's aren't too sticky. And there was about 85% humidity that day.
Don't forget too a good reaction time helps alot. ;-)
Don't forget too a good reaction time helps alot. ;-)
#12
ya the 6 speed will feel faster. 1st gear is way shorter. course while times may be about the same, the 6 speed will trap 2-3 mph faster on average (from what I've seen here) than the auto, hence the better power transfer through a manual tranny than an auto
#13
Originally Posted by Gooey
i ran 14.7 stock.......with new hks exhaust on and frankencar i ran 14.8 constantly....took off frankencar...now my car will only run 15.0
this is all with a 2.1xx 60'
this is all with a 2.1xx 60'
#14
a local guy here wtih a full catback and injen is runnin a 14.3 and a guy with just injen ran a 14.6@94mph...their traps are so much higher then my 91.xxx mph
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,751
Originally Posted by Maximadmoiselle
Wasn't there a guy from NJ who ran like 14.1 bone stock auto just a month ago?
#17
Sorry Monte, I lead you on. I think we're talking about the same person, MaximusLow. He ran a 14.45 @ 95.27 with a 2.159 60' bone stock. Here's the thread
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=332946
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=332946
#20
Hard to say. It 'seems' that most of the 6th gen guys are less die hard on performance than previous gens, thus not alot of track times. I do recall seeing a 14.2 stock for the 6th gen auto . In the 6th gen forum there is a sticky I believe with their limited 1/4 mile times. All that being said, I think they are pretty equal.
#21
Don't they weigh alot more though?? Therefore making them slower. I thought I remember seeing C&D saying that the 6spd did 6.4 0-60, 14.8 1/4 whereas a 5.5 Gen 6spd did it in 6.0 to 60 and 14.6 in the 1/4. And its been my observation C&D gets the best times out of most cars...(they hire professional drivers)
#23
The '04+ SE 5 speed autos are slightly heavier, geared better, and most likely make 280 hp at the crank instead of the advertised 265. That's why they are appearing to be slightly to significantly faster than the '02-'03 Maxima autos...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bk2k3max
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
7
09-17-2015 09:39 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
08-19-2015 08:20 PM
follyburr
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
0
08-12-2015 08:57 PM