Maxima Forums

Maxima Forums (https://maxima.org/forums/)
-   5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) (https://maxima.org/forums/5th-generation-maxima-2000-2003-7/)
-   -   going to buy a 5th gen but pros and cons between 3.0 and 3.5 (https://maxima.org/forums/5th-generation-maxima-2000-2003/550309-going-buy-5th-gen-but-pros-cons-between-3-0-3-5-a.html)

akurtzer57 Jan 9, 2008 05:02 PM

going to buy a 5th gen but pros and cons between 3.0 and 3.5
 
what are the stats on a 3.0 and 3.5 manual cars. Also what seems to be better the 3.5 and a 6 speed interests me most for the horsepower.

CoolMax Jan 9, 2008 05:07 PM

wat stats r u l00king for (that can't be found anywhere on teh internets, edmunds, etc.)?
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=211688

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 05:09 PM

www.google.com

96blackmaxSE Jan 9, 2008 05:13 PM

3.5 is faster....

I'd like to hear about reliability issues between 5 and 5.5 gens, if any....I'm trying to mature out of the 4th gen forum hahah.

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 05:15 PM

3.0 - doesnt burn oil
3.5 - a lot burn oil (bad rings)

akurtzer57 Jan 9, 2008 05:27 PM

how many miles till they start burning oil im use to my vg30e never using a drop

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by akurtzer57 (Post 6177706)
how many miles till they start burning oil im use to my vg30e never using a drop

i was giving you basic info. we arent going to get in to a huge discussion about it. there are plenty of threads (including mine) that cover it.

L.M.L. Jan 9, 2008 05:34 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177684)
3.0 - doesnt burn oil
3.5 - a lot burn oil (bad rings)

that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.

kroze Jan 9, 2008 05:38 PM

so the 3.5 is inferior to the 3.0 from a build quality/reliability standpoint?

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by L.M.L. (Post 6177717)
that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.

:confused:
i didnt post statistics
3.5s have the problem (maxima, Z, and G) and 3.0 dont

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by kroze (Post 6177726)
so the 3.5 is inferior to the 3.0 from a build quality/reliability standpoint?

all a whole? no. some do have the problem and its more noticeable to people on here due to driving style.
ive had both and ill still take my oil burning 3.5 6MT over my old 3.0 auto

wyche89 Jan 9, 2008 06:13 PM

3.5 is faster.. thats all that matters

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177729)
all a whole? no. some do have the problem and its more noticeable to people on here due to driving style.
ive had both and ill still take my oil burning 3.5 6MT over my old 3.0 auto

wouldn't we all pefer stick shifts? i personally like 5.5 gens for speed thats a sleeper to most but love 3.0's for overall durability and good speed, but there is different categories to view both cars from

Stardust Jan 9, 2008 06:56 PM


Originally Posted by L.M.L. (Post 6177717)
that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.

you're statistically incorrect, and misleading in this case.

upstatemax Jan 9, 2008 06:56 PM

The 3.0 IS more reliable than the 3.5.

The 3.5 is faster, but IMO not that much... Yes, the 3.5 burning oil is an example of Nissans lowered quality standards. I say this because if your 3.5 is burning oil, it's no easy fix. Expensive and 95% of the people on this board (probably more) can't fix it on their own, they NEED to bring it to a shop ($$$$$$), call around local shops and ask for a quote on a ring job for the 3.5 and let me know what they say.

If all you care about is speed, then get a 3.5, but I don't see the point in risking an expensive PIA repair for a slightly faster car, especially since IF you do tend to even use the extra power (drive really hard) you are almost guaranteed to burn oil since you will fry your rings even faster.

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:00 PM

the 3.5 is faster but not by much? :laugh:

upstatemax Jan 9, 2008 07:10 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177870)
the 3.5 is faster but not by much? :laugh:

It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something... :nervous:

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.

aventerav Jan 9, 2008 07:17 PM

Get the 5.5, faster, and looks better. :)

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by upstatemax (Post 6177883)
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something... :nervous:

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.

:sprint: i co-sign

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by aventerav (Post 6177896)
Get the 5.5, faster, and looks better. :)

how much better does it looks? except for the headlights which everybody changes, ok :sprint: for 5.5 stock headlights but :sprint: for 5th gen se tail lights, so its equal

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:41 PM

whole front end looks better on the 02-03

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:42 PM


Originally Posted by upstatemax (Post 6177883)
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something... :nervous:

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.

people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s. :D
ive had both.

upstatemax Jan 9, 2008 07:47 PM

Looks are subjective...

saying that one part looks better on either one makes zero sense in this discussion.

What is not subjective, 5.5 headlights are a common theft item and also very expensive to replace/repair, especially since body damage (fenders/hood/bumper) is common from a theft.

cefiro80 Jan 9, 2008 07:48 PM

I would say get a 5.5 it will be faster and have some interior refinements over a 3.0. If you are just looking for a good reliable car then get the 3.0

Scottwax Jan 9, 2008 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by upstatemax (Post 6177883)
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something... :nervous:

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.

Boat? :confused:

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Vehi...180.A4347.html

3218 pounds with an automatic, 3224 pounds with a manual

That is less than 100 pounds more than the 3132 listed curb weight of a 2007 Corvette Z06.

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...1&Profile=1024

I'd hardly call a 5-5.5 gen Maxima a boat, at least when talking weight.

My 5.5 gen isn't an oil burner so obviously I'll take the extra 33 hp it comes with vs a 5th gen.

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177932)
people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s. :D
ive had both.

3.5 is noticeably faster but not like a charger 3.5 vs srt8 difference i drove 4th 5th 5.5th and 6th gens

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:50 PM

the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:51 PM

A33B...VQ35DE...RS6FS1A...or nothing!!!

:wall:

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:54 PM


Originally Posted by upstatemax (Post 6177939)
Looks are subjective...

saying that one part looks better on either one makes zero sense in this discussion.

What is not subjective, 5.5 headlights are a common theft item and also very expensive to replace/repair, especially since body damage (fenders/hood/bumper) is common from a theft.

:sprint: i co-sign also

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 07:55 PM

the theft problem has gone down.
not buying a car because of that is stupid. your whole car could get stolen...so do you not buy one? everything happens for a reason...dont live scared.

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177945)
the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class

most powerful according to nissan and stillen

Scottwax Jan 9, 2008 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17 (Post 6177944)
3.5 is noticeably faster but not like a charger 3.5 vs srt8 difference

:laugh: Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either. http://www.scottwax.com/rice/videos/.../kekekegay.gif

Scottwax Jan 9, 2008 07:57 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177945)
the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class

4 door sports car, baby! :D

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177958)
the theft problem has gone down.
not buying a car because of that is stupid. your whole car could get stolen...so do you not buy one? everything happens for a reason...dont live scared.

agreed but in some way i think thats what he was saying, thats why looks doesnt count in this particular topic

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 08:03 PM


Originally Posted by Scottwax (Post 6177960)
:laugh: Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either. http://www.scottwax.com/rice/videos/.../kekekegay.gif

all maxima's (4th gens and up) will crush a 3.5 charger.......... and it's a fact cause i proved it, multiple ways

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 08:03 PM

you know what else doesnt matter?
this thread...like this is the first time this debate has happened on here.

upstatemax Jan 9, 2008 08:04 PM


Originally Posted by soonerfan (Post 6177932)
people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s. :D
ive had both.

I have also driven both... One of the times my Maxima was in the body shop they gave me an 02 "loaner" for the week.

I don't think the extra is worth it, the 3.5 might be faster, but the 3.0 is no slouch either... ;)

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 08:05 PM


Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17 (Post 6177985)
all maxima's (4th gens and up) will crush a 3.5 charger.......... and it's a fact cause i proved it, multiple ways

chargers are PIGS!!! 3.5 isnt enough for it.
i drove my buddies daytona...it may have more power than my car but it felt slow as hell due to weight and AT.

SoonerFan Jan 9, 2008 08:06 PM


Originally Posted by upstatemax (Post 6177987)
I have also driven both... One of the times my Maxima was in the body shop they gave me an 02 "loaner" for the week.

I don't think the extra is worth it, the 3.5 might be faster, but the 3.0 is no slouch either... ;)

i know a 3.0 isnt a slouch. my first love was my 00.

Grand_hustle17 Jan 9, 2008 08:08 PM


Originally Posted by Scottwax (Post 6177960)
:laugh: Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either. http://www.scottwax.com/rice/videos/.../kekekegay.gif

and thats why it's not that much faster............ look at the fastest maxima and look what motor it is, (especially dandymax N/A 3.0)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands