5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

going to buy a 5th gen but pros and cons between 3.0 and 3.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2008, 05:02 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
akurtzer57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,077
going to buy a 5th gen but pros and cons between 3.0 and 3.5

what are the stats on a 3.0 and 3.5 manual cars. Also what seems to be better the 3.5 and a 6 speed interests me most for the horsepower.
akurtzer57 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:07 PM
  #2  
is invisible
iTrader: (7)
 
CoolMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DFW
Posts: 11,778
wat stats r u l00king for (that can't be found anywhere on teh internets, edmunds, etc.)?
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=211688
CoolMax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:09 PM
  #3  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
www.google.com
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:13 PM
  #4  
boost me.....
iTrader: (30)
 
96blackmaxSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisville/Lex-Vegas, KY
Posts: 2,042
3.5 is faster....

I'd like to hear about reliability issues between 5 and 5.5 gens, if any....I'm trying to mature out of the 4th gen forum hahah.
96blackmaxSE is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:15 PM
  #5  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
3.0 - doesnt burn oil
3.5 - a lot burn oil (bad rings)
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:27 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
akurtzer57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,077
how many miles till they start burning oil im use to my vg30e never using a drop
akurtzer57 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:29 PM
  #7  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by akurtzer57
how many miles till they start burning oil im use to my vg30e never using a drop
i was giving you basic info. we arent going to get in to a huge discussion about it. there are plenty of threads (including mine) that cover it.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:34 PM
  #8  
L.M.L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by soonerfan
3.0 - doesnt burn oil
3.5 - a lot burn oil (bad rings)
that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 05:38 PM
  #9  
Member
 
kroze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 286
so the 3.5 is inferior to the 3.0 from a build quality/reliability standpoint?
kroze is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:39 PM
  #10  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by L.M.L.
that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.

i didnt post statistics
3.5s have the problem (maxima, Z, and G) and 3.0 dont
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 05:40 PM
  #11  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by kroze
so the 3.5 is inferior to the 3.0 from a build quality/reliability standpoint?
all a whole? no. some do have the problem and its more noticeable to people on here due to driving style.
ive had both and ill still take my oil burning 3.5 6MT over my old 3.0 auto
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 06:13 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
wyche89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
3.5 is faster.. thats all that matters
wyche89 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 06:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by soonerfan
all a whole? no. some do have the problem and its more noticeable to people on here due to driving style.
ive had both and ill still take my oil burning 3.5 6MT over my old 3.0 auto
wouldn't we all pefer stick shifts? i personally like 5.5 gens for speed thats a sleeper to most but love 3.0's for overall durability and good speed, but there is different categories to view both cars from
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 06:56 PM
  #14  
F---ing Kangaroos
iTrader: (10)
 
Stardust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 2,912
Originally Posted by L.M.L.
that's statistically incorrect. and at least misleading in this case.
you're statistically incorrect, and misleading in this case.
Stardust is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 06:56 PM
  #15  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
upstatemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 4,035
The 3.0 IS more reliable than the 3.5.

The 3.5 is faster, but IMO not that much... Yes, the 3.5 burning oil is an example of Nissans lowered quality standards. I say this because if your 3.5 is burning oil, it's no easy fix. Expensive and 95% of the people on this board (probably more) can't fix it on their own, they NEED to bring it to a shop ($$$$$$), call around local shops and ask for a quote on a ring job for the 3.5 and let me know what they say.

If all you care about is speed, then get a 3.5, but I don't see the point in risking an expensive PIA repair for a slightly faster car, especially since IF you do tend to even use the extra power (drive really hard) you are almost guaranteed to burn oil since you will fry your rings even faster.
upstatemax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:00 PM
  #16  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
the 3.5 is faster but not by much?
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:10 PM
  #17  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
upstatemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 4,035
Originally Posted by soonerfan
the 3.5 is faster but not by much?
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something...

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.
upstatemax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:17 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
aventerav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 827
Get the 5.5, faster, and looks better.
aventerav is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:34 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by upstatemax
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something...

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.
i co-sign
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:38 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by aventerav
Get the 5.5, faster, and looks better.
how much better does it looks? except for the headlights which everybody changes, ok for 5.5 stock headlights but for 5th gen se tail lights, so its equal
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:41 PM
  #21  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
whole front end looks better on the 02-03
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:42 PM
  #22  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by upstatemax
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something...

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.
people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s.
ive had both.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:47 PM
  #23  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
upstatemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 4,035
Looks are subjective...

saying that one part looks better on either one makes zero sense in this discussion.

What is not subjective, 5.5 headlights are a common theft item and also very expensive to replace/repair, especially since body damage (fenders/hood/bumper) is common from a theft.
upstatemax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:48 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
cefiro80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 309
I would say get a 5.5 it will be faster and have some interior refinements over a 3.0. If you are just looking for a good reliable car then get the 3.0
cefiro80 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:48 PM
  #25  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by upstatemax
It's not that much faster.

We are talking about four-door family sedans right?

I hope I did not stumble into a forum about actual sports cars where real speed and power actually mean something...

It's a frigging FWD boat of a family sedan that is used as DD for almost EVERYONE in this forum. I would take more reliability over a SLIGHTLY faster car any day.
Boat?

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Vehi...180.A4347.html

3218 pounds with an automatic, 3224 pounds with a manual

That is less than 100 pounds more than the 3132 listed curb weight of a 2007 Corvette Z06.

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...1&Profile=1024

I'd hardly call a 5-5.5 gen Maxima a boat, at least when talking weight.

My 5.5 gen isn't an oil burner so obviously I'll take the extra 33 hp it comes with vs a 5th gen.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:49 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by soonerfan
people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s.
ive had both.
3.5 is noticeably faster but not like a charger 3.5 vs srt8 difference i drove 4th 5th 5.5th and 6th gens
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:50 PM
  #27  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:51 PM
  #28  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
A33B...VQ35DE...RS6FS1A...or nothing!!!

SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:54 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by upstatemax
Looks are subjective...

saying that one part looks better on either one makes zero sense in this discussion.

What is not subjective, 5.5 headlights are a common theft item and also very expensive to replace/repair, especially since body damage (fenders/hood/bumper) is common from a theft.
i co-sign also
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:55 PM
  #30  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
the theft problem has gone down.
not buying a car because of that is stupid. your whole car could get stolen...so do you not buy one? everything happens for a reason...dont live scared.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:56 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by soonerfan
the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class
most powerful according to nissan and stillen
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:56 PM
  #32  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
3.5 is noticeably faster but not like a charger 3.5 vs srt8 difference
Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:57 PM
  #33  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by soonerfan
the 02-03 is one of the all time best "luxury" sports sedans in its class
4 door sports car, baby!
Scottwax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:59 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by soonerfan
the theft problem has gone down.
not buying a car because of that is stupid. your whole car could get stolen...so do you not buy one? everything happens for a reason...dont live scared.
agreed but in some way i think thats what he was saying, thats why looks doesnt count in this particular topic
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:03 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by Scottwax
Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either.
all maxima's (4th gens and up) will crush a 3.5 charger.......... and it's a fact cause i proved it, multiple ways
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:03 PM
  #36  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
you know what else doesnt matter?
this thread...like this is the first time this debate has happened on here.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:04 PM
  #37  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
upstatemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 4,035
Originally Posted by soonerfan
people that say the 3.5 isnt much faster...drive 3.0s.
ive had both.
I have also driven both... One of the times my Maxima was in the body shop they gave me an 02 "loaner" for the week.

I don't think the extra is worth it, the 3.5 might be faster, but the 3.0 is no slouch either...
upstatemax is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:05 PM
  #38  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
all maxima's (4th gens and up) will crush a 3.5 charger.......... and it's a fact cause i proved it, multiple ways
chargers are PIGS!!! 3.5 isnt enough for it.
i drove my buddies daytona...it may have more power than my car but it felt slow as hell due to weight and AT.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:06 PM
  #39  
Cletus
iTrader: (5)
 
SoonerFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 23,676
Originally Posted by upstatemax
I have also driven both... One of the times my Maxima was in the body shop they gave me an 02 "loaner" for the week.

I don't think the extra is worth it, the 3.5 might be faster, but the 3.0 is no slouch either...
i know a 3.0 isnt a slouch. my first love was my 00.
SoonerFan is offline  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:08 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by Scottwax
Well, yeah, a 175 hp difference (250 vs 425) is more noticable than a 33 hp difference (222 vs 255).

Speaking of, my brother has a 3.5 Charger and a Dodge Ram Hemi and won't race me with either.
and thats why it's not that much faster............ look at the fastest maxima and look what motor it is, (especially dandymax N/A 3.0)
Grand_hustle17 is offline  


Quick Reply: going to buy a 5th gen but pros and cons between 3.0 and 3.5



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM.