01 Maxima SE vs. 01 330ci which would win
#1
01 Maxima SE vs. 01 330ci which would win
I'm going to reace against one of my friends who has a BMW 330ci 5-speed in a couple weeks. I think I'm gonna get woooped cuz I drive an automagic....do you guys agree? (both are stock)
#2
Re: 01 Maxima SE vs. 01 330ci which would win
Originally posted by awsker
I'm going to reace against one of my friends who has a BMW 330ci 5-speed in a couple weeks. I think I'm gonna get woooped cuz I drive an automagic....do you guys agree? (both are stock)
I'm going to reace against one of my friends who has a BMW 330ci 5-speed in a couple weeks. I think I'm gonna get woooped cuz I drive an automagic....do you guys agree? (both are stock)
#5
Re: Ouch!...
Originally posted by Vyrus
I'm already looking for his kill on E46Fanatics.com Forum. Those 330CIs are MURDERERS (Something like 6.0 sec 0-60)...
-Cyrus
I'm already looking for his kill on E46Fanatics.com Forum. Those 330CIs are MURDERERS (Something like 6.0 sec 0-60)...
-Cyrus
0-60 in 5.9 seconds ...damn I wish I had a 2K2 Maxima
#6
The 330Ci at 6.0 seconds? That doesn't sound right. That's a 3.0L I-6 with 225hp stock @ 5900. Weight is pretty similar to a 5th gen SE...just over 3200 lbs which is side-by-side with the SE. You're dead as an automatic, but it shouldn't be a slaughter. Is it a convertible? That's an extra 400lbs for him if it is.
Now typing after a few second thought...its a RWD isn't it? Ohh....so, not sure any more.
Now typing after a few second thought...its a RWD isn't it? Ohh....so, not sure any more.
#7
my 2k2 auto has consistently beat 330Cis my friend has one (2k1-5sp.)and we've established that my max is faster--he kills me @ 0-60 but around 75 the story changes, i can understand losing by a little but definitly not by more than 1.25 cars-- & no i don't manual my auto
good luck anyways
good luck anyways
#8
As a follow-up. I have a buddy with a 330Ci-C which I've been hoping to go to the track with sometime soon. Its a 5-speed, but his convertible outweighs me by 400 lbs. and I have a tiny bit more power (theoretically) so I'm hoping I can take him despite the RWD. Who knows. Maybe I'll wait until I manage to get a Y-Pipe on.
#9
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE
good luck, because you will need it for it to be even close. Sure you want to race him?
good luck, because you will need it for it to be even close. Sure you want to race him?
#11
I don't know about the 2k1 but i've beat 330ci's a couple of times. The first one i beat twice. I don't know if it was a manual or auto.
At launch he got me but i was able to catch up. By 2nd we were even. At 3rd i pulled around a car ahead before we both had to stop for the lights up ahead.
The second time i raced a 330ci it was an even match at 1 and 2. But at 3 i passed him again. Probably 1 or 1 1/2 car lengths.
This is on an auto. No manual shifting either.
At launch he got me but i was able to catch up. By 2nd we were even. At 3rd i pulled around a car ahead before we both had to stop for the lights up ahead.
The second time i raced a 330ci it was an even match at 1 and 2. But at 3 i passed him again. Probably 1 or 1 1/2 car lengths.
This is on an auto. No manual shifting either.
#12
Originally posted by soundmike
I don't know about the 2k1 but i've beat 330ci's a couple of times. The first one i beat twice. I don't know if it was a manual or auto.
At launch he got me but i was able to catch up. By 2nd we were even. At 3rd i pulled around a car ahead before we both had to stop for the lights up ahead.
The second time i raced a 330ci it was an even match at 1 and 2. But at 3 i passed him again. Probably 1 or 1 1/2 car lengths.
This is on an auto. No manual shifting either.
I don't know about the 2k1 but i've beat 330ci's a couple of times. The first one i beat twice. I don't know if it was a manual or auto.
At launch he got me but i was able to catch up. By 2nd we were even. At 3rd i pulled around a car ahead before we both had to stop for the lights up ahead.
The second time i raced a 330ci it was an even match at 1 and 2. But at 3 i passed him again. Probably 1 or 1 1/2 car lengths.
This is on an auto. No manual shifting either.
#13
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
it must have been an auto 330 they are FAST cars.
it must have been an auto 330 they are FAST cars.
#14
WTG Matt!
I guess based on dmbmax's phrase i should rephrase it to:
"it must have been an auto Max they are FAST-ER cars."
I guess based on dmbmax's phrase i should rephrase it to:
"it must have been an auto Max they are FAST-ER cars."
Originally posted by mattattax
it IS possible that it was a 5 sp.--my 2k2 auto max has a car and a half (1/4) on my friends 2k1 330ci 5 sp.--on the other hand i've never beat him from 0-60
it IS possible that it was a 5 sp.--my 2k2 auto max has a car and a half (1/4) on my friends 2k1 330ci 5 sp.--on the other hand i've never beat him from 0-60
#16
Re: 01 Maxima SE vs. 01 330ci which would win
Originally posted by awsker
I'm going to reace against one of my friends who has a BMW 330ci 5-speed in a couple weeks. I think I'm gonna get woooped cuz I drive an automagic....do you guys agree? (both are stock)
I'm going to reace against one of my friends who has a BMW 330ci 5-speed in a couple weeks. I think I'm gonna get woooped cuz I drive an automagic....do you guys agree? (both are stock)
which one is it? ur saying urs is auto and then both are stick?
if you have a manual tranny, u'd be close given that you are a very good driver, if you have an automagic...forget about it..
#17
I suggest you get ready to lose, everyone will easily agree, if his is a 5-speed, and yours an automagic(like mine), you will get killed. However, if you race an E36,(I've done it many a times ha-ha), you'll kick some serious ***. Have fun.
#18
There's a guy near the dealership with a A/T 330, we seem to leave work at the same time, I've run him a few times in my '00 5-speed SE. he seems to have a lot of low-end, I can hardly keep up at low speeds, but by 85 or so, I've got him by 1/2 a car length and pulling before traffic, etc intervenes. I don't think an stockish auto '00-'01 could hang. It would be interesting to run him with an open road!
Regards, David Burnette
Regards, David Burnette
#19
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
i won't believe that an auto 2k2 can beat a 2k1 5-spd 330CI, unless i see it happen.
i won't believe that an auto 2k2 can beat a 2k1 5-spd 330CI, unless i see it happen.
#22
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
MAX2000JP is back to stock right now...he has a 2000 5-speed SE and he took a 330 on the highway a week or so ago....they aren't that fast...
MAX2000JP is back to stock right now...he has a 2000 5-speed SE and he took a 330 on the highway a week or so ago....they aren't that fast...
#24
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
they are pretty fast, and so are maximas but what i'm saying is that i don't think a 2k2 auto can beat a 5-spd 330.
they are pretty fast, and so are maximas but what i'm saying is that i don't think a 2k2 auto can beat a 5-spd 330.
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
they are pretty fast, and so are maximas but what i'm saying is that i don't think a 2k2 auto can beat a 5-spd 330.
they are pretty fast, and so are maximas but what i'm saying is that i don't think a 2k2 auto can beat a 5-spd 330.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Found the link. Based on the date it would have been a 2K2 Auto and not a 6spd.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=66051
In other words it should be pretty even with a stock 330 vs a stock 2k2 auto Max on a highway roll. The Max might have the edge.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=66051
In other words it should be pretty even with a stock 330 vs a stock 2k2 auto Max on a highway roll. The Max might have the edge.
#27
Originally posted by PhatGuy
Found the link. Based on the date it would have been a 2K2 Auto and not a 6spd.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=66051
Found the link. Based on the date it would have been a 2K2 Auto and not a 6spd.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=66051
#28
Re: Re: 01 Maxima SE vs. 01 330ci which would win
Originally posted by irvine78
which one is it? ur saying urs is auto and then both are stick?
if you have a manual tranny, u'd be close given that you are a very good driver, if you have an automagic...forget about it..
which one is it? ur saying urs is auto and then both are stick?
if you have a manual tranny, u'd be close given that you are a very good driver, if you have an automagic...forget about it..
#29
I've seen some nice times for a stock 330xi:
5.7seconds from 0 to 60mph.
14.7seconds in the 1/4mi.
With bolt-ons and a 5-speed, what Phatguy did is completely feasible...of course, it'd help if he had the video to prove it.
5.7seconds from 0 to 60mph.
14.7seconds in the 1/4mi.
With bolt-ons and a 5-speed, what Phatguy did is completely feasible...of course, it'd help if he had the video to prove it.
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by CoolMax
I've seen some nice times for a stock 330xi:
5.7seconds from 0 to 60mph.
14.7seconds in the 1/4mi.
With bolt-ons and a 5-speed, what Phatguy did is completely feasible...of course, it'd help if he had the video to prove it.
I've seen some nice times for a stock 330xi:
5.7seconds from 0 to 60mph.
14.7seconds in the 1/4mi.
With bolt-ons and a 5-speed, what Phatguy did is completely feasible...of course, it'd help if he had the video to prove it.
#33
I've raced 2 330cis so far with my mods. One was auto, the other was a stick. Both times netted the same results.
Off the line - dead even up to 2nd gear. Once I get into 3rd, I will start pulling. By 120mph, I am 1 to 1 1/2 cars ahead.
Go ahead and race him! And please post your results!!!
Off the line - dead even up to 2nd gear. Once I get into 3rd, I will start pulling. By 120mph, I am 1 to 1 1/2 cars ahead.
Go ahead and race him! And please post your results!!!
#34
Originally posted by SFMax20SE
I've raced 2 330cis so far with my mods. One was auto, the other was a stick. Both times netted the same results.
Off the line - dead even up to 2nd gear. Once I get into 3rd, I will start pulling. By 120mph, I am 1 to 1 1/2 cars ahead.
Go ahead and race him! And please post your results!!!
I've raced 2 330cis so far with my mods. One was auto, the other was a stick. Both times netted the same results.
Off the line - dead even up to 2nd gear. Once I get into 3rd, I will start pulling. By 120mph, I am 1 to 1 1/2 cars ahead.
Go ahead and race him! And please post your results!!!
#35
Thanx!
I ordered mine from http://www.courtesyparts.com/
I wasn't able to find anyone that had them in stock in the bay area
I ordered mine from http://www.courtesyparts.com/
I wasn't able to find anyone that had them in stock in the bay area
Originally posted by awsker
You got a sweet ride...do you anywhere in the bay area where I can get the clear side markers (front & back) at a low price ?
You got a sweet ride...do you anywhere in the bay area where I can get the clear side markers (front & back) at a low price ?
#36
Originally posted by awsker
You got a sweet ride...do you anywhere in the bay area where I can get the clear side markers (front & back) at a low price ?
You got a sweet ride...do you anywhere in the bay area where I can get the clear side markers (front & back) at a low price ?
also try: www.custommaxima.com
#37
Don't get the 330 numbers
I know that manufacturer numbers are just that - numbers - that can be low or high, but I have seen the 330CI rated at 5.9 for the 0-60 and the 330XI (AWD) rated at 5.7 in the October C&D where it goes up against a WRX and an S4.
My point is this: These 3 liter BMWs are rated at 225 hp and 214 T, which are not earth-shattering numbers for 3285 and 3525 pound cars. Again, they may be under-rated, but it would have to be by a large margin to support these 0-60 times. Of course, in the October C&D comparo, the WRX clocked in at a 5.4s time for the 0-60, which is unbelievably low as well. Maybe there was magic in the air, but the 330IX doing a 5.7s sprint to 60mph with only that 3 liter engine and 3525 pounds to haul around seems lucky.
As we know, a very good indicator of performance is the power-to-weight ratio, or pounds per HP.
The WRX is rated at 13.59, the 330CI at 14.60, the 330XI at 15.67 and the 2K2 Maxima at 12.64 pounds per HP, with lower numbers being better. Yes, take into effect gearing, aerodynamics, auto tranny losses, rear/all wheel drive, etc. But still, something to think about. Hmmm.......
I have raced 330CI BMWs on the road with my 99 Contour SVT (15.35 lbs./HP) and we were very close every time, under 100 MPH. I am a very good shifter, but still. I think that these numbers published for the cars have been a little lucky compared to real world stats.
My point is this: These 3 liter BMWs are rated at 225 hp and 214 T, which are not earth-shattering numbers for 3285 and 3525 pound cars. Again, they may be under-rated, but it would have to be by a large margin to support these 0-60 times. Of course, in the October C&D comparo, the WRX clocked in at a 5.4s time for the 0-60, which is unbelievably low as well. Maybe there was magic in the air, but the 330IX doing a 5.7s sprint to 60mph with only that 3 liter engine and 3525 pounds to haul around seems lucky.
As we know, a very good indicator of performance is the power-to-weight ratio, or pounds per HP.
The WRX is rated at 13.59, the 330CI at 14.60, the 330XI at 15.67 and the 2K2 Maxima at 12.64 pounds per HP, with lower numbers being better. Yes, take into effect gearing, aerodynamics, auto tranny losses, rear/all wheel drive, etc. But still, something to think about. Hmmm.......
I have raced 330CI BMWs on the road with my 99 Contour SVT (15.35 lbs./HP) and we were very close every time, under 100 MPH. I am a very good shifter, but still. I think that these numbers published for the cars have been a little lucky compared to real world stats.
#38
Re: Don't get the 330 numbers
Originally posted by 2k2se6spd
I know that manufacturer numbers are just that - numbers - that can be low or high, but I have seen the 330CI rated at 5.9 for the 0-60 and the 330XI (AWD) rated at 5.7 in the October C&D where it goes up against a WRX and an S4.
My point is this: These 3 liter BMWs are rated at 225 hp and 214 T, which are not earth-shattering numbers for 3285 and 3525 pound cars. Again, they may be under-rated, but it would have to be by a large margin to support these 0-60 times. Of course, in the October C&D comparo, the WRX clocked in at a 5.4s time for the 0-60, which is unbelievably low as well. Maybe there was magic in the air, but the 330IX doing a 5.7s sprint to 60mph with only that 3 liter engine and 3525 pounds to haul around seems lucky.
As we know, a very good indicator of performance is the power-to-weight ratio, or pounds per HP.
The WRX is rated at 13.59, the 330CI at 14.60, the 330XI at 15.67 and the 2K2 Maxima at 12.64 pounds per HP, with lower numbers being better. Yes, take into effect gearing, aerodynamics, auto tranny losses, rear/all wheel drive, etc. But still, something to think about. Hmmm.......
I have raced 330CI BMWs on the road with my 99 Contour SVT (15.35 lbs./HP) and we were very close every time, under 100 MPH. I am a very good shifter, but still. I think that these numbers published for the cars have been a little lucky compared to real world stats.
I know that manufacturer numbers are just that - numbers - that can be low or high, but I have seen the 330CI rated at 5.9 for the 0-60 and the 330XI (AWD) rated at 5.7 in the October C&D where it goes up against a WRX and an S4.
My point is this: These 3 liter BMWs are rated at 225 hp and 214 T, which are not earth-shattering numbers for 3285 and 3525 pound cars. Again, they may be under-rated, but it would have to be by a large margin to support these 0-60 times. Of course, in the October C&D comparo, the WRX clocked in at a 5.4s time for the 0-60, which is unbelievably low as well. Maybe there was magic in the air, but the 330IX doing a 5.7s sprint to 60mph with only that 3 liter engine and 3525 pounds to haul around seems lucky.
As we know, a very good indicator of performance is the power-to-weight ratio, or pounds per HP.
The WRX is rated at 13.59, the 330CI at 14.60, the 330XI at 15.67 and the 2K2 Maxima at 12.64 pounds per HP, with lower numbers being better. Yes, take into effect gearing, aerodynamics, auto tranny losses, rear/all wheel drive, etc. But still, something to think about. Hmmm.......
I have raced 330CI BMWs on the road with my 99 Contour SVT (15.35 lbs./HP) and we were very close every time, under 100 MPH. I am a very good shifter, but still. I think that these numbers published for the cars have been a little lucky compared to real world stats.
#40
Re: Re: Re: Don't get the 330 numbers
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE
don't forget RWD
don't forget RWD