5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

DexronVI no good for JATCO auto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2009, 07:55 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Love_00_Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pleasanton,CA
Posts: 1,136
DexronVI no good for JATCO auto

I have tried all kinds of legal soups on my tranny and recently had DexVI for 10K miles.

I would strongly suggest not trying it out since the fluid is so low in vis (6.0 cst) that my tranny started to slip. The slips didn't happen immediately meaning while the visocity was close to 6 cst it was fine but when it wore down it acted up.

I promptly switched back to Castrol MV Import ATF and the tranny behavior is back normal.

In short, DONT try DexVI on our trannies, it is not suited for our application.
Love_00_Max is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 09:11 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mandyfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,222
How did you decide to use Dex VI? I thought DEX VI was specific to certain applications only and ours (Max) was not part of it.
mandyfig is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 09:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Love_00_Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pleasanton,CA
Posts: 1,136
Originally Posted by mandyfig
How did you decide to use Dex VI? I thought DEX VI was specific to certain applications only and ours (Max) was not part of it.
Good question. When I did a UOA on another ATF sample sometime back with <6.0cst the numbers were just fine and also the tranny shift predictably (remember Dexron starts off with 7.8 cst and fell below 6cst in this case). The visocity improvers don't hold up well on regular Dex.

DexVI solved that with a fortified friction modifiers and stable vis in and around 6 cst. But my tranny must have shredded it so much the pressure was so low resulting in slips. 6.0cst can be sustained only in the newer GM trannies.

Anyway, higher cst resulting in higher pressure and no slips.
Love_00_Max is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 12:40 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
mandyfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,222
Wow, how do you know so much about viscosities and such?
mandyfig is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 07:01 PM
  #5  
SHIFT_om nom nom nom
iTrader: (30)
 
Metal Maxima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,998
ZOMG, lemme whip out my rheological p3n0r as well!!!!!

Seriously, the reason for which you're posting such tech-heavy terms is...
Metal Maxima is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 07:25 PM
  #6  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Anyone use B&M's Trick Shift ATF in a Maxima? I used it in my Chevelle, Cutlass and Accord with excellent results. The friction modifiers definitely firm up shifts. The original formula says not for use in 1998 and newer or electronically controlled transmissions but the synthetic version has no such disclaimer.

http://www.bmracing.com/PRODUCTS/Flu...12-qt-box-only

Last edited by Scottwax; 11-14-2009 at 07:28 PM.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 07:02 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
FloydMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by Love_00_Max
Good question. When I did a UOA on another ATF sample sometime back with <6.0cst the numbers were just fine and also the tranny shift predictably (remember Dexron starts off with 7.8 cst and fell below 6cst in this case). The visocity improvers don't hold up well on regular Dex.

DexVI solved that with a fortified friction modifiers and stable vis in and around 6 cst. But my tranny must have shredded it so much the pressure was so low resulting in slips. 6.0cst can be sustained only in the newer GM trannies.

Anyway, higher cst resulting in higher pressure and no slips.
Thanks for the heads up. Cst, HT/HS and VII are important indicators of transmission fluid compatibility with Maximas apparently and there is very little information on the actual fluid/oil characteristics so its easy to see how you were blindsided. Its better with lubricating oils but even there the actions of the last decade and a half have caused more confusion than knowledge. With the "M" oils, its looks like a trend that will continue.

I've noted that the difference in product data and MSDS between Mobil 1's Synthetic ATF and their ATF D/M are very similar with the Dino based ATF D/M actually looking better on several important characteristics such as superior flash point. Manufacturers have been slow to endorse the Synthetic while the ATK D/M has more endorsements. There may be a clever economic ploy with customers' price acceptance behind their endorsements, however, and a reluctance to give up routine maintenance dollars.

The long list on Mobil's website is actually their "wish list" although I'm relatively confident that the fluid is all that Mobil claims. Besides costs though, I'm disturbed by the Mobil 1 Synthetic's lack of differentiation from the ATF D/M. It makes the dexron III/mercon route look more like the economically justifiable and best maintenance route to follow. Simple matter to drain 4+ quarts once a year at $10 cost and replace so the average age of all the fluid is consistently at 3 years.

To their credit, however, Mobil has publicly stated that their Mobil 5000 lubricating oils are actually their best offering for the money and having seen that drain oil after 5000 miles, I'd have to agree it is a very good product.

So its Nissan Matic D or dexronIII/mercon or Mobil Synthetic ATF.

Does anyone that used Mobil ATF D/M have anything pro or con to contribute? It appears that dexronIII/mercon from other producers has had a positive following.

Last edited by FloydMax; 11-15-2009 at 07:10 PM.
FloydMax is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 08:53 PM
  #8  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Currently, I'm using Penzoil's Dextron III/Mercon ATF, plus Lucas Transmission Fix, since I have the typical cold weather soft/flare 2-3 shift until the transmission fully warms up. The Lucas additive definitely seems to help in that regard.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:13 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
I used ford motorcraft mercon atf (it was free, and that's okay with me) for about 20,000 miles with no real issues (other than the 2-3 flare scottwax referred to). I recently just drained and filled with some Cam2 ATF (I'll have to check exactly what it was). After that, it felt like the transmission shifted a little firmer and less sloppy, but that might just be in my head - who knows. Not sure if that really helps anyone though
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  #10  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Malibu Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
I was under the impression that Dexron VI was compatable to DexronIII. Although I've read that VI is synthetic and III is not.
Malibu Jim is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AcuraLegend
Infiniti I30/I35
10
10-17-2016 08:47 PM
pkfinn
1st-3rd Generations Classifieds (1981-1994)
2
01-03-2016 02:55 PM
AcuraLegend
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
13
09-22-2015 04:22 PM
MaxLife17
New Member Introductions
5
09-08-2015 02:36 PM
A32goldylocks
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
09-02-2015 06:39 AM



Quick Reply: DexronVI no good for JATCO auto



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 PM.