G8 GT vs Maxima (repost from dif. forum)
BTW, you need to get out more. Chern isnt even the fastest max on this site
As a disclaimer, I really like the G8's. I would seriously consider trading the max for one if that option came up. Im just a bigger fan of the truth than of G8's
Last edited by Gemner; Mar 10, 2010 at 02:07 AM.
lol, a full bolt-on 5.5 gens runs times that are faster than a G8, it wont take boost to beat one, Sparks and Jay_Pee can both possibly bust 12s on street tires.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...iac-g8-gt.html
This was posted before in this thread

Has the G8 GT:
0-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.95 at 101.3
Actually kind of disappointing for a 360 hp, 385 lb-ft V8. Barely out of the 14's.
Faster than a stock Max, of course... but certainly not out of its reach. Although it is silly to think there are "tons of maximas" that could beat it... of all maximas out there, probably 0.0003% of them could do better.
Umm, No.
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...iac-g8-gt.html
This was posted before in this thread
Has the G8 GT:
0-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.95 at 101.3
Actually kind of disappointing for a 360 hp, 385 lb-ft V8. Barely out of the 14's.
Faster than a stock Max, of course... but certainly not out of its reach. Although it is silly to think there are "tons of maximas" that could beat it... of all maximas out there, probably 0.0003% of them could do better.
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...iac-g8-gt.html
This was posted before in this thread

Has the G8 GT:
0-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.95 at 101.3
Actually kind of disappointing for a 360 hp, 385 lb-ft V8. Barely out of the 14's.
Faster than a stock Max, of course... but certainly not out of its reach. Although it is silly to think there are "tons of maximas" that could beat it... of all maximas out there, probably 0.0003% of them could do better.
Just like everything else, it depends on who did the test. Car and Driver got a 0-60 in 5.2 w/13.8 quarter for the G8. This is really a joke as far as performance goes though. I had a nicely modded 2k2 Maxima, a 2k7 G35S Sedan and now a G8 GT. The power from the L76 is simply in another league, especially when mods are introduced. Mods are extremely cheap for the G8 and they add tremendous power. Long Tube headers add 45 rwhp. A simple tune with CAI can add 35+ rwhp, and the list goes on and on. Stock for stock there's no comparison and mod for mod there's no comparison. Not trying to bash here. I absolutely loved my 2k2 Maxima and was saddened the day someone hit me and totaled it. I loved my G35S as well, but the power and torque output of the LSx motors is simply breath taking to say the least.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Just like everything else, it depends on who did the test. Car and Driver got a 0-60 in 5.2 w/13.8 quarter for the G8. This is really a joke as far as performance goes though. I had a nicely modded 2k2 Maxima, a 2k7 G35S Sedan and now a G8 GT. The power from the L76 is simply in another league, especially when mods are introduced. Mods are extremely cheap for the G8 and they add tremendous power. Long Tube headers add 45 rwhp. A simple tune with CAI can add 35+ rwhp, and the list goes on and on. Stock for stock there's no comparison and mod for mod there's no comparison. Not trying to bash here. I absolutely loved my 2k2 Maxima and was saddened the day someone hit me and totaled it. I loved my G35S as well, but the power and torque output of the LSx motors is simply breath taking to say the least.
Nobody is saying a Maxima will keep up mod for mod, we aren't that stupid. It's cute of you to take it that way, though
Just like everything else, it depends on who did the test. Car and Driver got a 0-60 in 5.2 w/13.8 quarter for the G8. This is really a joke as far as performance goes though. I had a nicely modded 2k2 Maxima, a 2k7 G35S Sedan and now a G8 GT. The power from the L76 is simply in another league, especially when mods are introduced. Mods are extremely cheap for the G8 and they add tremendous power. Long Tube headers add 45 rwhp. A simple tune with CAI can add 35+ rwhp, and the list goes on and on. Stock for stock there's no comparison and mod for mod there's no comparison. Not trying to bash here. I absolutely loved my 2k2 Maxima and was saddened the day someone hit me and totaled it. I loved my G35S as well, but the power and torque output of the LSx motors is simply breath taking to say the least.
B
I don't know how big the gains seen with bolt-ons in the GM motors are, but I know my friend's LT-1 Camaro gained about 30 HP just from a solid dyno-tune.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
A head/cam/bolton (long tubes)/tune LSX can top 500whp N/A. Most H/C/bolton are around 420-480whp, though.
again following that logic you could add that crap to the new 5.0 mustang and be close to 600hp. different car and motor so maybe not but im not to crazy to make an assumption like that
B
Umm, No.
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...iac-g8-gt.html
This was posted before in this thread
Has the G8 GT:
0-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.95 at 101.3
Actually kind of disappointing for a 360 hp, 385 lb-ft V8. Barely out of the 14's.
Faster than a stock Max, of course... but certainly not out of its reach. Although it is silly to think there are "tons of maximas" that could beat it... of all maximas out there, probably 0.0003% of them could do better.
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...iac-g8-gt.html
This was posted before in this thread

Has the G8 GT:
0-60: 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.95 at 101.3
Actually kind of disappointing for a 360 hp, 385 lb-ft V8. Barely out of the 14's.
Faster than a stock Max, of course... but certainly not out of its reach. Although it is silly to think there are "tons of maximas" that could beat it... of all maximas out there, probably 0.0003% of them could do better.
for those of u that are wondering how it gets so much power off of simple bolt ons, the LSX has a pretty high compression ratio, its equal to the VQ and then its displacement is also high, so just getting it to breath is going to make a dramatic difference in power.
My buddy has a Trailblazer SS and I can keep up with him after the new mods (not from a roll, of course) but thats like 5500lbs or something nuts like that.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
see heads and cam along with boltons i can believe. but just headers, CAI and tune adding 80+hp. that sounds WAY to good to be true.
again following that logic you could add that crap to the new 5.0 mustang and be close to 600hp. different car and motor so maybe not but im not to crazy to make an assumption like that
B
again following that logic you could add that crap to the new 5.0 mustang and be close to 600hp. different car and motor so maybe not but im not to crazy to make an assumption like that
B
Also, you are mistaking wheel HP and crank HP. The new mustang 5.0 will probably be roughly equal with a LS2 for wheel horse power... That 400 number is crank HP. The 5.0 is also smaller displacement and more efficient in stock form (not as likely to gain from mods).
You can't apply the "same logic" to every platform. Nobody is saying you should. It just so happens that the stock manifolds/intake and tune on most stock LSX applications are restrictive and can allow for huge gains with the right aftermarket parts.
Proof can easily be shown by bolton-only LS1 F-bodies running 11s, cam+bolton-only running 10s... While stock LS1 F-bodies tend to run mid/low 13s with some high 12s. Plus all the dynos that can be found on LS1tech proving large gains on minor boltons and tune.
Yes, headers+exhaust, CAI, and tune can add 80WHP to most stock LSX options. You have to consider it's a large displacement engine, and their stock equipment is not nearly as efficient as the stock equipment of our VQs.
Also, you are mistaking wheel HP and crank HP. The new mustang 5.0 will probably be roughly equal with a LS2 for wheel horse power... That 400 number is crank HP. The 5.0 is also smaller displacement and more efficient in stock form (not as likely to gain from mods).
You can't apply the "same logic" to every platform. Nobody is saying you should. It just so happens that the stock manifolds/intake and tune on most stock LSX applications are restrictive and can allow for huge gains with the right aftermarket parts.
Proof can easily be shown by bolton-only LS1 F-bodies running 11s, cam+bolton-only running 10s... While stock LS1 F-bodies tend to run mid/low 13s with some high 12s. Plus all the dynos that can be found on LS1tech proving large gains on minor boltons and tune.
Also, you are mistaking wheel HP and crank HP. The new mustang 5.0 will probably be roughly equal with a LS2 for wheel horse power... That 400 number is crank HP. The 5.0 is also smaller displacement and more efficient in stock form (not as likely to gain from mods).
You can't apply the "same logic" to every platform. Nobody is saying you should. It just so happens that the stock manifolds/intake and tune on most stock LSX applications are restrictive and can allow for huge gains with the right aftermarket parts.
Proof can easily be shown by bolton-only LS1 F-bodies running 11s, cam+bolton-only running 10s... While stock LS1 F-bodies tend to run mid/low 13s with some high 12s. Plus all the dynos that can be found on LS1tech proving large gains on minor boltons and tune.
Headers + Tune:
Last edited by bigleman; Mar 10, 2010 at 09:52 AM.
Shouldn't this thread be moved to the Other Cars forum? Why is a street-race thread still here... about a Pontiac, no less?
I've test-driven the G8-GT, and sure, it's fast. It's also fat, with sloppy fit-n-finish. Typical GM, Australian build notwithstanding.
I've test-driven the G8-GT, and sure, it's fast. It's also fat, with sloppy fit-n-finish. Typical GM, Australian build notwithstanding.

People are trying to debate what's faster now, I guess.
Even the 7th gen is 0.5+ seconds slower to 60 mph:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._g8/index.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._g8/index.html
Lets keep beating this discussion to death....who really cares.
I'm sure there are plenty of Maxima's on the org that are faster than the G8 or my Grand Prix, so be it. When you have to argue to death about how this car is that and this car is this and it no longer becomes fun....then what's the point?
I'm sure there are plenty of Maxima's on the org that are faster than the G8 or my Grand Prix, so be it. When you have to argue to death about how this car is that and this car is this and it no longer becomes fun....then what's the point?




