5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

MAF or Knock Sensor Diagnostics

Old May 10, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #1  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
MAF or Knock Sensor Diagnostics

A million related threads on these components, but here's one direct question I can't find answers to:

Can the MAF or Knock Sensor fail incrementally, or is their functionality in total, meaning either it works or it doesn't?
Old May 10, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #2  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
They can both intermittently not do their job.
Old May 10, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #3  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Well, when my MAF failed, it didnt do the usual 3k-3.5k rev limit thing all the time. It would do it very rarely and when it did, i'd just turn the car off and back on. The car reved out like normal though. It was just dead slow at WOT. The car actually felt stronger at half throttle than it did at full throttle. I just swapped it out with a free junkyard one just for the hell of it. The difference from the butt dyno was like if I were to spray a 50 shot.

Before I swapped it out the 3k rev limit would start to happen more frequently. So I guess it CAN fail incrementally. But It can also intermittently do it's job when on its way out like Nmex said.
Old May 10, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
essential's description is of off-again, on-again failure. And I understand that experience, having had the similar behavior with failing coil packs.

But what you're describing is full-on failure, then full-on functionality. What I'm asking is, can a MAF or Knock Sensor fail partially, like where it "mostly" works, but not 100%?
Old May 10, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Well, yes and no. Remember that I said, even when it would rev out no problem, the car was considerably slower. Like there was no torque available. With the new one it felt like a new car.

Actually, would the lack of power be considered full on failure as is the 3k rpm limit?
Old May 11, 2010 | 05:46 AM
  #6  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
I've read about people replacing their knock sensor in response to light pinging. Does that make any sense?
Old May 11, 2010 | 06:05 AM
  #7  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by Rochester
essential's description is of off-again, on-again failure. And I understand that experience, having had the similar behavior with failing coil packs.

But what you're describing is full-on failure, then full-on functionality. What I'm asking is, can a MAF or Knock Sensor fail partially, like where it "mostly" works, but not 100%?
My buddy had that on his old o3 6mt max. His maf according to a few tuners was "weak". The pulls werent as hard as they shoulda been at wot. I'd say it was somewhere around 70-80% working? Butt dyno proved it but than again that's not the most reasonable proof. However He did drive around like that for 2 months and it kinda died high end. It never fully went out though (to know knowledge).
Old May 11, 2010 | 06:15 AM
  #8  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Maybe try this:

http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...-write-up.html
Old May 11, 2010 | 07:08 AM
  #9  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Oh, nice. Thank you, NmexMAX. Based on this, it appears the MAF can send a "weak" signal, which means it's possible for the MAF to be at less than 100% functionality. I wonder about the Knock Sensor as well?

However, I'm not understanding how the voltmeter is getting a connection to the 4 wires for the reading. Can you explain that? (Dammit, Jim, I'm a Doctor, not an Electrician!)
Old May 11, 2010 | 07:49 AM
  #10  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
http://forums.maxima.org/1557964-post3.html <-- You might want to check an FSM for proper ranges for our (03) KS.

And this post explains how to check each wire (4).
http://forums.maxima.org/3798707-post12.html

Check each wire individually ... using the battery GND.

I'm not an electrician either, it's called comprehension.
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:40 AM
  #11  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Just to follow up on this thread. I replaced my MAF last week with a new 2001 MAF, and soldered on the IAT thermistor. The new MAF works just fine, and apparently my old one worked just fine, too... So it seems all I did was some preventative maintenance for about $100.

So that leaves me to consider (obsess over) the Knock Sensor. To that point again, has anyone ever replaced their KS in an effort to address light, low-end pinging?
Old May 28, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #12  
lake985's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 229
From: Bronx, NY
I had to replace my knock sensor about six months ago due to a SES light (actually the KS, camshaft, and crank position sensors all failed---or were on their way out). I had moderate low end pinging (around 1.5-2K rpms) year-round and it was drastically reduced when the knock sensor was changed. Now I rarely get any pinging, unless it's really hot outside. Also, according to the in-dash mileage calculator, I'm now getting a whopping 15.7mpg as opposed to the previous 14.6mpg.
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #13  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
On my 4th gen, I experienced the same thing, no pore pinging.
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #14  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by lake985
I had to replace my knock sensor about six months ago due to a SES light (actually the KS, camshaft, and crank position sensors all failed---or were on their way out). I had moderate low end pinging (around 1.5-2K rpms) year-round and it was drastically reduced when the knock sensor was changed. Now I rarely get any pinging, unless it's really hot outside. Also, according to the in-dash mileage calculator, I'm now getting a whopping 15.7mpg as opposed to the previous 14.6mpg.
Hmm... moderate low end pinging. That's me. Although it's more like idle-1500, not above.

ridinwitha35 took some great pictures of his KS replacement last Fall:

http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...ere-we-go.html
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #15  
CraigSE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 595
From: London, ON, Canada
Originally Posted by lake985
I had to replace my knock sensor about six months ago due to a SES light (actually the KS, camshaft, and crank position sensors all failed---or were on their way out). I had moderate low end pinging (around 1.5-2K rpms) year-round and it was drastically reduced when the knock sensor was changed. Now I rarely get any pinging, unless it's really hot outside. Also, according to the in-dash mileage calculator, I'm now getting a whopping 15.7mpg as opposed to the previous 14.6mpg.
Notice any change in performance? I've considered changing my KS to fix the typical 1700k RPM (give or take) ping, and to see if it can help performance at all. My car has been running great lately, but sometimes it just does not pull as strong.
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #16  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
This is beginning to look like a few years ago when 4th gen KS's were going out, and a lot of members started replacing them and saw overall improvement in MPG/performance and less pinging. History does repeat itself.
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #17  
lake985's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 229
From: Bronx, NY
Originally Posted by CraigSE
Notice any change in performance? I've considered changing my KS to fix the typical 1700k RPM (give or take) ping, and to see if it can help performance at all. My car has been running great lately, but sometimes it just does not pull as strong.
Like Nmex mentions above, changing the KS does help performance. However, you should note that I also changed my spark plugs at the same time as part of my 100k maintenance and my car was running pretty crappy before. Nonetheless, my car pulls a lot harder now and I'm happy with the results
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:17 PM
  #18  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Me
http://forums.maxima.org/1557964-post3.html <-- You might want to check an FSM for proper ranges for our (03) KS.

Here's the specific answer.
http://forums.maxima.org/newreply.ph...eply&p=7579659
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #19  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
NmexMAX, you might want to fix that post. Your link loads a reply form to Spock. However, if you paste the link text in your quote into the address bar, you get your 7-year-old entry on testing the KS.

My favorite was your old Groucho quote: "A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of five." I feel like I'm channeling Groucho.
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #20  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Ya who cares ... I don't ... point being, you know your resistance values now and that's that.
_______________
Originally Posted by You
My favorite was your old Groucho quote: "A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of five." I feel like I'm channeling Groucho.



Old May 28, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #21  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Ya who cares ... I don't

"I just want to have a beer while I'm caring."
- Homer Simpson
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:48 PM
  #22  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Maker's Mark > *
Old May 29, 2010 | 08:31 PM
  #23  
JiggaD369's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 476
From: Fort Mill, SC
KS can be checked with a DMM. The resistance is supposed to be between 400-620 ohms.

As for MAF, you have to check for voltage between pins 2 & 4 and ground. 2 is supposed to be 5v and 4, 12V.

Both sensors play a very substantial role in power loss.

Last edited by JiggaD369; May 29, 2010 at 08:45 PM.
Old May 30, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #24  
kingrukus's Avatar
no more maxima...
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,294
From: Toronto, ON
Does a dead MAF affect fuel economy much? Mine has been dead for a while now, but I am picking up a replacement from DAVEB soon. Car feels strong until 3500rpms, and I never really go beyond that, but still need to get it replaced.
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 05:42 AM
  #25  
02maxima02's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
My gen 5 Maxima was knocking even though I only use Sunoco Ultra. Went to 3 mechanics with no luck. Had the car carbon cleaned as a last resort. Then the car developed a stalling problem & I read in one of the posts here to clean the MAF sensor. It didn't fix the stalling problem, but no more knock. Go figure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
57
Oct 14, 2025 05:16 PM
my03maxima
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
9
Jul 28, 2024 07:40 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 PM.