AEM vs. JWT Cone Filter Question
AEM vs. JWT Cone Filter Question
Ok, so I have what I think is a unique question with regard to these filters. I know the JWT is oiled, whereas the AEM is dry-flow. My question is this:
If both are on a velocity stack, which is going to flow better? As you can see in the pictures, the JWT has a concave 'cone' going in the top, while the AEM filter has a rubber 'cap'...
I know the difference is probably negligible, but I really would like to know what you guys think about this. Does the JWT allow better airflow due to the 'concave cone' in the top of the filter?

If both are on a velocity stack, which is going to flow better? As you can see in the pictures, the JWT has a concave 'cone' going in the top, while the AEM filter has a rubber 'cap'...
I know the difference is probably negligible, but I really would like to know what you guys think about this. Does the JWT allow better airflow due to the 'concave cone' in the top of the filter?

I'll suggest a theory, but have nothing to back that. I think they would both provide very similar flow for the simple reason, the oiled unit is designed with less resistance, relying on the oil to trap debris, where the other has a far greater surface area to draw in air, even though a potentially more restrictive material.
The only way to know is to find readings on a CFM flow of these filters to compare, but chances are both manufactures will use apples to oranges comparison. You'd need to find someone that actually did an independent comparison to find out if the difference is indeed nominal.
Something else to consider with a filter is longevity once the dirt starts to build up after 5 or 10 thousand miles...I'm sure one will become more restricted over time, requiring cleaning more frequently then the other.
Again, all theory, I just had a few minutes to kill...
The only way to know is to find readings on a CFM flow of these filters to compare, but chances are both manufactures will use apples to oranges comparison. You'd need to find someone that actually did an independent comparison to find out if the difference is indeed nominal.
Something else to consider with a filter is longevity once the dirt starts to build up after 5 or 10 thousand miles...I'm sure one will become more restricted over time, requiring cleaning more frequently then the other.
Again, all theory, I just had a few minutes to kill...
Oh, and why do you have Maf -> Maf adapter -> coupler -> filter? Doesn't the JWT just go directly on to the Maf housing?
Last edited by jowo9; Oct 5, 2010 at 01:41 PM.
To push it as far away from the engine as possible.
Actually, the part sequence is: TB, coupler #1, mid-pipe, coupler #2, MAF Housing, adapter plate #1, coupler #3, adapter plate #2, air filter.
Last edited by Rochester; Oct 5, 2010 at 02:54 PM.
I wonder if surface area of the filter element has anything to do with it?
If someone has access to both intakes and a data logging capability, I would say get some MAF logs and compare them. That would be the only way to see which one flows better.
I like the JWT, but it's only because I've been using this same type of intake/filter since 2000, and appreciate the quality, the customer service and the fact that the replacement filter is only 30$ shipped
.
If someone has access to both intakes and a data logging capability, I would say get some MAF logs and compare them. That would be the only way to see which one flows better.
I like the JWT, but it's only because I've been using this same type of intake/filter since 2000, and appreciate the quality, the customer service and the fact that the replacement filter is only 30$ shipped
.
I understand that most after market filters will/do outflow the factory setup and provide more than the required amount of airflow.
That being said, I replaced the K&N oiled filter on my Stillen setup with an AEM for the sole purpose of eliminating the oiled filter.
When I changed them out, I noticed an oily residue starting to form on the throttle plate and sensor. This was after only 1K miles. Not Good.
I don't notice any change while driving, be it cruising or standing on it.
That being said, I replaced the K&N oiled filter on my Stillen setup with an AEM for the sole purpose of eliminating the oiled filter.
When I changed them out, I noticed an oily residue starting to form on the throttle plate and sensor. This was after only 1K miles. Not Good.
I don't notice any change while driving, be it cruising or standing on it.
Ok, so I have what I think is a unique question with regard to these filters. I know the JWT is oiled, whereas the AEM is dry-flow. My question is this:
If both are on a velocity stack, which is going to flow better? As you can see in the pictures, the JWT has a concave 'cone' going in the top, while the AEM filter has a rubber 'cap'...
I know the difference is probably negligible, but I really would like to know what you guys think about this. Does the JWT allow better airflow due to the 'concave cone' in the top of the filter?


If both are on a velocity stack, which is going to flow better? As you can see in the pictures, the JWT has a concave 'cone' going in the top, while the AEM filter has a rubber 'cap'...
I know the difference is probably negligible, but I really would like to know what you guys think about this. Does the JWT allow better airflow due to the 'concave cone' in the top of the filter?


My JWT unit uses the new R2C Filter which is a dry unit and has a plastic cap on the front like the AEM you pictured above.
Cattman sells the R2C filter as an upgrade so I doubt having that open area at the front makes any difference at all.
I think the biggest difference is having that big velocity stack after the filter, regardless of type.
I wonder if surface area of the filter element has anything to do with it?
If someone has access to both intakes and a data logging capability, I would say get some MAF logs and compare them. That would be the only way to see which one flows better.
I like the JWT, but it's only because I've been using this same type of intake/filter since 2000, and appreciate the quality, the customer service and the fact that the replacement filter is only 30$ shipped
.
If someone has access to both intakes and a data logging capability, I would say get some MAF logs and compare them. That would be the only way to see which one flows better.
I like the JWT, but it's only because I've been using this same type of intake/filter since 2000, and appreciate the quality, the customer service and the fact that the replacement filter is only 30$ shipped
.
Cost is a valid consideration. That Apexi pop-charger can run over $70 after shipping.
Ouch.
I buy one every 2 years (about 15K+ miles at a time.) I'm on my 3rd filter.
Ouch.
I buy one every 2 years (about 15K+ miles at a time.) I'm on my 3rd filter.
Last edited by Rochester; Oct 6, 2010 at 05:38 PM.
So if I can get replacement JWT filters for $30 (even if it ends up being a little more), that'd be great. I just really need this intake. I'm running a GAB'd airbox, which is good for what it is, but I have a feeling that with my other mods, my engine could be making more power with a little better airflow...
hey NmexMAX, why have you never used a dryflow filter of any kind on your JWT stack? Or have you? Why is your preference oiled filters?
Never used the dry flow, only because I have 234k combined miles on 2 cars. And have only gone through 2 MAF's, (151k on one car and 1 MAF, and 81k on the other car and 1 MAF, so 2 combined).
And, IMO, the 'dry flow' is for paranoid dudes that don't agree with the K&N oil. That's just me though, so don't take it seriously, I'm sure the difference in power/flow is negligible, so do what you you think is good, or financially stable.
And send me a How To on those LED's ... or come do my interior.
And, IMO, the 'dry flow' is for paranoid dudes that don't agree with the K&N oil. That's just me though, so don't take it seriously, I'm sure the difference in power/flow is negligible, so do what you you think is good, or financially stable.
And send me a How To on those LED's ... or come do my interior.
Never used the dry flow, only because I have 234k combined miles on 2 cars. And have only gone through 2 MAF's, (151k on one car and 1 MAF, and 81k on the other car and 1 MAF, so 2 combined).
And, IMO, the 'dry flow' is for paranoid dudes that don't agree with the K&N oil. That's just me though, so don't take it seriously, I'm sure the difference in power/flow is negligible, so do what you you think is good, or financially stable.
And send me a How To on those LED's ... or come do my interior.
And, IMO, the 'dry flow' is for paranoid dudes that don't agree with the K&N oil. That's just me though, so don't take it seriously, I'm sure the difference in power/flow is negligible, so do what you you think is good, or financially stable.
And send me a How To on those LED's ... or come do my interior.

With regard to the filters, I don't have anything against oiled air filters, so I'm gonna go the JWT route. I believe the whole point of the oiled design is to improve flow... (can have larger pores, because the oil attracts the dirt particles). But, like you said, maybe the difference is negligible. Who knows. My main stipulation is simply that I use a velocity stack.
I'd like to get in line for that. Let's see, 1800 miles from Alberta to New Mexico... and then another 1800 miles to New York, and only 2400 miles back home. Are you free this weekend? Drive down and I'll buy you whatever air filter you want.
Alberta, Canada... damn, you're probably digging the snowtires out of the shed this weekend. Maybe next weekend, aye?
Welcome to my world. Feels like I'm on an Island, population: one Maxima.
Alberta, Canada... damn, you're probably digging the snowtires out of the shed this weekend. Maybe next weekend, aye?
Welcome to my world. Feels like I'm on an Island, population: one Maxima.
Last edited by Rochester; Oct 8, 2010 at 07:33 PM.
I'd like to get in line for that. Let's see, 1800 miles from Alberta to New Mexico... and then another 1800 miles to New York, and only 2400 miles back home. Are you free this weekend? Drive down and I'll buy you whatever air filter you want.
Alberta, Canada... damn, you're probably digging the snowtires out of the shed this weekend. Maybe next weekend, aye?
Welcome to my world. Feels like I'm on an Island, population: one Maxima.
Alberta, Canada... damn, you're probably digging the snowtires out of the shed this weekend. Maybe next weekend, aye?
Welcome to my world. Feels like I'm on an Island, population: one Maxima.
And about the winter tires... Usually I can hold out until at least November
we'll see this year. You never know...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoshG
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
51
Sep 21, 2015 10:41 PM
aminus21
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
6
Sep 12, 2015 04:53 PM
sdotcarter
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Sep 2, 2015 09:53 PM




