Attn: Frankencar . . .
#1
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Attn: Frankencar . . .
Hi Steve --
Some of us would like you to test your mid-pipe on a 2K or 2K1 Maxima using the following parameters:
1) Install a cone intake on a 5-speed Maxima but do NOT install your mid-pipe. (It doesn't matter whose cone intake you use.) Dyno test this setup and record the results.
2) Immediately install your mid-pipe on the same 5-speed Maxima and reconnect THE SAME CONE INTAKE you used in Step 1. Dyno test this setup and record the results.
Post your results here.
Thanks.
Bruce (y2kse) . . .
Some of us would like you to test your mid-pipe on a 2K or 2K1 Maxima using the following parameters:
1) Install a cone intake on a 5-speed Maxima but do NOT install your mid-pipe. (It doesn't matter whose cone intake you use.) Dyno test this setup and record the results.
2) Immediately install your mid-pipe on the same 5-speed Maxima and reconnect THE SAME CONE INTAKE you used in Step 1. Dyno test this setup and record the results.
Post your results here.
Thanks.
Bruce (y2kse) . . .
#4
Maybe
If we do not see anything from FC, we should just all chuck in a few bucks to an owner of a 2k1 with that type of setup and make those runs.
I have a 2K1 and would be willing...but I am getting married this Sat so it would have to wait a couple of weeks. But I dont have the cabbage to sport about 1.5 hours of runs. It easy to move the hardware around, but does take some time as I dont like to rush it.
But I agree. It should be run stock, then stock tube with cone filter and then full FC tube and cone filter. That way all results would be known.
I have a 2K1 and would be willing...but I am getting married this Sat so it would have to wait a couple of weeks. But I dont have the cabbage to sport about 1.5 hours of runs. It easy to move the hardware around, but does take some time as I dont like to rush it.
But I agree. It should be run stock, then stock tube with cone filter and then full FC tube and cone filter. That way all results would be known.
#6
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Re: Maybe
Originally posted by Colonel
It should be run stock, then stock tube with cone filter and then full FC tube and cone filter. That way all results would be known.
It should be run stock, then stock tube with cone filter and then full FC tube and cone filter. That way all results would be known.
PUHLEASE!
![laugh](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/laugh.gif)
PS: Yes Anachronism, Frankencar should run a test with the Monsterflow it they're alleging that it yields more horsepower and torque than some other brand of cone filter. The easy thing for them to do would be to run the tests as Colonel and I have suggested using a cone filter other than a Monsterflow. Then at the end of the tests, they can replace the cone filter they originally used with a Monsterflow and run a final test to prove (or disprove) their allegation.
#7
Oh, yeah- Steve, while you’re at it, test a baseline and then put a Stillen sticker on your car and test it again- I want to put this "5HP for a sticker" thing to rest. Oh. And windshield washer nozzle lights. Test red, then blue, then green to see which ones yield more HP. Come to think of it, you might want to just rent a Dyno for a month.
In all seriousness, I think we’re getting carried away here, guys. I think Steve ought to Dyno test his filter to support HP/TQ claims for a 2K-2K1. As promised.
Anything beyond that, and he’d be doing us all a huge favor, so let’s treat it that way.
Hi YJ.
In all seriousness, I think we’re getting carried away here, guys. I think Steve ought to Dyno test his filter to support HP/TQ claims for a 2K-2K1. As promised.
Anything beyond that, and he’d be doing us all a huge favor, so let’s treat it that way.
Hi YJ.
#8
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Originally posted by Adboy
In all seriousness, I think we’re getting carried away here, guys. I think Steve ought to Dyno test his filter to support HP/TQ claims for a 2K-2K1. As promised.
In all seriousness, I think we’re getting carried away here, guys. I think Steve ought to Dyno test his filter to support HP/TQ claims for a 2K-2K1. As promised.
#9
JWT intake with Frankencar midpipe
I originally had the JWT intake and recently bought the Franken Intake's midpipe. I installed the midpipe about two weeks ago and I definitely feel a little difference .
Haven't done a dyno but I was still able to gauge the increase in performance.
There is a mile long strip on staten island that me and my friends will race on every once in a while.
About .20 miles(little less than a quarter mile) from the starting line there is a large orange cone on the sidewalk.
When I had the JWT intake alone I would always hit that cone at
about 90 - 91 mph.
After the install of the midpipe by Frankencar performance I can now
consistently hit 94 - 96 mph when I reach that cone.
I know this is nowhere near as accurate as a dyno but I do see and experience gains from just the addition of the Frankencar Midpipe.
Not to mention.....the sh*t sounds so much better at WOT.
Haven't done a dyno but I was still able to gauge the increase in performance.
There is a mile long strip on staten island that me and my friends will race on every once in a while.
About .20 miles(little less than a quarter mile) from the starting line there is a large orange cone on the sidewalk.
When I had the JWT intake alone I would always hit that cone at
about 90 - 91 mph.
After the install of the midpipe by Frankencar performance I can now
consistently hit 94 - 96 mph when I reach that cone.
I know this is nowhere near as accurate as a dyno but I do see and experience gains from just the addition of the Frankencar Midpipe.
Not to mention.....the sh*t sounds so much better at WOT.
#10
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Re: JWT intake with Frankencar midpipe
Originally posted by acMAX
I originally had the JWT intake and recently bought the Franken Intake's midpipe. I installed the midpipe about two weeks ago and I definitely feel a little difference.
I originally had the JWT intake and recently bought the Franken Intake's midpipe. I installed the midpipe about two weeks ago and I definitely feel a little difference.
#12
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Originally posted by emax95
I tested it on my 02 and got 5.9 FWHP with the addition of the franken ram. A 2000-2001 should not be much different as far as gains go.
I tested it on my 02 and got 5.9 FWHP with the addition of the franken ram. A 2000-2001 should not be much different as far as gains go.
![Smilie](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
What kind of setup did you have before you installed the Frankencar Intake. Was it a Stillen Intake? If so, did you test the Frankencar Intake with the Stillen air filter or with the air filter that Frankencar provided? Was the Stillen air filter clean or dirty when you replaced it?
What I'm trying to determine by asking all these questions is whether ANY VARIABLE OTHER THAN THE ADDITION OF THE MID-PIPE could have contributed to the 5.9 FWHP increase you experienced when you installed the Frankencar Intake.
#14
Re: Re: JWT intake with Frankencar midpipe
Originally posted by y2kse
Thanks acMAX. It sounds like you achieved a great result by installing the mid-pipe, and it should provide Steve with even MORE encouragement to conduct his testing as Colonel and I have suggested.
Thanks acMAX. It sounds like you achieved a great result by installing the mid-pipe, and it should provide Steve with even MORE encouragement to conduct his testing as Colonel and I have suggested.
#15
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Re: Re: Re: JWT intake with Frankencar midpipe
Originally posted by CIRCO
. . . but for this minuscule amount of hp I don't believe Steve will run dynos because that cost money!
. . . but for this minuscule amount of hp I don't believe Steve will run dynos because that cost money!
If Steve is going to take the time to actually run the tests on a 2K-2K1, then how much more expensive would it be to perform the testing that Colonel and I are suggesting?
I look forward to hearing your results once you get your APEXI rev/speed meter installed.
#17
Originally posted by y2kse
Hi emax95. I figured you'd show up sooner or later.![Smilie](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
What kind of setup did you have before you installed the Frankencar Intake. Was it a Stillen Intake? If so, did you test the Frankencar Intake with the Stillen air filter or with the air filter that Frankencar provided? Was the Stillen air filter clean or dirty when you replaced it?
What I'm trying to determine by asking all these questions is whether ANY VARIABLE OTHER THAN THE ADDITION OF THE MID-PIPE could have contributed to the 5.9 FWHP increase you experienced when you installed the Frankencar Intake.
Hi emax95. I figured you'd show up sooner or later.
![Smilie](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
What kind of setup did you have before you installed the Frankencar Intake. Was it a Stillen Intake? If so, did you test the Frankencar Intake with the Stillen air filter or with the air filter that Frankencar provided? Was the Stillen air filter clean or dirty when you replaced it?
What I'm trying to determine by asking all these questions is whether ANY VARIABLE OTHER THAN THE ADDITION OF THE MID-PIPE could have contributed to the 5.9 FWHP increase you experienced when you installed the Frankencar Intake.
Also I just put the franken air filter on a couple of days ago so it had nothing to do with the testing.
#18
Re: at what RPM was the gain? Losses?
Originally posted by Gnstrolv
I installed it and it seems to have taken out some of the bottom end torque....
I installed it and it seems to have taken out some of the bottom end torque....
#19
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Originally posted by emax95
I tested teh franken intake with my stillen intake. Anotehr words I had teh stock air box on and stillen intake and then I added the franken ram. This was done back to back on the same day. The gains are very real.
Also I just put the franken air filter on a couple of days ago so it had nothing to do with the testing.
I tested teh franken intake with my stillen intake. Anotehr words I had teh stock air box on and stillen intake and then I added the franken ram. This was done back to back on the same day. The gains are very real.
Also I just put the franken air filter on a couple of days ago so it had nothing to do with the testing.
You stated that you'd expect comparable gains on a 2K and a 2K1. That's probably a fair statement.
#20
Originally posted by y2kse
Super. So what you're telling me is that you tested your Stillen Intake without the Frankencar mid-pipe to establish a baseline, then you removed the SI and installed the Frankencar mid-pipe, then you reinstalled the SI without cleaning or changing the air filter, and then you tested it again. Having done that, you achieved an increase of 5.9 HP on a 2K2. If that's the case, you've met the parameters for the test. And the results are impressive. Thanks.
You stated that you'd expect comparable gains on a 2K and a 2K1. That's probably a fair statement.
Super. So what you're telling me is that you tested your Stillen Intake without the Frankencar mid-pipe to establish a baseline, then you removed the SI and installed the Frankencar mid-pipe, then you reinstalled the SI without cleaning or changing the air filter, and then you tested it again. Having done that, you achieved an increase of 5.9 HP on a 2K2. If that's the case, you've met the parameters for the test. And the results are impressive. Thanks.
You stated that you'd expect comparable gains on a 2K and a 2K1. That's probably a fair statement.
![Smilie](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#23
ok i'm here i've been making intakes all night. here's what i will do. i'll find a test subject, prolly RU4REAL, get him out to worcestor with his stock box on, make a run, take it off put just out cone and adapter on, make a run. install mid section make a run, install monsterflow instead of k/n make a run. i can't give a time frame but hopefully within the next couple weeks when we both have time, will he be a good third party audit. i'll also get pics and maybe vids and the dyno jet files. also we haven't alleged a hp and tq gain with the monster flow. i've always said we might see a hp or two, we don't expect to, the biggest reason is for smoother flow and the non maf damaging tactifying solution.
any other questions feel free to email me or post here and
emax
always got my back man, thanks.
any other questions feel free to email me or post here and
emax
![kiss](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/kiss.gif)
#24
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
the biggest reason is for smoother flow and the non maf damaging tactifying solution.
the biggest reason is for smoother flow and the non maf damaging tactifying solution.
And does your mid-pipe work with the Berk Filter??
Do you have a pic of the monster filter??
Thanks,
Mark
#25
yes the mid pipe will work with the berk intake and it's 65 shipped for 2k-2k1 and 60 shipped for 2k2
the monsterflow filter has a mild velocity stack along with patented turbulence reducers in teh filter structure that is supposed to smooth the air flow.
there are pics on www.monsterflow.com but the site is down, it's the same filter pr uses with their CAI's now.
-steve
the monsterflow filter has a mild velocity stack along with patented turbulence reducers in teh filter structure that is supposed to smooth the air flow.
there are pics on www.monsterflow.com but the site is down, it's the same filter pr uses with their CAI's now.
-steve
#27
Supporting Maxima.org Member
![](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/support.gif)
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
. . . here's what i will do. i'll find a test subject, prolly RU4REAL, get him out to worcestor with his stock box on, make a run, take it off put just out cone and adapter on, make a run. install mid section make a run, install monsterflow instead of k/n make a run. i can't give a time frame but hopefully within the next couple weeks when we both have time . . .
. . . here's what i will do. i'll find a test subject, prolly RU4REAL, get him out to worcestor with his stock box on, make a run, take it off put just out cone and adapter on, make a run. install mid section make a run, install monsterflow instead of k/n make a run. i can't give a time frame but hopefully within the next couple weeks when we both have time . . .
![Smilie](https://maxima.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#28
Originally posted by y2kse
Super. So what you're telling me is that you tested your Stillen Intake without the Frankencar mid-pipe to establish a baseline, then you removed the SI and installed the Frankencar mid-pipe, then you reinstalled the SI without cleaning or changing the air filter, and then you tested it again. Having done that, you achieved an increase of 5.9 HP on a 2K2. If that's the case, you've met the parameters for the test. And the results are impressive. Thanks.
You stated that you'd expect comparable gains on a 2K and a 2K1. That's probably a fair statement.
Super. So what you're telling me is that you tested your Stillen Intake without the Frankencar mid-pipe to establish a baseline, then you removed the SI and installed the Frankencar mid-pipe, then you reinstalled the SI without cleaning or changing the air filter, and then you tested it again. Having done that, you achieved an increase of 5.9 HP on a 2K2. If that's the case, you've met the parameters for the test. And the results are impressive. Thanks.
You stated that you'd expect comparable gains on a 2K and a 2K1. That's probably a fair statement.
#29
Originally posted by sleepermax
Guys, I don't know if I'm stating the obvious, but when you install the Stillen intake with the stock resonator/mid-section it ends up bent/curved (particularly the accordion section) even more than with the stock airfilter box. The Franken Ram section is straight. I think if you could somehow install the Stillen Intake (or any other intake for that matter) and somehow adjust and straighten the stock resonator position, you very likely would not see any losses (I don't know if this is possible fitment-wise since I haven't tried it myself....). This is a significant variable that should also be looked at when making comparisons. There may not be a need to purchase a mid-section after all.
Guys, I don't know if I'm stating the obvious, but when you install the Stillen intake with the stock resonator/mid-section it ends up bent/curved (particularly the accordion section) even more than with the stock airfilter box. The Franken Ram section is straight. I think if you could somehow install the Stillen Intake (or any other intake for that matter) and somehow adjust and straighten the stock resonator position, you very likely would not see any losses (I don't know if this is possible fitment-wise since I haven't tried it myself....). This is a significant variable that should also be looked at when making comparisons. There may not be a need to purchase a mid-section after all.
-steve
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
09-25-2015 10:08 AM