5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.
View Poll Results: Did your aftermarket air filter screw up your MAF sensor?
Yes
71
33.65%
No
129
61.14%
What's a MAF sensor?
11
5.21%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

MAF Sensor Problems with Aftermarket Air Filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2002, 11:35 AM
  #41  
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cobymoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,198
Originally posted by akrus


Can you scan/post your bill? My dealer said that mine is the first he saw.

Albert
They ALWAYS say that to make their cars look trouble free. When I had my rotors done for the third time the service manager kept telling me, "first one I've seen," all three times!

About installation of the Frankencar and Berk Tuning, both of them you have to completely remove the MAF assembly. I would think that rough handling would not damage the MAF, maybe droping it would, but normal handling would not break the thing. It has to stand up to the shock of bouncing around with the car.

But you did bring up a very good point about the flimsy brackets or no brackets supplied by Frankencar. That could be a problem but I doubt it.

If people with bad MAF sensors would come forward with details of their car, intake type, filter, etc maybe we could draw some sort of meaningful conclusions.

Bryan
cobymoby is offline  
Old 05-23-2002, 11:52 AM
  #42  
Old Fuddy Duddy
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,712
Originally posted by cobymoby

If people with bad MAF sensors would come forward with details of their car, intake type, filter, etc maybe we could draw some sort of meaningful conclusions.
And be honest with any assembly issues that they could remember also.
Colonel is offline  
Old 05-23-2002, 12:03 PM
  #43  
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
akrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Originally posted by cobymoby

If people with bad MAF sensors would come forward with details of their car, intake type, filter, etc maybe we could draw some sort of meaningful conclusions.

Bryan
Year - 2002
Model - SE
Tranny - 6spd
Aftermarket Intake brand - FrankenCar with K$N
Mileage at install - ~10,000 kms
SES light on and car in limp mode - ~18,000 kms (returned to stock at this point)
Reinstall FrankenCar - ~20,000 kms, installed with new bracket to reduce vibration
Currently - ~25,000 kms on the car, no problem yet

Albert
akrus is offline  
Old 05-23-2002, 12:06 PM
  #44  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
I didnt......I just removed the air box...I was too affraid that I am going to mess up the MAF.

Originally posted by cobymoby



About installation of the Frankencar and Berk Tuning, both of them you have to completely remove the MAF assembly. I would think that rough handling would not damage the MAF, maybe droping it would, but normal handling would not break the thing. It has to stand up to the shock of bouncing around with the car.


Bryan
[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 05-23-2002, 08:24 PM
  #45  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
MaximaMan77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,815
Well here's what we found

The code was a 1456 undefined error. He said it was most likely not an emissions code as they come up in another sequence. Although he also said his scanner was not up to the current year. So we reset the light and I took it out for a ride, I just hit 1k miles so I hit it a little harder. So far no light.

He also said that the "some" oil should not damage the sensor and with the amount of air going into the MAF it should self clean somewhat. With all the cars he works on and many mod'ed he doesn't run into MAF problems unless it was defective to begin with.

If someone knows what this code is currently for please chime in.

We'll see what happens over the next few days.
Hope this helps.
MaximaMan77 is offline  
Old 05-23-2002, 09:01 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
sascuderi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,329
MAF

Has anyone on the .org had their MAF go who didn't have a intake mod?
sascuderi is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 08:20 AM
  #47  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
Re: MAF

Originally posted by sascuderi
Has anyone on the .org had their MAF go who didn't have a intake mod?
yea...some

one case with over-oiled K&N panel

check out my earlier thread : "intake -- does it shorten the life of ur MAF sensor"
[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 08:59 AM
  #48  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
y2kse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Perhaps an even better question would be, has anyone running a stock airbox and OEM filters exclusively ever had their MAF sensor go bad?

This is just a guess on my part, but it usually takes a fairly high incidence of failures before NNA responds with a TSB. So my guess is that the problem is NOT confined to just those who have installed aftermarket intakes and filters.

That, of course, leads to another interesting question. If my thesis is correct, how in the hell is "air-ingested dust/dirt" getting to the air flow meter in a completely stock intake setup? Or is it possible that NNA is simply covering their tracks by blaming defectively designed air flow meters on "air-ingested dust/dirt". After all, if the old air flow meters were A-OK, why would Nissan find it necessary to replace them with new ones of a different design . . . new ones that require an ECM reprogramming on top of it?

y2kse is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 09:42 AM
  #49  
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
soundmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: H-Town
Posts: 6,011
Bruce, speaking of stock airbox. I've looked at my filter (OEM) occassionally and noticed that dirt is concentrated on one portion of the filter. Specifically on the lower left corner.

What bugs me is that the intake opening after the filter isn't even directly behind that corner. What gives? Any ideas?
soundmike is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 09:43 AM
  #50  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
I believe so....if the dust is the problem, why are they still recommand to use the same filter for the "best protection" against dust? I believe the sensor is just to sensitive to dust or increase amount of air flow initially. However, they have to play around with the wording and target that the cause is not due to Nissan's faulty equipment...but the air quality.

y2kse : will the DTC P0100 code trigger a CEL? is it common to see that CEL prior to MAF sensor malfuction? I remember someone's sensor just blown without any indication of CEL.

thx


Originally posted by y2kse
Perhaps an even better question would be, has anyone running a stock airbox and OEM filters exclusively ever had their MAF sensor go bad?

This is just a guess on my part, but it usually takes a fairly high incidence of failures before NNA responds with a TSB. So my guess is that the problem is NOT confined to just those who have installed aftermarket intakes and filters.

That, of course, leads to another interesting question. If my thesis is correct, how in the hell is "air-ingested dust/dirt" getting to the air flow meter in a completely stock intake setup? Or is it possible that NNA is simply covering their tracks by blaming defectively designed air flow meters on "air-ingested dust/dirt". After all, if the old air flow meters were A-OK, why would Nissan find it necessary to replace them with new ones of a different design . . . new ones that require an ECM reprogramming on top of it?

[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 04:42 PM
  #51  
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
akrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]

y2kse : will the DTC P0100 code trigger a CEL? is it common to see that CEL prior to MAF sensor malfuction? I remember someone's sensor just blown without any indication of CEL.
My MAF blew and the light went on immediately. Also went into limp mode right away. No warning at all.

Albert
akrus is offline  
Old 05-24-2002, 07:03 PM
  #52  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
y2kse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Originally posted by soundmike
Bruce, speaking of stock airbox. I've looked at my filter (OEM) occassionally and noticed that dirt is concentrated on one portion of the filter. Specifically on the lower left corner.

What bugs me is that the intake opening after the filter isn't even directly behind that corner. What gives? Any ideas?
The lower left corner is where air enters the airbox. That's why dirt tends to concentrate there. And I suspect the fact that the intake opening after the filter isn't directly behind that corner is an attempt on Nissan's part to prevent the air from being forced through a small section of the filter.
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
y2kse : will the DTC P0100 code trigger a CEL? is it common to see that CEL prior to MAF sensor malfuction?
Yes, the DTC P0100 code should trigger a CEL. In fact, the TSB stipulates that in the title: MIL "ON" WITH DTC P0100 (MASS AIRFLOW SENSOR - MAFS) STORED.
y2kse is offline  
Old 05-26-2002, 07:53 AM
  #53  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
y2kse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
I'd say the results of the poll are in. The overwhelming majority of respondents (7 out of 10) indicated that they experienced no MAF sensor problems after installing an aftermarket intake or filter.

Draw your own conclusions.
y2kse is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 11:59 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
MaximaPolak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Passaic County, NJ
Posts: 4,426
Never.....Injen intake and nothing blown.
MaximaPolak is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:17 PM
  #55  
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
KLOOGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Murrieta, Ca
Posts: 9,421
Who dug up this dinosaur of a thread....?...
KLOOGY is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:24 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
nyautostyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,539
polak is hoe'ing up the forum these days huh? :smile:

had intake installed for 25k miles so far and no problems.
nyautostyle is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 08:24 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
kc1125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 105
no 2003s have MAF failure yet????
kc1125 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 02:05 AM
  #58  
Seoul Man
 
spiromax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,010
I have a theory about 5.5th gen MAF failure. If anybody thinks that my theory is wrong, don't tell me. I like this theory too much. If this theory is old news that everybody already knows about... then why are we still posting threads about MAF failure?

First, I list the facts as we know them:

1. The 2001 5th gen MAF sensor does not fail often.

2. There have been two different OEM MAF sensors used in the 2002/2003 5.5th gen Maxima.

3. The MAF sensor used in 2002 and possibly early production 2003 Maximas fails often, and these failures are NOT limited to vehicles with modded intakes. There have been several reports of 2002 MAF sensor failure on stock intakes with OEM filters.

4. The MAF sensor used in the majority of 2003 Maximas does not fail often, even on vehicles with modded intakes and oiled filters (like my car).

5. Nissan no longer offers the older 5.5th gen MAF sensor as a replacement part. All 2002 and 2003 Maximas in need of OEM MAF sensor replacement now receive the newer version of the 5.5th gen MAF sensor, and Maximas switching from the older 5.5th gen sensor to the newer 5.5th gen sensor require an ECU reflash, which can be performed at a dealership with a Consult II.

6. 5.5th gen owners with bad MAF sensors may choose not to buy the fairly expensive newer 5.5th gen MAF sensor. Instead, they may use a 2001 5th gen MAF sensor as long as they transfer the temperature sensor component from their stock MAF sensors to the 2001 replacement sensor (on 2000 and 2001 Maximas, the temperature and MAF sensors were separate).

CONCLUSIONS:

Aftermarket intakes and filters should not cause MAF failure if they are installed and maintained properly. A design flaw in the original MAF sensor used in 2002 and some early 2003 Maximas causes it to fail too easily. Replacing the older MAF sensor with either a modified 2001 sensor or the newer 5.5th gen sensor could solve the weak MAF sensor problem in 2002 and some early 2003 Maximas.
spiromax is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 06:01 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
jjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 702
if this trend of digging up old thread continues, i'm going to start asking what size tires you can put on a 17x7 rim.
jjames is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:05 AM
  #60  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
falconert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 41
voted yes
I installed FrankenCar w/ K&N this weekend and blew MAF in less than 5 min. It appears the oil got on the sensor. I am gonna send back the K&N and try the dry ApexI filter. Hopefully I will have better results.
falconert is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:57 AM
  #61  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
chr0nos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 913
i beleive the thermister (little wire in the maf) has an electrical current running through it to measure air flow. with intakes your air flow increases, and it has to compensate by putting more current through the wire. this alone may burn it out, or damage the metal. a better theory however is when you run your car hard, and then turn it off and leave it parked, the thermister is still warm/hot and this deteriorates the wire and causes it to fail. this is just a theory, i don't know how hot the thermister actually gets.
chr0nos is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 08:22 PM
  #62  
Junior Member
 
dmonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 27
When I installed a cheap *** Ractive intake on my altima I never had a single problem with my maf
dmonger is offline  
Old 06-28-2005, 07:13 AM
  #63  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
joebangaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the OC & Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,586
i haven't had the monsterflow filter for long enough to know if it'll end up damaging my MAF, but the reason why I'm posting is cuz i got no CEL/SES and I never reset my ECU after the install. oh well, had it on for a couple thousand miles now and i like it. *crosses fingers*
joebangaa is offline  
Old 06-28-2005, 10:55 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
sooner02r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 848
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Better include boneheaded users of aftermarket filters that overoil their filters but still blame the makers even though the instructions are plainly and clearly stated in their instructions that most bonehead people chose to ignore but still want to blame the maker.

I now fall into this category. I had my aftermarket intake on with an oiled filter for over a year with no problems, but the last time I cleaned and re-oiled it, I overoiled it and was in a hurry so I didn't let it dry overnight like I usually do before driving with it. So I am now a bonehead who spent $80 for a new MAF that could've gone toward more mods.
sooner02r1 is offline  
Old 06-28-2005, 11:26 PM
  #65  
Seoul Man
 
spiromax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,010
Further support for my theory...

Since I posted, the only people who have added MAF failure stories are 2002 owners.
spiromax is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 09:04 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
96blkonblkse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,867
K&N FIPK with new maf and its been fine for 5000km...My MAF failed before i put the FIPK and mine is a 2002
96blkonblkse is offline  
Old 06-24-2006, 07:54 AM
  #67  
Sports Button FTW
iTrader: (22)
 
meccanoble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,294
my MAF died maybe 4,000 miles after changing my filter to a monster foam filter but i dont think thats the cause, i think its time just came. Plus, i used the same filter for my new MAF and had to have put another 2,000 miles on that MAF with no problems. Just changed to an ASMOIL which looks like great quality but i dont think MAF was damaged by filter in my situation...
meccanoble is offline  
Old 06-26-2006, 08:12 PM
  #68  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
v1per's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
No problems here

I have about 500 miles on my car with a new K&N (factory oiled) and haven't had any problems. I think the weak MAF is blowing by itself and the filter is being blamed.
v1per is offline  
Old 06-30-2006, 05:26 AM
  #69  
Member
 
geenowalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 239
Quick question? Last weekend, I was in Nazereth visiting some friends, and we ran into John Lemosis (apparently he workes with the indy racers up in that area....had no idea who he was, my buddy recognized him). I have been reading all of the comments about oiled filters and when I asked him, he said that they would never use anything like that in a race car. Only a "dry breather" which I took as a regular filter. Why are they so popular with street cars?
geenowalker is offline  
Old 07-01-2006, 04:28 AM
  #70  
Seoul Man
 
spiromax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,010
Originally Posted by geenowalker
Quick question? Last weekend, I was in Nazereth visiting some friends, and we ran into John Lemosis (apparently he workes with the indy racers up in that area....had no idea who he was, my buddy recognized him). I have been reading all of the comments about oiled filters and when I asked him, he said that they would never use anything like that in a race car. Only a "dry breather" which I took as a regular filter. Why are they so popular with street cars?
Because they're reusable, and it should cost a lot less in the long run to buy the filter cleaner and filter oil for a K&N than it costs to keep buying new Apexi dry filters. That doesn't mean that a dry filter isn't a better choice. It just means that it's a more expensive choice. Race car crews, whether you're talking about NHRA drag racing, NASCAR, Indy Car, WRC, or whatever, are used to the idea of overhauling or even rebuilding engines and replacing expensive parts after every event. Most street car owners don't do that.
spiromax is offline  
Old 07-01-2006, 01:38 PM
  #71  
Junior Member
 
Rocket3004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 28
I think you need to make the pole include oiled or non-oiled filters. On the VW 1.8T, people experienced MAF failures, mainly due to oiling. People w/ "ghetto" intakes that didn't have oil on the filters, interestingly enough, never had any MAF issues.
Rocket3004 is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 08:50 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
wyche89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
i have a 2001 automatic max, and i was good with my filter... but i did it kind of ghetto style.. lol.. trying to save money instead of buying the stillen filter at first, i bought this filter from pep boys.. it was bigger and a whole lot cheaper.. so im thinking cool.. but in order to fit it on, i had to cut off the plastic flanges of the MAF where it bolted to the airbox... so i did that, then recently i decide that looks really horrible, so i sucked it up and put out the money for the stillen hi flow and a new MAF since i destroyed mine being cheap.. lol.... what i SHOULD have done was kept my old mass air sensor on, and just swapped plastic housings.. but no, i changed the whole thing, sensor and all.. and what happened? bam.. check engine light.. and a $90 nissan dealer visit.. so yeah, that sucked...
the filter never screwed up my sensor though
wyche89 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 03:48 AM
  #73  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
clborden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waterbury,CT
Posts: 225
At first I said yes, but in reality I think it was on its way out anyway. As soon as I started it, after installing intake, it was bad. I think just the movement in my hands was it. After installing the new one there was a world of differance in power. There is no way all of that extra power came from an injen intake, which is no longer on the car anyway. Car feels the same.
clborden is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 03:52 AM
  #74  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
clborden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Waterbury,CT
Posts: 225
Originally Posted by wyche89
i have a 2001 automatic max, and i was good with my filter... but i did it kind of ghetto style.. lol.. trying to save money instead of buying the stillen filter at first, i bought this filter from pep boys.. it was bigger and a whole lot cheaper.. so im thinking cool.. but in order to fit it on, i had to cut off the plastic flanges of the MAF where it bolted to the airbox... so i did that, then recently i decide that looks really horrible, so i sucked it up and put out the money for the stillen hi flow and a new MAF since i destroyed mine being cheap.. lol.... what i SHOULD have done was kept my old mass air sensor on, and just swapped plastic housings.. but no, i changed the whole thing, sensor and all.. and what happened? bam.. check engine light.. and a $90 nissan dealer visit.. so yeah, that sucked...
the filter never screwed up my sensor though
So what happened? Did you have to buy 2 MAFs? I dont think I'm following you.
clborden is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 06:52 AM
  #75  
Junior Member
 
kinesisfilms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17
mine messed up, but then again my car also had 103,000 miles when i put the intake in so it might have been that the air intake was too sudden of a change for such an old maf....
kinesisfilms is offline  
Old 11-20-2006, 05:37 PM
  #76  
Junior Member
 
compx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
My 2000 max se had the MAF go out on me within 3 months of simply replacing the stock filter with a fram counter replacement. On my reciept the dealer noted USING ANYTHING OTHER THAN NISSAN FACTORY AIR FILTERS CAN DAMAGE THE MAF.

I dont know why either as I too have used Fram, k&n, and other filters on all of my cars and never had this problem. I will say that when I was reading up on the Max prior to buying the car that common problems were coils and maf's. So it aint just us, it is a common problem.

Btw I have replaced a coil now as well.
compx is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 12:12 AM
  #77  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Shogunsc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 718
Went thru two 22680-AM600 and one 22680-2Y001 with the midpipe/apexi setup within a year. Now I'm on my fourth MAF (22680-AM600) with the stock airbox setup...for the past 30k miles...no problem.
Shogunsc4 is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 05:12 AM
  #78  
Member
 
geenowalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 239
Blew my MAF (1st and only) at 110K. Have only used Fram off the counter air and oil filters since the stock replacements at 10K (air) and 3K (oil). Airfilter gets changed every 10-12K and am now on my 13th fram filter.


2000 SE
147000 miles
geenowalker is offline  
Old 11-26-2006, 11:00 AM
  #79  
Junior Member
 
kinesisfilms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17
ok...well i have my brand new maf in my car and after about 2-3 weeks of driving i notice my rpms are not normal...when my car had the stock intake with my original MAF i would run 60mph at 2 rpms flat, and 80 at 3 rpms flat...i have a ****ty 4 speed.......with a short ram intake and a brand new maf it was running just fine...until a couple of days ago when it dropped around 30 degrees.....so now i am running 60 mph at 2.3rpms and 85 at 3 rpms flat......the entire engine performance has shifted...even when i drove back to florida and it is warm again....i also never reset my ecu as stated in the instructions that came with the MAF.....ha.....im just hoping it's not blown again.....i hate these nissan MAFs
kinesisfilms is offline  
Old 11-27-2006, 04:30 PM
  #80  
Junior Member
 
mickrussom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
I would imagine that a filter with a significantly lower impedance to airflow should cause the mass airflow sensor to get pissy - but that's just a guess.
mickrussom is offline  


Quick Reply: MAF Sensor Problems with Aftermarket Air Filters



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 AM.