6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008) Discussion of the 6th generation Maxima. Come see what others are saying.

Gen6 vs Gen5 Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 07:16 AM
  #1  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Gen6 vs Gen5 Performance

I created models of the new 04 Maxima's in CarTest2000. I don't have any solid numbers yet, though. Just be forewarned, the Gen6 Max's are a good 200lb heavier than the Gen5.1's. And the larger and likely heavier 18" wheels on the SE models are going to add more unsprung weight and drag the car down further. Also, who knows how much power to the wheels the new car are *really* going to have, but whatever it is, it's probably not going to be significant enough to offset the weight difference.

So it's looking more and more like the Gen6's are going to be SLOWER cars than the 02/03's , but still faster than any of the previous 3.0 Maxima's.

I'll try to get some solid performance numbers tonight to post up. The problem is that CarTest2000 assumes 15" wheels, and the algorithms for wheel/tire weight compensation are not accurate. So I'm having to continuously re-run the 02/03 models until I get more or less typical numbers for these cars, and then I'll apply that to the 04's with some small additional adjustments for the 18's.


Stay tuned
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 08:00 AM
  #2  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
i want to see how this hp / lb ratio works out
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 08:20 AM
  #3  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally posted by SprintMax
i want to see how this hp / lb ratio works out : D
Impossible to really know until somebody dyno's unfortunately. They also didn't release the peak power/torque RPM's yet, so it's all a guessing game. I think the marketers are still fighting with the engineers trying to figure out what they can get away with safely. Nissan will want this car to go up against the W8 Passat, with 270HP, so it looks like they're trying to stretch the figures again to me.

02/03 255HP/246TQ is really more like 240-245HP/265TQ

04 265HP/255TQ ?? Any guesses?



Old Jan 8, 2003 | 07:25 PM
  #4  
JimmyH's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 360
From: Chicagoland
Next year it will be 19" wheels...
why do they keep getting bigger? My car accelerates faster with my snow tires on 15" steel wheels, than with my performance summer tires on the 17" alloys. 28 lbs versus 45 lbs.
You CAN feel the difference.
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #5  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Re: Gen6 vs Gen5 Performance

Originally posted by SteVTEC
I created models of the new 04 Maxima's in CarTest2000. I don't have any solid numbers yet, though. Just be forewarned, the Gen6 Max's are a good 200lb heavier than the Gen5.1's. And the larger and likely heavier 18" wheels on the SE models are going to add more unsprung weight and drag the car down further. Also, who knows how much power to the wheels the new car are *really* going to have, but whatever it is, it's probably not going to be significant enough to offset the weight difference.

So it's looking more and more like the Gen6's are going to be SLOWER cars than the 02/03's , but still faster than any of the previous 3.0 Maxima's.

I'll try to get some solid performance numbers tonight to post up. The problem is that CarTest2000 assumes 15" wheels, and the algorithms for wheel/tire weight compensation are not accurate. So I'm having to continuously re-run the 02/03 models until I get more or less typical numbers for these cars, and then I'll apply that to the 04's with some small additional adjustments for the 18's.


Stay tuned
I am agreeing with you, I think they will be a tad slower.
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #6  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Well, I've pretty much come to the conclusion that I can't come to a conclusion just yet.

Full power figures are not published yet, and even when they are, who knows what they'll *REALLY* be this time, knowing Nissan. Plus who knows how much extra drag these 18's are gonna cause. Too many unknowns. I think at best the 6spd will only match the performance of the 02/03's. That new 5AT is a different story, though. The gearing is much closer together than with the old 4AT. Even if the ET's are the same or slightly slower, the trap speeds should be up from 92 to around 94 or so.

Here's the gearing layout...

1st: 47
2nd: 72
3rd: 111
4th: 165
5th: 220

5th is obviously a very tall cruising gear, and 4th is the highway burner. But 1-3 are much closer together now and should give improved 1/4 mile and around town pep. The old 4AT was set at about 45, 80, and 128 which was much taller and wider.

The 4AT in the SL has the same exact ratios as before.
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 05:42 AM
  #7  
tbirdrob's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 269
How do you know how much the 6th gen weighs? I can't find that information anywhere.
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/index.shtml

Did anyone see this?!

The 5AT is STANDARD on the SE, and the 6MT is OPTIONAL


So will the "optional" 6MT reduce the price, or will we have to pay more for it?


The fact that it's optional will actually change some things. That means the curb weight was listed for the 5AT Maxima, which would be heavier. The "optional" 6MT will reduce the weight by about 60lb, bringing the G6 SE 6MT curb weight from 3432lb to about 3372lb. Still a lot heavier (by about 150lb) compared to the 02/03's, but not as heavy as expected.


I think it's all going to come down to how Nissan actually rated the power this time around. If 265HP really is 265HP (220-225whp manual, 205whp automagic) then the new Maxima will probably be just as fast as (but not faster than) the old one. If it's still over-rated then it'll probably be a slower car overall.


Can't wait to see some dynos
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
Tripower's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 209
Originally posted by SteVTEC
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/index.shtml

Did anyone see this?!

The 5AT is STANDARD on the SE, and the 6MT is OPTIONAL


So will the "optional" 6MT reduce the price, or will we have to pay more for it?
My guess is the manual will be a "no cost" option on the SE. In other words, same price, you pick it. Wasn't the base MSRP the same for the manual and auto on the 02 & 03s?
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 02:00 PM
  #10  
tbirdrob's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 269
Originally posted by SteVTEC
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/index.shtml

Did anyone see this?!

The 5AT is STANDARD on the SE, and the 6MT is OPTIONAL


So will the "optional" 6MT reduce the price, or will we have to pay more for it?


The fact that it's optional will actually change some things. That means the curb weight was listed for the 5AT Maxima, which would be heavier. The "optional" 6MT will reduce the weight by about 60lb, bringing the G6 SE 6MT curb weight from 3432lb to about 3372lb. Still a lot heavier (by about 150lb) compared to the 02/03's, but not as heavy as expected.


I think it's all going to come down to how Nissan actually rated the power this time around. If 265HP really is 265HP (220-225whp manual, 205whp automagic) then the new Maxima will probably be just as fast as (but not faster than) the old one. If it's still over-rated then it'll probably be a slower car overall.


Can't wait to see some dynos
Where did you find the curb weight information?
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 03:10 PM
  #11  
unknownpmp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 257
Originally posted by Tripower


My guess is the manual will be a "no cost" option on the SE. In other words, same price, you pick it. Wasn't the base MSRP the same for the manual and auto on the 02 & 03s?
i don't know about the us but in canada it was a $900cdn option for the auto+TCS for the 2k3
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #12  
95emeraldgxe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,653
Originally posted by JimmyH
Next year it will be 19" wheels...
why do they keep getting bigger? My car accelerates faster with my snow tires on 15" steel wheels, than with my performance summer tires on the 17" alloys. 28 lbs versus 45 lbs.
You CAN feel the difference.
bigger is better (looks wise atleast)
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #13  
2001SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,145
yepp...and those 245's are impressive too
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #14  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Originally posted by 2001SE
yepp...and those 245's are impressive too
They are impressive until you have to replace them, hell you will be broke look at what the tires cost for the 00-03 Se's (stock).
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 07:30 PM
  #15  
dwapenyi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,998
Even if the 5th gen 3.5 was faster, it should only be a little faster, does it matter? I mean, the 6th gen offers a WHOLE lot of new goodies that the 5th, 4th and even 3rd gens NEVER had. Like Skyview, console seating for 4, independant rear suspension, 320 watt 8 speaker BOSE, 6 speed,much roomier etc. Yes, the previous generations had some of the stuff, but the 6th has it all.

The 1st thing I would do if I bought one is get rid of that damned tooth!

DW
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #16  
Anuj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,461
From: NJ
Originally posted by Tripower


My guess is the manual will be a "no cost" option on the SE. In other words, same price, you pick it. Wasn't the base MSRP the same for the manual and auto on the 02 & 03s?
Yeah for the 02/03 the manual and the auto had the same MSRP for equally loaded. Of course since the Maxima became a 6-speed and it wasn't common, they raised the prices on the manuals.
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 07:30 AM
  #17  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally posted by dwapenyi
Even if the 5th gen 3.5 was faster, it should only be a little faster, does it matter?
Remember all the great 4th Gen vs 5th Gen 3.0 debates?

Coming soon to orgy flame wars near you: Battle of the 3.5's! Gen5 vs Gen6!

Originally posted by dwapenyi
I mean, the 6th gen offers a WHOLE lot of new goodies that the 5th, 4th and even 3rd gens NEVER had. Like Skyview, console seating for 4, independant rear suspension, 320 watt 8 speaker BOSE, 6 speed,much roomier etc. Yes, the previous generations had some of the stuff, but the 6th has it all. :-)

The 1st thing I would do if I bought one is get rid of that damned tooth!

DW
Agreed, even on the tooth point!

Nevertheless, it's going to be interesting to see which car really is faster and who will have bragging rights afterall. hehee
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Aug 16, 2024 08:23 PM
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Sep 26, 2015 12:01 PM
Dasmith
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
Sep 23, 2015 08:28 PM
Keyno McMike
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
Sep 21, 2015 07:18 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06 AM.