6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008) Discussion of the 6th generation Maxima. Come see what others are saying.

First SSIM in a 6th gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #41  
redmaxpa007's Avatar
i SeE what you did therE
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 41,704
From: the DAMN south
send that to me and i will see what it does on an altima...


Old Apr 29, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #42  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by !PrjctMax!
Went out for a drive and here's some more feedback:

-I can definitely feel roughness in air flow around 3,500-high 4,000's...most likely due to the lack of smoothing the runners out?
-Low end has a noticeable lag to some extent...nothing horrible, but noticeable
-A few runs from 3rd gear from about 60mph at 3,500-6,500...lags a little and then picks up around 4,500...few times it felt like VTEC mode y0
-Gas mileage seems to be about the same if not slightly better...I know the carputer isn't accurate, but the miles that I have driven compared with the miles I have left are slightly more than before...and I've been womping on it quite a few times.

Overall I am happy with the mod so far considering it didn't cost an arm and a leg like the Kinetix, but I know that there is room for some improvement if I were to smooth everything out in the IM.

I'm sure that the ECU still has some adapting to do since I only put <100 miles on it.
You'll probably notice more lowend loss when you drive normally (below 3k RPM), and the MPG will be lower because of it.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #43  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Armon
While the correlation between the SSIM mod and increased horsepower may be in doubt, I think I've found another correlation which can be backed up by objective evidence:

Stay in school kids.
That's the second or third time I made that mistake...sew me...I mean sue me...

Originally Posted by RHMax
You'll probably notice more lowend loss when you drive normally (below 3k RPM), and the MPG will be lower because of it.
I know dis'...
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #44  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by pmohr
You do realize that that doesn't make sense, right?
E≠mc2
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #45  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
So project, how's the driveability of the car? Is it out the door or is it improved. I usually cruise at 140kph or 3000rpm. Does it feel sluggish at those RPMS?

Kamski
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #46  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
If you cruise at 3,000 then you're cruising, so no power is needed...

kurwa, otwusz swoje oczy!

http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...9&postcount=34

The ***** is good and my MPG has been close to the same, so I'm not complaining about that...I'm just going to take the thing off and smooth out the inside of it and add the coolant bypass valve that I should have put on a while ago...
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #47  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by kamski
Yeah.................. anyways thanks for stating the obvious.



Care ≠ not me.

Because, once the SSIM is in I'll dyno the car and send the ECU to technosqare for a proper tune.

All im saying is I hope i dont loose a lot of low end TQ.
And you still wont pony up for a header isntall,
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #48  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
And you still wont pony up for a header isntall,
There are a few side issues with that.

A) the hot shot set i have have the cat damaged during removal from last maxima. needs fixing $$$
B) they will throw a CEL because the moron who designed them put the primary o2 bung in 1 collector instead of at the bottom of the 3-1 where it should read all 3 cylinders. Need to relocate the bung $.
C) same for the rear header. $$
D) need to have a splitter bracket welded in on the new cat that splits exhaust flow to two seperate O2 sensor, the hot shot design has two secondary sensors side by side that read exhaust flow from 6 cylinders instead of 3. $$$

(STOCK: prim o2 reads 3 then cat then post reads 3.)
(HS: prim o2 reads 1 then cat then post reads 6.) CONFIRMED fixable my nissan senior tech that replaced my engine, he said he wouldnt install the POS HS headers I had cause they need a lot of work before he would slap them on a brand new engine. LOT OF WORK = LOTS OF $$$

E) going to cuba for 8 days to relax with the GF for our 5 years anniversary $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$

F) 8h to install them..... thats a little mental.

G) SSIM = free, dyno = $65. TSQ = $$$ but still cheaper then Headers.

Kamski
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #49  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by kamski
A) the hot shot set i have have the cat damaged during removal from last maxima. needs fixing $$$
Did these come off of a 6th gen Maxima? Because if so then great, but if they came off a 5.5 gen Maxima, . It has yet to be determined that they will fit or not. And considering that you aren't going to tackle this yourself, I wouldn't think a shop would be too easy on you as far as prices go. Couple that with the fact that you will need to get an EGR bung welded in since 5.5 gens do not have external EGR, like the 6th gen does, so in your opinion, even more $$. But, it can be bittersweet, as if they did come from a 5.5 gen, they will sell that much faster.


Originally Posted by kamski
B) they will throw a CEL because the moron who designed them put the primary o2 bung in 1 collector instead of at the bottom of the 3-1 where it should read all 3 cylinders. Need to relocate the bung $. ...C) same for the rear header. $$
Relocating / adding bungs is horrifically cheap.


Originally Posted by kamski
D) need to have a splitter bracket welded in on the new cat that splits exhaust flow to two seperate O2 sensor, the hot shot design has two secondary sensors side by side that read exhaust flow from 6 cylinders instead of 3. $$$
I know your O2 sensor set-up, no need for the lesson. IMO, not an issue. My WBO2 reads from all 6. Your primaries (header bungs) will take care of each bank for you. Secondaries aren't as important, as they only 'step in' when the primaries are gone. Even then, open loop / closed loop SES lights will tell you when your primaries are dying /dead.


Originally Posted by kamski
F) 8h to install them..... thats a little mental.
Depends on who you are.

Originally Posted by kamski
G) SSIM = free, dyno = $65. TSQ = $$$ but still cheaper then Headers.
Considering the nit picking you're doing for every $, I would think that a dyno + TSECU would bother you, and in the end, you'll gain FAR more with the headers.

BTW, have fun on your trip.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #50  
Torgus's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,202
From: Boston Baby!
haha this is a fun thread to read. so you have a cel?

bungs cost almost nothing to move as nmexmax said.

and about your dyno...which GEAR did you dyno in? and what it it's ratio?

the reason you have an SES light on afaik is whomever did you ssim f'ed up. one of the cylinders is getting improper air flow. others have had this problem too. unfortunately your going to be driving around with a ses light for as long as you have it...



sell me your 5th gen headers.

Last edited by Torgus; Apr 30, 2008 at 03:27 PM.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #51  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
1.) He got rid of his SES. it was because he had not performed the throttle closed position reset . IAVL.

2.) I've been studying the A34 dyno situation for years now. It seems as if 4th gear dynos are ideal because 3th gear seems to have a 'blip' dues to TQCNVTR lock-up. I've discussed it many times with a few members, and if A34 members want to get rid of the blip, it needs to be done in 4th gear. in the case of the A34, ratio is not important because the FD of the 5AT is semi 'short' but the gear ratios are tall to make up for this. So, the closest gear ratio the 5AT set is 5th, and Jesus, we wouldn't want anyone dynoing in 5th.

3.) There was only 1 isolated case of 'ssim' + SES, and it was, IMO, improper install. that member did not pursue the SES much, and just got rid of it. but as stated priorly, the OP of THIS thread has since gotten rid of his SES.

4.) After further though and logic. It has come to me that kamski's headers may not be from a 5.5 gen. The only reason I state this is because kamski mentioned the cat was fubar'd. And 5.5 gen HS header sets do not come w/ a cat already in place, only 6th gen Maximas and 3,5L Altimas do.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #52  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
1.) He got rid of his SES. it was because he had not performed the throttle closed position reset . IAVL.

2.) I've been studying the A34 dyno situation for years now. It seems as if 4th gear dynos are ideal because 3th gear seems to have a 'blip' dues to TQCNVTR lock-up. I've discussed it many times with a few members, and if A34 members want to get rid of the blip, it needs to be done in 4th gear. in the case of the A34, ratio is not important because the FD of the 5AT is semi 'short' but the gear ratios are tall to make up for this. So, the closest gear ratio the 5AT set is 5th, and Jesus, we wouldn't want anyone dynoing in 5th.

3.) There was only 1 isolated case of 'ssim' + SES, and it was, IMO, improper install. that member did not pursue the SES much, and just got rid of it. but as stated priorly, the OP of THIS thread has since gotten rid of his SES.

4.) After further though and logic. It has come to me that kamski's headers may not be from a 5.5 gen. The only reason I state this is because kamski mentioned the cat was fubar'd. And 5.5 gen HS header sets do not come w/ a cat already in place, only 6th gen Maximas and 3,5L Altimas do.

Yes the HS headers i got are from a 6th gen, he trader his in for some form of a Lexus or another. BAH toyota!!!

Anywhoo, from what the origional buyer told me, the EGR got mangled during the install :S shop fixed it for him NC. Then during removal going back to stock they dropped the y-pipe and damaged the cat. WHICH TOTALY sucks cause i got quoted $200 on the cat repair, plus i spent $500 on them, plus $500-600 to install, plus $100 for all the bung relocations.

FAK!!! Anyone want a set of HS headers for cheap? :-(

I cant swing the HS install plus the TSQ re-flash all at once.

Kamski
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #53  
madmik's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 648
Originally Posted by !PrjctMax!
This mod does "hurt" low end a little, but I haven't noticed it much.

How did you measure the 10-15% better flow?

The runners were supposed to be polished up quite nicely by the guy that did it, but ummm...as you can see, he didn't!

Either way, I know that there was a noticeable power gain, so me happy
Air flow was measured using Autoenginuity software. It can reports on what the MAF is sensing, along with 50+ other sensor signal.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #54  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by madmik
Air flow was measured using Autoenginuity software. It can reports on what the MAF is sensing, along with 50+ other sensor signal.

So should I get that done while Im getting the shelf removed?

Kamski
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #55  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by kamski
So should I get that done while Im getting the shelf removed?

Kamski
If the shop isn't retarded, then they should do it regardless...unless you just told them to remove the shelf and that's it...
Old May 1, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #56  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by madmik
Air flow was measured using Autoenginuity software. It can reports on what the MAF is sensing, along with 50+ other sensor signal.
Could you post up before and after graphs. Sorta like this one:

Old May 1, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #57  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by !PrjctMax!
If the shop isn't retarded, then they should do it regardless...unless you just told them to remove the shelf and that's it...
Well looks like nothing got done, and since I need to have my car back together before going on vacation I went and picked it up. :-( Will have to try again after I come back from sunshine.

On a plus side I got most of the stuff put back together. Now i could prolly do this mod all on my own in an hour and a half easy. This sucks, more waiting for TSQ re-flash :-(
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #58  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
Yeah, after doing the install once, I'm sure that I could do it in less than half the time on my next time since I know what to take off first and what to put back on first.
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #59  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Couple that with the fact that you do not need any of the VIAS equipment.
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #60  
kamski's Avatar
.org extraordinaire
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,618
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Couple that with the fact that you do not need any of the VIAS equipment.
Wasteful black tubes.

Q? the 350z motor has variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust. Do our cars? OT i know but reading about 350z motors on ebay and this got me curious.

Kamski

Last edited by kamski; May 2, 2008 at 09:57 AM.
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #61  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Only the rev up has it on both cams. But even the non rev ups have a different maps. Read the stickys in the All Motor Forum, they have a lot of good info regarding that.
Old May 4, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #62  
My-Body-Is-Ready's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 589
sorry your not the first
Old May 4, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #63  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
First published and willing to share sound better?
Old May 5, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #64  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
After running a tank of gas, my gas mileage is pretty much right on where it used to be...20.5 and that's using the real way of dividing the miles by gallons.

There were multiple 100mph+ runs with this tank as well, so it didn't eat up as much as gas as expected.
Old May 19, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #65  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Well after reading all this im goign to take the plunge this weekend...

thanks for the info ppls
Old May 23, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #66  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Dan,

Have any more info for us..? Ses Come back on?
Old May 23, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #67  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
IIRC, he's going for a dyno 'soon'.
Old May 23, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #68  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
IIRC, he's going for a dyno 'soon'.
What is IIRC LOL...
Old May 23, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #69  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
If I Remember Correctly
Old May 23, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #70  
!PrjctMax!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,238
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
Dan,

Have any more info for us..? Ses Come back on?
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
1.) He got rid of his SES. it was because he had not performed the throttle closed position reset . IAVL.
Haven't had any CEL problems since it got reset...only problem is my steering column...

Originally Posted by NmexMAX
IIRC, he's going for a dyno 'soon'.
Yes sir, once my b-pipe and y-pipe get shipped back. I sent out my y-pipe to get the flex-pipes swapped with "normal" ones that don't hiss while revving down. The b-pipe is on back-order and hopefully it will be stocked early June, so I will get both of them early-mid June and dyno accordingly.
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #71  
mrjasonlyrics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,245
Can a grinder do this or does the machine shop use some special type of machine???
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:12 PM
  #72  
ShocknAwe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,285
From: Atlanta, Ga
If you have a high end dremel it can. Grinder is awful akward
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:21 PM
  #73  
mrjasonlyrics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,245
Originally Posted by ShocknAwe
If you have a high end dremel it can. Grinder is awful akward
Oh okay. I have a dremel and a grinder so i'll see what I can do with both. Is there anything I should know before this mod? Any codes? Problems that might occur? Anything that might affect my car or motor?

I've never done this but i'm no novice when it comes to experimenting on my own car. The pics provided in this thread is very helpful.
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:25 PM
  #74  
ShocknAwe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,285
From: Atlanta, Ga
gotta ask someone who has done it but I know a dremel will cut through it
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:29 PM
  #75  
maximusberg's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 185
From: Cherry hill, NJ
yeah its a decent mod... great for power up top...
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:42 PM
  #76  
mrjasonlyrics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,245
My boy got the 04 altima and he has it. Trust me I know that gives some serious power. That guy pulls off on me like i'm driving in reverse or something. LOL.
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 08:47 PM
  #77  
kurt1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 152
How would BOP and Ssim work together? Or u can only do 1 or the other? Only
Down side I can see with Ssim on a 4sp auto is that the revs are always going to be lower on the 4sp so you'll need low end- midrange torque.
Old May 6, 2012 | 09:41 PM
  #78  
Cottonsupra's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
From: Moreno Valley, California
If I'm not mistaken, if you have a 2004 Auto you could install the TransGo Reprogram Kit in order to get higher revs. I'm not sure if it will fit the 05-08 models though.
Old May 8, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #79  
taz394's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
From: Houston,TX
i know a 6th gen local here in texas that did this 4-5 years ago lol
Old May 8, 2012 | 08:47 AM
  #80  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Jesus.

A dremel? I'd rather shoot myself in the face.

A trans go reprogram kit for higher revs?

BOP + SSIM?






All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 AM.