8th Generation Maxima (2016-) Let's see what Nissan has to offer on the 8th generation Maxima

Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:19 PM
  #1  
adamgalazka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 86
From: King George, VA
Fuel Economy

So I have had the car for about 600 miles. Most of my driving to work during the week consists of 60% highway (speeds of 50-65 MPH) and 40% city (speeds of 25-35 MPH). I am averaging 27 MPG. Yesterday I took my first drive to school. It's about an 1 hour and 15 minutes drive (around 65 miles), mostly highway (Speeds of 50-65 MPH) and I was able to get 32 MPG on that one drive. I was wondering what the rest of the 8th Gen owners were averaging on their cars?
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:22 PM
  #2  
guitarman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 179
I do a mix of city/highway leaning towards city and am getting 22.5 overall, which is 1-2 mpg better than I got with the 7th gen.
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 03:33 PM
  #3  
wyobbagy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 106
From: Philadelphia
shocked

at 1500 miles I am averaging 30.3 mpg......not sure why??
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 03:36 PM
  #4  
charliebrown's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 123
From: Los Angeles
18 mpg in my SR
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
cnp's Avatar
cnp
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 26
From: St. Louis
About 24 mpg so far, 600 miles, mixed driving 75% city/25% highway.
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 06:04 PM
  #6  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by cnp
About 24 mpg so far, 600 miles, mixed driving 75% city/25% highway.


8.9 mpg here
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 07:45 PM
  #7  
R1600Turbo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by WasDmater
8.9 mpg here
Unless you floor it everywhere you go, that doesn't sound right.

Also, the best way to calculate mileage is when you fill up. The readout in the car isn't exactly accurate.
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 09:40 PM
  #8  
wtgkb8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 140
From: Sherwood, AR
Originally Posted by R1600Turbo
Unless you floor it everywhere you go, that doesn't sound right.

Also, the best way to calculate mileage is when you fill up. The readout in the car isn't exactly accurate.
I know in my 2015 Murano...the readout has been surprisingly accurate. It only varies 0.2-0.4 mpg off hand calculations. Let's hope the 2016 Maxima's are similar in accuracy.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 05:50 AM
  #9  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by R1600Turbo
Unless you floor it everywhere you go, that doesn't sound right.

Also, the best way to calculate mileage is when you fill up. The readout in the car isn't exactly accurate.


It doesn't sound right to me but that is what it says. I drive normally. I live 3 minutes from work. I have driven only 78 miles since I got it 2 weeks or so ago.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 06:10 AM
  #10  
djenkins's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 36
On my way back from Phoenix where I bought my SR, I was at a little over 32 mpg. That was about a 335 mile drive. Here in town, mostly going to and from work which is mostly freeway, I'm getting a little over 22 mpg. I'll pay better attention after my next fill up.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 06:21 AM
  #11  
nbwalton2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 31
About 24~25 mpg. Average trip speed is about 30 to 35 mph. Not much stop and go, just 2 lane roads, with a 10 min commute to work.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
adamgalazka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 86
From: King George, VA
Originally Posted by WasDmater
It doesn't sound right to me but that is what it says. I drive normally. I live 3 minutes from work. I have driven only 78 miles since I got it 2 weeks or so ago.
Did you reset your MPG reading when you bought the car? 8MPG does not sound right.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 09:37 AM
  #13  
zoemayne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 770
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by adamgalazka
Did you reset your MPG reading when you bought the car? 8MPG does not sound right.
8 mpg is like a Hummer or Excursion. Maybe you sit idle a lot but thats not acceptable... Def missing some info here.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 12:45 PM
  #14  
steevo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 171
Idling for long stretches will drop the mpg reading. Do you use the remote start and let the car run at idle? You are getting 0 mpg added to your average....
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 01:49 PM
  #15  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by adamgalazka
Did you reset your MPG reading when you bought the car? 8MPG does not sound right.

No, I did not do that.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 01:53 PM
  #16  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by steevo
Idling for long stretches will drop the mpg reading. Do you use the remote start and let the car run at idle? You are getting 0 mpg added to your average....



I used the remote start once and let it run for about 3 minutes. I have also sat in the car with the engine running for about 10 minutes while learning to use some of the features.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 05:32 PM
  #17  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
I recall posting a list of around 40 variables involved in measuring fuel efficiency here on maxima.org around ten years ago. Many were minor things, such as temperature, front-to-rear slant and side-to-side slant of the car when refueling, cutoff point at which the pump nozzle is set, etc, etc.

The only really accurate way to measure MPG is to use the same pump at the same station each time for several fillups, recording gallons and mileage at each fillup. That assures the level of the added fuel is reaching exactly the same point at each fillup.

But then we know that we will be encountering different driving situations every time we leave our driveway, so extreme accuracy is not possible (or even meaningful) outside the laboratory. But, in my opinion, any MPG derived from less than several fillups should be viewed with a jaundiced eye.

Last edited by lightonthehill; Jul 11, 2015 at 05:38 PM.
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 03:46 PM
  #18  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by adamgalazka
Did you reset your MPG reading when you bought the car? 8MPG does not sound right.



I reset the MPG reading today. Now I am getting 11.9 MPG on my 3 minute ride to work.
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 04:01 PM
  #19  
george__'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,230
From: Earth
Originally Posted by WasDmater
I reset the MPG reading today. Now I am getting 11.9 MPG on my 3 minute ride to work.

FAIL
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 04:07 PM
  #20  
R1600Turbo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by WasDmater
I reset the MPG reading today. Now I am getting 11.9 MPG on my 3 minute ride to work.
You're not driving enough for it to register an actual MPG number. My drive to/from work is around 25 minutes one way and it takes nearly half that to get to a true number. However, that number will go up or down depending on driving. I would bet on your next fill up that if you calculated it manually it would be a lot higher.

And 3 minutes? I would ride a bicycle.
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 04:11 PM
  #21  
WasDmater's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by R1600Turbo
You're not driving enough for it to register an actual MPG number. My drive to/from work is around 25 minutes one way and it takes nearly half that to get to a true number. However, that number will go up or down depending on driving. I would bet on your next fill up that if you calculated it manually it would be a lot higher.

And 3 minutes? I would ride a bicycle.

LOL, you do not understand, this is my bicycle!
Old Jul 16, 2015 | 02:31 PM
  #22  
Max8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 255
From: Iowa
We just took it on a 650 trip. About 50 miles in town and the rest on 70-75mph interstate. Averaged 31.9 for the trip.
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 04:33 AM
  #23  
Randy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 223
Smile

Now that it April 2016. Time to get this thread going
again since last post was July 2015. Just completed a 234 mile trip.
Computer is showing 34mpg. Trip consisted of traveling
55 on most roads with some 70-75 on some sections
where allowed. There were also some lights. I used
Cruise on 75% of trip. I am very happy with that number even if
computer is off some.
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 08:12 AM
  #24  
slpgh's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 73
I have a 25 minute commute mostly slow city driving with a couple miles of highway, and I get less than 21 on most trips. Haven't had a highway trip 1000 miles in yet...
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 08:53 AM
  #25  
Kevin1960's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 50
From: Indialantic Florida
Took a 4 hour round trip to west palm last night
248 miles in half a tank, over 30 mpg
And comfortable with the seat heater on low
No more back ache!!
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 10:49 PM
  #26  
Ricky Green's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 42
From: San Diego, CA
I am averaging 23.0 mpg.
-Average daily commute: 24miles R/T in a lot of stop and go due to traffic lights and traffic. Long lights too here in San Diego which adds to idling time.
-80% stop and go/20% highway
-Driving style: Smooth and controlled but somewhat spirited. Try and coast to red lights.




Originally Posted by Kevin1960
Took a 4 hour round trip to west palm last night
248 miles in half a tank, over 30 mpg
And comfortable with the seat heater on low
No more back ache!!
Old Apr 17, 2016 | 06:44 PM
  #27  
Mason Hatcher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 389
From: South Texas
I have taken two road trips in mine in 6 weeks and 3700 miles. On the last trip I averaged 32.9 It was up to nearly 35 until I hit the 85 MPH toll road around Austin. I confirmed it by fill up to fill up calculations.

In town it varies from 19 to 25 depending on the type of roads and traffic.
Old Apr 18, 2016 | 05:07 AM
  #28  
yosbel_11@yahoo.es's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 14
Just a question guys ...what type of fuel do you guys use? Premium or regular? Does this car requires premium only ? ...thanks in advance
Old Apr 18, 2016 | 07:57 PM
  #29  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
Originally Posted by yosbel_11@yahoo.es
Just a question guys ...what type of fuel do you guys use? Premium or regular? Does this car requires premium only ? ...thanks in advance
There have been hundreds of posts regarding this on this board (and on the boards of every generation Maxima). In short, octane is not tied directly to MPG, but IS tied to performance. Many here use regular (87 octane), as they are not interested in great performance. Others here use nothing but premium (91 or 93 octane) as that is recommended by Nissan and gives maximum performance.

I have owned nothing but Maximas since October 1984, and always use premium the first 18 months, then midgrade (89 octane) the rest of the time I own the car. I have found that, although electronic devices would detect the difference in performance between premium and midgrade, I have not been able to detect that difference by the 'seat of my pants.' By contrast, some folks here can detect a slight dropoff in performance when going to regular.

Just be aware there will be 19, 347 opinions here, so use your own judgement, and go with what makes you happy.
Old Apr 18, 2016 | 08:05 PM
  #30  
Mason Hatcher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 389
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by lightonthehill
There have been hundreds of posts regarding this on this board (and on the boards of every generation Maxima). In short, octane is not tied directly to MPG, but IS tied to performance. Many here use regular (87 octane), as they are not interested in great performance. Others here use nothing but premium (91 or 93 octane) as that is recommended by Nissan and gives maximum performance.

I have owned nothing but Maximas since October 1984, and always use premium the first 18 months, then midgrade (89 octane) the rest of the time I own the car. I have found that, although electronic devices would detect the difference in performance between premium and midgrade, I have not been able to detect that difference by the 'seat of my pants.' By contrast, some folks here can detect a slight dropoff in performance when going to regular.

Just be aware there will be 19, 347 opinions here, so use your own judgement, and go with what makes you happy.

Actually, the EPA ratings given are with premium fuel. You will get better fuel mileage with premium. Your car will run just fine on less than premium; however, you will likely get less MPG. However, the higher cost of the higher octane will not likely be offset by the savings in MPG.
Old Apr 18, 2016 | 08:10 PM
  #31  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
[QUOTE= You will get better fuel mileage with premium. Your car will run just fine on less than premium; however, you will likely get less MPG. However, the higher cost of the higher octane will not likely be offset by the savings in MPG.[/QUOTE]



Yes, the testing is done with premium because the auto manufacturer recommends premium. Premium is recommended because it gives maximum PERFORMANCE, not improved MPG.

I have never measured any difference in MPG between midgrade and premium since car fuel systems improved to where the timing automatically adjusts based on the type of fuel encountered. Regular may lower the MPG if the car's fuel system does not adjust the timing enough to handle it properly.

I have read in auto mags and technical journals for decades that octane has no bearing on MPG in a car with a fuel system that can properly adjust for the octane encountered, and this Maxima can adjust to midgrade, and in many cases, adjust down to regular.

There have been many threads on this here on maxima.org over the last ten to fifteen years, and this misunderstanding is always eventually settled by a few techies amongst us giving references to complicated laboratory studies that are more precise than our real-world experiences.

Last edited by lightonthehill; Apr 18, 2016 at 08:30 PM.
Old Apr 19, 2016 | 12:34 PM
  #32  
djstorniolo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 19
From: new york
i get 18 to 22 in nyc 50/50 city/ hi
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Oct 2, 2022 02:13 PM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
Forge277
1st & 2nd Generation Maxima (1981-1984 and 1985-1988)
12
Jun 13, 2016 09:26 PM
msellas
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 23, 2015 09:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.