Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking Talk about suspension geometry, advanced handling/chassis setup, custom brakes, etc. NOT your basic brake pads and "best drop" Information.

Subframe connectors street legal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #1  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Subframe connectors street legal?

Are subframe connectors like the ones Stillen used to sell legal? Are the stage 1 tubes welded to the frame rails street legal?
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #2  
SpeedCrazie's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,281
Wait, Stillen use to sell these? I thought only warpspeed did?
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
95maxrider's Avatar
Lightly modded
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,742
From: Herndon, VA
I never heard anything about them being illegal. I've passed MD inspection with them as well. What makes you think they're illegal? BTW, you're probably thinking about WSP, not Stillen.
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #4  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
I've never heard anything to suggest that they're not legal anywhere. Besides, they likely make the car significantly more crash-worthy.
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,285
From: Burke, VA
yes, they are legal. Foxbody mustang guys have installed ladder SFCs for years and years (and many other cars for that matter)

Hell, even a full roll cage is street legal as long as the car's other safety features remain intact (seatbelt, etc)
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:05 AM
  #6  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Well some of the mechanics around here have suggested that the tubes I have welded to the frame rails of my 240 are not street legal. And Im out to prove them wrong. Basically there like the Stage I (Warpspeed, my bad) connectors, except they tilt UP at both ends (front and rear) instead of toward your rocker panels. And I dont have the X brace just two roll bar-size tubes. The car is insanely strong now. With the engine out you pick up the front end and move it around and it feels like a solid one-piece.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #7  
natty99's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 556
From: Washington, DC
got pics?...
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #8  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Not yet. But its a pretty good description. Only thing is that they are UNDER the frame rails. But I got big tires for ground clearance.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #9  
SPiG's Avatar
SomePsychoGuy
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Do the SFCs show a good difference on the S13? I thought I had read that the 240SX's frame was already pretty strong, but I guess it can't hurt.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #10  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
JClaw just said he noticed a huge difference on his S13 with the longitudinal rails alone....

Also, here's a great thread about chassis foaming an S14. The guy noticed a big difference. I think with any car older than 2000 model year (to make a generalization) you would notice big stiffness improvements with either SFCs and foam (or both), since automakers only recently started focusing on stiffening the chassis. Also, with a car as old as an S13 the chassis metal is probably weakened due to age and stress.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #11  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
The car notes a date production sometime in late 1988, meaning its been through 19 canadian winters and was severely weakened by rust when I bought it (it was a beater). Even a top shape S13 would benefit from this. Yes the S13 chassis and suspension is way better than my previous 95 maxima, and even in its condition handled much better than my max, but ANY unibody car will benefit greatly from this. For the 20 lbs it adds anyway...
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
DandyMax's Avatar
3.5 in the works
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,477
From: Ontario, Canada
I'm still thinking about about seam welding my Max... I probably will do it at some point.

JClaw did you get my last PM about that file you wanted? I can't remember if I already sent it or not..
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 03:27 PM
  #13  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
I see absolutely no reason why they wouldn't be street legal.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #14  
ColdSHO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,551
only thing i coudl think of is that certian parts of the car are supposed to bend/deflect/break/deform during a crash, int eh 5th gen sales brochure"02" it even mentions that the hood bends in a certian patern as to not go into the car via the windshield. so i guess if the "law" wanted to be strict theyd prob use soemthing like" the frame would be stronger and change the way the cars supposed to/intended to act in a collision"
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #15  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
That point has been covered before. SFCs are entirely between the front and rear wheels. They do not extend into either the front or rear crumple zones. Stiffening the passenger compartment area relative to the crumple zones should improve crashworthiness, although I know it's a complex topic.

The sides of the car obviously have no crumple zones and so having the extra tubing along the frame rails would likely decrease intrusion into the passenger comparment in the event of a side impact. Unless you get hit by a SUV or truck, which are going to be way above the SFCs.

My conclusion is SFCs can only help safety. I doubt we'll ever have hard facts to back it up so I'm just going on my reasoning.
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #16  
ColdSHO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,551
a stronger car doesnt always mean a safer car, look at alot of the "boats" in the 70's little of the car "Gave" during an accident and more of the impact was transfered into the occupants.

ur point is well recived and i feel that sfc would have little or no negative impact in most accidents. its just that our cars wern't designed for the mods that we do to them in mind.
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #17  
riducati996's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
They came from the factory on both of my Saleens that I have owned.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
4
Sep 23, 2015 03:34 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:42 AM.