Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking Talk about suspension geometry, advanced handling/chassis setup, custom brakes, etc. NOT your basic brake pads and "best drop" Information.

The end all thread of why Drilled/Slotted do not work.

Old 01-29-2011, 04:32 PM
  #1  
Turbo'd Saab
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
DrunkieTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 35,381
The end all thread of why Drilled/Slotted do not work.

I've been having a battle with someone over on a different forum why they continuously think Drilled rotors on an 11" brake setup will stop better than my 13" solid rotor setup That is when I came across this thread that really broke down into the physics of it all.

Link:
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/suspe...dissolved.html

Cliffnotes: Slotted/drilled = for looks except for a few rare cases which shouldn't apply if you're on this forum.

QUOTE(Taken from a sticky at Celicatech)
===========
First, lets get some physics. Tell me how a heatsink with less mass will cool better? You do realize that a brake rotor acts as a large heatsink to transfer heat from the brake pads to the rotor. The heat generated from pads has to go somewhere and so it transfers to the rotor and caliper.

Porsche claims: "Discs are cross-drilled to enhance braking in the wet. The brakes respond faster because the water vapour pressure that builds up during braking can be released more easily."

They have said nothing about enhancing normal braking circumstances and the larger diameter rotors probably make up for the lack of material present in a smaller cross drilled rotor.

From Wilwood's website:
QUOTE

Q: Why are some rotors drilled or slotted?
A: Rotors are drilled to reduce rotating weight, an issue near and dear to racers searching for ways to minimize unsprung weight. Drilling diminishes a rotor's durability and cooling capacity.

Slots or grooves in rotor faces are partly a carryover from the days of asbestos pads. Asbestos and other organic pads were prone to "glazing" and the slots tended to help "scrape or de-glaze" them. Drilling and slotting rotors has become popular in street applications for their pure aesthetic value. Wilwood has a large selection of drilled and slotted rotors for a wide range of applications.

As for the porsche rotors, a few notes from a forum I frequent:
QUOTE


1) The holes are cast in giving a dense boundary layer-type crystalline grain structure around the hole at the microscopic level as opposed to drilling which cuts holes in the existing grain pattern leaving open endgrains, etc, just begging for cracks.

2) The holes are only 1/2 the diameter of the holes in most drilled rotors. This reduces the stress concentration factor due to hole interaction which is a function (not linear) of hole diameters and the distance between them.

3) Since the holes are only 1/2 as big they remove only 1/4 as much surface area and mass from the rotor faces as a larger hole. This does a couple of things:

It increases effective pad area compared with larger holes. The larger the pad area the cooler they will run, all else being equal. If the same amount of heat is generated over a larger surface area it will result in a lower temperature for both surfaces.

It increases the mass the rotor has to absorb heat with. If the same amount of heat is put into a rotor with a larger mass, it will result in a lower temperature.

3) The holes are placed along the vanes, actually cutting into them giving the vane a "half moon" cut along its width. You can see that here:

This does a couple of things:

First, it greatly increases the surface area of the vanes which allows the entire rotors to run cooler which helps prevent cracks by itself.

Second, it effectively stops cracking on that side of the hole which makes it very difficult to get "hole to hole" cracks that go all the way through the face rotor (you'll get tiny surface "spider cracks" on any rotor, blank included if you look hard enough).

That's why Porsche rotors are the only "crossdrilled" rotors I would ever consider putting on my car.

BTW, many of the above features are not present in older Porsche brakes. The above is for "Big Reds" and newer.

This is quite different from the standard drilled rotors you get from brembo/kvr/powerslot/"insert random ricer parts brand name here" brake rotors.

Further proof of the uselessness of cross drilled rotors are found here:

Those Poor Rotors

QUOTE
Crossdrilling your rotors might look neat, but what is it really doing for you? Well, unless your car is using brake pads from the 40’s and 50’s, not a whole lot. Rotors were first ‘drilled’ because early brake pad materials gave off gasses when heated to racing temperatures – a process known as ‘gassing out’. These gasses then formed a thin layer between the brake pad face and the rotor, acting as a lubricant and effectively lowering the coefficient of friction. The holes were implemented to give the gasses ‘somewhere to go’. It was an effective solution, but today’s friction materials do not exhibit the same gassing out phenomenon as the early pads.

For this reason, the holes have carried over more as a design feature than a performance feature. Contrary to popular belief they don’t lower temperatures (in fact, by removing weight from the rotor, the temperatures can actually increase a little), they create stress risers allowing the rotor to crack sooner, and make a mess of brake pads – sort of like a cheese grater rubbing against them at every stop. (Want more evidence? Look at NASCAR or F1. You would think that if drilling holes in the rotor was the hot ticket, these teams would be doing it.)

The one glaring exception here is in the rare situation where the rotors are so oversized (look at any performance motorcycle or lighter formula car) that the rotors are drilled like Swiss cheese. While the issues of stress risers and brake pad wear are still present, drilling is used to reduce the mass of the parts in spite of these concerns. Remember – nothing comes for free. If these teams switched to non-drilled rotors, they would see lower operating temperatures and longer brake pad life – at the expense of higher weight. It’s all about trade-offs.


From Stoptech:

QUOTE
Which is better, slotted or drilled rotors?

StopTech provides rotors slotted, drilled or plain. For most performance applications slotted is the preferred choice. Slotting helps wipe away debris from between the pad and rotor as well as increasing the "bite" characteristics of the pad. A drilled rotor provides the same type of benefit, but is more susceptible to cracking under severe usage. Many customers prefer the look of a drilled rotor and for street and occasional light duty track use they will work fine. For more severe applications, we recommend slotted rotors.

That almost sounds like an excuse to use cross drilled rotors, and for your street car which probably is never driven on the track, the drilled rotors are fine, but as Stoptech states, they will crack and are not good for severe applications.

From Baer:

QUOTE
"What are the benefits to Crossdrilling, Slotting, and Zinc-Washing my rotors?

In years past, crossdrilling and/or Slotting the rotor for racing purposes was beneficial by providing a way to expel the gasses created when the bonding agents employed to manufacture the pads...However, with today’s race pad technology, ‘outgassing’ is no longer much of a concern...Slotted surfaces are what Baer recommends for track only use. Slotted only rotors are offered as an option for any of Baer’s offerings."

Then from Grassroots Motorsports:
QUOTE
"Crossdrilling your rotors might look neat, but what is it really doing for you? Well, unless your car is using brake pads from the '40s and 50s, not a whole lot. Rotors were first drilled because early brake pad materials gave off gasses when heated to racing temperatures, a process known as "gassing out." ...It was an effective solution, but today's friction materials do not exhibit the some gassing out phenomenon as the early pads. Contrary to popular belief, they don't lower temperatures. (In fact, by removing weight from the rotor, they can actually cause temperatures to increase a little.) These holes create stress risers that allow the rotor to crack sooner, and make a mess of brake pads--sort of like a cheese grater rubbing against them at every stop. Want more evidence? Look at NASCAR or F1. You would think that if drilling holes in the rotor was the hot ticket, these teams would be doing it...Slotting rotors, on the other hand, might be a consideration if your sanctioning body allows for it. Cutting thin slots across the face of the rotor can actually help to clean the face of the brake pads over time, helping to reduce the glazing often found during high-speed use which can lower the coefficient of friction. While there may still be a small concern over creating stress risers in the face of the rotor, if the slots are shallow and cut properly, the trade-off appears to be worth the risk. (Have you looked at a NASCAR rotor lately?)

And then, let's check out what was said on the aforementioned Altima thread [[[ Long thread at altimas.net that was deleted by that server. it is hosted here ]]]:

QUOTE
Here is how it works. The friction between the pad and rotor is what causes you to stop. This friction converts your forward energy into heat (remember Einstein: Energy is neither created nor destroyed, it is converted). Now that heat is a bad thing. Yes it is bad for the rotors but it is a lot worse for the pads. A warped rotor will still stop the car - it will just feel like ****. Overheated pads however WILL NOT stop the car. It is here where the rotors secondary responsibility comes in. Its job now is to DISSIPATE the heat away from the pads and DISPERSE it through itself. Notice that DISSIPATE and DISPERSE are interchangeable? Once the heat is removed from the pad/surface area it is then removed. Notice where the removal falls on the list of duties? That's right - number 3. Here is the list again. Memorize it because I will be using it a lot in this post:

#1 Maintains a coefficient of friction with the pad to slow the forward inertia of the vehicle

#2 DISSIPATE the heat

#3 REMOVE the heat from the brake system

Let's look more in-depth at each step now shall we? No? Too bad assclown we are doing it anyway.

#1 Maintains a coefficient of friction with the pad to slow the forward inertia of the vehicle:
This one is pretty simple and self-explanatory. The rotor's surface is where the pads contact and generate friction to slow the vehicle down. Since it is this friction that causes the conversion of forward acceleration into deceleration (negative acceleration if you want) you ideally want as much as possible right? The more friction you have the better your stopping will be. This is reason #1 why BIGGER brakes are the best way to improve a vehicle's stopping ability. More surface area on the pad and the rotor = more friction = better stopping. Does that make sense Ace? Good. Let's move on.

#2 DISSIPATE The Heat:
Let's assume for a second that the vehicle in question is running with Hawk Blue pads on it. The brand doesn't really matter but that is what I am using as my example. They have an operating range of 400 degrees to 1100 degrees. Once they exceed that 1100 degree mark they fade from overheating. The pad material gets too soft to work effectively - glazing occurs. This means that a layer of crude glass forms on the surface of the pad. As we all know glass is very smooth and very hard. It doesn't have a very high coefficient of friction. This is bad - especially when I am coming down the back straight at VIR at 125MPH. Lucky for us the rotor has a job to do here as well. The rotor, by way of thermal tranfer DISSIPATES the heat throughout itself. This DISSIPATION lessens the amount of heat at the contact area because it is diluted throughout the whole rotor. The bigger the rotor the better here as well. The more metal it has the more metal the heat can be diluted into. Make sense? This isn't rocket science here d00d.

#3 REMOVE the heat from the brake system:
Now comes your favorite part of the process. This is what you thought DISSIPATION was. It is ok. I will allow you to be wrong. This is the step where the rotor takes the heat it DISSIPATED from the pads and gets rid of it for good. How does it do this? By radiating it to the surface - either the faces or inside the veins. It is here where cool air interacts with the hot metal to cool it off and remove the heat. Once again there is a reoccuring theme of "the bigger the better" here. The bigger the rotor, the more surface area it will have which means more contact with the cooling air surrounding it. Got it? Good.

Now let's look at why cross-drilling is a bad idea.

First - as we have already established, cross-drilling was never done to aid in cooling. Its purpose was to remove the worn away pad material so that the surfaces remained clean. As we all know this doesn't have much of a purpose nowadays.

Next - In terms of cooling: Yes - x-drilling does create more areas for air to go through but remember - this is step 3 on the list of tasks. Let's look at how this affects steps 1 and 2. The drilling of the rotor removes material from the unit. This removal means less surface area for generating surface friction as well as less material to accept the DISSIPATED heat that was generated by the friction. Now because of this I want to optimize step one and 2 since those are the immediate needs. If it takes longer for the rotor to get rid of the heat it is ok. You will have a straight at some point where you can rest the brakes and let your cooling ducts do their job. My PRIMARY concern is making sure that my car slows down at the end of the straight. This means that the rotor needs to have as much surface as possible to generate as much friction as possible and it needs to DISSIPATE the resulting heat AWAY from the pads as quick as possible so they continue to work. In both cases x-drilling does nothing to help the cause.

Now let's talk about strength - and how x-drilled rotors lack it. This one is simple. Explain again just how drilling away material/structure from a CAST product DOES NOT weaken it? Since you are obviously a man of great knowledge and experience surely you have seen what can happen to a x-drilled rotor on track right? Yes it can happen to a non-drilled rotor as well but the odds are in your favor when pimpin' bling-bling drilled y0! Since you are also an expert on thermodynamics why not explain to the group what happens to a cast iron molecule when it is overheated. I will give you a little hint - the covalence bonds weaken. These bonds are what hold the molecules together boys and girls. You do the math - it adds up to fractures.

So why don't race teams use them if they are so much better? Consistency? Hmmmm . . . no. I am gonna go with the real reason her chodeboy. It is because of several factors actually. They are as follows but in no particular order:

- Less usable surface area for generating friction
- Less material to DISSIPATE the heat away from the pads
- Less reliable and they are a safety risk because of fatigue and stress resulting from the reduced material

And what are the benefits? Removal of particulate matter and enhanced heat removal. I gotta tell ya - it is a tough choice but I think I am going to stick with the safe, reliable, effective-for-my-stopping needs solution Tex.
=====================

So basically, buy them if you think they look cool, but not if you think this will be an acceptable performance upgrade.
DrunkieTheBear is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Orleans,La.
Posts: 1,394
Mr Drunkie sir, i applaude you, i would not have had the patience to find this great piece, great find im thinking sticky???

Last edited by mista0406; 01-30-2011 at 01:14 AM.
mista0406 is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 09:44 PM
  #3  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
Thanks for posting. Making this a sticky.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 03-28-2011, 03:20 PM
  #4  
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,427
wonderful. i thought this was already thrown down. i guess others think otherwise.
MrDicks95SE is offline  
Old 03-28-2011, 04:14 PM
  #5  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
It comes up every few months with the n00bs and we have to re-educate people. I finally quit doing it since I was tired of typing. Not to mention people don't believe us until they see it from a "real" source- like elsewhere on the internet.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 10:50 AM
  #6  
3.5 Swapped!
iTrader: (32)
 
95maxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 7,182
I would like to add a valuable link to this thread and ask a few questions about slotted rotors.

First, here's a LINK to a PDF file that has a lot of the info Drunkie already posted along with other reputable sources.

I'm well aware that pretty much any aftermarket drilled rotors we can buy are garbage. A quick search on Google turns up some clear evidence of what can happen:





However, some of the info already posted seems to suggest that slotted rotors may indeed be a better choice for high performance driving than blank rotors.

From StopTech:
"For most performance applications slotted is the preferred choice. Slotting helps wipe away debris from between the pad and rotor as well as increasing the "bite" characteristics of the pad."

From Bear:
"Slotted surfaces are what Baer recommends for track only use"

From AP Racing:
"Grooves improve 'cleaning' of the pad surfaces and result in a more consistent brake performance. Grooved discs have a longer life than cross-drilled discs."

The reason I started thinking about this is because I've noticed that my Q45/13" Cobra/HPS pad combo seems to have a lot of trouble when it's wet out. I'm on Michelin PS2 tires as well, which are quite good in the wet.

I noticed at the last auto-x I attended that my friend's stock BMW 330i was able to stop in literally half the distance of my car in wet conditions. I had been running in my car all day and I did two runs in his car and was blown away by how easily and drama-free his car stopped in the wet. When I stomped on my brakes my ABS went crazy and shuddered my brake pedal intensely without actually doing much to stop the car. Doing the same stop in his car resulted in almost no ABS kickback and MUCH shorter stopping distances. Since he has blank rotors, the difference can't be attributed to having slotted rotors, but it got me thinking anyways. On a side note, how are BMW brakes/ABS systems so incredible? Is it all down to ABS programming, or could it have something to do with the design of the Q45 caliper?

This got me to thinking about new Mercedes cars that very gently apply the brakes when it's wet out to keep water off the rotor in case of a panic stop. This made me wonder if slotted rotors would perform better in wet conditions than blank rotors as the water would have some place to go when the pad is applied. Is there any truth to this?

It also seems that brake manufacturers recommend slotted rotors for high performance driving, and I've seen nothing in this thread to the contrary. I'm going to be getting a Wilwood BBK with 2 piece rotors soon, and am seriously considering getting slotted rotors with it. Can anyone tell me why I shouldn't do that?

Thanks!
95maxrider is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 10:13 AM
  #7  
3.5 Swapped!
iTrader: (32)
 
95maxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 7,182
Originally Posted by 95maxrider View Post
However, some of the info already posted seems to suggest that slotted rotors may indeed be a better choice for high performance driving than blank rotors.

From StopTech:
"For most performance applications slotted is the preferred choice. Slotting helps wipe away debris from between the pad and rotor as well as increasing the "bite" characteristics of the pad."

From Bear:
"Slotted surfaces are what Baer recommends for track only use"

From AP Racing:
"Grooves improve 'cleaning' of the pad surfaces and result in a more consistent brake performance. Grooved discs have a longer life than cross-drilled discs."
So I'm about to order a BBK from Wilwood and need to decide if I should get blanks or slotted. I think I'm going to go slotted unless someone tells me otherwise.....
95maxrider is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 07:45 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Reedsport, OR
Posts: 3,956
Yup only drilled rotors crack




I had cross drilled Stillens on my 96 GMC Sierra with no cracking. Any rotor has the potential to crack. Most people that install cross drilled rotors are likely to trash whatever brakes they run.

Last edited by asand1; 12-19-2011 at 07:48 PM.
asand1 is offline  
Old 05-28-2012, 07:04 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 973
Originally Posted by asand1 View Post
Yup only drilled rotors crack




I had cross drilled Stillens on my 96 GMC Sierra with no cracking. Any rotor has the potential to crack. Most people that install cross drilled rotors are likely to trash whatever brakes they run.
Exactly, any rotor can crack. Ive had plenty cross drilled slotted from diff companies. Buy a good or known tested brand and you'll be fine.
DjHackStyle is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 12:41 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 33
I think that more vanes on the end of the rotor would aid in heat dissipation. More fins=More surface area for airflow.
RushNatU is offline  
Old 02-08-2013, 01:51 PM
  #11  
3.5 Swapped!
iTrader: (32)
 
95maxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 7,182
Originally Posted by RushNatU View Post
I think that more vanes on the end of the rotor would aid in heat dissipation. More fins=More surface area for airflow.
What does this have to do with slotted/drilled rotors?
95maxrider is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 02:15 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,293
I agree on the drilled portion as under high use they can crack but slotted rotors still serve a purpose. Have you ever seen carbon ceramic rotors before? They have hairline cracks all over the place but that is normal. I have slotted rotors on my set-up and will admit that I do like the aesthetics but that doesn't mean the slots are useless with todays pads
ShocknAwe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
02-06-2017 05:33 PM
londonflu
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
2
09-19-2015 02:33 PM
Bonka
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
09-14-2015 11:18 PM
DBear
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
3
09-14-2015 08:33 PM
Hdnseek
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
09-09-2015 05:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: The end all thread of why Drilled/Slotted do not work.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.