All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.

G35 Manifold fitment issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2006 | 10:20 PM
  #1  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
G35 Manifold fitment issues

Hey, i'm doing my 3.5 swap soon, and I can get a good deal on a G35 manifold (upper and lower) for $200. Does anyone know by how much the hood wouldn't clear?

I'm thinking about either using hood spacers or grinding down the hood frame, or both.

I don't really want to use a hood scoop, but I might have a custom hood setup if the fitment is way off.

Let me know, i'm interested in doing it, as the G35's and Z's make so much more HP, and if I add a plenum spacer, even more. I think sacrificing the hood would be worth it.

-Freddy
Old 02-27-2006 | 10:43 PM
  #2  
1FSTMX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Measure the manifold height of both a G35 and your maxima. Go from there.
Old 02-27-2006 | 10:43 PM
  #3  
SEmy2K2go's Avatar
Go BUCKS!!!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,562
From: Delaware, OH-IO
Why don't you just post with your other username, El? Instead of post whoring with a new one?
Old 02-28-2006 | 07:59 AM
  #4  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
question's still not answered, and I don't know anyone with a 3.5 or G35.

I looked at a few threads, and no one really said by how much it didn't fit, and since i'm using both the upper and lower, bolting on wouldn't be an issue.

bump.............
Old 02-28-2006 | 10:06 AM
  #5  
l3ftonm3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 642
since i dont think anyone has done this yet, your going to have to measure it and see for yourself. I say take the plunge could always resell them. But you would have some bragging rights if you were the first 3.5 4thgen with both manifolds and a spacer. I drool over this setup.
Old 02-28-2006 | 10:25 AM
  #6  
maxmale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
umm, i hope you can get this to work, i'd be interested in this as well.
Old 02-28-2006 | 10:32 AM
  #7  
il99max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 265
From: Bartlett, IL
A little off topic, but I think Nismo3112 is going to be experimenting with something similar. I think in one of his posts he had gotten his hands on a 350Z intake plenum. I didn't think it was possible to swap the intake manifolds off of rwd cars (Z, G35) with a 4.5 gen.
Old 02-28-2006 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
I guess it depends on what G35. The 03-04 are rated at 260hp.

Originally Posted by tavarish
Hey, i'm doing my 3.5 swap soon, and I can get a good deal on a G35 manifold (upper and lower) for $200. Does anyone know by how much the hood wouldn't clear?

I'm thinking about either using hood spacers or grinding down the hood frame, or both.

I don't really want to use a hood scoop, but I might have a custom hood setup if the fitment is way off.

Let me know, i'm interested in doing it, as the G35's and Z's make so much more HP, and if I add a plenum spacer, even more. I think sacrificing the hood would be worth it.

-Freddy
Old 02-28-2006 | 10:43 AM
  #9  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
I guess it depends on what G35. The 03-04 are rated at 260hp. And from the dynos I see here, the 3.5 maxima seems to be dynoing at around the same #s.

The 05+ Gs and Zs depending on the model, some got the rev up engine and VTCs on the exhaust as well as the intake cam? So that's where the extra hp comes from?

Originally Posted by tavarish
Hey, i'm doing my 3.5 swap soon, and I can get a good deal on a G35 manifold (upper and lower) for $200. Does anyone know by how much the hood wouldn't clear?

I'm thinking about either using hood spacers or grinding down the hood frame, or both.

I don't really want to use a hood scoop, but I might have a custom hood setup if the fitment is way off.

Let me know, i'm interested in doing it, as the G35's and Z's make so much more HP, and if I add a plenum spacer, even more. I think sacrificing the hood would be worth it.

-Freddy
Old 02-28-2006 | 11:48 AM
  #10  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
it says the 03 G35's are rated at 280hp.

http://www.edmunds.com/used/2003/inf...767/specs.html

Also, the FX35 manifolds would be the same, correct, as they're also the RWD 3.5's rated at 280hp.

i can't afford the 300hp version, and it's super hard to find.

i don't think the fitment would be that much of an issue, and maybe i'll pay a visit to my local nissan dealer and take some measurements.
Old 02-28-2006 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
03 autos were rated at 260. I'm not sure if the auto/manual manifolds were diff. I've not seen any manifold differential disscussion on the G boards UNTIL the 05 6MT rev up engine (298hp) is mentioned. Slightly diff lower (lower of the 2 upper pieces) portion.

But even then, the G/Z manifolds seem to suffer from 3 front bank leaness. Thus the invention of aftermarket plenums and spacers.

Also from the limited info I've seen, the 3.5 maximas and the 03-04 G sedans seem to dyno similar.
Old 02-28-2006 | 12:00 PM
  #12  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
ahh....i see what you mean, the sedans were rated at 260hp. the coupes were 280. i doubt there were any real manifold changes, but i'll do my research, as i still have lots of time for this setup.
Old 02-28-2006 | 12:27 PM
  #13  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
I got plenums from a 287 hp Z. I will let you guys know how it turns out once Spring break comes around the corner.

Here is a quick comparo between the 300hp version of the plenum (left) and the 287hp version. I have seen dyno's where the 287 version actually has more area under the curve.
Old 02-28-2006 | 12:49 PM
  #14  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
very cool, i'll be looking forward to doing this...maybe we can start a club of maximas with weird hoods.

If hood clearance is really an issue, you can most likely make a fiberglass hood with a bit of a flare, not a scoop, but just an accenting flare. It wouldn't look too much different from stock.

Or, if you want to keep the stock hood, i was thinking you can just use some hood spacers (like some Z guys do), or add washers to the bolts in the crossmember, lowering the engine. (I dont know how safe that would be, however. )
Old 02-28-2006 | 12:52 PM
  #15  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
The Rev up lower has shorter runners for more high end power. But at a loss of low end torque.
Old 02-28-2006 | 01:26 PM
  #16  
diymaximakid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,792
well if you did a hood scoop you would have kinda intake manifold intercooler type thing.thats a plus to that.but nismo how high is the manifold from top to bottom
Old 02-28-2006 | 01:48 PM
  #17  
chris'smax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
I cant wait to try out one of these manifolds. I think i may sneak in the garage tonight and gank the IM off my moms G35
Old 02-28-2006 | 02:09 PM
  #18  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
im guessing part of the reason the g35 dyno's about the same as a max is parasitic loss. being that a g is rwd, they probly have a higher parasitic loss which would explain the dynos being closer than expected.
Old 02-28-2006 | 02:34 PM
  #19  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
nismo3112 quick question. i nthat pic that you have posted is that the lower and upper plenum from a 350z/g35? also which lower part of the plenum are you going to use? The reason for that question is that the revup plenum is good for top end but the regular plenum is good all around the curve. if you want serious top end you want to use the revup version. if you are going to use the regular version get a spacer and call it a day.
and about the hood clearance, that is nto a big problem. Just get a scoop and cut a hole in your hood.
Next is the placement of the tb. It will face the other way and the highest point is the tb and the part of the plenum next to the tb. So the piping will have to run towards the coolant overflow tank.
also did anybody notice that the front valve cover is different as well?

here is a pic of a photoshop i did.
Old 02-28-2006 | 02:55 PM
  #20  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by vsamoylov
nismo3112 quick question. i nthat pic that you have posted is that the lower and upper plenum from a 350z/g35? also which lower part of the plenum are you going to use? The reason for that question is that the revup plenum is good for top end but the regular plenum is good all around the curve. if you want serious top end you want to use the revup version. if you are going to use the regular version get a spacer and call it a day.
and about the hood clearance, that is nto a big problem. Just get a scoop and cut a hole in your hood.
Next is the placement of the tb. It will face the other way and the highest point is the tb and the part of the plenum next to the tb. So the piping will have to run towards the coolant overflow tank.
also did anybody notice that the front valve cover is different as well?

here is a pic of a photoshop i did.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v720/vsamoylov/DSC00961.jpg[IMG]
Im not sure if it was from a Z/G, but I am using the standard 287hp version. I am going to see how the plenum sits and then decide if I will get a spacer or not.
Old 02-28-2006 | 02:57 PM
  #21  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
what lower are you using? injectors?
Old 02-28-2006 | 03:02 PM
  #22  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by diymaximakid
but nismo how high is the manifold from top to bottom
Here are some pics I snapped:



And this is top to bottom including the lower.
Old 02-28-2006 | 03:05 PM
  #23  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by vsamoylov
what lower are you using? injectors?
350Z lower. It is very different from the 5.5 gen lower, it also looks like the 5.5 gen fuel rail will bolt on, but i'm not sure, I will know for sure in a few weeks when I start the project.

BTW, I will be using DE-K injectors.
Old 02-28-2006 | 03:40 PM
  #24  
diymaximakid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,792
nismo,im gonna keep in contact with you.I'll prob be attempting this the same time you will be.
Old 02-28-2006 | 04:09 PM
  #25  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
350Z lower. It is very different from the 5.5 gen lower, it also looks like the 5.5 gen fuel rail will bolt on, but i'm not sure, I will know for sure in a few weeks when I start the project.

BTW, I will be using DE-K injectors.
why not use the Vq35 injectors?
Old 02-28-2006 | 04:09 PM
  #26  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
maxima and 350z are different
Old 02-28-2006 | 04:10 PM
  #27  
chris'smax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by tavarish
why not use the Vq35 injectors?
They are the same
Old 02-28-2006 | 04:32 PM
  #28  
diymaximakid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,792
no not true completely. dek and rwd injectors are the same and fwd maxima injectors are different.IIRC
Old 02-28-2006 | 05:15 PM
  #29  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by diymaximakid
no not true completely. dek and rwd injectors are the same and fwd maxima injectors are different.IIRC
Exactly. This way I can flow more fuel without touching the fuel psi vs. running stock VQ35's.


DE-K injectors = more fuel than FWD 3.5 jectors at the same given fuel psi.
Old 02-28-2006 | 05:19 PM
  #30  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
so when is spring break?
Old 02-28-2006 | 05:29 PM
  #31  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,663
From: Charlotte, NC
I see someone already dug up the old Emax thread from the grave.


Yes this was attempted about four years ago and the hood does not clear.

However I am going to be testing one on the dyno soon now that I finally got my car back from the body shop.
Old 02-28-2006 | 06:39 PM
  #32  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by vsamoylov
so when is spring break?
Mine starts the 11th.
Old 02-28-2006 | 06:40 PM
  #33  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I see someone already dug up the old Emax thread from the grave.


Yes this was attempted about four years ago and the hood does not clear.

However I am going to be testing one on the dyno soon now that I finally got my car back from the body shop.
I am just going to cut the hood where need be, and let it stick out of the hood. And if it doesn't look too outrageous i'll keep it like that.
Old 02-28-2006 | 06:41 PM
  #34  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I am just going to cut the hood where need be, and let it stick out of the hood. And if it doesn't look too outrageous i'll keep it like that.
that would remind me of that dude that has the vq30 in his 240sx. his im wouldnt clear either so he cut a hole in the hood and he drives it like that. summer is comming anyway.
Old 02-28-2006 | 07:32 PM
  #35  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,663
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I am just going to cut the hood where need be, and let it stick out of the hood. And if it doesn't look too outrageous i'll keep it like that.

And extend the TB wires @ MAF wires?
Old 02-28-2006 | 07:46 PM
  #36  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
And extend the TB wires @ MAF wires?
Yeah. This won't interfere with the MAF and TPS output voltages will it?
Old 03-01-2006 | 07:32 AM
  #37  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
Yeah. This won't interfere with the MAF and TPS output voltages will it?
i hope not...
Old 03-01-2006 | 07:45 AM
  #38  
Larrio's Avatar
The Definitive AE Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,670
well, solder supposedly adds resistance to the electrical current. (IIRC)
Old 03-01-2006 | 08:14 AM
  #39  
tavarish's Avatar
Thread Starter
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,327
From: Elizabeth, NJ
Originally Posted by Larrio
well, solder supposedly adds resistance to the electrical current. (IIRC)
what about crimp connectors?
Old 03-01-2006 | 09:12 AM
  #40  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,688
Well I just read in a few different past threads that you shouldn't have a problem with extending the MAF wires as long as you use the same or larger guage wire with low impedance.


Quick Reply: G35 Manifold fitment issues



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 PM.