All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lower plenum butterfly valve removal?+ -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #1  
vortechpower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,564
Lower plenum butterfly valve removal?+ -

Lower plenum butterfly valve removal?+ -

What are the pros and cons of removing the lower plenum butterfly valves on the DE-K? (Super charge application,2.87)

Gas milage?
Low end?
Top end?
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #2  
sonicrunch's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 737
From: Minneapolis,MN
I think you know the answer.
Old Apr 12, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
vortechpower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,564
Is there really a benefit though? I took the ones out of my 99 cali spec and didnt notice too much difference
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #4  
NewLoveI30's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,860
With your FI application it would definitely benefit you to keep your VI opperating correctly.

... I guess it's good N/A as well, but the gains are only compounded with boost.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:00 AM
  #5  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by NewLoveI30
With your FI application it would definitely benefit you to keep your VI opperating correctly.

... I guess it's good N/A as well, but the gains are only compounded with boost.
He's not talking about the VI. He's talking about the swirl valves in the intake manifold.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #6  
sonicrunch's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 737
From: Minneapolis,MN
Originally Posted by nismology
He's not talking about the VI. He's talking about the swirl valves in the intake manifold.
Sure fooled me. I thought he was talking about the VI as well.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:30 AM
  #7  
vortechpower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,564
"lower plenum"
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:47 AM
  #8  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by sonicrunch
Sure fooled me. I thought he was talking about the VI as well.
Originally Posted by vortechpower
Is there really a benefit though? I took the ones out of my 99 cali spec and didnt notice too much difference
Since when do '99 cali-spec's have a VI.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #9  
matty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,163
From: Northern Jersey
I would take them out. Ive heard of a huge difference when the engine is cold, they are supposidly closed completly. As the motor warms up, they begin to open. There is still restriction there even when their open.

I vote to take them out for sure

-matt
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 09:36 AM
  #10  
vortechpower's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,564
Originally Posted by nismology
Since when do '99 cali-spec's have a VI.
My 99 cali spec motor had the "swirl valves" in it. I swapped the lower plenum with a 96 lower plenum.

One would think it would be better not to have the swirl valves but has anyone proven this theory?
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #11  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by vortechpower
My 99 cali spec motor had the "swirl valves" in it. I swapped the lower plenum with a 96 lower plenum.
I know exactly what you mean(t). I was just showing sonicrunch that one could deduce that you were referring to the swirl valves based on what you had previously posted.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #12  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
No one needs to prove it is better to have less turbulence/restriction.

Are the gains worth the work to remove them is a better question.

Originally Posted by vortechpower
One would think it would be better not to have the swirl valves but has anyone proven this theory?
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #13  
sonicrunch's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 737
From: Minneapolis,MN
Originally Posted by vortechpower
"lower plenum"


DOH!
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #14  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
FSM description on their purpose makes it pretty clear....

This system has a swirl control valve in the intake passage of each
cylinder. While idling and during low engine speed operation, the swirl control
valve closes. Thus the velocity of the air in the intake passage
increases, promoting the vaporization of the fuel and producing a
swirl in the combustion chamber. Because of this operation, this system tends to increase the burning speed of the gas mixture, improve fuel consumption, and increase the stability in running conditions.
Also, except when idling and during low engine speed operation,
this system opens the swirl control valve. In this condition, this
system tends to increase power by improving intake efficiency via
reduction of intake flow resistance, intake flow. The solenoid valve controls swirl control valve’s shut/open condition. This solenoid valve is operated by the ECM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trailer54
Nitrous
13
Nov 18, 2015 07:44 PM
tgreen
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Oct 18, 2015 06:18 PM
Max139617
6th Generation Classifieds (2004-2008)
2
Sep 20, 2015 07:25 PM
Max139617
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
2
Sep 20, 2015 07:09 PM
tardrex
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
Sep 11, 2015 07:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 AM.