All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

350z IM in a maxima

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #1  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
350z IM in a maxima

ok guys it is official, the 350z manifolds will not work W/O modification, its actually really close. The hood closes to the first latch but that is with out a intake. if you look closely there is a black line after the bend and if that "bend" was cut off and replaced with a straight tubing it would clear the hood easy. I remember seeing a 4th gen guy with a 3.5 swap that did the same thing.








I dont have any data as of the moment and probably wont until i get a modified manifold.

I did take the hood off and go for a test drive. i didnt really feel a difference other than power really fell off by 7k, could that be in part of the super short intake.
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #2  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Cool. Thanks for sharing. I thought it had already been established that the 350Z IM wouldn't fit without some sort of modification though.

eng92 posted data here when he installed his: http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=473182
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #3  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Is it a revup or standard collector? If it's a revup, it'd be interesting to compare your gm/s data with eng92's.
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #4  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
its was only on the car just to see if i wanted to have the custom work done to the manifold to make it work right... i do want to get a dyno done before i do the final swap. there are a few other minor issues... like having to remove a tab from the valve cover and moving some wiring.

Do you know what the casting number for the revup collector? inside it has like ML2 and MR2 i think... i double check when i go out there

Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #5  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Using images in this thread (http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=226682) for reference you definitely have the standard collector.
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #6  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
its an MREV2??? wow... those are the performance ones correct? i can get a better pic of the collector if needed...
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #7  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
No. The MREV2 is a standard collector that's been modified by an aftermarket company. You can ignore those pictures. The ones of significance are of the revup. You definitely have the standard non-revup MREV.
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #8  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
ah i see...what all is modified to the MREV2?
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #9  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
For the most part, some material is shaved off the top of the #1 and #2 intake runners to unshroud them since they're starved for air a bit from the factory.
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #10  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
IMO, the Z33 (revup or not) will either gain trap or plain lose ET since we do not have Z33 CVTC maps from the factory, couple that with a stock rev limit. So, either add area under the curve, or extend the rev limit in order to exploit the 'new' powerband.
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #11  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
i have the TS l spec reflash so i already have the higher rev limit... the car wouldnt pull past 6800-7000, and that was in 3rd gear, short cone intake and no hood...atleast with the stock IM setup it would still pull a bit past 7k but not very hard
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #12  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by coinage
i have the TS l spec reflash
Ahh

Originally Posted by coinage
atleast with the stock IM setup it would still pull a bit past 7k but not very hard
What's your rev limit? The 'standard' L-spec 7100?
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #13  
coinage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
From: Hershey, PA
yeah the standard... now i didnt say it would go far past 7k just saying that i could get it to the rev limiter without much trouble...

I did forget to mention that i did remove the butterfly from the the stock IM just to see if it had a difference... is that what everyone refers to as the SSIM or is that when they make a block off plate?
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #14  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by nismology
it'd be interesting to compare your gm/s data with eng92's.
the curve, yes, the actual #'s Would it be a fair comparison since eng92's got more supporting mods, so he'd be taking in more air. That and we all know Canadian air is
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #15  
DandyMax's Avatar
3.5 in the works
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,477
From: Ontario, Canada
It was over 100 F with the humidex up here last week, 95 without it...
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #16  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Yes it clears fine with the 'bend' removed.

The Revup IM also loses a lot of torque.
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #17  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
The Revup IM also loses a lot of torque.
Yup. I was reading up on all the IM setups and which is best for the non-revup motor. The general consensus is that a non-revup VQ should just get a spacer (w/the standard lower collector) and MREV2, with the spacer being of the most benefit. Revup lower collector just loses too much area under the curve to justify the top-end advantages, for most.


In other news, when are you gonna break down and get the Z33 CVTC maps programmed in?

Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:28 AM
  #18  
L.M.L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
this guy says: "MREV2 5/16" Iso Spacer Bought these items back in January, they were installed by Tony over at Motordyne. These items combined will give you the highest hp/tq gains over any n/a mod. Here is my dyno to prove it. This was done at the time of installation at Motordyne. Gains were 25hp @ 4500rpms and 28.3 tq @ 4500rpms. Supporting mods were Nismo cat-back and Pop Charger. 277HP and 263.6TQ were my final numbers."
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #19  
DasYears
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
if i had an extra 2 inches under my hood i would be on this, spacer and MREV2. but since it already doesnt fit under a max hood and needs ANOTHER 5/16 to really make power, its dead to me
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #20  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by DasYears
if i had an extra 2 inches under my hood i would be on this, spacer and MREV2. but since it already doesnt fit under a max hood and needs ANOTHER 5/16 to really make power, its dead to me
You and your non having Z33 CVTC map as..
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #21  
DasYears
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
You and your non having Z33 CVTC map as..
lol. i wish, i wish. maybe EU and V-manage will take care of that...














IBmaybein10years
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #22  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
I remember Jime installed it and did not have to cut any of the hood bracing off. I on the other hand, did...


Some old school pics:




You can see where I had to cut underneith the hood.
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #23  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
So, does it provide gains without said CVTC maps? Or, does it just leave area under the curve to be desired?
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #24  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Even though you've already established what the OP has, this is just for reference so that people can see the difference in designs...

Non Rev Up lower collector is left, Rev Up collector is right:




Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Goffery2uned
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
9
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 PM
julian888
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
0
Aug 6, 2015 04:39 AM
ViciousVQ30
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
Aug 5, 2015 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 PM.