All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.

3.5 shortblock + 3.0 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2010 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
3.5 shortblock + 3.0 heads

I have searched and read and know alot of people never post and alot of info never makes it to the org. Has anyone ever done or knows someone that has done this setup either dyno'd or tracked the car.

I read alot of old threads and they kinda leave you hanging or my search skills just suck. I read about the nismo heads with 3.0 combustion chambers and seen it was good for 12-1 cr with stock pistons and 13.X-1 with aftermarket and got me to thinking I have a crap load of parts sitting around.

I was thinking about taking a 3.5 shortblock, cleaning up the casting flaws and very light porting on some 3.0 heads, throwing in some jwt knockoff cams and hr valve springs, meth with either a dek uim or de usim with a sheet metal pelnum and a pftb just to see what is does.

Last edited by t6378tp; 11-02-2010 at 02:25 PM.
Old 11-02-2010 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
btw, if you don't want to post feel free to pm me
Old 11-02-2010 | 05:23 PM
  #3  
datdude20's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,027
From: zimbabwe
3.5 block with ported heads, cams and 00vi would be nasty
Old 11-02-2010 | 05:30 PM
  #4  
datdude20's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,027
From: zimbabwe
Ported 3.0 heads*
Old 11-02-2010 | 05:47 PM
  #5  
bobfu3.0's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 175
From: sacramento
i sold my s1s a week ago too.so far everybodysays go full 3.5 t637 sent pm
Old 11-02-2010 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
^ been there done that + alot of people are followers ^

want to try something different since I have the parts sitting around but honestly I would not suggest going out and buy the parts to try this
Old 11-02-2010 | 06:43 PM
  #7  
krazy6's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,565
From: Yorba Linda, CA
The main reason why people don't make the hybrid is the fact that the VQ35 heads flow better. At least I think that is the reason. lol

If you can make the VQ30 heads flow what the stock VQ35 heads flow, then you will be in good shape. Should make some nice power with the higher compression and cams.

DO IT!!!
I'm interested.
Old 11-02-2010 | 07:06 PM
  #8  
Crusher103's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 54,041
From: Dur-ham NC
From what i hear the 3.5 heads out flow the 3.0 heads by so much that u can take the heads off a 3.5 put them on a 3.0 and even thou compression will fall a bit it will still theoretically make more power.

I think if u put that to the test in RL it will make less but people and their theories.
Old 11-02-2010 | 07:44 PM
  #9  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by Crusher103
From what i hear the 3.5 heads out flow the 3.0 heads by so much that u can take the heads off a 3.5 put them on a 3.0 and even thou compression will fall a bit it will still theoretically make more power.
I highly doubt that, more of hear say and people talking out their azz. 3.5 heads flow better but 3.0 heads flow pretty good too. remember they can make power to 7k easy untouched and with very little work should be make power on a 3.5 with a 72k also. dont forget dandymax was making power all up there and felt it would continue to 8k

now if you want to rev to 8k thats another story but what I really want is to hear from people that have done it cause they ARE out there

Last edited by t6378tp; 11-02-2010 at 07:46 PM.
Old 11-02-2010 | 09:26 PM
  #10  
krazy6's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,565
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Here is some data on VQ30 vs. VQ35 head flow.
http://forums.maxima.org/all-motor/3...flow-data.html

The VQ30 exhaust ports actually outflow the VQ35 exhaust ports. Intake ports are a different story though.
Old 11-02-2010 | 10:14 PM
  #11  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,631
From: West burbs, Chicago
pathfinder heads
Old 11-03-2010 | 03:41 AM
  #12  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
pathfinder heads
the only problem is I was going for a cheap bump the CR which means I would have to replace the pistons if I go with these heads. Plus I already have 3.0heads in the garage
Old 11-03-2010 | 06:35 AM
  #13  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
I know some of the south florida guys have played around with this setup. Anyone know the results
Old 11-03-2010 | 07:15 AM
  #14  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,985
Shoot Essential1 a PM, he knows some people who have done this.
Old 11-03-2010 | 08:02 AM
  #15  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
From: Boynton Beach, FL
We got a car down here with a 3.5 long block, ported 3.0 heads, 3.5 cams and FWD VQ35 intake manifold. It also has a JWT ecu with 7000k rev limit and OBX 3.5 equal length headers down to just a 2 1/4" exhaust. It's pretty quick. It runs side by side with another local max with:


* SSIM
* VQ35DE block and heads
* VQ35HR valve springs double-seated
* Debuloz Ebay JDM cams
* Intake cams clocked to full-retard CVCT position of ~64*
* 3" catback
* custom longtube equal length headers
* Emanage Blue tuned
* 3" MAF

(some might remember whos car this was)

Originally Posted by datdude20
3.5 block with ported heads, cams and 00vi would be nasty
00vi deffinately makes less power/tq than an 02IM on a 3.5 block. When he had the 00vi on it, he dynod around 240whp. havent dynod the new setup yet, but it is seriously way more powerful with the 02IM. There is no denying it that the 00vi was choking up the motor. Even the intake note sounds different.

Both cars love tripple digit spray by the way.
Old 11-03-2010 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
phatboislim's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,162
^that sounds tasty!! both cars. i'd like to see numbers of the Frankenstein (3.5 block 3.0 heads and 3.0 block 3.5 heads) always assumed it'd be stupid to use 3.0 heads on a 3.5 block, but buy the sound of it...i'm wrong
Old 11-03-2010 | 08:24 AM
  #17  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by essential1
We got a car down here with a 3.5 long block, ported 3.0 heads, 3.5 cams and FWD VQ35 intake manifold. It also has a JWT ecu with 7000k rev limit and OBX 3.5 equal length headers down to just a 2 1/4" exhaust. It's pretty quick. It runs side by side with another local max with:


* SSIM
* VQ35DE block and heads
* VQ35HR valve springs double-seated
* Debuloz Ebay JDM cams
* Intake cams clocked to full-retard CVCT position of ~64*
* 3" catback
* custom longtube equal length headers
* Emanage Blue tuned
* 3" MAF

(some might remember whos car this was)



00vi deffinately makes less power/tq than an 02IM on a 3.5 block. When he had the 00vi on it, he dynod around 240whp. havent dynod the new setup yet, but it is seriously way more powerful with the 02IM. There is no denying it that the 00vi was choking up the motor. Even the intake note sounds different.

Both cars love tripple digit spray by the way.
Mmmm so maybe ditch the 00vi and make a sheet metal intake

And track times on the hybrid setup ?
Old 11-03-2010 | 08:48 AM
  #18  
ajcool2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,555
From: Baltimore, Md
Originally Posted by t6378tp
Mmmm so maybe ditch the 00vi and make a sheet metal intake

And track times on the hybrid setup ?
Setups like these very rarely make it to the track lol.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:03 AM
  #19  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Maybe I should give Tilley a call ?

update: crap the # I had on him is disco
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:41 AM
  #20  
tuko316's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 177
Long tube headers on a fwd car? Wonder what they look like.

Good luck with the build. Should be very interesting.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:41 AM
  #21  
tuko316's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 177
Long tube headers on a fwd car? Wonder what they look like.

Good luck with the build. Should be very interesting.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:43 AM
  #22  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by t6378tp
Mmmm so maybe ditch the 00vi and make a sheet metal intake

And track times on the hybrid setup ?
Not saying the 00vi is a bad manifold. It's just that it doesnt have enough volume to keep up with how much an internally bone stock 3.5 can breath. Research what SG motorsports did with their bone stock internal 350z on the dyno. This is why ITBs are so benificial to us. Our motors even in stock form need as much open space both on the intake and exhaust side.

Originally Posted by ajcool2
Setups like these very rarely make it to the track lol.
True... lol. Although, when he finally made it to the track and the MAF died during the first run and he ran a 13.5

And as far as the cammed one goes, we've been to the track about 8 times... but it either rained, blew a tire out, lost 3rd gear, seized up the release bearing, snapped an axle, etc... Something doesnt want us going to the track. I tried going with my car 2 weeks ago and it started misfiring.
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:49 AM
  #23  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by tuko316
Long tube headers on a fwd car? Wonder what they look like.

Good luck with the build. Should be very interesting.
When refering to longtubes, we are just talking about this...




(my hotshots)

VS. shorty designs such as these...

Old 11-03-2010 | 10:10 AM
  #24  
phatboislim's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,162
i want to know why the long tube headers flow better than the shortys...serious question, and if it takes this thread off of course, i'm sorry in advance.
Old 11-03-2010 | 11:13 AM
  #25  
ajcool2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,555
From: Baltimore, Md
Originally Posted by phatboislim
i want to know why the long tube headers flow better than the shortys...serious question, and if it takes this thread off of course, i'm sorry in advance.
Yeah this would definatly take the thread off course but in my mind I would say because the merge is further back allowing the exhaust to gain more velocity. This could be completely wrong but its just how I see it.
Old 11-03-2010 | 11:15 AM
  #26  
TurboA32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,154
3.5 block and 3.0 heads and a 00vi or mevi will be the way to go. it will raise the compression which means more power so do it lol. there was a guy on here that was beating regular 3.5 swap maximas in his 3.5 block and 3.0 heads with a mevi and he ported and polished the 3.0 heads
Old 11-03-2010 | 11:18 AM
  #27  
phatboislim's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,162
Originally Posted by ajcool2
Yeah this would definatly take the thread off course but in my mind I would say because the merge is further back allowing the exhaust to gain more velocity. This could be completely wrong but its just how I see it.
interesting hypothesis.
Old 11-03-2010 | 11:34 AM
  #28  
tuko316's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 177
Thanks essntial. When you said custom it through me off thinking they were custom fabbed and longer then hotshots design.
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:38 PM
  #29  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by essential1
Research what SG motorsports did with their bone stock internal 350z on the dyno. This is why ITBs are so benificial to us. Our motors even in stock form need as much open space both on the intake and exhaust side.
I think they're around 330hp now
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:42 PM
  #30  
ajcool2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,555
From: Baltimore, Md
Originally Posted by t6378tp
I think they're around 330hp now
Yeah I remember that thread. Havent checked up on it in a while.
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:43 PM
  #31  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,631
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by t6378tp
the only problem is I was going for a cheap bump the CR which means I would have to replace the pistons if I go with these heads. Plus I already have 3.0heads in the garage
oh I either didn't read or didn't really register what your 2nd paragraph said. I thought you were turbo.
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:49 PM
  #32  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by ajcool2
Yeah this would definatly take the thread off course but in my mind I would say because the merge is further back allowing the exhaust to gain more velocity. This could be completely wrong but its just how I see it.
It has to do with exhaust pulses and tube length. When a cylinder fires the suction created after the collector helps to pull the exhaust gases from the next cylinder thus clearing out the cylinder for a better burn also the longer tube helps hold the heat and burn and make which makes more tq and mid range

But your right not really what this thread is about
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:51 PM
  #33  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
oh I either didn't read or didn't really register what your 2nd paragraph said. I thought you were turbo.
Your correct I am turbo but also planning to make a n/a maxima next year
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:57 PM
  #34  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by essential1


True... lol. Although, when he finally made it to the track and the MAF died during the first run and he ran a 13.5
you remember his trap speed
Old 11-03-2010 | 01:03 PM
  #35  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by TurboA32
3.5 block and 3.0 heads and a 00vi or mevi will be the way to go. it will raise the compression which means more power so do it lol. there was a guy on here that was beating regular 3.5 swap maximas in his 3.5 block and 3.0 heads with a mevi and he ported and polished the 3.0 heads
If i'm not mistaken, I know who your talking about and that's the same motor that is in the car that I'm refering too. It went from 00vi to FWD 3.5 IM and it is significantly more powerful.

Originally Posted by t6378tp
I think they're around 330hp now
And if i remember correctly, kevin recently dynod the sentra w/ ITBs again with bigger exhaust and it's a little higher than that. . Completely different build though, but just showing that these DE's have more left in them all motor.
Old 11-03-2010 | 01:16 PM
  #36  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by t6378tp
you remember his trap speed
dont recall
Old 11-04-2010 | 06:57 AM
  #37  
grey99max's Avatar
LandShark has Cosworth
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,327
From: Topeka, KS
Originally Posted by t6378tp
.... usim with a sheet metal plenum and a pftb just to see what is does.

What? what is this sheet metal plenum of which you speak? Are you designing something sneaky? Inquiring minds want to know.

Old 11-04-2010 | 08:42 AM
  #38  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by grey99max
What? what is this sheet metal plenum of which you speak? Are you designing something sneaky? Inquiring minds want to know.

I was planning to take a 3.5 uim and cut off the plenum and make a new sheet metal plenum and elbow for boost but I popped the motor.

Now I have to rework the #'s for a dek and will just cut off the flange from a de uim and make new runners, plenum with a 3.5-4inch diameter elbow that bolts up directly to a pftb
Old 11-04-2010 | 10:06 AM
  #39  
streetzlegend's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,097
Originally Posted by t6378tp
I was planning to take a 3.5 uim and cut off the plenum and make a new sheet metal plenum and elbow for boost but I popped the motor.

Now I have to rework the #'s for a dek and will just cut off the flange from a de uim and make new runners, plenum with a 3.5-4inch diameter elbow that bolts up directly to a pftb
That would have been great as far as the plan you had to cut up the 3.5 UIM and make a sheet metal one. I consider it proven that the 3.5 UIM provides uneven flow distribution between both banks. I would stay away from it if possible.
Old 11-04-2010 | 11:09 AM
  #40  
t6378tp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
Originally Posted by streetzlegend
That would have been great as far as the plan you had to cut up the 3.5 UIM and make a sheet metal one. I consider it proven that the 3.5 UIM provides uneven flow distribution between both banks. I would stay away from it if possible.
If I still had the 3.5 version #1 of the intake would have been done this winter. I'll have more info about a 3.0/3.5 hyrid intake towards the summer


Quick Reply: 3.5 shortblock + 3.0 heads



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.