not impressed w/Eclipse Head Unit
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
not impressed w/Eclipse Head Unit
Bought the CD8053, had it installed with an 8 disc changer, running Boston's front and Boston's rear, a Diamond 10" sub...
I am seriously considering pulling it and selling it on ebay.
I have an old Pioneer DEH-M990DSP that is collecting dust, and I recently found (and bought) and old Pioneer "M-Bus" 6 disc changer.
I think I might drop it back in....it was killer back in the day..
I'm just worried about cosmetics. Will the 1994 built cd player look weird in my 2003 Titanium Edition Maxima?
I think so, but I really like that old thing..
advice?
-vq
I am seriously considering pulling it and selling it on ebay.
I have an old Pioneer DEH-M990DSP that is collecting dust, and I recently found (and bought) and old Pioneer "M-Bus" 6 disc changer.
I think I might drop it back in....it was killer back in the day..
I'm just worried about cosmetics. Will the 1994 built cd player look weird in my 2003 Titanium Edition Maxima?
I think so, but I really like that old thing..
advice?
-vq
#4
some of the new Eclipe Head units are so versatile, with pretty flexible crossovers and parametric EQ's, that make outboard processing unnessary and will make installs much simpler. Are you using HU power and dissapointed with that? Many use amps for all their speakers so that won't come into play.
Are you saying you notice a difference in sound? skipping? I'd definately like to know whats up. The newer eclipses are getting good reviews, and like I said, are so great for somebody that wants to have a lot of control of their system up front at the head unit and doesn't want to splurge for the Pioneer HU Processor combo (P9 I think) or Alpine high price stuff.
Are you saying you notice a difference in sound? skipping? I'd definately like to know whats up. The newer eclipses are getting good reviews, and like I said, are so great for somebody that wants to have a lot of control of their system up front at the head unit and doesn't want to splurge for the Pioneer HU Processor combo (P9 I think) or Alpine high price stuff.
#6
Originally Posted by Tony Fernandes
VQ...that 8053 should more than suffice! What the heck don't you like about it?
Tony
Tony
#9
Originally Posted by MacAlert
I love my Eclipse HU except the sound sucks right now cause I'm running the HU on stock Bose speakers and amp.
I've never heard of a complaint about an Eclipse HU either
#10
Originally Posted by Conrad283
So when are you going back to Don to get the rest of your stuff?
I've never heard of a complaint about an Eclipse HU either
I've never heard of a complaint about an Eclipse HU either
#11
Originally Posted by MacAlert
Beats me, parents are not giving me money for this one. All I can say is, my parents Dodge Caravan has more bass then my car.
#16
I have to hear this....this is a first.....
BTW dont expect that outdated HU to sound much better- if you cant make a system sound good with any 8v Eclipse model- its time to start looking at your settings/ tunings or other components at fault
BTW dont expect that outdated HU to sound much better- if you cant make a system sound good with any 8v Eclipse model- its time to start looking at your settings/ tunings or other components at fault
#17
The thing that puzzels me is that hes got pretty much all top of the line stuff. His components are BostonZ's front/back. Which btw I recall you stating you werny impressed with either
Something has to be wrong but at this point, im as is every1 else VQ.
Something has to be wrong but at this point, im as is every1 else VQ.
#18
What are u nuts?
8053 is probably one of the best head units that i have ever had....even though i am selling it now lol....but its because i bought the avx2404 which i am also selling to get the AVN...but anyhow the 8053 game my car an extra boost in sound....if anyone wants input on it just ask DON that unit freakin rocked!!!!!!!!!!
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
The set up sounds good, don't get me wrong, but not really better than previous systems...no skipping, nothing is "wrong" with it, it just isn't giving me the extra sound quality I was expecting. Time alignment has been set up by the installers (authorized Eclipse dealer - KC Trends in ... Kansas City) and I know how to tune a stereo to sound the way I want it..
It sounds good, but just not good enough to be worth having spent $550 on it.
I heard all the praise for these, and with Boston Z6's in the front, and Boston Pro Series 5 1/4s in the rear...a Diamond 10" sub... I was expecting it to sound better than "lesser" previous systems.
I didn't notice much of a difference.
I think I can get $300 to $350 for it on ebay...as I have the box and receipt still.
It's not that my old Pioneer DEH-M990DSP sounded better, the difference isn't that noticeable. It also had a built in EQ.
The Eclipse is harder to see than the old Pioneer was, but the main thing I don't like is that the Eclipse's buttons are super sensitive. I guess I'm getting used to it.
I guess it's just not giving me what I expected. From what everyone was saying, I thought it was going to be musical nirvana, but spending the money (when I already had a good unit) proved to be a waste.
The Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was a BAD A$$ cd player in its day...the only downside is that it only has 2 RCA preouts. MSRP on the Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was like $850-900, and this is back in 1994. So you know it was a killer HU.
Plus the Pioneer is easier to operate, and its free (well, paid for anyway, it cost me a fortune when I bought it back in '94, i was only 20)
-vq
It sounds good, but just not good enough to be worth having spent $550 on it.
I heard all the praise for these, and with Boston Z6's in the front, and Boston Pro Series 5 1/4s in the rear...a Diamond 10" sub... I was expecting it to sound better than "lesser" previous systems.
I didn't notice much of a difference.
I think I can get $300 to $350 for it on ebay...as I have the box and receipt still.
It's not that my old Pioneer DEH-M990DSP sounded better, the difference isn't that noticeable. It also had a built in EQ.
The Eclipse is harder to see than the old Pioneer was, but the main thing I don't like is that the Eclipse's buttons are super sensitive. I guess I'm getting used to it.
I guess it's just not giving me what I expected. From what everyone was saying, I thought it was going to be musical nirvana, but spending the money (when I already had a good unit) proved to be a waste.
The Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was a BAD A$$ cd player in its day...the only downside is that it only has 2 RCA preouts. MSRP on the Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was like $850-900, and this is back in 1994. So you know it was a killer HU.
Plus the Pioneer is easier to operate, and its free (well, paid for anyway, it cost me a fortune when I bought it back in '94, i was only 20)
-vq
#21
Well I can certainly understand your point of view and it does make sense, but IMO these days the 8053 is about as high end as you can go be4 you step upto flip screen.
It just sucks that you had to buy it & lose money on it. The 8443 is usually more then enough for 95% of the people out there.
It just sucks that you had to buy it & lose money on it. The 8443 is usually more then enough for 95% of the people out there.
#25
Originally Posted by HitManSE
Well I can certainly understand your point of view and it does make sense, but IMO these days the 8053 is about as high end as you can go be4 you step upto flip screen.
Tony
#26
VQ I think you need to take some time to adjust to the new HU. That HU was one of the best I have owned especially with all the features and functions. Give it a couple months and get used to it, I think you will enjoy it. Do you use it is EXPERT/Professional mode (I think that is the nomenclature).
#28
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 17,671
Originally Posted by Dohcser
VQ I think you need to take some time to adjust to the new HU. That HU was one of the best I have owned especially with all the features and functions. Give it a couple months and get used to it, I think you will enjoy it. Do you use it is EXPERT/Professional mode (I think that is the nomenclature).
Well if he had the TA set then hes in ProMode
--Don
#30
Originally Posted by VQMAN
The set up sounds good, don't get me wrong, but not really better than previous systems...no skipping, nothing is "wrong" with it, it just isn't giving me the extra sound quality I was expecting. Time alignment has been set up by the installers (authorized Eclipse dealer - KC Trends in ... Kansas City) and I know how to tune a stereo to sound the way I want it..
It sounds good, but just not good enough to be worth having spent $550 on it.
It sounds good, but just not good enough to be worth having spent $550 on it.
Originally Posted by VQMAN
I heard all the praise for these, and with Boston Z6's in the front, and Boston Pro Series 5 1/4s in the rear...a Diamond 10" sub... I was expecting it to sound better than "lesser" previous systems.
I didn't notice much of a difference.
I didn't notice much of a difference.
Originally Posted by VQMAN
I think I can get $300 to $350 for it on ebay...as I have the box and receipt still.
Originally Posted by VQMAN
It's not that my old Pioneer DEH-M990DSP sounded better, the difference isn't that noticeable. It also had a built in EQ.
The Eclipse is harder to see than the old Pioneer was, but the main thing I don't like is that the Eclipse's buttons are super sensitive. I guess I'm getting used to it.
I guess it's just not giving me what I expected. From what everyone was saying, I thought it was going to be musical nirvana, but spending the money (when I already had a good unit) proved to be a waste.
The Eclipse is harder to see than the old Pioneer was, but the main thing I don't like is that the Eclipse's buttons are super sensitive. I guess I'm getting used to it.
I guess it's just not giving me what I expected. From what everyone was saying, I thought it was going to be musical nirvana, but spending the money (when I already had a good unit) proved to be a waste.
Originally Posted by VQMAN
The Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was a BAD A$$ cd player in its day...the only downside is that it only has 2 RCA preouts. MSRP on the Pioneer DEH-M990DSP was like $850-900, and this is back in 1994. So you know it was a killer HU.
Plus the Pioneer is easier to operate, and its free (well, paid for anyway, it cost me a fortune when I bought it back in '94, i was only 20)
-vq
Plus the Pioneer is easier to operate, and its free (well, paid for anyway, it cost me a fortune when I bought it back in '94, i was only 20)
-vq
Tony
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don't know why anyone would expect one headunit to sound "better" than another. 99.9% of better sound is achieved with speakers. 95% of that improvement is because of speaker placement, aiming, and integration with the vehicle interior.
There are definite improvements that can be had from a high quality headunit like the Eclipse. But you aren't going to notice them if you don't know what to listen for. I would pay $550 for the Eclipse if it didn't have all the BS bells and whistles. With that BS it's just another pretty face worth no more than any other $100 headunit.
There are definite improvements that can be had from a high quality headunit like the Eclipse. But you aren't going to notice them if you don't know what to listen for. I would pay $550 for the Eclipse if it didn't have all the BS bells and whistles. With that BS it's just another pretty face worth no more than any other $100 headunit.
#33
I agree with Jmax on this one. It is nearly impossible to hear the minor differences between two headunits. The only things to look for are features, functionality, looks, and reliability. The rest of your setup will really determine the quality of the sound.
You might go the other way around, though. Sell your Pioneer. It is a 10 year old headunit and it is only a matter of time till something goes out on it.
You might go the other way around, though. Sell your Pioneer. It is a 10 year old headunit and it is only a matter of time till something goes out on it.
#34
Originally Posted by VQMAN
The set up sounds good, don't get me wrong, but not really better than previous systems...no skipping, nothing is "wrong" with it, it just isn't giving me the extra sound quality I was expecting. Time alignment has been set up by the installers (authorized Eclipse dealer - KC Trends in ... Kansas City) and I know how to tune a stereo to sound the way I want it..
-vq
-vq
#35
Originally Posted by Kojiro_FtT
Dude you paid too much money to not be happy with your install. Go back to the authorized Eclipse dealer and explain to them how you are not happy and ask them to tweak it for you. If they are a good place they will help you out. If they are not co-operative then I would ask for your install money back.
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Kojiro_FtT
Dude you paid too much money to not be happy with your install. Go back to the authorized Eclipse dealer and explain to them how you are not happy and ask them to tweak it for you. If they are a good place they will help you out. If they are not co-operative then I would ask for your install money back.
I was expecting something spectacular...
I guess my systems have always been spectacular, but I was expecting to go a couple of notches beyond that...
about the Head Unit not making the thing sound any better.....
in my home theatre (also Boston Speakers) I went from a Sony Receiver to a Yamaha (like "top of the line Yamaha you can get at Best Buy - so basically a mid level Yamaha) and it sounds much cleaner..
A head unit can make a difference in how the same speaker sound..
-vq
#38
I am have not had any experience with the new eclipse models but I have the older head unit like the 5443 i think thats the number and i love everything about it. It especially how you can tune the sub out volume rather than doing it the ghetto fartford fosgate way with a **** to the rear amp.
#39
The thing that puts this head unit in such high regard is it's tuning possibilities. Crossovers/eQ/time alignment...very flexible. This is a great option for others who would use outboard processors. IMO if thats not being taken advantage of, this head unit isn't going to make dramatic differences.
#40
Originally Posted by VQMAN
I'm not "unhappy", I'm just not impressed. The Eclipse got a lot of "good press" and it isnt' all that special. The 8 volt preouts are sending a cleaner signal to my amp, which is decreasing distortion, but...I don't know....
I was expecting something spectacular...
I guess my systems have always been spectacular, but I was expecting to go a couple of notches beyond that...
about the Head Unit not making the thing sound any better.....
in my home theatre (also Boston Speakers) I went from a Sony Receiver to a Yamaha (like "top of the line Yamaha you can get at Best Buy - so basically a mid level Yamaha) and it sounds much cleaner..
A head unit can make a difference in how the same speaker sound..
-vq
I was expecting something spectacular...
I guess my systems have always been spectacular, but I was expecting to go a couple of notches beyond that...
about the Head Unit not making the thing sound any better.....
in my home theatre (also Boston Speakers) I went from a Sony Receiver to a Yamaha (like "top of the line Yamaha you can get at Best Buy - so basically a mid level Yamaha) and it sounds much cleaner..
A head unit can make a difference in how the same speaker sound..
-vq