View Poll Results: Which setup will sound better?
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll
Another JL Audio question.
#3
Originally Posted by slickrick
i heard 1 13.5 in 2.4cubes tuned to 29hz off a 1000/1 in a 4th gen...very similar output to my setup when i had my seats down. i say go wit hthe one 13.
#8
Well there r plenty of subs that r as good , if not better, for cheaper, but he wanted us to pick b/t the 2. But the W7's r awesome subs, and if you've got the money to spend on them I'm not gonna tell ya to get anything else.
#10
Originally Posted by '96MaxGLE
Well there r plenty of subs that r as good , if not better, for cheaper, but he wanted us to pick b/t the 2. But the W7's r awesome subs, and if you've got the money to spend on them I'm not gonna tell ya to get anything else.
#14
Originally Posted by memphis_sktr
I guess what I want is bass more than anything.
Chris
Chris
Tony
#15
A 15" RE XXX IMO, and I'm sure ppl will agree, would blow a W7 away. And It would be a couple hundred less than the 13.5W7. I like JL subs very clean & loud, but I agree with everyone else saying that they're over-priced.
#17
Originally Posted by NCTRNL
You can say what you want but the W7 is easily the best series if not top 2 or 3 series on the market. The Image Dynamics subs are good but honestly...they can't be mentioned with the W7's...
#19
Originally Posted by memphis_sktr
I guess what I want is bass more than anything.
Chris
Chris
Thats just ridiculous.
But if you just want a lot of bass and arent to worried about SQ I would get a Kicker Solobaric l5 or l7.
#20
Originally Posted by memphis_sktr
I guess what I want is bass more than anything.
Chris
Chris
#25
For those that Didnt know....
The "W7" was originally built by ID. They didnt have the funds to patent and mass produce it at the time, so JL stepped in a bought the rights. The current W6v2 was supposed to be their W7, since buying the rights for the actual W7, JL just made their original plans into a v2.
The "W7" was originally built by ID. They didnt have the funds to patent and mass produce it at the time, so JL stepped in a bought the rights. The current W6v2 was supposed to be their W7, since buying the rights for the actual W7, JL just made their original plans into a v2.
#26
Originally Posted by slickrick
Don i thought JL was made locally to my house in miramar...and ID had their own buildhouse in Ca???
#30
Originally Posted by blkONblk01
You want LOUD *** BASS? get the new Kicker Solo X 18" 5000 watts rms!!
Thats just ridiculous.
But if you just want a lot of bass and arent to worried about SQ I would get a Kicker Solobaric l5 or l7.
Thats just ridiculous.
But if you just want a lot of bass and arent to worried about SQ I would get a Kicker Solobaric l5 or l7.
I really don't like kicker, for what reasons I don't know, but I will also look into it. I haven't heard anything from kicker, but I wouldn't mind having 18s in the trunk as long as the bass comes with the size. Thanks.
#32
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
Funny you say that, being that the W7 IS an ID sub.
The W7 isn't made by Image Dynamics. Say what you want about the history and everything but it's the flagship JL sub and it's one of the best sound quality subs on the market.
#34
Originally Posted by NCTRNL
The W7 isn't made by Image Dynamics. Say what you want about the history and everything but it's the flagship JL sub and it's one of the best sound quality subs on the market.
Yea umm, sorry but your Wrong. What I state is FACT, what you state is OPINION, which holds more water?
#37
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
Yea umm, sorry but your Wrong. What I state is FACT, what you state is OPINION, which holds more water?
Since you are stating "fact" you should have no problem showing proof of this fact. Something like a technical drawing, picture of a prototype, copy of the documentation of a financial transaction between JL and ID, an article that chronicles ID's "super sub". Anything besides heresay would do.
You show me that and I will acknowledge that you are correct. Man, you better have more than "what I state is FACT" to back a statement like that.
Keep in mind I think JL and ID both make very good products so I am not questioning wheter or not ID makes a good sub...hell I have an old IDQ in my garage now that was a great sub.
And FWIW a quick timeline for you...
The W6v2 was developed AFTER the W7. The W6v2 uses several of the 7 patents from the W7. One of them being DMA which is a way of analyzing how a speaker behaves while being played. JL developed the system while developing the W7 because up until that time the most common way to analyze speakers was through their thiele-small properties. However since these paramaters change while a speaker moves they are not totally accurate. If you don't believe this, take any speaker, connect a multi meter and watch how impedance changes while you push the speaker in and out. The DMA helps the engineer see how a speaker behaves over the entire excursion of the speaker so it can be built to maintian its liniarity.
For you techno geeks:
http://www.jlaudio.com/subwoofers/W7_DMA.html
Even if ID had some wicked *** skunk-works style woofer they were working on that they never released that does not make it the W7...that is unless you can prove that JL actually bought plans, drawings, and or patents from ID.
Yes, I realize this is my first post so most of you will instantly dis-credit it, but after someone showed me this thread I had to say something.
One last piece of car audio wisdom...there is very rarely a best anything.
And to the original question (sorry fro thread hi-jacking) 2 12w6v2s will be louder than the single 13w7 because they will be moving a lot more air. And if you have enough room to port the w6s look out because that will get FREAKING LOUD!!
#38
Originally Posted by joequimby
Since you are stating "fact" you should have no problem showing proof of this fact. Something like a technical drawing, picture of a prototype, copy of the documentation of a financial transaction between JL and ID, an article that chronicles ID's "super sub". Anything besides heresay would do.
You show me that and I will acknowledge that you are correct. Man, you better have more than "what I state is FACT" to back a statement like that.
Keep in mind I think JL and ID both make very good products so I am not questioning wheter or not ID makes a good sub...hell I have an old IDQ in my garage now that was a great sub.
And FWIW a quick timeline for you...
The W6v2 was developed AFTER the W7. The W6v2 uses several of the 7 patents from the W7. One of them being DMA which is a way of analyzing how a speaker behaves while being played. JL developed the system while developing the W7 because up until that time the most common way to analyze speakers was through their thiele-small properties. However since these paramaters change while a speaker moves they are not totally accurate. If you don't believe this, take any speaker, connect a multi meter and watch how impedance changes while you push the speaker in and out. The DMA helps the engineer see how a speaker behaves over the entire excursion of the speaker so it can be built to maintian its liniarity.
For you techno geeks:
http://www.jlaudio.com/subwoofers/W7_DMA.html
Even if ID had some wicked *** skunk-works style woofer they were working on that they never released that does not make it the W7...that is unless you can prove that JL actually bought plans, drawings, and or patents from ID.
You show me that and I will acknowledge that you are correct. Man, you better have more than "what I state is FACT" to back a statement like that.
Keep in mind I think JL and ID both make very good products so I am not questioning wheter or not ID makes a good sub...hell I have an old IDQ in my garage now that was a great sub.
And FWIW a quick timeline for you...
The W6v2 was developed AFTER the W7. The W6v2 uses several of the 7 patents from the W7. One of them being DMA which is a way of analyzing how a speaker behaves while being played. JL developed the system while developing the W7 because up until that time the most common way to analyze speakers was through their thiele-small properties. However since these paramaters change while a speaker moves they are not totally accurate. If you don't believe this, take any speaker, connect a multi meter and watch how impedance changes while you push the speaker in and out. The DMA helps the engineer see how a speaker behaves over the entire excursion of the speaker so it can be built to maintian its liniarity.
For you techno geeks:
http://www.jlaudio.com/subwoofers/W7_DMA.html
Even if ID had some wicked *** skunk-works style woofer they were working on that they never released that does not make it the W7...that is unless you can prove that JL actually bought plans, drawings, and or patents from ID.
Furthermore, your status of NEWB, means I need to prove nothing to you, as most people on here know what I state is factual, as well as a few of them knowing the situation with the transaction themselves.
#39
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
Considering it was never supposed to be public knowledge anyone would be hardpressed to find WRIITEN proof. Although if he was up to it and felt like doing me the favor how about a call from my JL rep? Would that suit your needs??
Furthermore, your status of NEWB, means I need to prove nothing to you, as most people on here know what I state is factual, as well as a few of them knowing the situation with the transaction themselves.
Furthermore, your status of NEWB, means I need to prove nothing to you, as most people on here know what I state is factual, as well as a few of them knowing the situation with the transaction themselves.
Yes, have your JL rep call me...that would suit my needs. PM me or e-mail me and I will give you the information he can reach me at. Or tell me which rep firm he works for, his name I will call him myself
I don't care what my "status" is here...that is a really strong statement to make on the basis that you know a guy who knows a guy.