Audio and Electronics Discuss in-car entertainment systems, audio and video systems, car alarms and other electronics topics.

new setup.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #1  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
new setup.

well i won't have my car for three days because i am getting everything redone. box,amp, wiring. should look and sound real nice. we decided to go with about 2cuft each it will be rear firing. we are upping the wire from 2 to 1/0 gauge and we are monting the amp in the wheel well with plexiglass about 1" lower than flush with a cover so it will be stealth but can show off the amp when i want. the rear will appear to be completely sealed from the cabin but there will be a screen dye'd to match the exterior of the car above the box flush with the box. i have very high hopes for this setup. i will post pics when i can, i am going to drop by after work to check out the progress and maybe snap a few pics of the installation. wish me luck...
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
swowlinc's Avatar
1993 SE
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,038
From: Suitland Md
WOW!! Big thangs...big thangs! I just bought a sunroof deflector
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #3  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
yea, i know.
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #4  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
update, i was talking to the guy and now we are integrating a plexiglass window on the back of the box so when the seats are folded down you will be able to see the motor structure. shold be sweet, i can't freakin wait any longer. will take some more pics today.
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:44 AM
  #5  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
the box is now approximatly 2.2 cubic ft. and we are using gray flextone paint on the interior of the box to give it that marble look, we are also integrating blacklights inside the box and maybe in the amp rack.
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #6  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
alright here are some teaser pics.


Old Mar 9, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #7  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383



these are not completed pics. but you kind of get the general idea.
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #8  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
what, no questions or comments?
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #9  
2 Da Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,009
looks dam good so far bro.
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #10  
zero2sixtyZ's Avatar
You embarrass me.
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,308
From: Malden, MA
very nice work so far. should look nice when it's finished.
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #11  
2 Da Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,009
o btw where did u get that radiant ember color vinyl from? that shiet looks nice
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #12  
TheBigDu's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,427
Well, it's definitely a very nice fit. But I'm trying to figure out why you have openings between the two sub chambers?

By the way, your car is beautiful also. I don't know much about sixth gens; is that a factory color?
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #13  
AscendantMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 12,619
From: Houston
damn, looks good so far

and yeah, why not two seperate chambers for the box?

my install is blah, (appearance-wise) compared to that

Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #14  
TheBigDu's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,427
I never noticed this before...

Lucky for you, I guess Nissan got rid of the torsion-bar trunk lid setup in favor of the non-obtrusive hydraulic setup you have when they brought out the sixth gen. We fifth-and-below genners couldn't do your setup without having an ugly notch of some sort cut into the wood. (Unless the trunk lid was modified of course.)

Eh, just thought I'd point that out.
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #15  
djfrestyl's Avatar
Suspension Yoda
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,500
From: Central, NJ
Originally Posted by TheBigDu
I never noticed this before...

Lucky for you, I guess Nissan got rid of the torsion-bar trunk lid setup in favor of the non-obtrusive hydraulic setup you have when they brought out the sixth gen. We fifth-and-below genners couldn't do your setup without having an ugly notch of some sort cut into the wood. (Unless the trunk lid was modified of course.)

Eh, just thought I'd point that out.

It's an unforunate truth.

Doesn't take much to mod that out though
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #16  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
Originally Posted by AscendantMax
damn, looks good so far

and yeah, why not two seperate chambers for the box?

my install is blah, (appearance-wise) compared to that

because i am only running one amp a 1 ohm and seperate chambers are not required. thanks for all the compliments. i am throwing a lot of money into this thing so it better be nice. i just don't have th supplies to do this sort of thing on my own.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:55 AM
  #17  
BBOYSTEVIE's Avatar
Back from Hibernation
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,100
Thats gonna look nice. What's your front stage?
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #18  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Looks excellent!


Originally Posted by maxmale
because i am only running one amp a 1 ohm and seperate chambers are not required.
But i dont understand that reasoning for sharing internal space.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 04:28 AM
  #19  
mendon99's Avatar
tastey wheat
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,773
From: WPB, FL
looks really good, your ears should be hurting in no time
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 05:59 AM
  #20  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by maxmale
because i am only running one amp a 1 ohm and seperate chambers are not required. .
Huh? You lost me here.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:45 AM
  #21  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
Originally Posted by maxmale
because i am only running one amp a 1 ohm and seperate chambers are not required. thanks for all the compliments. i am throwing a lot of money into this thing so it better be nice. i just don't have th supplies to do this sort of thing on my own.

Doesn't matter what resistance your running the amp at, and I think what you meant is that your running it mono. Regardless seperate chambers are better because if one of the subs blows out, it will be easier to notice. If your throwing alot of money into it, please have them do it right.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #22  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
sorry, got ahead of myself. 1 amp + 2 4ohm dvc subs = 1 ohm. figured this was obvious. probably should have stated it is a mono amp.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #23  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
Speaker impedance and what type of amp your using are both completely irrelevant to the enclosure design. One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. If this is what the shop thats doing the work is telling you, I would bne a bit skeptical of their actual knowledge.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #24  
SC2K1's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 450
Looking good
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #25  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
Originally Posted by maxmale
sorry, got ahead of myself. 1 amp + 2 4ohm dvc subs = 1 ohm. figured this was obvious. probably should have stated it is a mono amp.

Again this has nothing to do with the chambering of the box. No matter what they told you.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #26  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
it makes a lot more sense. if i weren't running a mono amp then it would be a chambered box. if i were running two different amps then it would be chambered.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #27  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
if i am wrong and this setup sounds like **** then i will be the first to say so. but since both subs are on the same channel and seeing the same wattage essentially then phase cancelation shouldn't be a problem.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #28  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by maxmale
if i am wrong and this setup sounds like **** then i will be the first to say so. but since both subs are on the same channel and seeing the same wattage essentially then phase cancelation shouldn't be a problem.
Phase cancellation? You are talking standing backwaves being swapped around between subs like 2 **** stars swapping giz in a Debbie Does Dallas encore.

The worse part is if it sounds like *** and you dont know it.

Dont get me wrong man, the work itself and design of the trunk looks very good.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #29  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
not to mention no two subs will ever get the same EXACT power consistantly.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #30  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
not to mention no two subs will ever get the same EXACT power consistantly.
yep..
nor resistance, nor impedance drop for that matter....Hehe that would mean both subs to 100% read identically in EVERY voice coil and being a mono amp the first sub wired closest to the power source gets a
few more goodies...
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #31  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
What the hell is up with that center chamber anyway? Its like two half circles...Maybe they screwed up the front plate the first time and figured, ah what the hell we'll throw it inside the box and save some MDF.

Also did notice, the jigsaw owns them on circle cuts.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #32  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
Maybe they screwed up the front plate the first time and figured, ah what the hell we'll throw it inside the box and save some MDF.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #33  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
Haha I didn't think of that.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #34  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by nismos14
Haha I didn't think of that.
Me neither, i truly hope thats not the case...if so, wow...
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 06:24 AM
  #35  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
Originally Posted by MannyNJ2k2max
Me neither, i truly hope thats not the case...if so, wow...


Honestly I would'nt doubt it though. Main reason is that the bracing inside would be different if they were going to put a big slab like that they might as well have chambered it. But since they weren't going to they could have just used braces.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #36  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
What the hell is up with that center chamber anyway? Its like two half circles...Maybe they screwed up the front plate the first time and figured, ah what the hell we'll throw it inside the box and save some MDF.

Also did notice, the jigsaw owns them on circle cuts.
unless they mistakenly thought my subs were 10" there is no way those holes were originally for the front.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #37  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by maxmale
unless they mistakenly thought my subs were 10" there is no way those holes were originally for the front.
Wouldnt that be a good reason why it wasnt used? If they cut it for 12s, then it prolly wouldnt be in the center now.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 07:06 AM
  #38  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
Or they cut it from another board they had laying around. The cuts are all to smooth for that to not seem shady.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #39  
djfrestyl's Avatar
Suspension Yoda
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,500
From: Central, NJ
Hilarious. Anyway, are you going to have them seal off the chambers from each other?
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #40  
maxmale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,383




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:44 PM.