Anyone (or 2 or 3) want to go in on aluminum lugnuts wif me?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Anyone (or 2 or 3) want to go in on aluminum lugnuts wif me?
Hey!!
Check it out... the lightest lugs I could find at 19.5 gram
Problem is, they sell em 16 at a time. If we could find any other people to go in on it, we could split the cost of the extra set. I'd also try to get a deal if we can get 4 people ... but worst case the cost would wind up being around $90 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali for 4 people)
with 2 it would be 108 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali)
Heres the analysis- it seems like we could save about 1.5 oz/lugnut with these.
(they are .685 oz each)
times 20 that makes about 30 oz savings, divided by 16 oz/lb = 1.875 lbs, figure since it is rotational weight though fairly close to the center of rotation, factor 4 instead of 8 for effective weight and you get... around 8 lbs of weight reduction. (and the crowd goes mild)
A good looking way to make up for the Tower Brace weight tho!!
Anyone into it? Any perfectionists, or autocrossers who are consistently losing by a tenth out there?
Check it out... the lightest lugs I could find at 19.5 gram
Problem is, they sell em 16 at a time. If we could find any other people to go in on it, we could split the cost of the extra set. I'd also try to get a deal if we can get 4 people ... but worst case the cost would wind up being around $90 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali for 4 people)
with 2 it would be 108 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali)
Heres the analysis- it seems like we could save about 1.5 oz/lugnut with these.
(they are .685 oz each)
times 20 that makes about 30 oz savings, divided by 16 oz/lb = 1.875 lbs, figure since it is rotational weight though fairly close to the center of rotation, factor 4 instead of 8 for effective weight and you get... around 8 lbs of weight reduction. (and the crowd goes mild)
A good looking way to make up for the Tower Brace weight tho!!
Anyone into it? Any perfectionists, or autocrossers who are consistently losing by a tenth out there?
#2
interesting.....i would worry about them getting stripped to hell by my impact when I go to the track though......the weight savings is tempting, though. then I remember my auto-x wheels are heavy as hell (since they're also my winter wheels)
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
ugh, you should do something about that irish-
www.machiii.net
get some 11.8 lb wheels, man! $450 shipped. The mod that enhances all mods! Then you dont have to worry about as much impact even!
Edit: got some big calipers, eh? never mind about 15" wheels then!
www.machiii.net
get some 11.8 lb wheels, man! $450 shipped. The mod that enhances all mods! Then you dont have to worry about as much impact even!
Edit: got some big calipers, eh? never mind about 15" wheels then!
#4
Originally Posted by Spaniard
ugh, you should do something about that irish-
www.machiii.net
get some 11.8 lb wheels, man! $450 shipped. The mod that enhances all mods! Then you dont have to worry about as much impact even!
Edit: got some big calipers, eh? never mind about 15" wheels then!
www.machiii.net
get some 11.8 lb wheels, man! $450 shipped. The mod that enhances all mods! Then you dont have to worry about as much impact even!
Edit: got some big calipers, eh? never mind about 15" wheels then!
#5
Originally Posted by irish44j
hell will freeze over before the wife lets me have 3 sets of wheels....limited room in the townhouse basement....
#6
I hate to sound negative, but if you're open to some constructive criticism, I really don't think this is the best bang for the buck. Better wheels and tires would be way higher on the list of upgrades.
-Mike
-Mike
Originally Posted by Spaniard
Hey!!
Check it out... the lightest lugs I could find at 19.5 gram
Problem is, they sell em 16 at a time. If we could find any other people to go in on it, we could split the cost of the extra set. I'd also try to get a deal if we can get 4 people ... but worst case the cost would wind up being around $90 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali for 4 people)
with 2 it would be 108 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali)
Heres the analysis- it seems like we could save about 1.5 oz/lugnut with these.
(they are .685 oz each)
times 20 that makes about 30 oz savings, divided by 16 oz/lb = 1.875 lbs, figure since it is rotational weight though fairly close to the center of rotation, factor 4 instead of 8 for effective weight and you get... around 8 lbs of weight reduction. (and the crowd goes mild)
A good looking way to make up for the Tower Brace weight tho!!
Anyone into it? Any perfectionists, or autocrossers who are consistently losing by a tenth out there?
Check it out... the lightest lugs I could find at 19.5 gram
Problem is, they sell em 16 at a time. If we could find any other people to go in on it, we could split the cost of the extra set. I'd also try to get a deal if we can get 4 people ... but worst case the cost would wind up being around $90 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali for 4 people)
with 2 it would be 108 + ship (+tax unless someone is outside of cali)
Heres the analysis- it seems like we could save about 1.5 oz/lugnut with these.
(they are .685 oz each)
times 20 that makes about 30 oz savings, divided by 16 oz/lb = 1.875 lbs, figure since it is rotational weight though fairly close to the center of rotation, factor 4 instead of 8 for effective weight and you get... around 8 lbs of weight reduction. (and the crowd goes mild)
A good looking way to make up for the Tower Brace weight tho!!
Anyone into it? Any perfectionists, or autocrossers who are consistently losing by a tenth out there?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by idlingmike
I hate to sound negative, but if you're open to some constructive criticism, I really don't think this is the best bang for the buck. Better wheels and tires would be way higher on the list of upgrades.
-Mike
-Mike
#8
I looked at this a while ago and decided the power/$ just wasn't there. Heck, I just saved 5lbs per front tire by switching compounds, profile, and tread depth while staying with a 16" rim. That's like 80lbs at the very outer rotational mass. 5.5lbs per ea rear saved too when combined with some new rims. My K-1's were just a bit too heavy and I'll use em for the rears when tracktime comes.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Ive actually found a better product. Down to 17 grams, and available in a set of 20. Im about to buy it tonite (just got paid !! )
They are out of black, so Im thinking silver... I am not sure I can get away with electric red or blue!
http://www.racingdimension.com/index...ROD&ProdID=203
the available colors
By my figuring, its knocking about 10-11 lb unsprung weight off the the car...
(standard lugnuts = 2.0 oz (weighed on postal scale))
2.0 oz x 20 lugs = 40 oz x 28 g/oz = 1120 g
20 x 17g each = 340 g
difference = 780 g
780 g * (1 oz/28 g)
= 28 oz
28 oz / 16 oz/lb = 1.74 lb dropped
1.74 lb x 6 (rotational mass, close to middle, so say 6, not a factor of 8)
= 10.44 lbs!
For about 70 bucks, done!!
They are out of black, so Im thinking silver... I am not sure I can get away with electric red or blue!
http://www.racingdimension.com/index...ROD&ProdID=203
the available colors
By my figuring, its knocking about 10-11 lb unsprung weight off the the car...
(standard lugnuts = 2.0 oz (weighed on postal scale))
2.0 oz x 20 lugs = 40 oz x 28 g/oz = 1120 g
20 x 17g each = 340 g
difference = 780 g
780 g * (1 oz/28 g)
= 28 oz
28 oz / 16 oz/lb = 1.74 lb dropped
1.74 lb x 6 (rotational mass, close to middle, so say 6, not a factor of 8)
= 10.44 lbs!
For about 70 bucks, done!!
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by krismax
will this lug fit the acorn style of the kosei K-1?
Speaking of extreeeeeme weight reduction, I saw some really really lightweight rims on tirerack. Like $370 each but 15x7 were only 10.7 lbs. Wow... If I only had money like that to spend...
#12
Originally Posted by Spaniard
Not sure... Hey Krismax, what have you gotten your max's weight down to?
Speaking of extreeeeeme weight reduction, I saw some really really lightweight rims on tirerack. Like $370 each but 15x7 were only 10.7 lbs. Wow... If I only had money like that to spend...
Speaking of extreeeeeme weight reduction, I saw some really really lightweight rims on tirerack. Like $370 each but 15x7 were only 10.7 lbs. Wow... If I only had money like that to spend...
yeah that a decent weight for a 15x7 mine are 15x7 but around 13.5lbs . Iam sticking with my koseis very cheap for the weight.
#14
Originally Posted by Spaniard
Yea, theres better money to spend than going from 12-13 lbs rims to 11 lb rims for $1500. Whats the story on the CF hood (TRUNK) ? Im interested too...
Edit: trunk not hood
Edit: trunk not hood
And a huge weight savings you may want to look into is 95 max aluminum bumbers just the front seems to have saved around 25lbs. These bumpers front and rear filled with foam would be much lighter than the steel and stronger.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Spaniard
Ive actually found a better product. Down to 17 grams, and available in a set of 20. Im about to buy it tonite (just got paid !! )
They are out of black, so Im thinking silver... I am not sure I can get away with electric red or blue!
By my figuring, its knocking about 10-11 lb unsprung weight off the the car...
For about 70 bucks, done!!
They are out of black, so Im thinking silver... I am not sure I can get away with electric red or blue!
By my figuring, its knocking about 10-11 lb unsprung weight off the the car...
For about 70 bucks, done!!
2.0 oz x 20 lugs = 40 oz x 28 g/oz = 1120 g
20 x 17g each = 340 g
difference = 780 g
780 g * (1 oz/28 g)
= 28 oz
28 oz / 16 oz/lb = 1.74 lb dropped
So you would remove a whopping total of 1.74lbs of unsprung weight.
Also, such a minor change in weight that close to the axis of rotation will be irrelevant to performance. Just keep some strong lug nuts on there. It's worth the extra grams to keep you wheels from flying off.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by $tillenmax2k
How in the world are they gonna knock off 10lbs when the stock ones don't even weigh that much?
2.0 oz x 20 lugs = 40 oz x 28 g/oz = 1120 g
20 x 17g each = 340 g
difference = 780 g
780 g * (1 oz/28 g)
= 28 oz
28 oz / 16 oz/lb = 1.74 lb dropped
So you would remove a whopping total of 1.74lbs of unsprung weight.
Also, such a minor change in weight that close to the axis of rotation will be irrelevant to performance. Just keep some strong lug nuts on there. It's worth the extra grams to keep you wheels from flying off.
2.0 oz x 20 lugs = 40 oz x 28 g/oz = 1120 g
20 x 17g each = 340 g
difference = 780 g
780 g * (1 oz/28 g)
= 28 oz
28 oz / 16 oz/lb = 1.74 lb dropped
So you would remove a whopping total of 1.74lbs of unsprung weight.
Also, such a minor change in weight that close to the axis of rotation will be irrelevant to performance. Just keep some strong lug nuts on there. It's worth the extra grams to keep you wheels from flying off.
10/1.74 = 5.7 factor, not the usual 8 that is suggested for rotational mass so dropping the 'effective' equivalent of 10lbs (what I meant) is not inconcievable.
And "irrelevant" is such a strong word!! Everything adds up!
And finally, I dont think that the lugnuts are less "Strong"... I always torque to spec before a track session, so I would be suprised if 3-5 of them decided to break or let go... Anyone else care to chime in?
#18
Originally Posted by Spaniard
OK, you are not as passionate about it as I am. I actually considered spending $1600 to get 10.7 lb wheels in 15x7 instead of my 12 lb'ers... So for $70 bucks this seemed like pretty good bang for z buck
10/1.74 = 5.7 factor, not the usual 8 that is suggested for rotational mass so dropping the 'effective' equivalent of 10lbs (what I meant) is not inconcievable.
And "irrelevant" is such a strong word!! Everything adds up!
And finally, I dont think that the lugnuts are less "Strong"... I always torque to spec before a track session, so I would be suprised if 3-5 of them decided to break or let go... Anyone else care to chime in?
10/1.74 = 5.7 factor, not the usual 8 that is suggested for rotational mass so dropping the 'effective' equivalent of 10lbs (what I meant) is not inconcievable.
And "irrelevant" is such a strong word!! Everything adds up!
And finally, I dont think that the lugnuts are less "Strong"... I always torque to spec before a track session, so I would be suprised if 3-5 of them decided to break or let go... Anyone else care to chime in?
I find that the people who dont have the passion like we do tend to have slow as$ cars
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Spaniard
OK, you are not as passionate about it as I am. I actually considered spending $1600 to get 10.7 lb wheels in 15x7 instead of my 12 lb'ers... So for $70 bucks this seemed like pretty good bang for z buck
I'm all for improving performance, but i always make sure the Pros outweigh the possible Cons when considering modifications. Simply saying that the lug nut's weight can't be compounded to come up with an imaginary inflated reduction in unsprung weight, and only slightly so for rotational mass.
#21
If you're that serious about the weight and performance then how about lightweight rotors like Ceasar was looking into? Or shaving tires to 4/32"? Or carbon fiber driveshafts? Much to be gained from any/all those I would think.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by BEJAY1
If you're that serious about the weight and performance then how about lightweight rotors like Ceasar was looking into? Or shaving tires to 4/32"? Or carbon fiber driveshafts? Much to be gained from any/all those I would think.
#23
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,431
try www.thebrakeman.com his oe replacement "convo" rotors shed a good amount of weight and aren't extremely expensive like titanium ones...
and they are right here in CA...
and they are right here in CA...
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
try www.thebrakeman.com his oe replacement "convo" rotors shed a good amount of weight and aren't extremely expensive like titanium ones...
and they are right here in CA...
and they are right here in CA...
I can totally see these in the rear:
and also going for something perhaps a bit more substantial up front---- but still lighter!
I might be able to lose 40 lb of rotational weight for something like $700. Compared to 60 lbs sprung weight with CF hood and trunk for like $1500!
I just hope he makes the stuff in the right specs for da 4th gen.
You are da MAN!!! Thank you, much.
#27
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,431
I don't know the weight savings....you would probably have to call them...but I don't think they make the racing application in our sizes...just the convoOE rotors which are still a good weight savings...
hey spaniard...do you think I could go to the track with you one time...I want to see if the maxima is any good at the track...I know I will add weight to your car and throw off your balance you are used to, but I want to get into track racing and want to see without actually tracking my car if it is something I would want to do as AutoX is getting old...
hey spaniard...do you think I could go to the track with you one time...I want to see if the maxima is any good at the track...I know I will add weight to your car and throw off your balance you are used to, but I want to get into track racing and want to see without actually tracking my car if it is something I would want to do as AutoX is getting old...
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
hey spaniard...do you think I could go to the track with you one time...I want to see if the maxima is any good at the track...I know I will add weight to your car and throw off your balance you are used to, but I want to get into track racing and want to see without actually tracking my car if it is something I would want to do as AutoX is getting old...
Since its my first time at willow springs, I will be taking it a bit easy and definately will not care about extra weight. The one thing that would make it easy is if you can get a snell 2001 helmet instead of looking around to borrow one.
Let me know whatcha think-
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
sounds good...I've been to willow springs before but haven't driven my car there...been with friends before...I can have a helmet from my autoX'ing days...
#31
I'd highly recommend staying away from stuff like the Convo rotors and other things like that.. just use standard round discs.. buy the best quality you can afford... and spend the money to make yourself some 2-pc rotors if you're really concerned about weight savings.
the 2004 Maxima rotors that I have made for my stuff drop unsprung weight by over 5lb per corner, and they're a forged steel rotor that lasts a loooooong time. (I've been through about 15 sets of brake pads on them already and haven't had to turn them yet!)
the 2004 Maxima rotors that I have made for my stuff drop unsprung weight by over 5lb per corner, and they're a forged steel rotor that lasts a loooooong time. (I've been through about 15 sets of brake pads on them already and haven't had to turn them yet!)
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA 95054
Posts: 972
Originally Posted by Matt93SE
I'd highly recommend staying away from stuff like the Convo rotors and other things like that.. just use standard round discs.. buy the best quality you can afford... and spend the money to make yourself some 2-pc rotors if you're really concerned about weight savings.
the 2004 Maxima rotors that I have made for my stuff drop unsprung weight by over 5lb per corner, and they're a forged steel rotor that lasts a loooooong time. (I've been through about 15 sets of brake pads on them already and haven't had to turn them yet!)
the 2004 Maxima rotors that I have made for my stuff drop unsprung weight by over 5lb per corner, and they're a forged steel rotor that lasts a loooooong time. (I've been through about 15 sets of brake pads on them already and haven't had to turn them yet!)
#34
yeah, sorry for not making that clear.. the weights I was mentioning above are comparing the stock 2004 Maxima rotor to the 2 pc custom ones.
I have some worn out stock rotors around here somewhere.. I'll see if I can't get some numbers on them as well.
but honestly you should be able to find/make something that will work witht he stock calipers and wheels and save you a decent amount of rotating, unsprung weight.
I have some worn out stock rotors around here somewhere.. I'll see if I can't get some numbers on them as well.
but honestly you should be able to find/make something that will work witht he stock calipers and wheels and save you a decent amount of rotating, unsprung weight.
#35
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,431
wait, so do they have 2pc rotors in our stock size/application? or do the Z32 rotors come in 2pc somewhere? I wouldn't think twice about the convoOE rotors if I switched up to the beefy Z32 rotors...I know they are almost the same diameter as ours...but the thickness is much, much more...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maximeltman
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
08-31-2015 01:01 PM