242/238
05-04-2007, 06:00 PM
#1
242/238
So I rounded, 241.65 
I could probably gain a few by leaning it a bit, but that's for next time. I knew 2nd gear would give lower tq #'s, so I did some 3rd gear runs. I would use 2nd for the smoothness of the curve and it's less creepy than going to 140mph.
Also did some 2nd gear runs in order to compare to my last session. This is basically comparing the 2 different intakes. Although I did add a UDP, but
Interesting results nonetheless.
I could probably gain a few by leaning it a bit, but that's for next time. I knew 2nd gear would give lower tq #'s, so I did some 3rd gear runs. I would use 2nd for the smoothness of the curve and it's less creepy than going to 140mph.
Also did some 2nd gear runs in order to compare to my last session. This is basically comparing the 2 different intakes. Although I did add a UDP, but
Interesting results nonetheless.
05-04-2007, 08:24 PM
#3
I decided it wasn't worth it(race fuel) Not at this altitude. It's cheap insurance when tuning in the upper 13's/low 14's though. The 3rd gear curves are more choppy. That's why I use 2nd, but using 3rd gave me more AFR conditioning resolution, hence better powah.
05-05-2007, 12:58 PM
#8
Previous best vs yesterday's run. Fatter torque curve.
Seems as if the curve stays smoother throughout the powerband when using the stock helmholtz type resonator. This can be seen on Z33 dynos as well. All have a small dip in the 5k's, and when we add a straight midpipe, we see the same dip. Stock resonator has friendly inlet sizing AND it's nice and smooth.
Maybe sleeve it so air only goes one way, into the engine. 
Seems as if the curve stays smoother throughout the powerband when using the stock helmholtz type resonator. This can be seen on Z33 dynos as well. All have a small dip in the 5k's, and when we add a straight midpipe, we see the same dip. Stock resonator has friendly inlet sizing AND it's nice and smooth.
Maybe sleeve it so air only goes one way, into the engine.
05-06-2007, 09:54 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 210
making a LOT more power under the curve than the previous best. and only slight power loss to 7200, obviously the result of the SSIM. would you say its the MAF housing or the spacers that give you that gain in the lower range? i guess you could say both, but which do you think helped most? impressive numbers, btw
05-07-2007, 06:19 AM
#11
Originally Posted by Theyears02
would you say its the MAF housing or the spacers that give you that gain in the lower range? i guess you could say both, but which do you think helped most? impressive numbers, btw
05-08-2007, 10:11 AM
#14
Originally Posted by eyecon7
Damnnn... what did you do to get this... just tuning
I haven't even really dove into playing w/ the AFR that much. TS does a good job, but i know there's more to be had with it.
05-18-2007, 04:30 PM
#17
Originally Posted by HotshotVQ35
and everyone said pullies like an intake add no HP 
nice #'s!
nice #'s!
09-01-2007, 10:27 AM
#21
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Previous best vs yesterday's run. Fatter torque curve.
how come your TQ is falling like that, is a smooth and gradual decrease, but what could be done to fight that?
09-01-2007, 10:40 AM
#22
Originally Posted by MDeezy
Wow great number and great powerband! Very smooth technosquare did a good job with the tune.
how come your TQ is falling like that, is a smooth and gradual decrease, but what could be done to fight that?
how come your TQ is falling like that, is a smooth and gradual decrease, but what could be done to fight that?
But here's my theory.http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...11&postcount=4
09-01-2007, 12:24 PM
#24
Originally Posted by MDeezy
have you thought about Aarons thermal spacer kit to combat heat soak?
09-01-2007, 01:33 PM
#25
yea a 3rd gear run with an AT would really take a lot out of the motor, especially after a couple pulls.
I would love to see a new dyno with the thermal spacers.
so let me get this straight.
did you get the technosquare before or after the 3" Maf?
You've done some moderate tuning with the SAFC on top of the TS, or you havent done any corrections with the SAFC yet?
wonder how much you would put down if you were an MT
I would love to see a new dyno with the thermal spacers.
so let me get this straight.
did you get the technosquare before or after the 3" Maf?
You've done some moderate tuning with the SAFC on top of the TS, or you havent done any corrections with the SAFC yet?
wonder how much you would put down if you were an MT
09-01-2007, 02:47 PM
#26
Originally Posted by MDeezy
yea a 3rd gear run with an AT would really take a lot out of the motor, especially after a couple pulls.
I would love to see a new dyno with the thermal spacers.
so let me get this straight.
did you get the technosquare before or after the 3" Maf?
You've done some moderate tuning with the SAFC on top of the TS, or you havent done any corrections with the SAFC yet?
wonder how much you would put down if you were an MT
I would love to see a new dyno with the thermal spacers.
so let me get this straight.
did you get the technosquare before or after the 3" Maf?
You've done some moderate tuning with the SAFC on top of the TS, or you havent done any corrections with the SAFC yet?
wonder how much you would put down if you were an MT
and dyno'd.I've had the ECU for well over a year. The MAF is new though. I've leaned it a bit via SAFCII. TS had it perfect @ 13.0 so I didn't have to do much. I would also like to see what the hell I'd have if I had an MT.
09-01-2007, 02:52 PM
#28
Originally Posted by MDeezy
didnt the 3" maf lean you out accross the board anyway? so leaning it with the SAFC II in addition would lean you up some no?
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=517758
