Dyno Discussion and Slips Discussion and a moderated "Dyno Slips" sub-forum to allow for posting of dyno slips.

'04 Maxima SE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #1  
Oolatec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
'04 Maxima SE

So here are my mods:

Cattman headers/y-pipe (no cats)
NWP IM spacers/VIAS block-off plate
Unorthodox stock diameter pully
Greddy SP2 exhaust

Did 3 runs with a Fujita intake, and 3 more runs with an R2c prototype intake.

Here's the average:



Fujita video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0Rny1ujpcc

R2c prototype video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeKXIFzemeU

The dyno guy mostly does Fords etc. but he did see that I was running pretty lean because of all the bolt-ons.

So it looks like an SAFC2/UTEC will be needed?

Also, is anyone aware of a stock 6th Gen that was ever dyno'd?
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #2  
rroderiques77's Avatar
Demodded and Forgotten
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Area 51
Pretty decent numbers actually. What does the AFR look like?
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #3  
Oolatec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
Way outta wack. Pretty lean. But it may be due to an intake leak... I need to get it looked at real soon because I've been running with the P1283 for close to 3 months...
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
rroderiques77's Avatar
Demodded and Forgotten
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Area 51
Originally Posted by Oolatec
Way outta wack. Pretty lean. But it may be due to an intake leak... I need to get it looked at real soon because I've been running with the P1283 for close to 3 months...
Interested to see what kind of numbers you'd pull after a tune
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #5  
Oolatec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by rroderiques77
Interested to see what kind of numbers you'd pull after a tune
When I find a shop I feel I can trust to tune this thing... for sure!
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #6  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
It's going to be leaner more likely because of that intake leak you were referring to, IMO.

Usually headers/exhaust make our cars run richer. A wideband O2 and an AFC/UTEC would be in order here to correct AFRs. UTEC will let you do timing control and CVTC maps as well as rev limiter, yada yada yada...AFC2 will just do fuel.

Nice numbers! 254 is a lot...I guess you need it, hauling that yacht around though haha kidding.
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
Oolatec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
It's going to be leaner more likely because of that intake leak you were referring to, IMO.

Usually headers/exhaust make our cars run richer. A wideband O2 and an AFC/UTEC would be in order here to correct AFRs. UTEC will let you do timing control and CVTC maps as well as rev limiter, yada yada yada...AFC2 will just do fuel.

Nice numbers! 254 is a lot...I guess you need it, hauling that yacht around though haha kidding.
Almost forgot about this thread...

TY for the input! Yeah, I still haven't gotten her looked at re: the intake leak. I know it's leaking somewhere. I can hear it. My bet is the NWP spacers. I'm quite sure the headers are still on nice and tight.

Really been thinking of the UTEC. Have to find a shop around here that knows how to tune with that. Any wideband o2 you would recommend?
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #8  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
I've heard really good things about the Innovate LC-1. You can have one for around $180 on eBay, brand new in the box.

I use an AEM wideband and it works fine for me, decent response and accuracy. Display is easy to read even at night/direct sunlight.

Check this thread for more information -> WBO2 comparison

Make sure you check post #19 if you are considering a UTEC.

Last edited by MoncefA33; Jul 31, 2009 at 10:32 PM.
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 07:17 AM
  #9  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
It's going to be leaner more likely because of that intake leak you were referring to, IMO.

Usually headers/exhaust make our cars run richer. A wideband O2 and an AFC/UTEC would be in order here to correct AFRs. UTEC will let you do timing control and CVTC maps as well as rev limiter, yada yada yada...AFC2 will just do fuel.

Nice numbers! 254 is a lot...I guess you need it, hauling that yacht around though haha kidding.
utec does not control cvtc maps
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #10  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Whoops, my bad.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Goffery2uned
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
9
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 PM
julian888
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
0
Aug 6, 2015 04:39 AM
julian888
New Member Introductions
1
Aug 5, 2015 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 AM.