Heres a real G35 dyno plot
#1
Heres a real G35 dyno plot
Check this link out: http://home.earthlink.net/~kyang01/g35dyno.htm
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
#4
Re: Heres a real G35 dyno plot
Originally posted by emax95
Check this link out: http://home.earthlink.net/~kyang01/g35dyno.htm
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
Check this link out: http://home.earthlink.net/~kyang01/g35dyno.htm
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
#6
Originally posted by Nealoc187
Is the 6spd G35 out yet? I'm assuming this guy was automatic... 213 to the wheels from a 260hp manual tranny car is weak. Please tell me he's auto.
Is the 6spd G35 out yet? I'm assuming this guy was automatic... 213 to the wheels from a 260hp manual tranny car is weak. Please tell me he's auto.
If you think that tranny loss is bad you must think the auto maxima's dynoes are horrible! 213 from a RWD auto equipped car rated a 260 HP is pretty good IMO, especialy with the nissan over rated #'s these days.
Thanks Kashoggio
#10
Re: Heres a real G35 dyno plot
Originally posted by emax95
Check this link out: http://home.earthlink.net/~kyang01/g35dyno.htm
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
Check this link out: http://home.earthlink.net/~kyang01/g35dyno.htm
It appears that this car has a good amount of extra grunt up top. I checked out my last dyno plot and I make more peak TQ then the G35 at 3000 RPM
#15
Originally posted by 02MaximizedVQ
Maxima's with 255hp, 6spd and FWD are dynoing at 205hp and the Infiniti is dynoing with a whopping 8 more HP, with an automatic, and power robbing RWD. Impressive.
Jesse
Maxima's with 255hp, 6spd and FWD are dynoing at 205hp and the Infiniti is dynoing with a whopping 8 more HP, with an automatic, and power robbing RWD. Impressive.
Jesse
i always thought FWD was the power-robber.
you know something's wrong when a 260 HP auto dynos 10 more HP to the wheels than a "255 HP" manual.
its also strange that the dyno started at 4000 RPMs. i hit my peak torque at 3500 RPMs. i wonder if the dyno missed something by starting so high.
#16
Originally posted by Newman
i always thought FWD was the power-robber.
you know something's wrong when a 260 HP auto dynos 10 more HP to the wheels than a "255 HP" manual.
its also strange that the dyno started at 4000 RPMs. i hit my peak torque at 3500 RPMs. i wonder if the dyno missed something by starting so high.
i always thought FWD was the power-robber.
you know something's wrong when a 260 HP auto dynos 10 more HP to the wheels than a "255 HP" manual.
its also strange that the dyno started at 4000 RPMs. i hit my peak torque at 3500 RPMs. i wonder if the dyno missed something by starting so high.
#18
Damn, it sure looks like the G35 has a VI. The upswing in HP@5200 and the way TQ holds on sure looks like some manifold trickery.
The reason the dyno starts so high is because many autos will downshift if you go WOT. Starting higher in the RPMs lessens the chance of a downshift. Of course, I thought you could hold the gears on the G35.
210+rwhp from a stock auto RWD V6 with less than 3000 miles is pretty impressive. I beat this car would dyno 220+hp after 10000 miles or so. The auto is only loosing about 18% thru the drivetrain. I'll take a G35 anyday. Even in auto form.
Dave
The reason the dyno starts so high is because many autos will downshift if you go WOT. Starting higher in the RPMs lessens the chance of a downshift. Of course, I thought you could hold the gears on the G35.
210+rwhp from a stock auto RWD V6 with less than 3000 miles is pretty impressive. I beat this car would dyno 220+hp after 10000 miles or so. The auto is only loosing about 18% thru the drivetrain. I'll take a G35 anyday. Even in auto form.
Dave
#19
Originally posted by Dave B
Damn, it sure looks like the G35 has a VI. The upswing in HP@5200 and the way TQ holds on sure looks like some manifold trickery.
Dave
Damn, it sure looks like the G35 has a VI. The upswing in HP@5200 and the way TQ holds on sure looks like some manifold trickery.
Dave
#20
There's always the possibility the dyno is off. Until another Maxima is tested on the same dyno immediately after the G35 we may not no why there is a discrepancy. Nissan could have under rated the HP of the G35 and/or overated the Maxima. I remember in SCC magazine they were dynoing stock WRX's at 142hp and the next issue they apologized and said the dyno was off. The new figures were around 161 I believe.
Jesse
Jesse
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Remember, the G35 (and 2002 Max, for that matter) has variable cam timing. You may well be seeing the cam indexing at 5200 rpm. Although Nissan uses the term "continuously", the system may actually index via multiple discrete steps, and is not truely continous...something along the lines of 5 degree retard steps. Just a guess.
Originally posted by Dave B
Damn, it sure looks like the G35 has a VI. The upswing in HP@5200 and the way TQ holds on sure looks like some manifold trickery.
The reason the dyno starts so high is because many autos will downshift if you go WOT. Starting higher in the RPMs lessens the chance of a downshift. Of course, I thought you could hold the gears on the G35.
210+rwhp from a stock auto RWD V6 with less than 3000 miles is pretty impressive. I beat this car would dyno 220+hp after 10000 miles or so. The auto is only loosing about 18% thru the drivetrain. I'll take a G35 anyday. Even in auto form.
Dave
Damn, it sure looks like the G35 has a VI. The upswing in HP@5200 and the way TQ holds on sure looks like some manifold trickery.
The reason the dyno starts so high is because many autos will downshift if you go WOT. Starting higher in the RPMs lessens the chance of a downshift. Of course, I thought you could hold the gears on the G35.
210+rwhp from a stock auto RWD V6 with less than 3000 miles is pretty impressive. I beat this car would dyno 220+hp after 10000 miles or so. The auto is only loosing about 18% thru the drivetrain. I'll take a G35 anyday. Even in auto form.
Dave
#22
Originally posted by 02MaximizedVQ
There's always the possibility the dyno is off. Until another Maxima is tested on the same dyno immediately after the G35 we may not no why there is a discrepancy. Nissan could have under rated the HP of the G35 and/or overated the Maxima. I remember in SCC magazine they were dynoing stock WRX's at 142hp and the next issue they apologized and said the dyno was off. The new figures were around 161 I believe.
Jesse
There's always the possibility the dyno is off. Until another Maxima is tested on the same dyno immediately after the G35 we may not no why there is a discrepancy. Nissan could have under rated the HP of the G35 and/or overated the Maxima. I remember in SCC magazine they were dynoing stock WRX's at 142hp and the next issue they apologized and said the dyno was off. The new figures were around 161 I believe.
Jesse
Stock 4th gen 5-speeds typically dyno about that
#24
That is a very nice hp curve. Just enough to keep the shifts in the meat of the powerband under WOT. I haven't driven the G35 yet so I don't know how well the tranny shifts. If it shifts like an auto max, then some vb work and that thing will be sweet.
I agree with Dave B about the hp. 213/260 = about an 18% driveline loss. That's very good for an auto.
Now the interesting thing is . . . with 18% driveline loss, the 6 speed may not be much faster. That's just a hair better than the 15 or so on my 5speed.
This may be like the corvette - 6 speed only marginally faster.
I agree with Dave B about the hp. 213/260 = about an 18% driveline loss. That's very good for an auto.
Now the interesting thing is . . . with 18% driveline loss, the 6 speed may not be much faster. That's just a hair better than the 15 or so on my 5speed.
This may be like the corvette - 6 speed only marginally faster.
#28
Originally posted by Lordrandall
227 is the 5th gen Max, not the G35.
FWD
227 is the 5th gen Max, not the G35.
FWD
I remember in SCC magazine they were dynoing stock WRX's at 142hp and the next issue they apologized and said the dyno was off. The new figures were around 161 I believe.
161whp is REALLY pitiful for a 227 hp car.
#29
Originally posted by SR20DEN
Looks to me like they're talking about 161 out of 227hp being pitiful for the AWD Subaru WRX.
Looks to me like they're talking about 161 out of 227hp being pitiful for the AWD Subaru WRX.
#31
There has got to be something wrong with that dyno plot. I have never seen in my life a tourque curve that stays that flat, minus the dip. The only car ever to come close was a viper. And that even dropped off at about 4,800. But hey maybe nissan has figured out something. Props if they did.
cya
ryan
cya
ryan
#32
Originally posted by Foglght
There has got to be something wrong with that dyno plot. I have never seen in my life a tourque curve that stays that flat, minus the dip. The only car ever to come close was a viper. And that even dropped off at about 4,800. But hey maybe nissan has figured out something. Props if they did.
cya
ryan
There has got to be something wrong with that dyno plot. I have never seen in my life a tourque curve that stays that flat, minus the dip. The only car ever to come close was a viper. And that even dropped off at about 4,800. But hey maybe nissan has figured out something. Props if they did.
cya
ryan
#34
Originally posted by gLok
Remember, AWD cars dyno lower because its pushing power through all four wheels. Its really misleading.
Remember, AWD cars dyno lower because its pushing power through all four wheels. Its really misleading.
Plus there are two differentials its going thrgh so it makes sense to see it lower.
#35
so explain this to me. If the car has 216 tq. Why does the graph not show that. They have the same numbers on the left and right side of the screen for the scale, but yet the tourque number doesn't even come close to 216. More like 200. Just wondering!?
cya
ryan
cya
ryan
#36
Originally posted by Foglght
so explain this to me. If the car has 216 tq. Why does the graph not show that. They have the same numbers on the left and right side of the screen for the scale, but yet the tourque number doesn't even come close to 216. More like 200. Just wondering!?
cya
ryan
so explain this to me. If the car has 216 tq. Why does the graph not show that. They have the same numbers on the left and right side of the screen for the scale, but yet the tourque number doesn't even come close to 216. More like 200. Just wondering!?
cya
ryan
#40
Originally posted by Foglght
ok now i just looked at it again so see if im truly nuts here. One of those data lines......either tourque or hp, is just at 200. So one of them is wrong. I don't understand how you cannot see this.
ok now i just looked at it again so see if im truly nuts here. One of those data lines......either tourque or hp, is just at 200. So one of them is wrong. I don't understand how you cannot see this.
The hp line starts at the bottom left and climbs to the top right.
HP and torque lines always cross at 5252 rpms
So remember that on a dyno chart that torque will always be the higher number before 5252 and HP will always be the higher number after 5252. Torque is really what gets measured. Hp is merely a calculation of torque and rpm.