S-AFC settings. What needs to be set for a Max?
#1
S-AFC settings. What needs to be set for a Max?
Before going to my 1hr dyno session for the first since the s/c been installed to tune the a/f ratio.
I wanted to know what "basic" settings I should setup on the S-AFC before doing the Hi throttle adjustments at the dyno. By I mean all the other setting like sensor type, pressure type, and all that other jazz. There are a rack of things to set. I dont want to be wasting my time setting the stuff during my 1hr spot.
There are so many settings, shiet...... I dont know what the hell to set them to.
Any help would be appreciated.
Dixit
I wanted to know what "basic" settings I should setup on the S-AFC before doing the Hi throttle adjustments at the dyno. By I mean all the other setting like sensor type, pressure type, and all that other jazz. There are a rack of things to set. I dont want to be wasting my time setting the stuff during my 1hr spot.
There are so many settings, shiet...... I dont know what the hell to set them to.
Any help would be appreciated.
Dixit
#2
Dixit,
I will PM you my info if you want to call me...
but you need to put ignition to on but not crank car.
select etc, car type, 6 cyl arrow up to right
settings, sensor type, hot-wire, in 4 out 4
Lo-throttle 39%, Hi-throttle 40%
I will be available tomorrow by cell if ya need more info...
I have yet to get to the dyno as I am stilld ealing with an o2 sensor not playing nice and the CEL won't clear out until it is replaced but hopefully soon.
I will PM you my info if you want to call me...
but you need to put ignition to on but not crank car.
select etc, car type, 6 cyl arrow up to right
settings, sensor type, hot-wire, in 4 out 4
Lo-throttle 39%, Hi-throttle 40%
I will be available tomorrow by cell if ya need more info...
I have yet to get to the dyno as I am stilld ealing with an o2 sensor not playing nice and the CEL won't clear out until it is replaced but hopefully soon.
#3
What about setting like when you set the car to 6 cylinder, which way you point the Throttle Sensor Type? incline or decline?
On the graph scale what setting for intake pressure? and air flow % correction?
Two more questions, what is this Deceleration air settings for upper limits? Do I touch anything there?
And what rpms points do yall use when you tune? Like what 8 do see best chosen?
Dixit
On the graph scale what setting for intake pressure? and air flow % correction?
Two more questions, what is this Deceleration air settings for upper limits? Do I touch anything there?
And what rpms points do yall use when you tune? Like what 8 do see best chosen?
Dixit
#4
When I dyno tuned my afc it came out perfect. Gained 55hp from it.. My dyno chart is more inclined and less staggered. I have my settings at home. When I get off work I'll send you the info.
#5
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
When I dyno tuned my afc it came out perfect. Gained 55hp from it.. My dyno chart is more inclined and less staggered. I have my settings at home. When I get off work I'll send you the info.
When I dyno tuned my afc it came out perfect. Gained 55hp from it.. My dyno chart is more inclined and less staggered. I have my settings at home. When I get off work I'll send you the info.
#6
Originally posted by JAY25
55HP from Dyno tunning with the SAFC, you sure about those numbers? I am looking at 6 thru maybe 15 HP gain. I am awaiting my ME VI, but I ll post the gains when I DYNO my car w/SAFC
55HP from Dyno tunning with the SAFC, you sure about those numbers? I am looking at 6 thru maybe 15 HP gain. I am awaiting my ME VI, but I ll post the gains when I DYNO my car w/SAFC
#8
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
#9
Originally posted by JAY25
You using aftermarket injectors? The only Dyno I did was at 5.9 PSI, and my car Dynoed @ 244HP. I was not boosting 10 since my belt was slipping. Lets see what the missing 3 PSI will do, the SAFC and the ME VI?
You using aftermarket injectors? The only Dyno I did was at 5.9 PSI, and my car Dynoed @ 244HP. I was not boosting 10 since my belt was slipping. Lets see what the missing 3 PSI will do, the SAFC and the ME VI?
#10
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
3PSI is alot.. Put it this way. Before I had my SC I only dyno'd a pathetic 155fwhp.. My car was definitely sick back then. Adding the SC with 3.33" gave me 100hp about 10-11psi.. And the afc gave the other 55.. So it's definitely something more left for you.
3PSI is alot.. Put it this way. Before I had my SC I only dyno'd a pathetic 155fwhp.. My car was definitely sick back then. Adding the SC with 3.33" gave me 100hp about 10-11psi.. And the afc gave the other 55.. So it's definitely something more left for you.
Dixit
#11
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
#12
Originally posted by irvine78
what the? are you serious? you have all motor(not squeezing) 310fwhp just with the S-AFC?
what the? are you serious? you have all motor(not squeezing) 310fwhp just with the S-AFC?
#13
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
All-Motor? Hell no, aint you read where he has a 3.33" that aint all motor. He got only 155 whp motor which is damn low.
All-Motor? Hell no, aint you read where he has a 3.33" that aint all motor. He got only 155 whp motor which is damn low.
#14
Originally posted by irvine78
what the? are you serious? you have all motor(not squeezing) 310fwhp just with the S-AFC?
what the? are you serious? you have all motor(not squeezing) 310fwhp just with the S-AFC?
#15
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
That's would kinda be impossible to be all motor unless I had a 150 shot But I'm running a SC 3.33". Just threw on my blitz bov the other day and it seems to be running better with it.
That's would kinda be impossible to be all motor unless I had a 150 shot But I'm running a SC 3.33". Just threw on my blitz bov the other day and it seems to be running better with it.
#17
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
Yeah about 1 month ago I dyno'd with all motor. At that time I had, intake, y-pipe, test-pipe, greddy evo catback/exhaust, udp. And all I got was 155fwhp. I ran it three times. The guy had like this meter that he connected to my exhaust. I guess it measures how rich you run. The meter was reading something like 14.5. Thats high, he sais it should be like 10.5 or soo. When I changed out my plugs they were black. So I know I was running super rich, I guess that would explain the 155fwhp back then.
Yeah about 1 month ago I dyno'd with all motor. At that time I had, intake, y-pipe, test-pipe, greddy evo catback/exhaust, udp. And all I got was 155fwhp. I ran it three times. The guy had like this meter that he connected to my exhaust. I guess it measures how rich you run. The meter was reading something like 14.5. Thats high, he sais it should be like 10.5 or soo. When I changed out my plugs they were black. So I know I was running super rich, I guess that would explain the 155fwhp back then.
On an all motor you cant be running at 10.5:1. That is too rich. All motor you want to be around 12.5:1 to 13:1. Something else seems wrong, seems like you might have had a VAIS problem. I would love to see the dyno on it to see what is the issue.
Dixit
#18
no way.
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
When I dyno tuned my afc it came out perfect. Gained 55hp from it.. My dyno chart is more inclined and less staggered. I have my settings at home. When I get off work I'll send you the info.
When I dyno tuned my afc it came out perfect. Gained 55hp from it.. My dyno chart is more inclined and less staggered. I have my settings at home. When I get off work I'll send you the info.
#20
Originally posted by Jer
The 10+psi of boost is what's got my attention... that shouldn't be possible unless someone wrote "3.33" in whiteout on the pulley...
The 10+psi of boost is what's got my attention... that shouldn't be possible unless someone wrote "3.33" in whiteout on the pulley...
Dixit
#21
too high numbers for being running RICH?!?!
this reply is so lame, i'm gonna start dancin!
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
I tuned my afc on the dyno. I did a before and after. Before 255fwhp, after 310fwhp.. I think I got so high #'s because I was running extremly rich. I have to lean myself out a lot on the afc just to get back to reasonable #'s..
#22
Originally posted by Chebosto
[IMG]too high numbers for being running RICH?!?!
[IMG]too high numbers for being running RICH?!?!
SuDZ
#23
Originally posted by SuDZ
He meant he got such high gains (55Hp) because of leaning out the fuel. I think he was saying he was running too rich causing the low Dyno numbers.
SuDZ
He meant he got such high gains (55Hp) because of leaning out the fuel. I think he was saying he was running too rich causing the low Dyno numbers.
SuDZ
For those non-believers I scanned the dyno's from before and after sc w/afc installed..
Before SC & AFC
AFC + SC
#25
not to doubt that you gained the hp because i don't but that dyno is uncorrected. it should be SAE corrected like your first one. you hp numbers will prolly be slightly lower. if you go back and get them on disk you can play with it at home using the viewer...
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
Finally someone understands
For those non-believers I scanned the dyno's from before and after sc w/afc installed..
Before SC & AFC
AFC + SC
Finally someone understands
For those non-believers I scanned the dyno's from before and after sc w/afc installed..
Before SC & AFC
AFC + SC
#26
Originally posted by Confused
not to doubt that you gained the hp because i don't but that dyno is uncorrected. it should be SAE corrected like your first one. you hp numbers will prolly be slightly lower. if you go back and get them on disk you can play with it at home using the viewer...
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
not to doubt that you gained the hp because i don't but that dyno is uncorrected. it should be SAE corrected like your first one. you hp numbers will prolly be slightly lower. if you go back and get them on disk you can play with it at home using the viewer...
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
Only question I got is the 2nd dyno done in 4th or 3rd? If it was 4th then maybe that is why the #s are slighly higher than normal.
Dixit
#27
Originally posted by Confused
not to doubt that you gained the hp because i don't but that dyno is uncorrected. it should be SAE corrected like your first one. you hp numbers will prolly be slightly lower. if you go back and get them on disk you can play with it at home using the viewer...
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
not to doubt that you gained the hp because i don't but that dyno is uncorrected. it should be SAE corrected like your first one. you hp numbers will prolly be slightly lower. if you go back and get them on disk you can play with it at home using the viewer...
no disrespect intended just trying to help.
#28
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Also the reason why the first dyno #s are soo low compared to others with that much mods is that they dynoed it in 2nd gear. You can tell from the mph on the chart. But what is wierd how the 2nd run is like 86mph. Cant see how they got that speed on 2nd gear on an auto. Cant get more than 70-75 on 2nd gear.
Only question I got is the 2nd dyno done in 4th or 3rd? If it was 4th then maybe that is why the #s are slighly higher than normal.
Dixit
Also the reason why the first dyno #s are soo low compared to others with that much mods is that they dynoed it in 2nd gear. You can tell from the mph on the chart. But what is wierd how the 2nd run is like 86mph. Cant see how they got that speed on 2nd gear on an auto. Cant get more than 70-75 on 2nd gear.
Only question I got is the 2nd dyno done in 4th or 3rd? If it was 4th then maybe that is why the #s are slighly higher than normal.
Dixit
#29
But what about the 1st dyno. Was that in 2nd?
Cause im lost now, I thought dynoing in 2nd would give you lower number but im being told it would actually give you higher numbers? What is the right one?
Cause im lost now, I thought dynoing in 2nd would give you lower number but im being told it would actually give you higher numbers? What is the right one?
#30
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
But what about the 1st dyno. Was that in 2nd?
Cause im lost now, I thought dynoing in 2nd would give you lower number but im being told it would actually give you higher numbers? What is the right one?
But what about the 1st dyno. Was that in 2nd?
Cause im lost now, I thought dynoing in 2nd would give you lower number but im being told it would actually give you higher numbers? What is the right one?
Now thats sounds a bit better since I woke up this morning and said something is wrong with those 55HP gains out of a SAFC. I now see why your numbers are a bit different, plus your auto. Have you taken it to the track to exercise those 297Ponies?
#31
Originally posted by JAY25
Now thats sounds a bit better since I woke up this morning and said something is wrong with those 55HP gains out of a SAFC. I now see why your numbers are a bit different, plus your auto. Have you taken it to the track to exercise those 297Ponies?
Now thats sounds a bit better since I woke up this morning and said something is wrong with those 55HP gains out of a SAFC. I now see why your numbers are a bit different, plus your auto. Have you taken it to the track to exercise those 297Ponies?
#32
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
I only went to exercise the 255 when I didn't have the afc.. So the extra ponies should make a difference now... I think I ran a 14.5 last time. But I didn't do anything to the car. tire psi etc.. left it street..
I only went to exercise the 255 when I didn't have the afc.. So the extra ponies should make a difference now... I think I ran a 14.5 last time. But I didn't do anything to the car. tire psi etc.. left it street..
I'm not trying to put up the B.S. flag, just doesn't make sense. It's hard to really see the kind of gains you're talking about if you use skewed numbers to begin with. I know it's probably impossible to do now, but to really see the gains of the AFC alone you would have to have a baseline before/after (with the same gear pulls, same add-ons, etc....only diff is adding the AFC).
#35
Originally Posted by BigDogJonx
On the graph scale what setting for intake pressure? and air flow % correction?
Two more questions, what is this Deceleration air settings for upper limits? Do I touch anything there?
And what rpms points do yall use when you tune? Like what 8 do see best chosen?
Dixit
Two more questions, what is this Deceleration air settings for upper limits? Do I touch anything there?
And what rpms points do yall use when you tune? Like what 8 do see best chosen?
Dixit
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pktaske
6th Generation Classifieds (2004-2008)
1
05-06-2016 07:49 AM
pktaske
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
0
09-04-2015 08:40 AM