View Poll Results: Are these Sweet or no
Yes
89
75.42%
No
29
24.58%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll
*Vote time* Sweet or not..
who said your car has to be low to be a show car
12-25-2002, 08:15 PM
#43
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 286
those cars are hot without question
12-25-2002, 08:53 PM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,809
Jason and Blake BOTH have the TWO hottest max's outta anybody on this board!!Ant
12-25-2002, 09:16 PM
#46
Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Cumalot
So I guess what you saying is that a car can be stock height and be a show car?
So I guess what you saying is that a car can be stock height and be a show car?
12-25-2002, 09:22 PM
#47
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Maximan190
yes; i dont see 67-69 Camaros lowered and theyre still show cars..
yes; i dont see 67-69 Camaros lowered and theyre still show cars..
12-25-2002, 09:32 PM
#48
Re: I think they're both nice...
You can have both form and function.
My car has 19"s, custom interior, huge stereo, custom paint, etc.
But it's also SC'd, nitroused, and has just about every other performance part. That's why I kept my coilovers instead of swapping to air.
My car has 19"s, custom interior, huge stereo, custom paint, etc.
But it's also SC'd, nitroused, and has just about every other performance part. That's why I kept my coilovers instead of swapping to air.
Originally posted by Black VQ
They aren't really my thing. I go more for form over function, so I'd just have a suspension more for handling than a drop, for example. No bodykits, and I'd probably go with some lightweight 16s.
Still I think both Maximas are very tastefully done.
They aren't really my thing. I go more for form over function, so I'd just have a suspension more for handling than a drop, for example. No bodykits, and I'd probably go with some lightweight 16s.
Still I think both Maximas are very tastefully done.
12-26-2002, 01:29 AM
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,659
i think they're both hot......
12-26-2002, 10:45 AM
#50
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 341
I think they are pretty keen for show cars. Not really my cup of tea but they are done really well. I'm not sure about the function of the car but thats not the point when you are into show class in most cases. To me it is more impressive to see a functional and nice looking car. In my opinion a car enthusiast should have a car that performs as well as it looks but not everyone thinks as I do so who am I to judge? As long as I didn't pay for it I could care less actually.
12-26-2002, 11:15 AM
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
I don't think they are rice, but where's the check box for ghetto?
12-26-2002, 11:18 AM
#53
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I don't think they are rice, but where's the check box for ghetto?
I don't think they are rice, but where's the check box for ghetto?
And don't forget the
12-26-2002, 11:29 AM
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Cumalot
lol...how many times do we have to say they're show cars? That's why they're so low.
lol...how many times do we have to say they're show cars? That's why they're so low.
And if I'm not mistaken, there is no lowering requirement to enter your car in a show. And also the concept of a good show car is relative. Else, we wouldn't need judges and nobody would vote, because we could just let Cumalot tell us the winner every time.
12-26-2002, 11:35 AM
#55
What's your definition of ghetto?
I always considered ghetto to be work that's badly done. And the workmanship on both cars is excellent.
I always considered ghetto to be work that's badly done. And the workmanship on both cars is excellent.
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I don't think they are rice, but where's the check box for ghetto?
I don't think they are rice, but where's the check box for ghetto?
12-26-2002, 12:19 PM
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,452
I'm under the impression that both cars aren't supercharged. How ricey are they? Not much, they're both done tastefully and nice looking cars.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
12-26-2002, 12:22 PM
#58
The 5th gen is supercharged.
Originally posted by ereet
I'm under the impression that both cars aren't supercharged. How ricey are they? Not much, they're both done tastefully and nice looking cars.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
I'm under the impression that both cars aren't supercharged. How ricey are they? Not much, they're both done tastefully and nice looking cars.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
12-26-2002, 02:29 PM
#60
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Maximan190
yes; i dont see 67-69 Camaros lowered and theyre still show cars..
yes; i dont see 67-69 Camaros lowered and theyre still show cars..
you're comparing apples to oranges in this case...antiques/classics and sport compact cars...
12-26-2002, 02:30 PM
#61
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,637
Originally posted by ereet
I'm under the impression that both cars aren't supercharged. How ricey are they? Not much, they're both done tastefully and nice looking cars.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
I'm under the impression that both cars aren't supercharged. How ricey are they? Not much, they're both done tastefully and nice looking cars.
My defination of Rice is putting looks over performance, in an effort to look faster.
These guys are putting looks over performance, in an effort to look BETTER.
It might make them look ****ty to some people, but it certinaly doesn't make them ricey.
12-26-2002, 02:44 PM
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 594
Well i think the first is dropped way too much and thats rice. I mean the rims are partly covered which way to far a drop. The second not as bad. I wouldn't want it dropped that much for practical reasons but at least the rims aren't covered.
12-26-2002, 02:56 PM
#64
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,637
Originally posted by 96max5sp
Well i think the first is dropped way too much and thats rice. I mean the rims are partly covered which way to far a drop. The second not as bad. I wouldn't want it dropped that much for practical reasons but at least the rims aren't covered.
Well i think the first is dropped way too much and thats rice. I mean the rims are partly covered which way to far a drop. The second not as bad. I wouldn't want it dropped that much for practical reasons but at least the rims aren't covered.
12-26-2002, 03:01 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Cumalot
So I guess what you saying is that a car can be stock height and be a show car?
So I guess what you saying is that a car can be stock height and be a show car?
12-26-2002, 03:04 PM
#66
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,637
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Maxima91
no hes saying that they are tooo low, they dont have to be stock to be show, just not THIS LOW, they still look good though
no hes saying that they are tooo low, they dont have to be stock to be show, just not THIS LOW, they still look good though
i mean, c'mon now..
12-26-2002, 03:05 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by gtr_rider
is that better?
i mean, c'mon now..
is that better?
i mean, c'mon now..
12-26-2002, 03:30 PM
#69
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,637
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No
Originally posted by Maxima91
dummass, i meant the 5th gen, the 4th looks fine
dummass, i meant the 5th gen, the 4th looks fine
12-26-2002, 03:51 PM
#72
Handsome
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,074
IMHO the drastic drop doesn't look clean. I would keep the fender to wheel gap even all the way around.
I am more partcial to cars like Max4speed's 4th gen for show quality. But most max's look great with just a good set of wheels, shaved emblems, clear corners, and red/clears.
I am more partcial to cars like Max4speed's 4th gen for show quality. But most max's look great with just a good set of wheels, shaved emblems, clear corners, and red/clears.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
08-11-2015 11:59 AM