View Poll Results: Are these Sweet or no
Yes
89
75.42%
No
29
24.58%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll
*Vote time* Sweet or not..
12-24-2002, 07:49 PM
#1
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,640
*Vote time* Sweet or not..
This discussion has been going on for too long now, and it needs to be settled once and for all.
Please, cast your votes and tell me if you would like these two selected cars, or do you think they are "rice" as they call it.
Please close wisely as you can only vote once and only once.
Here is the first Selection:
and the second
this brought to you by easily to contradict members.
Choose 'yes' if you like them, or 'no' if you do not. Please do not vote according to if you like the owner or not.
Please, cast your votes and tell me if you would like these two selected cars, or do you think they are "rice" as they call it.
Please close wisely as you can only vote once and only once.
Here is the first Selection:
and the second
this brought to you by easily to contradict members.
Choose 'yes' if you like them, or 'no' if you do not. Please do not vote according to if you like the owner or not.
12-24-2002, 08:01 PM
#6
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 333
I like both of them. I love the dropped look on our max's.
12-24-2002, 08:39 PM
#14
Originally posted by rob van dam
its funny.....blake's car doesn't even exist anymore..he sold it...
..it was so nice......
its funny.....blake's car doesn't even exist anymore..he sold it...
..it was so nice......
-Cyrus
12-24-2002, 08:40 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 457
i like both of them....i've seen blakes in person a few times and i love it...yeahh too bad he sold it...but anyways, both of them are cool, not rice at all to me, just my opinion
12-24-2002, 08:45 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 243
Both cars are lookin good, though I think the first one is a bit too low.
12-24-2002, 09:08 PM
#17
Both cars are not rice at all. I like both of them, very tastefully done IMO. Remember both are show cars. Yes, Blake's car was too low, but again it's for SHOW. He didn't drive around like that of course, but I think some of you might not know that with the comment of it's too low. I haven't seen the other guy's car in person, but I have seen Blake's car in person and it looked very clean. Too bad he decided to part with the mods and maybe the car, he had one of the best looking 5th gens IMO. Neither cars are no where near "rice". Then again, I know some people will call a car rice no matter what. I guess the only way it's not rice to some people if it's totally stock.
12-24-2002, 09:14 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 204
luv them both and also wanna lower mine like that. mad respects to owners still.
12-24-2002, 10:17 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think they are both pretty sweet, but my preference is with the 4th gen.
12-25-2002, 07:46 AM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 412
I like both. Like i said in the other thread, it would be rice if Blake didn't have bags and couldn't lift it up for driveability.
12-25-2002, 08:41 AM
#26
192.168.1.1
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 17,640
Originally posted by 2002Maxxxima
I like both. Like i said in the other thread, it would be rice if Blake didn't have bags and couldn't lift it up for driveability.
I like both. Like i said in the other thread, it would be rice if Blake didn't have bags and couldn't lift it up for driveability.
That would be plain stupid
12-25-2002, 08:44 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 412
Originally posted by gtr_rider
That would be plain stupid
That would be plain stupid
......jk
12-25-2002, 10:02 AM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
I think they're both nice...
They aren't really my thing. I go more for form over function, so I'd just have a suspension more for handling than a drop, for example. No bodykits, and I'd probably go with some lightweight 16s.
Still I think both Maximas are very tastefully done.
Still I think both Maximas are very tastefully done.
12-25-2002, 10:22 AM
#31
Re: I think they're both nice...
Originally posted by Black VQ
They aren't really my thing. I go more for form over function, so I'd just have a suspension more for handling than a drop, for example. No bodykits, and I'd probably go with some lightweight 16s.
They aren't really my thing. I go more for form over function, so I'd just have a suspension more for handling than a drop, for example. No bodykits, and I'd probably go with some lightweight 16s.
12-25-2002, 11:03 AM
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,630
I am voting yes only b/c of Jay's car.
12-25-2002, 11:48 AM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Re: Re: I think they're both nice...
Originally posted by MAXIN
these are SHOW cars.... your setup would not win much shows, or even looks....although it may outperform them....hence the term SHOW cars.
these are SHOW cars.... your setup would not win much shows, or even looks....although it may outperform them....hence the term SHOW cars.
12-25-2002, 03:52 PM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,630
Originally posted by gtr_rider
wheres your kit? I wanna see when you get it
wheres your kit? I wanna see when you get it
12-25-2002, 04:35 PM
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 54
No
Nice cars but lowered just too much.
Jim
Jim
that about sums it up