General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Old Feb 5, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
Nealoc187's Avatar
Thread Starter
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Just something some of you might find interesting: I took the liberty of using Requin6's dyno plot and inputting it into Cartest2000. I had previously accurately modeled my best run with the VI on street tires of 14.46 @ 96.7. The ONLY changes I made to this model were using Requin6's WHP numbers AND a 7200rpm rev limiter (with the power dropping off to 187whp at 7200rpm), no other changes were made. This yeilded a 1/4 mile time of 13.88 @ 101.89 on street tires with a 2.20 60' time. Modeling with slicks showed 13.59 @ 101.47 on a 1.90 60' time.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #2  
JeffesonM's Avatar
living out of a maxima...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,432
From: NJ
Re: Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Originally posted by Nealoc187
...a 1/4 mile time of 13.88 @ 101.89 on street tires
with slicks 13.59 @ 101.47...


tell JWT to hurry up with your ECU
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #3  
SEguy182's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,016
From: Hoover, AL
Re: Re: Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Originally posted by JeffesonM



tell JWT to hurry up with your ECU
seriously
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
BrianV's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,597
Re: Re: Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Originally posted by JeffesonM



tell JWT to hurry up with your ECU
Your car looks clean, I haven't seen it before, real clean keep up the good work.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #5  
NISMO808's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,762
wow those are great numbers.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
HitManSE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,965
Looks like ur gonna get the title of the fastest all motor max back from ethan once the ECU arrives, for now anyway
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
BBaker025's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,807
The fastest all motor max is getting faster!!! Take a video of ur next track run on slicks, I gotta see it!
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
Iilac's Avatar
Spelled with a I not a L for Iilac. Prounced Ii-eee-ack.
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,434
From: Central Valley, California
That's awesome to hear. Please get vids of the run when you accomplish this.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:15 PM
  #9  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Holy ****. more than .6 sec with just adding the JWT ECU to a VI.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #10  
Requin6's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,804
From: Frederick, MD
Re: Modeled JWT ECU w/MEVI and 7200rpm rev limiter in CarTest

Originally posted by Nealoc187
Just something some of you might find interesting: I took the liberty of using Requin6's dyno plot and inputting it into Cartest2000. I had previously accurately modeled my best run with the VI on street tires of 14.46 @ 96.7. The ONLY changes I made to this model were using Requin6's WHP numbers AND a 7200rpm rev limiter (with the power dropping off to 187whp at 7200rpm), no other changes were made. This yeilded a 1/4 mile time of 13.88 @ 101.89 on street tires with a 2.20 60' time. Modeling with slicks showed 13.59 @ 101.47 on a 1.90 60' time.
thanks neal, that is great news. looks like 13's NA is an accomplishable goal! and your times are only going to get lower and lower! (i had a good feeling about this )
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #11  
emax02's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by BBaker025
The fastest all motor max is getting faster!!! Take a video of ur next track run on slicks, I gotta see it!
What? I'm getting faster? I guess you are right



Neal, it's funny how the car-test time came out to exacly my time (13.883) @ almost 101 MPH. My 60' was simaler at 2.25 too.


It looks like this next track season is going to be a fun one! I am going to work very hard to keep my sig quote intact. I will not be using slicks though, so that should make up for my .5 liter advantage. My car weights a few hundred pounds more though, hmm, maybe I should get drag radials then? Hehe, nah..

Remember it's all in good fun!
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #12  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Isn't it amazing how simply gaining some extra useable RPM can really help things out? I've done the calculations and with just the fuel cut raised to 7000rpms (no other tuning), the MEVI equipped 4g is riding along a power curve with an extra 15fwhp and tq. I can only imagine what it will feel like with the JWT tuning and 7200rpm redline. I can't wait to order my JWT ecu.

Ethan,
We're holding you to your word of "NO SLICKS". Of course years ago you said you'd be keeping your I30, then you sold it and got a 2k2 Maxima which you said would stay stock because "you didn't like the lack of reliablilty with modifications.". Now look at you, 2k2 Maxima, UDP, intake, fabbed y-pipe, catback, lowered, wheels, aftermarket leather, bodykit, aftermarket wing, no aftermarket wing, G35 intake manifold, no G35 intake manifold, blown MAF sensors, and now potential headers.


.......just get the damn slicks



Dave
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 09:41 PM
  #13  
Victim64's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,032
JWT can kiss my ***! They need to get an ECU out for my ****ing 98 **** *** maxima so I can ****ing take advantage of this **** *** ****ing VI mother ****er! **** son of a *****!




Sorry, just releasing some anger and testing out the orgs profanity filter!
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #14  
96_vqmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,601
Wow that's great ###.Do your think that the 4g auto can take it up to 7200rpm without changing valve spring and all?Thanx!
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 01:16 AM
  #15  
pezking4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Originally posted by 96_vqmax
Wow that's great ###.Do your think that the 4g auto can take it up to 7200rpm without changing valve spring and all?Thanx!
auto?
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 06:03 AM
  #16  
infinitiblast's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,166
Why cant freaking JWT at least raise the rev limiters on the 98+ model 4th gens. I could care less about the remapped fuel maps and stuff..just raise my rev limiter..
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 06:45 AM
  #17  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
CAMS! GET THE JWT CAMS!

or not. i know its another 800 or so, but dont you think that the vim, ecu and cams would get you into the lower 13's ?

and what happens when u go turbo
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 06:58 AM
  #18  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
Originally posted by 96_vqmax
Wow that's great ###.Do your think that the 4g auto can take it up to 7200rpm without changing valve spring and all?Thanx!
auto's have the same engine's as 5spds
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 07:02 AM
  #19  
MAXIN's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,050
He is not going turbo for a while...



Anywho, I bet you can run with stock pulley S/C's with those numbers. Imagine the look on their faces....when they see your N/A...
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #20  
xHypex's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,365
From: TX
Originally posted by slimer
CAMS! GET THE JWT CAMS!
If you want your car to remain streetable you definitely don't want the cams. The top end is good (especially with the VI), but the low end gets neutered quite a bit.
-hype
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:16 AM
  #21  
JeffesonM's Avatar
living out of a maxima...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,432
From: NJ
Originally posted by Victim64
JWT can kiss my ***! They need to get an ECU out for my ****ing 98 **** *** maxima so I can ****ing take advantage of this **** *** ****ing VI mother ****er! **** son of a *****!
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:28 AM
  #22  
VQdriver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,308
if i get slicks it's all over fellas. hehe j/k. i'm missing out on all this VI/ecu fun. i bet that extra 700rpm makes a difference in a top end motor.
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:31 AM
  #23  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
GXE Powah!!!
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #24  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
Originally posted by SprintMax
GXE Powah!!!
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 12:01 PM
  #25  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally posted by xHypex

If you want your car to remain streetable you definitely don't want the cams. The top end is good (especially with the VI), but the low end gets neutered quite a bit.
-hype
I thought the JWT cams were very mild, meaning there was minimal loss in the low end? I remember reading a while back the the stock cam specs were not very different from the JWT cams, if I remember reading correctly.
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 01:47 PM
  #26  
Victim64's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,032
Quoted Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Victim64
JWT can kiss my ***! They need to get an ECU out for my ****ing 98 **** *** maxima so I can ****ing take advantage of this **** *** ****ing VI mother ****er! **** son of a *****!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by JeffesonM


Old Feb 6, 2003 | 07:57 PM
  #27  
emax02's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by Dave B


Ethan,
We're holding you to your word of "NO SLICKS". Of course years ago you said you'd be keeping your I30, then you sold it and got a 2k2 Maxima which you said would stay stock because "you didn't like the lack of reliablilty with modifications.". Now look at you, 2k2 Maxima, UDP, intake, fabbed y-pipe, catback, lowered, wheels, aftermarket leather, bodykit, aftermarket wing, no aftermarket wing, G35 intake manifold, no G35 intake manifold, blown MAF sensors, and now potential headers.


.......just get the damn slicks



Dave

The track I go to is way to far away to risk my reliablity, I've heard way to many stories about slicks and tow trucks.

BTW we went over what I said I beleive 4 times now. I understand I changed my mind, thats perfectly normal, people do/ do that on occasion..
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #28  
96BLUMAX's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,374
From: Leesburg,Virginia
Yeah power to the 4th gen. Take the title back.
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #29  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally posted by emax95



The track I go to is way to far away to risk my reliablity, I've heard way to many stories about slicks and tow trucks.

BTW we went over what I said I beleive 4 times now. I understand I changed my mind, thats perfectly normal, people do/ do that on occasion..
I'm just giving you crap


Dave
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #30  
96_vqmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,601
Originally posted by SprintMax


auto's have the same engine's as 5spds
Yes Moderator i know,j/k hehe.What i mean was can our motor rev up to 7200 rpm safely without changing the valve and not putting it at risk?
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 07:39 AM
  #31  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 07:49 AM
  #32  
Nealoc187's Avatar
Thread Starter
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally posted by 96_vqmax
Yes Moderator i know,j/k hehe.What i mean was can our motor rev up to 7200 rpm safely without changing the valve and not putting it at risk?
The transmission type will have no effect on the valvetrain's ability to handle increased RPMs.
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #33  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Neal-

Did you ever do a calculation to determine how much quicker the MEVI/JWT will be compared to just the MEVI in an all out highway topspeed run? I'm so pumped. I'm calling JWT on Monday and sending my ECU in


Dave
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #34  
Nealoc187's Avatar
Thread Starter
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally posted by Dave B
Neal-

Did you ever do a calculation to determine how much quicker the MEVI/JWT will be compared to just the MEVI in an all out highway topspeed run? I'm so pumped. I'm calling JWT on Monday and sending my ECU in


Dave
Not specifically but I will do so right now. Back in a few with the results.
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #35  
Nealoc187's Avatar
Thread Starter
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Note the 350Z used here is modeled at 13.53 @ 104.77mph in the 1/4 mile.

From a 60mph roll to:
100mph
OEM 9.84s
JWT ECU 8.32s
350 7.73

110mph
OEM 13.73s
JWT 12.23s
350 10.30

120mph
OEM 18.51s
JWT 16.57s
350 14.06s

130mph
OEM 26.71s
JWT 22.57s
350 18.17s

140mph
OEM 41.34s
JWT 35.20s
350 23.45 Note the 350Z hits 150mph before either OEM ECU or JWT ECU'd car hits 140


60mph roll to distance:

1/2 mile
OEM 18.73 @ 120.40mph
JWT 18.26 @ 123.27mph
350 17.78 @ 129.13mph

1 mile
OEM 32.70 @ 135.05mph
JWT 31.87 @ 137.74mph
350 30.61 @ 147.73mph

1.5 mile
OEM 45.68 @ 141.70mph
JWT 44.59 @ 144.48mph
350 42.43 @ 156.26mph
Old Feb 8, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #36  
gtr_rider's Avatar
192.168.1.1
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,617
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Originally posted by Nealoc187
Note the 350Z used here is modeled at 13.53 @ 104.77mph in the 1/4 mile.
In other words..
The 350z got wooooooo
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 12:47 AM
  #37  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
Originally posted by gtr_rider


In other words..
The 350z got wooooooo
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 04:50 AM
  #38  
96_vqmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,601
Originally posted by BriGuyMax


Nice looking Z
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 09:26 AM
  #39  
MAXIN's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,050
Originally posted by 96_vqmax
Nice looking Z
... but no brembos?
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 08:47 PM
  #40  
Iilac's Avatar
Spelled with a I not a L for Iilac. Prounced Ii-eee-ack.
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,434
From: Central Valley, California
Originally posted by MAXIN


... but no brembos?
It's the touring model. No brembos.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.