Cars is feels slower at WOT as oppose to partial throttle
Cars is feels slower at WOT as oppose to partial throttle
Hey,
If I floor the accel. in let's say 3rd gear, the rpms will climb fast but I won't feel the pull as much as I would if I start backing off the throttle. It feels like the car is chocking somewhere when I go WOT. There's no hesitation or anything though. This doesn't happen all the time though. Other times the car pull really strong. Maybe it's the MAFs. A few times the RPM jumped to 2k and stay there until would turn the car off and on a couple of times.
Thanks.
If I floor the accel. in let's say 3rd gear, the rpms will climb fast but I won't feel the pull as much as I would if I start backing off the throttle. It feels like the car is chocking somewhere when I go WOT. There's no hesitation or anything though. This doesn't happen all the time though. Other times the car pull really strong. Maybe it's the MAFs. A few times the RPM jumped to 2k and stay there until would turn the car off and on a couple of times.
Thanks.
i've noticed the same thing on my moms VQ auto. its definately alot slower at WOT, but if i back off to say 90% (VERY rough estimate) its slightly faster. doesnt the TPS send a WOT signal to the ECU and in doing so, the ECU dumps more fuel than necessary?
If your knock sensor is blown, it will dump your timing back, but the threshold is about 30% throttle or so from my OBD-II scanner, not 90%. I think 90% and above is when the ECU will jump over to open loop mode and run really rich (normal). It will also go to a different ignition timing map also. So it seems like something is happening on the closed loop to open-loop switchover.
If you've done all the maintenance including fuel-filter and you don't have a knock sensor ghost code (will not light the SES light) then I have no idea.
If you've done all the maintenance including fuel-filter and you don't have a knock sensor ghost code (will not light the SES light) then I have no idea.
Definately not the knock sensor, cause I have all the torque down low but the high end is suffering sometimes. Might be that the front coils are going little by little. If already had to change the rears some time ago.
Later
Later
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
If your knock sensor is blown, it will dump your timing back, but the threshold is about 30% throttle or so from my OBD-II scanner, not 90%. I think 90% and above is when the ECU will jump over to open loop mode and run really rich (normal)..
I doubt the car actually puts down more power at 80% throttle than WOT. There just isnt as much of a difference in acceleration between 80 and 100% as there is between, say, 40 - 80%.
It's like saying that a Y-pipe cuts low end power. It doesnt, but the high end gain is much more noticeable.
It's all mental:
It's like saying that a Y-pipe cuts low end power. It doesnt, but the high end gain is much more noticeable.
It's all mental:
Originally Posted by 2KxSEx
I wish it was all mental, but unfortunately I can actually feel the difference when it happens.
Later.
Later.
Originally Posted by 2KxSEx
Now that I think about this, my previous 2000 Altima did the same. I could be just a nissan thing if you know what I mean. Maybe the way the ECU is programed.
one question though:
when i floor my moms VQ, there is black smoke coming from the exhaust..there isnt alot but its more than none..if i back off the throttle it goes away, so i KNOW its running rich i'm just wondering if thats the cause of the WOT slowness.
Sprint,
Did you ever find the problem? This happend on the night I went to the track too!
It was running beautifully that morning though
I'm thinking it's the MAFs or the TPS along with O2 sensors. Those are the only three that control a/f delivery. But I'm not about to spend all that cash on finding the fix.
Later.
Did you ever find the problem? This happend on the night I went to the track too!
It was running beautifully that morning though
I'm thinking it's the MAFs or the TPS along with O2 sensors. Those are the only three that control a/f delivery. But I'm not about to spend all that cash on finding the fix.Later.
Originally Posted by 2KxSEx
Sprint,
Did you ever find the problem? This happend on the night I went to the track too!
It was running beautifully that morning though
I'm thinking it's the MAFs or the TPS along with O2 sensors. Those are the only three that control a/f delivery. But I'm not about to spend all that cash on finding the fix.
Later.
Did you ever find the problem? This happend on the night I went to the track too!
It was running beautifully that morning though
I'm thinking it's the MAFs or the TPS along with O2 sensors. Those are the only three that control a/f delivery. But I'm not about to spend all that cash on finding the fix.Later.
Originally Posted by MaDMaX024
the ECU ignores O2 and knock sensor readings at WOT, IIRC. i wonder why it runs rich at WOT if its still reading from the MAFS....
It may run rich because the map is just set rich. Generally speaking, richer is safer.
There's also the phenomenon called "cylinder soaking" that could be what you are feeling. From a dead stop, if you floor it suddenly, the engine can bog due to the immediate richness. Then it recovers from this shock of extra fuel and operates correctly. If you go to about 80-90% throttle, then WOT from a stop, the car will respond quicker. Crown Vics ('95-'99s) did this, and we were taught about it in a tactical driving course. I haven't really noticed it in my Maxima, but I haven't tried to notice it. This doesn't affect people brake torquing because the rpm's are already up.
This may be what you guys are feeling. Then again, it may not be.
Dave
This may be what you guys are feeling. Then again, it may not be.
Dave
Originally Posted by Dave Holmes
There's also the phenomenon called "cylinder soaking" that could be what you are feeling. From a dead stop, if you floor it suddenly, the engine can bog due to the immediate richness. Then it recovers from this shock of extra fuel and operates correctly. If you go to about 80-90% throttle, then WOT from a stop, the car will respond quicker. Crown Vics ('95-'99s) did this, and we were taught about it in a tactical driving course. I haven't really noticed it in my Maxima, but I haven't tried to notice it. This doesn't affect people brake torquing because the rpm's are already up.
This may be what you guys are feeling. Then again, it may not be.
Dave
This may be what you guys are feeling. Then again, it may not be.
Dave
that cylinder soaking issue is especially present in VG autos..thats just my personal experiance/observation.
Originally Posted by gtr_rider
Elaborate, IM not too sure what the 30% / 90% meant... I have a blown KS and its giving poor acceleration/gas mileage. What else should I expect?
How does cylinder soaking happen? When you go WOT, the ECU doesnt just dump more fuel.
It will not dump more fuel until it sees more air. The instant the throttle opens, there isn't more air flowing yet...so no more fuel.
Sounds like something that may have effected older cars, but not newer ones.
Dont take this the wrong way, but I dont care what they told you in tact. driving class. I want to know exactly how and why this cylinder soaking might happen.
It will not dump more fuel until it sees more air. The instant the throttle opens, there isn't more air flowing yet...so no more fuel.
Sounds like something that may have effected older cars, but not newer ones.
Dont take this the wrong way, but I dont care what they told you in tact. driving class. I want to know exactly how and why this cylinder soaking might happen.
Originally Posted by 2KxSEx
Hope you guys find the problem. I'm out of this conversation because I'm selling the max for a Mazdaspeed Protege

Last I heard, Mazdaspeed Protoges were having ECU lag/surge issues, so that might not solve your problems either. Mazda might finally have it fixed by now though, but you might want to check on the Mazda forums.
Like I said, I don't know if this affects the Maximas or not because I haven't tried to notice it. It definitely affects Crown Vics (which most police departments use) atleast up through '99s.
Let me try to find my NAPD Tactical Driving book from a few years ago. It should have the cause of cylinder soaking. But my basic understanding of it is the sudden increased air/fuel at WOT isn't initially burned efficiently (can explain the sudden black smoke from exhaust when first punched that doesn't continue while still at WOT). I'll look it up and get back to you on it.
Dave
Let me try to find my NAPD Tactical Driving book from a few years ago. It should have the cause of cylinder soaking. But my basic understanding of it is the sudden increased air/fuel at WOT isn't initially burned efficiently (can explain the sudden black smoke from exhaust when first punched that doesn't continue while still at WOT). I'll look it up and get back to you on it.
Dave
Originally Posted by mzmtg
How does cylinder soaking happen? When you go WOT, the ECU doesnt just dump more fuel.
It will not dump more fuel until it sees more air. The instant the throttle opens, there isn't more air flowing yet...so no more fuel.
It will not dump more fuel until it sees more air. The instant the throttle opens, there isn't more air flowing yet...so no more fuel.
Originally Posted by mzmtg
Sounds like something that may have effected older cars, but not newer ones.
Dont take this the wrong way, but I dont care what they told you in tact. driving class. I want to know exactly how and why this cylinder soaking might happen.

Dont take this the wrong way, but I dont care what they told you in tact. driving class. I want to know exactly how and why this cylinder soaking might happen.

Scenario A: 80-90% throttle, closed loop 14.7:1 mixture, 20 degrees timing.
Scenario B: 100% throttle, open loop 10-11:1 mixture, 10 degrees timing.
It's very well possible that off the line or at lower revs when you're launching, "A" would be more powerful than "B". As the revs ramp up at WOT, the timing curve will ramp up as well and get to about 25 degrees by the time you reach redline. At that point, 25 degrees of advance and 100% throttle in open-loop would probably beat out 80-90% throttle and 20 degrees of advance in closed-loop, but

You guys that think you're having a problem. Y'all need to get OBD-II scanners and do some data logging. That will help tremendously in figuring out what the hell is going on.
Originally Posted by Dave Holmes
But my basic understanding of it is the sudden increased air/fuel at WOT isn't initially burned efficiently (can explain the sudden black smoke from exhaust when first punched that doesn't continue while still at WOT). I'll look it up and get back to you on it.
Anyways, I've noticed that the engine seems a little less responsive at WOT than at 80-90%, and I think the OBD-II logs show why. But I've taken the engine up to pretty much redline at 80-90% throttle, and it is DEFINITELY quicker at WOT. So as mzmtg mentioned, it could also be a psychological issue.
The engine is much more responsive to small throttle input changes in closed-loop when the mixture is leaner and the timing is more advanced. This is dulled out when you're very rich in open-loop with less timing, but there is still more power. Unless there is something wrong.
Since the ECU doesn't monitor the MAF or O2s during open-loop at WOT (I don't think it does), if you had something obstructing your intake path that would make the mixture even richer and less responsive. Check air filter? Got some crud in your intake tube? If you're at higher mileage, you'd definitely want to check your throttle body also and maybe do a throttle body cleaning. There could be all sorts of junk and crud in there contributing to the problem that you wouldn't notice in closed-loop because the ECU is adjusting for that.
The engine is much more responsive to small throttle input changes in closed-loop when the mixture is leaner and the timing is more advanced. This is dulled out when you're very rich in open-loop with less timing, but there is still more power. Unless there is something wrong.
Since the ECU doesn't monitor the MAF or O2s during open-loop at WOT (I don't think it does), if you had something obstructing your intake path that would make the mixture even richer and less responsive. Check air filter? Got some crud in your intake tube? If you're at higher mileage, you'd definitely want to check your throttle body also and maybe do a throttle body cleaning. There could be all sorts of junk and crud in there contributing to the problem that you wouldn't notice in closed-loop because the ECU is adjusting for that.
You said you knew your knock sensor was blown, so all you have to do is replace it.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You said you knew your knock sensor was blown, so all you have to do is replace it.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.Replacing is going to be my only option as I live in south florida where its almost always 80+ degrees and I like to hear my intake
I learned a lot though. Good work
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You said you knew your knock sensor was blown, so all you have to do is replace it.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.
Or as a temporary measure, disconnect the ks-subharnass and put a 470k resistor across the ECU end of the harnass temporarily.
I think it's possible, if the fuel system is clogged/dirty or otherwise not pumping fuel quite as much as it should, that the Closed-Loop fuel trim ends up richer than open-loop (i.e. at open-loop, the mixture is too lean due to a fault in the fuel system, thus in Closed-Loop it compensates by using positive fuel trim values)... thus flooring it would run LEAN, not RICH, and backing off would put it back into positive fuel trim (Open Loop = fuel mixture computed from MAFS/ECT/IAT/etc, then in Closed Loop it uses Fuel trim values which define a percentage + or - open loop's mixture)
An OBD-II sensor scan tool might shed some light into that scenario, if it exists...
An OBD-II sensor scan tool might shed some light into that scenario, if it exists...




time, sounds like a filter issue