General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

For 5/6MT owners...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:27 PM
  #41  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
But whichever answer is correct and for which situation I think it's all a wash and can't be noticed anyway. The real answer would be "Just find a way to take your foot off the gas". And that is exactly what I have always done anyway. I will exceed the interstate speed limits by a wide margin when I can but I have always failed to understand why anyone would want to hurry up and wait at a stoplight. The very moment I see a red light I put the thing in neutral, granted I have enough inertia to make it.
!

Honestly, I think the main reason is most drivers are driving on automatic pilot. Most people don't have very good situational awareness and further, they're focusing on other things than driving. When I drive, I focus on driving, and it's a painful experience for me to ride with others who do things like that (waste all that gas zooming up to a light that I saw was red four seconds ago).
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:27 PM
  #42  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,820
From: Interior Alaska
Originally Posted by nismology
Wait...are we all talking about instantaneous fuel comsumption, or fuel consumption over time? Because that's what's causing alot of the confusion in this thread.
Both. while going down the hill, the car in gear will have better gas mileage. In theory, it's infinite. But as someone said, there might be a tiny amt. of gas leaking into the cylinders.

I was talking about fuel consumption over time. I argue that over time, the one the idles in N down a large hill will have better mileage. Here's why. Let's say you are in gear going down the hill at 3000rpm. You were just robbed of some kinetic energy and used it to push the cylinders up and down at a 3000rpm pace. When you're idling, you're only using the amount of fuel it takes to maintain 600rpm.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:33 PM
  #43  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,820
From: Interior Alaska
I was just thinking, if you have gas leaking from an injectors because the fuel rail is pressurized, wouldn't it fill up the cylinder with gas when you go and park the car since the fuel rail retains residual pressure when you turn off the engine?? Fuel injectors are very precise pieces of equipment. Barring a mechanical failure, I doubt they would leak fuel into the cylinder as a result of the fuel line pressure and the vacuum created in the cylinder during the intake stroke.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:35 PM
  #44  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by foobeca
I was talking about fuel consumption over time. I argue that over time, the one the idles in N down a large hill will have better mileage. Here's why. Let's say you are in gear going down the hill at 3000rpm. You were just robbed of some kinetic energy and used it to push the cylinders up and down at a 3000rpm pace. When you're idling, you're only using the amount of fuel it takes to maintain 600rpm.
Wrong. You are forgetting that MPG does NOT depend on time. Miles per gallon is a rate: distance traveled per amount of gas. If two people start at the top of a hill, Car 1 in gear and Car 2 in neutral, Car 2 will get to the bottom first but the Car 1 will use less gas.

But I see what you're trying to say, and it's what I said a couple of posts ago: practically speaking, we all want to get places reasonably quickly. Thus, if Car 1 wants to match Car 2's speed down the hill, Car 1 will have to depress the accelerator pedal to keep up, while Car 2 is not depressing the accelerator. In such a case, keeping it in gear clearly wastes gas.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:36 PM
  #45  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
Foobeca: Agreed. I highly doubt the injectors leak fuel despite the pressure. Fuel metering is VERY precise.

Anyhow, SR20DEN and Nismo87SE both said that coasting in gear the a/f ratio was off the charts and when it came back down to idle the a/f was richened. In the context of slowing down for a red light, the car left in gear will consume less fuel and save the brakes. It's a double bonus.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:38 PM
  #46  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by foobeca
I was just thinking, if you have gas leaking from an injectors because the fuel rail is pressurized, wouldn't it fill up the cylinder with gas when you go and park the car since the fuel rail retains residual pressure when you turn off the engine?? Fuel injectors are very precise pieces of equipment. Barring a mechanical failure, I doubt they would leak fuel into the cylinder as a result of the fuel line pressure and the vacuum created in the cylinder during the intake stroke.
I don't think so; when you turn off the engine any vacuum in the cylinders is quickly pressurized (with air).

I didn't use the term "leak" and I don't think we should use it because it implies a problem, something Nissan did not intend. What I'm proposing is a controlled, tiny flow of fuel when the cylinder is on the intake stroke. It's not a leak, it's just not a "injection" of fuel. It may or not exist, but the concept I proposed is not a "leak".
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:41 PM
  #47  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
You are both right in a sense. Foobeca is right that no fuel will leak out of the injectors unless there's an o-ring failure. And VQuick you're right by saying that if 2 cars are going down a hill and one car is in gear and one's in neutral, the car in gear will use less gas but will also take more time to get to the bottom.

Edit: Even if you dont wanna call it a leak, the FSM is clear when it says that fuel is CUT OFF. There's not much room for interpretation there...
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:43 PM
  #48  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by nismology
Anyhow, SR20DEN and Nismo87SE both said that coasting in gear the a/f ratio was off the charts and when it came back down to idle the a/f was richened. In the context of slowing down for a red light, the car left in gear will consume less fuel and save the brakes. It's a double bonus.
Yeah, I was just driving and experiementing a couple of hours ago. When coasting in gear, once the RPMs get down to about 1200, I consistently noticed a sudden change in the sound of the engine. I think that's the ECU making the A/F mixture richer again to maintain idle.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:49 PM
  #49  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,820
From: Interior Alaska
Originally Posted by VQuick
Wrong. You are forgetting that MPG does NOT depend on time. Miles per gallon is a rate: distance traveled per amount of gas. If two people start at the top of a hill, Car 1 in gear and Car 2 in neutral, Car 2 will get to the bottom first but the Car 1 will use less gas.

But I see what you're trying to say, and it's what I said a couple of posts ago: practically speaking, we all want to get places reasonably quickly. Thus, if Car 1 wants to match Car 2's speed down the hill, Car 1 will have to depress the accelerator pedal to keep up, while Car 2 is not depressing the accelerator. In such a case, keeping it in gear clearly wastes gas.
I meant to say distance.
Old 09-10-2005 | 03:56 PM
  #50  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,820
From: Interior Alaska
Someone with a MPG computer in their instrument cluster needs to do some experimenting. Go down some steep and not so steep hills in neutral once and let it coast in neutral, keep traveling a mile or so down the road. Record the MPG from the top of the hill to 1 mile afterwards. Then do the same with the car in gear.

I think it'll depend on the slope of the hill and the length of the slope to determine whether over a given distance, if N is better or in gear. It'll need to be at highway speeds.
Old 09-10-2005 | 04:04 PM
  #51  
silvermax2k2's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,935
Originally Posted by foobeca
Someone with a MPG computer in their instrument cluster needs to do some experimenting. Go down some steep and not so steep hills in neutral once and let it coast in neutral, keep traveling a mile or so down the road. Record the MPG from the top of the hill to 1 mile afterwards. Then do the same with the car in gear.

I think it'll depend on the slope of the hill and the length of the slope to determine whether over a given distance, if N is better or in gear. It'll need to be at highway speeds.

that can be arranged. all 2k2+ have them
Old 09-12-2005 | 11:02 AM
  #52  
tomservo291's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 731
Holy crap, I accidentally made a very prosperous thread!
Old 09-12-2005 | 05:06 PM
  #53  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Yeah, where you been? Great topic, I think we've gotten somewhere but haven't got a definitive answer.
Old 09-12-2005 | 05:45 PM
  #54  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,663
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by foobeca
Someone with a MPG computer in their instrument cluster needs to do some experimenting. Go down some steep and not so steep hills in neutral once and let it coast in neutral, keep traveling a mile or so down the road. Record the MPG from the top of the hill to 1 mile afterwards. Then do the same with the car in gear.

I think it'll depend on the slope of the hill and the length of the slope to determine whether over a given distance, if N is better or in gear. It'll need to be at highway speeds.
Read above
Old 09-21-2005 | 08:48 AM
  #55  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
I think i'm about to eat my words. Remember how i was saying that with the ignition off, in gear, and coasting the exhaust sound would be different? Well anyway, i tried this the other night. I have a header-back exhaust, so it's pretty loud. I took the car to 3500 in 3rd gear, coasted for a little bit, then shut the motor off while still in gear. There was ZERO change in the exhaust volume and/or sound in general. Switched the ignition back on, still no change. This is just another thing that proves that what the FSM says is true. During deceleration in gear, there is ZERO fuel going to the motor until ~1500 RPM, which is when it goes into idle fuel trim.
Old 09-21-2005 | 03:25 PM
  #56  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Cool, I'm gonna try that. Thanks for reporting back. And I think it's more like 1200 RPM. Somebody on a Nissan board said 800-1200 RPM depending on the car.
Old 09-21-2005 | 04:24 PM
  #57  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
D'oh!!!! I knew that...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
esco115
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
44
04-12-2013 07:00 AM
phatboislim
General Maxima Discussion
3
04-05-2013 01:45 PM
1chewabacha1
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
79
08-23-2012 05:46 PM
GAMERA30
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
24
09-27-2008 12:00 AM
Uptown Maxima
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
12
06-22-2008 05:04 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:53 PM.