General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

idea of adding extra oxygen into intake path....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #1  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
idea of adding extra oxygen into intake path....

i was curious to know if there would be any benefit of directly adding oxygen in the engine. would the extra oxygen helkp the engine combust more properly? would there be a similar effect to nitrous?
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:43 AM
  #2  
Nismo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,749
From: CA
. kaboom
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #3  
steven88's Avatar
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
how would u add more oxygen?
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #4  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
by tking a 10-15 lb of oxygen and running a line to the intke path, just like u would with a nitrous line..
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:17 AM
  #5  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
Originally Posted by Nismo
. kaboom

y kaboom, im not talking about only igniting pure oxygen, simply raising the amount of oxygen in the air entering the motor
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:17 AM
  #6  
steven88's Avatar
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
where would this supply of oxygen be refilled at?
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #7  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
my job, lol we have ample amounts of it laying around.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:38 AM
  #8  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
i was just reading up on nitrous and its very much the same principle, nitrous oxide is injected to release extra oxygen from the molecule and raise cylinder pressure, so i would be basically cutting out the nitrogen and directly injecting oxygen.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:55 AM
  #9  
Iron Scimitar's Avatar
Tha Snatcher
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,592
From: MD
boost it. problem solved.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #10  
D Love's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 653
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by panda_1
i was just reading up on nitrous and its very much the same principle, nitrous oxide is injected to release extra oxygen from the molecule and raise cylinder pressure, so i would be basically cutting out the nitrogen and directly injecting oxygen.
If the purpose of nitrous oxide is to get extra oxygen into the system, then I'm sure that there must be a problem with adding pure O2 into the system. If not, then that's probably what they'd be selling now. I mean, that would be the most obvious answer to the problem don't you think? Design engineers wouldn't go... hmmm we need more oxygen in the system... how about I add some molecule that has oxygen in it, with other stuff too. If all they really needed was oxygen.

I think it was probably more like, hmmm... we need more oxygen.... I could use pure O2, but that would cause XXX problem. So we can't use that. Must find another way... how about NO2? Sure, that would work. Genius! Nobel Prize here I come!
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:45 AM
  #11  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Just get nitrous...

The headaches will be far less.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:59 AM
  #12  
bigEL's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by D Love
If the purpose of nitrous oxide is to get extra oxygen into the system, then I'm sure that there must be a problem with adding pure O2 into the system. If not, then that's probably what they'd be selling now. I mean, that would be the most obvious answer to the problem don't you think? Design engineers wouldn't go... hmmm we need more oxygen in the system... how about I add some molecule that has oxygen in it, with other stuff too. If all they really needed was oxygen.

I think it was probably more like, hmmm... we need more oxygen.... I could use pure O2, but that would cause XXX problem. So we can't use that. Must find another way... how about NO2? Sure, that would work. Genius! Nobel Prize here I come!
You're on the right track. Air is only 21% oxygen. NOS has 1 oxygen atom per 2 nitrogen, so it has 33% oxygen. You see how much difference that makes already. Now imagine going to 100% oxygen. The combustion happens so fast, your engine goes kaboom instead of squish-bang. Plus welders combine oxygen with a flamable gas to create an extremely hot flame. The same thing would happen if you injected it into your engine. Basically, you'd melt everything in sight.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:10 AM
  #13  
bigEL's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by panda_1
would the extra oxygen helkp the engine combust more properly?
Oh, and to address this question: If all the sensors and everything in your engine are working as they should, your engine will combust properly. The engineers have worked out a certain fuel to air ratio. Just adding air may make your engine run too lean and too hot. Both conditions are detrimental to your engine. Because believe it or not, gasoline serves as a temperature regulator and lubricant. The engineers have counted on this when designing the engine. So stock combustion = proper combustion.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:17 AM
  #14  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
I suppose you could inject pure oxygen and get away with it if the injection rate were low enough. You would also have to inject the appropriate amount of additional fuel, otherwise you will run lean and won't make any additional power.

This idea was tried a long time ago by engine researchers. The fact that it is not done today says a lot about how difficult it is to keep from burning up your engine due to the uncontrollable burn rate, like bigEl says. Nitrous is a much better way to introduce additional oxidizer because the oxygen is not released from the molecule except at high temperatures seen in the combustion chamber towards the middle and end of the power stroke. This results in a much more stable oxidizer with a usable burn rate.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #15  
4x4Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,577
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....AD23CA9564&p=0

u COULD try something like this...but thats extremely ghetto
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #16  
86maxima96's Avatar
I Broke OT
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,665
Originally Posted by 4x4Max
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....AD23CA9564&p=0

u COULD try something like this...but thats extremely ghetto

...yeah, cuz filters are for puzzys
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #17  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
N2O is used specifically because when it breaks down into N2 and O2, the free nitrogen acts as a buffer to keep combustion temps down.

Also, by itself, it's not flammable or dangerous.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #18  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
then i guess going back to nitrous it is! lol, see this is why the org owns, everybody has input on topics.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #19  
bigEL's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by panda_1
see this is why the org owns, everybody has input on topics.
Yeah, it's a rarity.
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 04:42 AM
  #20  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
The result of the first test of pure oxygen into an engine.

Honda file photo:
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 07:39 AM
  #21  
Mizeree_X's Avatar
Getting back to his roots
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,549
Bigtime safety issue having a pure oxygen line plumbed to your engine; don't do it. As mzmtg said, nitrous (N2O) is non-flammable at ambient temps, so if the line were to leak it wouldn't be hazardous, whereas if the oxygen line were to leak and someone flicked a butt towards your car, you could kiss the surrounding 200 ft goodbye.
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #22  
bigEL's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by Mizeree_X
Bigtime safety issue having a pure oxygen line plumbed to your engine; don't do it. As mzmtg said, nitrous (N2O) is non-flammable at ambient temps, so if the line were to leak it wouldn't be hazardous, whereas if the oxygen line were to leak and someone flicked a butt towards your car, you could kiss the surrounding 200 ft goodbye.
Actually, it's a hard concept to understand, but neither gas is flammable by itself. They only oxidize whatever flammable material is present. Once the fuel is exhausted, both gases are pretty much inert in the sense that they won't continue to react. The problem in the real world is that there's usually no shortage of material that can serve as a fuel source.
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #23  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
So what happens when you get in an accident with an LOX tank in your trunk... LOX = LOLwtfpwnd
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #24  
guysohigh's Avatar
SimStones
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,323
From: Annandale
Leaf Blown!!!
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #25  
AsthmaMax11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,796
From: Atlanta, Georgia
oxygeNAWZ!!! F&F 3>*

but seriously I hope you don't kill yourself. This guy I used to work with just died last night and I am reminded that tomorrow is not promised...
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #26  
vansskaterfreek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,692
of course a honda owner and a bunch of kids would try this (im not a kid... im a teenager.. ) seriously.. what are you gonna do... put a midget under your hood ans make him hold the leaf blower?????
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #27  
4x4Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,577
Originally Posted by guysohigh
Leaf Blown!!!
Everytime i think of that video, i start thinking how i could amplify the effect of the leaf blower, and always come up to the basically same concept as a turbo haha turbo-----
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #28  
4x4Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,577
Originally Posted by vansskaterfreek
of course a honda owner and a bunch of kids would try this (im not a kid... im a teenager.. ) seriously.. what are you gonna do... put a midget under your hood ans make him hold the leaf blower?????
well you could put some very powerfull leaf blower in the trunk, maybe even 2, hell, put 5 back there, and run a vacuum line through the interior and through the firewall. I bet if you attached like 5 leaf blowers to your intake snorkel, you would get some mad tyte pawah!!! But no really, u prolly would get some good power considering that guy got 10whp from one leaf blower...
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #29  
Guinader's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 872
now if i can only find a way to attach the leaf blower's speed cable, to my car's throtle cable?!?!?!
I can have a home made turbo.
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #30  
ramberg's Avatar
GrandPa
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,914
From: Brooklyn, NY & Plantation, Fl.
Go with the nitrous. Are you going to be at maxout on the 30th. I am driving down on Monday.

Warren
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #31  
valentine1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 89
Just use nitrous, pure oxygen can be dangerous when you have it around anything that is flammable as it makes flammable materials combust more readily, even without a flame or spark. When I was in school for aviation maintenance they showed us a video of a guy throwing a potato chip bag into an oxygen enriched environment and the peanut oil on it ignited immediately with no ignition source. It's even worse when petroleum products are introduced. We can't even work on pure oxygen systems with tools that have been used for any other reason than for an o2 system because they may be contaminated with grease or oil and start a fire.
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #32  
kc10fish's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 428
please do the pure O2 thing. it will just prove Darwin's therory even more! better yet use a gressy air line to fill the bottle.......this is a bad joke right...
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #33  
kc10fish's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 428
thanks

Originally Posted by valentine1
Just use nitrous, pure oxygen can be dangerous when you have it around anything that is flammable as it makes flammable materials combust more readily, even without a flame or spark. When I was in school for aviation maintenance they showed us a video of a guy throwing a potato chip bag into an oxygen enriched environment and the peanut oil on it ignited immediately with no ignition source. It's even worse when petroleum products are introduced. We can't even work on pure oxygen systems with tools that have been used for any other reason than for an o2 system because they may be contaminated with grease or oil and start a fire.

i am an aviation mechanic. so do you have your a&p? hope all you all have a great X-mas. AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BE SAFE !!!!! bye
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 05:40 PM
  #34  
valentine1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 89
Originally Posted by kc10fish
i am an aviation mechanic. so do you have your a&p?
I've taken the writtens but haven't taken the oral and practicals yet, supposed to next month.
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #35  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
Originally Posted by kc10fish
please do the pure O2 thing. it will just prove Darwin's therory even more! better yet use a gressy air line to fill the bottle.......this is a bad joke right...

before u try and flame people and their topics, have some more time behind you, also always remember to properly spell......
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #36  
panda_1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,536
From: Port st Lucie
btw for everyone who thinks im retarded for bringin this topic up.... it was just curiousity and i can also say i recieved this today. just in time for x-mas.....

Old Dec 25, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #37  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by panda_1
btw for everyone who thinks im retarded for bringin this topic up.... it was just curiousity and i can also say i recieved this today. just in time for x-mas.....

Excellent, looks like a very Merry Christmas...
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #38  
talisman311's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 699
Originally Posted by bigEL
You're on the right track. Air is only 21% oxygen. NOS has 1 oxygen atom per 2 nitrogen, so it has 33% oxygen. You see how much difference that makes already. Now imagine going to 100% oxygen. The combustion happens so fast, your engine goes kaboom instead of squish-bang. Plus welders combine oxygen with a flamable gas to create an extremely hot flame. The same thing would happen if you injected it into your engine. Basically, you'd melt everything in sight.
No atom of any unqiue element is the same size. The atomic weight of an oxygen atom is approximately 16, nitrogen, approximately 14... SOooo N20(mass) = 2N + O = 2(14) + 16 = 44 amu. Annd % oxygen = 16/44 = 36.7%
BTW, I hated chemistry.
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 11:28 AM
  #39  
kc10fish's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 428
o do tell

Originally Posted by panda_1
before u try and flame people and their topics, have some more time behind you, also always remember to properly spell......

did I miss something or what? as far as the flame - I have seen the results of someone messing with O-2 and it wasn't pretty.
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #40  
devilz05's Avatar
Shift_3.0
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 745
From: central NJ
I saw a video where they used a leaf blower to push more air into the intake manifold and on the dyno it added something like 20hp. Then they sprayed the blower with nitrous while it was blowing to created a cold air effect and it boosted to 30 horsepower. These numbers are approximate, I saw the video a while back but I do remember being rather suprised.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:10 AM.