K&N panel air filters
Originally Posted by MaximA StyLeZ
well just to update, I've had it in for about 2 weeks, and there is no real difference. Im just happy i dont have to buy another filter 

Have you run a 1/4 after the switch?
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Just curious: what was your gas mileage before and after?
Have you run a 1/4 after the switch?
Have you run a 1/4 after the switch?
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
K&N IS WORTH THE MONEY. You will get a more responsive performance than Nissan OEM, and you will never have to buy another filter in your lifetime. I personally know of people who are simply anti-K&N, and that's their only motivation for cracking on it.
Have someone do the swap for you without your knowledge on three trials. Let them flip a coing to see which filter goes in first. Then you drive it under several conditions, and have them put in the other brand. Drive it again under the same conditions, and then do the third and final swap.
You make the choice as to which condition was best, and then have them tel you which flter they used.
I've used K&N in every car I've owned and they are the best investment you can make for $45 that I know of.
Period!
Have someone do the swap for you without your knowledge on three trials. Let them flip a coing to see which filter goes in first. Then you drive it under several conditions, and have them put in the other brand. Drive it again under the same conditions, and then do the third and final swap.
You make the choice as to which condition was best, and then have them tel you which flter they used.
I've used K&N in every car I've owned and they are the best investment you can make for $45 that I know of.
Period!
Another note that is NOT being brought up is the increase in the silicates that a KN brings. Anybody do the oil testing while using a KN? I am not anti KN, but I also use my brain a tad.
I agree with Dr-RJP, just because more air is entering the engine doesn't immediately mean that more fuel is being used. It could mean that the engine is working more efficiently because it does not work as hard to suck in air.
So you're saying that restrictive filters increase gas mileage? Why does everyone change their dirty air filters? Because it's restrictive and uses more gas, leading to poor mileage. Think about what you say before you say it. If that's not what you meant, then phrase it more carefully to avoid confusion.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
Originally Posted by Brushedpewter
You're missing the point. Nobody said K&N sucks. When you put a air filter like K&N or even a cone filter your performance will improve but you lose gas mileage. The reason is the stock nissan filters are very restrictive and they improve fuel economy. When you put a filter that lets more air in the engine will suck more air. When the engine sucks more air it compensates with fuel. Not to mention that some people love hearing their engine scream with a filter or a K&N filter which will waste more gas.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
Originally Posted by 99grnmaxgxe
I agree with Dr-RJP, just because more air is entering the engine doesn't immediately mean that more fuel is being used. It could mean that the engine is working more efficiently because it does not work as hard to suck in air.
So you're saying that restrictive filters increase gas mileage? Why does everyone change their dirty air filters? Because it's restrictive and uses more gas, leading to poor mileage. Think about what you say before you say it. If that's not what you meant, then phrase it more carefully to avoid confusion.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
So you're saying that restrictive filters increase gas mileage? Why does everyone change their dirty air filters? Because it's restrictive and uses more gas, leading to poor mileage. Think about what you say before you say it. If that's not what you meant, then phrase it more carefully to avoid confusion.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
The point that seems to be skipped as this discussion goes around and around:
New K&N better than new OEM
Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM
You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?
For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
New K&N better than new OEM
Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM
You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?
For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
The point that seems to be skipped as this discussion goes around and around:
New K&N better than new OEM
Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM
You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?
For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
New K&N better than new OEM
Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM
You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?
For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
AND, I will be happy to demonstrate to anyone who thinks otherwise that my cleaned and re-oiled K&N filter allows the same volume of air to pass through it as a brand new one.
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Did you ever consider the possibility that there is but ONE RIGHT way and MANY WRONG ways to clean & re-oil the filter? If you do not know the proper way to do it, then I suggest you stick to paper and never buy a reusable one because you can really screw up things on your car, like your MAF, for instance.
AND, I will be happy to demonstrate to anyone who thinks otherwise that my cleaned and re-oiled K&N filter allows the same volume of air to pass through it as a brand new one.
AND, I will be happy to demonstrate to anyone who thinks otherwise that my cleaned and re-oiled K&N filter allows the same volume of air to pass through it as a brand new one.
K&N, the people who mfg. this reusable filter, differentiate between a brand new K&N and one that has been cleaned and reoiled. They also differentiated between cleaned and reoiled and new OEM. Nobody needs your demonstration as we don't know each other and we're all going to be leasing Ferraris one day anyway.
OK, say it is true that a new paper filter flows better than freshly re-oiled K&N panel, how long does it take for the paper filter to be worse than re-oiled K&N?
What is it in re-oiled K&N that kills its flow? Is it that the cloth gets compressed? Anyone have any flow data to share on it?
What is it in re-oiled K&N that kills its flow? Is it that the cloth gets compressed? Anyone have any flow data to share on it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
57
Oct 14, 2025 05:16 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM




