General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

K&N panel air filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 07:27 AM
  #41  
dr-rjp's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,607
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by MaximA StyLeZ
well just to update, I've had it in for about 2 weeks, and there is no real difference. Im just happy i dont have to buy another filter
Just curious: what was your gas mileage before and after?

Have you run a 1/4 after the switch?
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #42  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Just curious: what was your gas mileage before and after?

Have you run a 1/4 after the switch?
I put my cleaned & reoiled K&N back in on Mon. And, as luck would have it, I'm driving to the coast on Sat. This is bizarre, gas is flirting with a high the way it is, and I'm driving all over the place. But I'll be able to check the mileage for the 3rd straight week. Last weekend was 29.5 on the used OEM, 1st week was 30.5. I think this weekend will be no different. Again, remember the validity when we do stats. If my mileage is out of a normal variance this Sat., it has nothing to do with the K&N, could be headwind, brake calipers seized, heavy foot, etc. But I'm confident I'll nail the 28-30 range even with a reoiled K&N in there. If you've already bought a K&N might as well use it. But if we can save somebody who hasn't wasted their money the $$45 plus the cleaning kit, it's a good thing.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #43  
Colonel's Avatar
Old Fuddy Duddy
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,712
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
K&N IS WORTH THE MONEY. You will get a more responsive performance than Nissan OEM, and you will never have to buy another filter in your lifetime. I personally know of people who are simply anti-K&N, and that's their only motivation for cracking on it.

Have someone do the swap for you without your knowledge on three trials. Let them flip a coing to see which filter goes in first. Then you drive it under several conditions, and have them put in the other brand. Drive it again under the same conditions, and then do the third and final swap.

You make the choice as to which condition was best, and then have them tel you which flter they used.

I've used K&N in every car I've owned and they are the best investment you can make for $45 that I know of.

Period!
A better test would be to NOT tell you filters have been changed. My guess would be if you used OEM (brand new) and K&N (brand new) and you remove the "butt dyno" crap....I bet "you" (generic term) wont be able to tell the difference.

Another note that is NOT being brought up is the increase in the silicates that a KN brings. Anybody do the oil testing while using a KN? I am not anti KN, but I also use my brain a tad.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #44  
99grnmaxgxe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,705
From: Tucson, AZ
I agree with Dr-RJP, just because more air is entering the engine doesn't immediately mean that more fuel is being used. It could mean that the engine is working more efficiently because it does not work as hard to suck in air.
Originally Posted by Brushedpewter
You're missing the point. Nobody said K&N sucks. When you put a air filter like K&N or even a cone filter your performance will improve but you lose gas mileage. The reason is the stock nissan filters are very restrictive and they improve fuel economy. When you put a filter that lets more air in the engine will suck more air. When the engine sucks more air it compensates with fuel. Not to mention that some people love hearing their engine scream with a filter or a K&N filter which will waste more gas.
So you're saying that restrictive filters increase gas mileage? Why does everyone change their dirty air filters? Because it's restrictive and uses more gas, leading to poor mileage. Think about what you say before you say it. If that's not what you meant, then phrase it more carefully to avoid confusion.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #45  
Brushedpewter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 633
Originally Posted by 99grnmaxgxe
I agree with Dr-RJP, just because more air is entering the engine doesn't immediately mean that more fuel is being used. It could mean that the engine is working more efficiently because it does not work as hard to suck in air.

So you're saying that restrictive filters increase gas mileage? Why does everyone change their dirty air filters? Because it's restrictive and uses more gas, leading to poor mileage. Think about what you say before you say it. If that's not what you meant, then phrase it more carefully to avoid confusion.
Also I put a cone filter on which sucks in a lot more air than the stock one, and with normal driving, I noticed about 1-2 mpg increase.
It depends what kind of engine you have, what kind of air filter you got and the way you drive. A K&N can even give you 5mpg improvement if your old filter was so dirty that it barely let in any air.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #46  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
The point that seems to be skipped as this discussion goes around and around:

New K&N better than new OEM

Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM

You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?

For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #47  
99grnmaxgxe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,705
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
If this is true, I'm going to put my cone filter back on and not worry about panel fiters.
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 08:10 AM
  #48  
dr-rjp's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,607
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
The point that seems to be skipped as this discussion goes around and around:

New K&N better than new OEM

Cleaned and reoiled K&N worse than new OEM

You want the airflow from a new K&N, then buy a new K&N every 10 or whatever interval you change your filter. It's dumb, but it's life--you have to pay a lot to get a little, called diminishing returns. One of the partners in our office puts a new K&N in every 15k. He was throwing away the old ones until I told him about the bogus 1 million mile claim. He still changes it every 15k, but keeps the one he takes out. We all knows what he does is foolish, but he spends $45 on his lunch bill every day, what's one new $45 filter every year or so?

For the rest of us, a new OEM at the right intervals makes the most sense. It's simply bizarre to not acknowledge that a cleaned & reoiled K&N has less airflow than a new OEM--it was on the K&N website 8 years ago.
Did you ever consider the possibility that there is but ONE RIGHT way and MANY WRONG ways to clean & re-oil the filter? If you do not know the proper way to do it, then I suggest you stick to paper and never buy a reusable one because you can really screw up things on your car, like your MAF, for instance.

AND, I will be happy to demonstrate to anyone who thinks otherwise that my cleaned and re-oiled K&N filter allows the same volume of air to pass through it as a brand new one.
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #49  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Did you ever consider the possibility that there is but ONE RIGHT way and MANY WRONG ways to clean & re-oil the filter? If you do not know the proper way to do it, then I suggest you stick to paper and never buy a reusable one because you can really screw up things on your car, like your MAF, for instance.

AND, I will be happy to demonstrate to anyone who thinks otherwise that my cleaned and re-oiled K&N filter allows the same volume of air to pass through it as a brand new one.
Cleaning and reoiling is not rocket science. One simply follows the instructions that comes with the kit, and common sense says do not over oil.

K&N, the people who mfg. this reusable filter, differentiate between a brand new K&N and one that has been cleaned and reoiled. They also differentiated between cleaned and reoiled and new OEM. Nobody needs your demonstration as we don't know each other and we're all going to be leasing Ferraris one day anyway.
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 07:16 AM
  #50  
igzy's Avatar
I Know Kwaliti
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,441
From: Ontario, Canada
OK, say it is true that a new paper filter flows better than freshly re-oiled K&N panel, how long does it take for the paper filter to be worse than re-oiled K&N?

What is it in re-oiled K&N that kills its flow? Is it that the cloth gets compressed? Anyone have any flow data to share on it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
57
Oct 14, 2025 05:16 PM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
Miket2006
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
Mar 1, 2021 03:55 AM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
Redfox
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:41 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:27 AM.