General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Latest JD Power and Associates 2007 Vehicle Dependibility Study is out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #41  
max95q's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 5,209
Im not worried about those numbers. I mean... who drives a Buick anymore. And what is the age group of Cadillac drivers. Yes, they are getting younger but there are some factors that play into some of those numbers. The key word being some. I believe some of those numbers are a good census but some I think are off due to the age of some of those drivers in some of the cars and the number of people that actually drive some of those cars.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 09:04 AM
  #42  
AnDyMaN's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,707
From: lawrenceville, ga
im guessing that in the vehicle dependability study, they put everything at equal value. i.e. peeling shift **** (?) = oil burning = sagging spare tire well.
so, more points doesn't mean bigger problem, maybe just more (possibly smaller) problems.


EDIT: this little test won't make me change my mind. my next car is the GT-R
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #43  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,285
From: Burke, VA
what a bunch of homoness here. My '00 Maxima was at the dealer about 6 times in the first 2 years, and add to that the 15 different broken things i've fixed (wheel bearings bad, etc)....

Sure, the engine has been reliable as hell, but this car at 130k miles has had alot more small problems than my '87 Integra (230k miles) or my '92 Accord (150k miles) ever did.

I still love the car, but definitely would NOT give high markes to Nissan in terms of "dependability"

hell, how many people here have blown their weak Nissan MAFs? I've done it twice.


Just admit that we drive middle-of-the-road vehicles and that they have middle-of-the-road reliability and dependability. As for me, I have little interest in purchasing another Nissan vehicle. Between the marginal build quality I've experienced and the complete lack of anything that looks halfway decent in the lineup, why would I?



btw, conversely my wife's Mazda3, in the first 3 years we've owned it, has had only ONE problem ever....a bad 02 sensor.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #44  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,285
From: Burke, VA
Originally Posted by STARR
Im sure these surveys also reflect new car sales, seeing how 53000 people where surveyed I doubt it was equal numbers from all 38 makes, the price range and vehicle Land Rover is selling cannot compare to what Toyota is doing and Im sure they are not selling the same amount, these surveys are not accurate and don't really show reality, these surveys are ego boosters if your car is at the top or has improved but in recent years most people around me use the car forums to search for information and to make the final decision to buy something
JD power does things the same way as other polling companies do. They use averages. It doesn't matter if there are "equal numbers from all 38 makes," since they're not listing the TOTAL GROSS number of problems, but only an average per x number of vehicles.

And seriously, I don't know anybody that uses "car forums" to search for a car. I wouldn't go to a Subaru forum if I was interested in subies. I certainly wouldn't go to Maxima.org if maxima shopping.....because all you get on the "forums" is advice from:
a) homers
b) haters
c) know-nothing morons.
d) guys who mod their cars so heavily they can't remember what "stock" is.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #45  
Teufelhunden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,866
From: NJ
who knows, with new nissans built in america, the quality probably has gone way down. but ive never had problems with my 92 240sx, 98 pathfinder and my 03 max. both vehicles had over 190k.
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #46  
apom's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 31
You have to be retarded to believe these surveys. end of story
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #47  
maxima985spd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Inaccurate survey, 100 vehicles surveyed? with hundreds of thousands manufactured.
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #48  
maxima985spd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
little boys tend to rice out nissan maximas making them less reliable
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #49  
liqidvenom's Avatar
brotherhood of tq
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,849
seems like alot of sour nissan fans
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #50  
Nissan 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,590
From: Bartlett, IL
Originally Posted by liqidvenom
seems like alot of sour nissan fans
your on a nissan forum, what do you expect?
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #51  
liqidvenom's Avatar
brotherhood of tq
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,849
some maturity and maybe people dropping that imports are better then>* mindset
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #52  
Zargon's Avatar
0100011001010101
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 792
From: The AZ
Originally Posted by maxima985spd
Inaccurate survey, 100 vehicles surveyed? with hundreds of thousands manufactured.

Where does it say 100 vehicles surveyed?


The survey was from 53,000 people.
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #53  
SMOKEYMOUNTAIN's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
Statistics 101:

A survey is just that, a survey. A survey doesn't produce causation or even the lesser scope of correlation. A survey is an external opinion gathering poll that at best gives an averaged "assumption". Nothing more, nothing less.

There are wayyyy to any extraneous variables, demographic nuances, corporate biases, marketing ploys, statistical unreliability, skewed surveying, etc, etc, entrenched into these polls which makes creating a top to bottom reliablity survey completely impossible.

C'mon guys, this isn't a double blind randomized experiment with all variables controlled in a controlled environment with subsequent peer review. These are real world (aka unreliable) surveys taken by real world surveyors (aka unreliable) given to real world consumers (aka really unreliable).
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #54  
2MaddMaxx's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Oldsmobile?

Did anyone else notice that Oldsmobile has been discontinued (shut down)?
I take it, this survey concerns model year 2007 vehicles??
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #55  
Zargon's Avatar
0100011001010101
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 792
From: The AZ
Originally Posted by 2MaddMaxx
Did anyone else notice that Oldsmobile has been discontinued (shut down)?
I take it, this survey concerns model year 2007 vehicles??

No. These are 2004 model year vehicles. The survey is done with the original owner after 3 years of ownership.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
Mar 12, 2020 12:06 AM
zzznightmarezz
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
0
Sep 21, 2015 06:32 PM
jchronis2552
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 21, 2015 05:52 AM
Bluenissan
Audio and Electronics
0
Sep 20, 2015 08:54 PM
guitarman
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
22
Sep 19, 2015 11:52 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:25 AM.