General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Need advice about suspension and Shox

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 12:40 PM
  #1  
cRedrum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 387
Okay heres the deal. Should I go ahead and get Koni's or just wait for the KYB AGX's. Also im thinking of switching to ground control coilovers because my eibachs arent low enough. To an extent, is the ride REALLY crappy in them even with tougher struts ? need advice. thanks.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 12:59 PM
  #2  
got rice?'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,245
From: Lancaster, PA
I'd get the Konis now and not wait around for the KYBs, which are only going to be slightly less expensive.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 01:15 PM
  #3  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by got rice?
I'd get the Konis now and not wait around for the KYBs, which are only going to be slightly less expensive.
Phuong,

Isn't that a relative statement? Sure, AGX's will be $400 shipped and Konis are $500 shipped (unless that has changed), but AGX'x will be much more straightforward install-wise.

If you're self-installing, that's one thing, but paying for an install would warrant waiting for the KYBs.....UNLESS you're getting a Coilover setup as cRedrum wants, then I would say the Konis are needed for longevity purposes......
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
95Max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 888
Per KYB the don't recommend the AGX for drops over 1.5in
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:09 PM
  #5  
cRedrum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 387
Originally posted by bill99gxe


Phuong,

Isn't that a relative statement? Sure, AGX's will be $400 shipped and Konis are $500 shipped (unless that has changed), but AGX'x will be much more straightforward install-wise.

If you're self-installing, that's one thing, but paying for an install would warrant waiting for the KYBs.....UNLESS you're getting a Coilover setup as cRedrum wants, then I would say the Konis are needed for longevity purposes......
Ahh bill. Every time i see you have replied to one of my threads i sigh. But this time we are agreeing. The only question i have is, What about just with my eibachs. Koni or KYB AGX's ?. Im not getting ground controls
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:23 PM
  #6  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by cRedrum


Ahh bill. Every time i see you have replied to one of my threads i sigh. But this time we are agreeing. The only question i have is, What about just with my eibachs. Koni or KYB AGX's ?. Im not getting ground controls
Well, I'm waiting on KYBs to become available so that I can get the H&R/KYB combo my wife....errr....that is I desire for the car.

For Eibachs, I would say either one would be fine....the AGXs would appeal more to me because of less install headaches AND ease of rear shock adjustability (Konis have to basically be removed to re-adjust in the rear; the fronts are a piece of cake)......the Konis would have a slight edge based on their rock-solid reputation for working with harsher springs (Generally, the Eibachs are tougher on struts than H&Rs). It's literally a toss up.

As long as it's a good topic and relevant to discussion, my responses will be informative.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:27 PM
  #7  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
Their should be a limit on how many questions you can ask a week
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:28 PM
  #8  
cRedrum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 387
Originally posted by SprintMax
Their should be a limit on how many questions you can ask a week
Whats the difference between that and post whoring like you Sprintmax ?
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:31 PM
  #9  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by SprintMax
Their should be a limit on how many questions you can ask a week
Should their?

or

Should there?


Hmmmm...an extension of evilness...limits on the number of questions you can ask....

I'll look into it.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Here's a simple concept. If you are unhappy with your current ride, then get the Koni's now, because they are available. If you are willing to wait another 2 months, then get the KYBs. But don't overlook what 95Max said, KYB doesn't advise using the AGX's with a drop of more than 1.5 inches. The answer then becomes pretty obvious to me.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:35 PM
  #11  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
Originally posted by cRedrum


Whats the difference between that and post whoring like you Sprintmax ?
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:39 PM
  #12  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Are you going to be constantly adjusting your shock settings? My bro has AGXs on his Integra. He just leaves them on 3 becuase anthing more is bone jarring. Unless you auto-x all the time or are an adjustment freak, just get the Koni fronts and put up w/ the intall hassle. It's not that hard. Then just get some cheapie KYB non-adjustables for the rear. If you have such a hard on for adjustability, just buy the adjustable Stillen rsb w/ the $$ difference.

People should be more realistic about adjustable suspensions. 90% of people that use coil overs just want that low ride for shows only. Most people that do adjustible shocks just play with them maybe 2-3 times and leave them alone. I doubt even 5% of the all .org people really know how to dial in their suspension anyway. I think the Koni fronts are a good idea becuase you get "some" adjustment and that's where 70% of the weight is anyway. Adjusting the rears to be too stiff just results in a skipping rear end on the beam 4-gen suspension.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:39 PM
  #13  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Am I the only one posting anything pertinent now?
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:47 PM
  #14  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Are you going to be constantly adjusting your shock settings? My bro has AGXs on his Integra. He just leaves them on 3 becuase anthing more is bone jarring. Unless you auto-x all the time or are an adjustment freak, just get the Koni fronts and put up w/ the intall hassle. It's not that hard. Then just get some cheapie KYB non-adjustables for the rear. If you have such a hard on for adjustability, just buy the adjustable Stillen rsb w/ the $$ difference.

People should be more realistic about adjustable suspensions. 90% of people that use coil overs just want that low ride for shows only. Most people that do adjustible shocks just play with them maybe 2-3 times and leave them alone. I doubt even 5% of the all .org people really know how to dial in their suspension anyway. I think the Koni fronts are a good idea becuase you get "some" adjustment and that's where 70% of the weight is anyway. Adjusting the rears to be too stiff just results in a skipping rear end on the beam 4-gen suspension.
I don't really agree on the rear ones........I think you need some that can take a beating back there with that beam. But I'm more of a do-it-correctly-one-time kind of person.....

And since Konis are a you-better-set-it-right-the-first-time kind of install in the back, AGXs make more long term since.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 02:57 PM
  #15  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Put it this way Bill. When I took my oem shocks out at about 80-90,000 miles on them, they will still good. Now the fronts were 100% toast. This tells me that the front takes much,much more abuse than the rear. With FWD and a heavy V6, it makes sense. Some other 4-gen guys have confirmed that their rears were not even worn when they took them out for replacement. This tells me that the back end is not really doing much. I can almost guarantee you that if you make the 4-gen rear much stiffer than it is w/ Eibachs or sprints, it's gonna skip like rock over water on rough roads. This set-up was also recommended by Keven97se after he fiddled w/ his suspension set-ups.

Originally posted by bill99gxe


I don't really agree on the rear ones........I think you need some that can take a beating back there with that beam. But I'm more of a do-it-correctly-one-time kind of person.....

And since Konis are a you-better-set-it-right-the-first-time kind of install in the back, AGXs make more long term since.
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 03:03 PM
  #16  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Put it this way Bill. When I took my oem shocks out at about 80-90,000 miles on them, they will still good. Now the fronts were 100% toast. This tells me that the front takes much,much more abuse than the rear. With FWD and a heavy V6, it makes sense. Some other 4-gen guys have confirmed that their rears were not even worn when they took them out for replacement. This tells me that the back end is not really doing much. I can almost guarantee you that if you make the 4-gen rear much stiffer than it is w/ Eibachs or sprints, it's gonna skip like rock over water on rough roads. This set-up was also recommended by Keven97se after he fiddled w/ his suspension set-ups.

[newbie response]

BLAH BLAH BLAH

You're wrong. My mechanic's wife's cousin's sister's husband's husband's wife's son's daughter who is in marketing for KYB says you are incorrect.

[/newbie response]

In the back I would rather have the control of setting it low initially, and then slightly increasing as the miles get higher and the dampening softens.....

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't consider Koni rears after what Keven went through.....
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 03:08 PM
  #17  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
That's what I'm trying to tell you Bill, they DON'T really wear out. I'd imagine you would have to ajust them maybe once every 50k for any appreciable wear.

Oh hell! Murder boy, just get what you want!

Originally posted by bill99gxe


[newbie response]

BLAH BLAH BLAH

You're wrong. My mechanic's wife's cousin's sister's husband's husband's wife's son's daughter who is in marketing for KYB says you are incorrect.

[/newbie response]

In the back I would rather have the control of setting it low initially, and then slightly increasing as the miles get higher and the dampening softens.....

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't consider Koni rears after what Keven went through.....
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 03:17 PM
  #18  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by Jeff92se
That's what I'm trying to tell you Bill, they DON'T really wear out. I'd imagine you would have to ajust them maybe once every 50k for any appreciable wear.


Ugggg.....Comparing the IRS rear on 3rd gens to the beam 4th gens doesn't seem applicable, despite the weight bias. To me, there is a significant wear difference between the 3rd gen rear and 4th gen rear on my vehicles. The 4th gen rear is much twitchier than it was when new. It has 36k on it. Adjusting it beats the heck out of taking something apart just to adjust it........

Oh hell! Murder boy, just get what you want!
Why the lack of love?
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 03:25 PM
  #19  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Murder = redrum. Not you Bill.

Are you sure it's the shocks? Keven never commented on twitchiness, only that the oem shocks he took out were not that worn. If it's that much more twitchy, I would maybe take it to Firestone and get the alignment checked. They have programs for lifetime alignment/checks etc... My toe setting was out even on the stock suspension due to settling. If the beam's toe settings are adjustable, maybe the same happened. I guess beam means the wheels just go up/down and that's it?

Originally posted by bill99gxe
Originally posted by Jeff92se


Ugggg.....Comparing the IRS rear on 3rd gens to the beam 4th gens doesn't seem applicable, despite the weight bias. To me, there is a significant wear difference between the 3rd gen rear and 4th gen rear on my vehicles. The 4th gen rear is much twitchier than it was when new. It has 36k on it. Adjusting it beats the heck out of taking something apart just to adjust it........



Why the lack of love? [/B]
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 03:35 PM
  #20  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Murder = redrum. Not you Bill.


Ahh....ok.....

Are you sure it's the shocks? Keven never commented on twitchiness, only that the oem shocks he took out were not that worn. If it's that much more twitchy, I would maybe take it to Firestone and get the alignment checked. They have programs for lifetime alignment/checks etc... My toe setting was out even on the stock suspension due to settling. If the beam's toe settings are adjustable, maybe the same happened. I guess beam means the wheels just go up/down and that's it?
No, I'm not sure. I think I have confused terms, though. It seems more "floaty" and "twitchy" than when new......

When I go to the 17" Borbet Type E's, then I'll re-align and re-evaluate....
Old Aug 3, 2001 | 05:34 PM
  #21  
cRedrum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 387
So you guys are saying i should just get Konis for the front ?

lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Aug 16, 2024 08:23 PM
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
Jan 6, 2017 06:05 PM
Pnjboyzz
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Nov 16, 2015 12:27 PM
JakeOfAllTrades
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
6
Oct 5, 2015 10:40 AM
JakeOfAllTrades
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
1
Sep 30, 2015 03:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 PM.