General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Launching: FWD vs. RWD vs. AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2001, 04:21 PM
  #1  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Launching: FWD vs. RWD vs. AWD

I have always heard FWD blows for launching cars. Is it becuase the weight isn't evenly distributed ?

Can someone please explain the advantages of RWD & AWD vs. FWD. And maybe RWD vs. AWD.

Thanks
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:27 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Evil Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 706
RWD-weight shifts back onto rear wheels when launching... good grip
FWD-weight shifts away from front wheels when launching... bad grip
AWD-what weight shift??? all wheels grip baby!!!
Evil Yak is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:31 PM
  #3  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Evil Yak
RWD-weight shifts back onto rear wheels when launching... good grip
FWD-weight shifts away from front wheels when launching... bad grip
AWD-what weight shift??? all wheels grip baby!!!
....

So why the hell does Nissan make the Maxima (or any car for that matter) FWD ? Is it cheeper ?

Is their any hope for FWD cars when it comes to drag racing ?
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
AznWontonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by Craig Mack


....

So why the hell does Nissan make the Maxima (or any car for that matter) FWD ? Is it cheeper ?

Is their any hope for FWD cars when it comes to drag racing ?
FWD still can do good, but its just that RWD and AWD do better. You still see 11-12 sec FWD cars..
AznWontonboy is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:38 PM
  #5  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
FWD still can do good, but its just that RWD and AWD do better. You still see 11-12 sec FWD cars..
But how come they even make cars in FWD ? Cost ? Yea your right. That lady Lisa Kubo ran like 8 second 1/4th in a civic.
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:38 PM
  #6  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
FWD is a much more compact package for automakers to build. It also creates room in the enterior as there is not driveshaft "hump" to deal with. FWD cars are superior to the RWD cars in wet and snowy conditions due to the fact that the majority of the weight is over the drive wheels. Porsche and old VW w/ their engine in back RWD is of course the exception.

Originally posted by Craig Mack


....

So why the hell does Nissan make the Maxima (or any car for that matter) FWD ? Is it cheeper ?

Is their any hope for FWD cars when it comes to drag racing ?
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 04:53 PM
  #7  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Jeff92se
FWD is a much more compact package for automakers to build. It also creates room in the enterior as there is not driveshaft "hump" to deal with. FWD cars are superior to the RWD cars in wet and snowy conditions due to the fact that the majority of the weight is over the drive wheels. Porsche and old VW w/ their engine in back RWD is of course the exception.

I see. Much more practicle.

What about AWD ? Mmmmm...awd maxima...
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 05:04 PM
  #8  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
Don't laugh. The new Jaguar X-type AWD is based on the Ford Modeo(or Contour) FWD chassis. What they did is keep the FWD and transverse engine mounts but added a tranny that has another output shaft going to the rear. Nissan infact has such a tranny for the Japan only Pulsar GTI but it's CA not VQ based. But the idea is the same.

Originally posted by Craig Mack


I see. Much more practicle.

Mmmmm...awd maxima...
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 06:52 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
TintDaMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,493
Also, FWD gives you more control in corners
TintDaMax is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 06:56 PM
  #10  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by TintDaMax
Also, FWD gives you more control in corners
So FWD is better for suspension reasons ? How so ?
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 07:09 PM
  #11  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
No it's not. Anytime you have the drive wheels and the steering wheels on the same side, it's going to be a handling compromise. Just can't avoid that.


Originally posted by Craig Mack


So FWD is better for suspension reasons ? How so ?
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 07:26 PM
  #12  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Jeff92se
No it's not. Anytime you have the drive wheels and the steering wheels on the same side, it's going to be a handling compromise. Just can't avoid that.


So what your tellin' me is TintDaMax is a foo ?
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 07:56 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
mAdD MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,677
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Don't laugh. The new Jaguar X-type AWD is based on the Ford Modeo(or Contour) FWD chassis. What they did is keep the FWD and transverse engine mounts but added a tranny that has another output shaft going to the rear. Nissan infact has such a tranny for the Japan only Pulsar GTI but it's CA not VQ based. But the idea is the same.

Isn't Jaq's AWD baised towards the front wheels and should the front wheels lose traction, something like 30% of hte torque goes to the rear?

I know the AWD system in Subarus are different depending on their transmission choice...if you have a manual tranny, the AWD is mechanically controlled and you have a 50/50% bias of power to the front/rear.

If you have an automatic Subie, the AWD system is electronically controlled and the car is something like 90/10 front/rear bais..and if the wheels slip, then a portion of the power goes to the rear.

Same goes for the Quattro system in the Audi TT and in the Passat AWD.. their system is not Torsen based (I think?) but I do know its FWD baised...not like the Quattro system in the A4/6/8..
mAdD MAX is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 08:21 PM
  #14  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
Yup. Sounds right to me. They did it that way becuase there was no way they were going to offer a FWD Jag. lol. Yeah it's FWD first then AWD.

Originally posted by mAdD MAX


Isn't Jaq's AWD baised towards the front wheels and should the front wheels lose traction, something like 30% of hte torque goes to the rear?

I know the AWD system in Subarus are different depending on their transmission choice...if you have a manual tranny, the AWD is mechanically controlled and you have a 50/50% bias of power to the front/rear.

If you have an automatic Subie, the AWD system is electronically controlled and the car is something like 90/10 front/rear bais..and if the wheels slip, then a portion of the power goes to the rear.

Same goes for the Quattro system in the Audi TT and in the Passat AWD.. their system is not Torsen based (I think?) but I do know its FWD baised...not like the Quattro system in the A4/6/8..
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 08:34 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
HoJo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 955
Originally posted by TintDaMax
Also, FWD gives you more control in corners
Ummm... No
HoJo is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 08:36 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
HoJo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 955
Originally posted by Craig Mack


So what your tellin' me is TintDaMax is a foo ?

Ummm... Yea
HoJo is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 09:41 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
max'n out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
All wheel drive is by far the best to have in all conditions. But typically it doesn't get as good as gas milage as the others. (for the most part i know theres exeptions). However awd is not always evenly distributed most are 70% front 30% rear. Audi is the only one i know for sure that has 50% 50%. Now if you have awd 50/50 with a wieght distribution of close to 50/50 look out. But most car weight is more like 65/35. Bmw is the one closet to 50 50 with like 52/48.
max'n out is offline  
Old 11-09-2001, 11:41 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
AznWontonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by max'n out
All wheel drive is by far the best to have in all conditions. But typically it doesn't get as good as gas milage as the others. (for the most part i know theres exeptions). However awd is not always evenly distributed most are 70% front 30% rear. Audi is the only one i know for sure that has 50% 50%. Now if you have awd 50/50 with a wieght distribution of close to 50/50 look out. But most car weight is more like 65/35. Bmw is the one closet to 50 50 with like 52/48.
Can you show me which cars are 70% front and 30% rear power distribution? Bmw still have something like a 60% power transfer to the rear wheels and 40% to the front with the near 50/50 weight balance.. good combo.
AznWontonboy is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 11:46 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
max'n out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
Can you show me which cars are 70% front and 30% rear power distribution? Bmw still have something like a 60% power transfer to the rear wheels and 40% to the front with the near 50/50 weight balance.. good combo.
The cars that come to mind with about 70/30 are the eagle talon's awd, and the new jag. Most are split either 70/30 or 30/70 execpt audi. Which ones do you really wanna know...i could be here for awhile listing them all.
max'n out is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 12:40 PM
  #20  
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
BottleFedMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 679
Another disadvantage of AWD is the weight factor. Let's just say that a Max weighs about 3200 lbs fully loaded and a Audi S4 weighs about 3800 lbs.
BottleFedMax is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 12:44 PM
  #21  
Member
 
PeaBodyJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 87
rwd is good
PeaBodyJones is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 01:05 PM
  #22  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by PeaBodyJones
rwd is good
Yea but a Maxima from the Ice-age isn't
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 02:54 PM
  #23  
PhatGuy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Craig Mack


But how come they even make cars in FWD ? Cost ? Yea your right. That lady Lisa Kubo ran like 8 second 1/4th in a civic.
A fwd car is better in the snow I find.
 
Old 11-10-2001, 03:50 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
black019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,317
Originally posted by Craig Mack


Yea but a Maxima from the Ice-age isn't
didnt those old school maximas have rwd???
black019 is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 04:05 PM
  #25  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Thread Starter
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by black019


didnt those old school maximas have rwd???
Yup.
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 10:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
black019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,317
i wonder why nissan changed it???
black019 is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 11:10 PM
  #27  
Member
 
PeaBodyJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 87
Originally posted by black019


didnt those old school maximas have rwd???
why yes we do. jealous?
PeaBodyJones is offline  
Old 11-10-2001, 11:41 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Bryan H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
fwd superior to awd and rwd in the turns?
who lied to you?

there is a reason why audio is stomping *** in the speed vision gt series.
why?
awd
whats behind it? rwd
behind that? fwd

nothing beats a awd feeling out of the hole on cheap street tires. NOT all of the awd cars hook. mine prefers to spin through first and second at the track.

rwd will always be king of traction
awd is just to breakable but ranks very high up there
fwd. defeats the whole purpose in general for traction while trying to race.
Bryan H is offline  
Old 11-11-2001, 12:52 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Stereodude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit Metro Area
Posts: 1,617
Originally posted by black019
i wonder why nissan changed it???
All automakers have bascially switched. It has a lot to do with drivability. A front wheel drive car behaves much more predictably at the limit than a rear wheel drive car. This is especially true in snow and rain. So it's good for the moronic car buying public (mostly everyone). You put most drivers in a rear wheel drive car in the snow and they all end up in ditches. In front wheel drive cars they manage.

Stereodude
Stereodude is offline  
Old 11-11-2001, 01:10 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
AznWontonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by Stereodude


All automakers have bascially switched. It has a lot to do with drivability. A front wheel drive car behaves much more predictably at the limit than a rear wheel drive car. This is especially true in snow and rain. So it's good for the moronic car buying public (mostly everyone). You put most drivers in a rear wheel drive car in the snow and they all end up in ditches. In front wheel drive cars they manage.

Stereodude
Where did you get this? I was under the thought that it was cheaper to manufacture.. Bmws, Mercedes, Jaguars.. Rarely front wheel drive.
AznWontonboy is offline  
Old 11-11-2001, 01:52 AM
  #31  
Member
 
PeaBodyJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 87
most sports cars have rwd...
PeaBodyJones is offline  
Old 11-11-2001, 06:38 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Stereodude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit Metro Area
Posts: 1,617
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
Where did you get this? I was under the thought that it was cheaper to manufacture.. Bmws, Mercedes, Jaguars.. Rarely front wheel drive.
The Germans do their own thing. They're driving enthusiasts, so they still use RWD because it generally gives you a better handling vehicle. Those cars are imported to the US, but were designed for the europeans. Most cars that are designed for the US population in mind are front wheel drive.

This is just information I've gathered talking to various engineers in the auto industry.

Stereodude
Stereodude is offline  
Old 11-11-2001, 08:59 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
max'n out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
Heres the deal. Fwd has become the thing because it just keeps diging. No matter the wheather it will just keep diging. Try that with a rwd car. You know what it does. your gonna go in a circle. This makes the car drivable to every lamo out there that can't drive. Rwd is used in sports cars because "it is better to push than pull". But the new line of thinking is it's better to "push and pull" (awd). Also fwd cars understeer where as rwd cars oversteer and awd car tend to be neutrel. Most people can deal with understeer most can't deal with the car spinging out behind them. If you know how to drive rwd is more sporty cuz you can keep speed going. If you can't drive then having fwd understeer is what you need cuz you can stay on the gas and it most likely woun't spin out and you can keep going.
max'n out is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thatcollegestudent
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
18
10-05-2015 02:29 PM
tcb_02_max
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
5
09-11-2015 12:23 PM
FanaticMadMax
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
08-10-2015 08:55 PM
Frank Fontaine
General Maxima Discussion
1
12-13-2000 03:21 PM



Quick Reply: Launching: FWD vs. RWD vs. AWD



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 AM.