I retract a comment I've made about the new Max being slower that the Alty

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 5, 2001 | 03:35 PM

#41

deezo

Thread Starter

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Apr 2001

Posts: 14,285

From: FV, NC

Quote:

Originally posted by medicsonic

I don't think that's possible. Maybe 14.2 or 14.1, but no 13s.

I forgot about Aaron's Y pipe. I got carried away.

Dec 5, 2001 | 03:59 PM

#42

PhatGuy

Guest

Posts: n/a

No speculation at all the Maxima is faster and no one can prove otherwise as of yet!

14.3 stock is the number to beat!

Dec 5, 2001 | 07:13 PM

#43

deezo

Thread Starter

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Apr 2001

Posts: 14,285

From: FV, NC

Quote:

Originally posted by PhatGuy
No speculation at all the Maxima is faster and no one can prove otherwise as of yet! 14.3 stock is the number to beat!

Dec 5, 2001 | 08:48 PM

#44

dmbmaxima2k2

Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 6,690

Quote:

Originally posted by medicsonic

I don't think that's possible. Maybe 14.2 or 14.1, but no 13s.

ya considering the times were at optimal conditions i could see maybe a 14.1 out of aaron. i'll have 13;s next year if they ever make some parts for this car.

Dec 6, 2001 | 02:30 PM

#45

kit99bar

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 420

Dave, have you seen BillyBruns' runs?
he's hit a 14.15 and averages a 14.3 run in his GT-S.

here's videos of his runs
http://brun1.home.mindspring.com/My%20Car/

Quote:

Originally posted by Dave B

Example: Maryland Dragway 12/00, two new Celica GT-Ss go to the track with just intake and exhaust mods, nothing else. They both run 14.3s@99mph. The conditions were 30 degree temps, 30% humidity, and wildly high baropressures exceeding 32.00 (29.8 is average). They have NEVER been able to come close to those ets since that night.
Dave