14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
#41
Originally posted by Greg's2kGLE
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
#43
Originally posted by Greg's2kGLE
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
On a side note a few cl-s owner's have vehmently denied that an auto can't do 14's let's see what they have to say now.
#44
Originally posted by Greg's2kGLE
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
Damn the '02 autos (with 33 more hp and 29 more lb-ft of torque than the 00-01's) are pulling 1 sec faster times. Damn I am mezmerized by this. That extra power made a hell or a difference.
#45
I just hope the tranny can hold the power. I'm pretty certain it's the same automagic, but it's been beefed up a little for the torque (trannies are rated at torque, not hp).
I love shifting, but I would really like to get a torquey crusier automatic. I'd like to have the luxury of a GLE. Get a cone intake, springs, B-pipe, y-pipe (?), and nice 17s. If I could run 14.5-14.7, I'd be happy (my track seems to be slower). I will be getting a project car which will either be a 5.0 or a 240SX. The project car will be a manual.
I'm jealous of you guys that getto run in this cold weather. My track closes in early November and unfortunately we had a very warm fall. However, I found a track south of me that opens up on Feb 1st Maybe I can make some runs in weather cooler than mid 70s this time
Dave
I love shifting, but I would really like to get a torquey crusier automatic. I'd like to have the luxury of a GLE. Get a cone intake, springs, B-pipe, y-pipe (?), and nice 17s. If I could run 14.5-14.7, I'd be happy (my track seems to be slower). I will be getting a project car which will either be a 5.0 or a 240SX. The project car will be a manual.
I'm jealous of you guys that getto run in this cold weather. My track closes in early November and unfortunately we had a very warm fall. However, I found a track south of me that opens up on Feb 1st Maybe I can make some runs in weather cooler than mid 70s this time
Dave
#46
Originally posted by Dave B
I just hope the tranny can hold the power. I'm pretty certain it's the same automagic, but it's been beefed up a little for the torque (trannies are rated at torque, not hp).
I love shifting, but I would really like to get a torquey crusier automatic. I'd like to have the luxury of a GLE. Get a cone intake, springs, B-pipe, y-pipe (?), and nice 17s. If I could run 14.5-14.7, I'd be happy (my track seems to be slower). I will be getting a project car which will either be a 5.0 or a 240SX. The project car will be a manual.
I'm jealous of you guys that getto run in this cold weather. My track closes in early November and unfortunately we had a very warm fall. However, I found a track south of me that opens up on Feb 1st Maybe I can make some runs in weather cooler than mid 70s this time
Dave
I just hope the tranny can hold the power. I'm pretty certain it's the same automagic, but it's been beefed up a little for the torque (trannies are rated at torque, not hp).
I love shifting, but I would really like to get a torquey crusier automatic. I'd like to have the luxury of a GLE. Get a cone intake, springs, B-pipe, y-pipe (?), and nice 17s. If I could run 14.5-14.7, I'd be happy (my track seems to be slower). I will be getting a project car which will either be a 5.0 or a 240SX. The project car will be a manual.
I'm jealous of you guys that getto run in this cold weather. My track closes in early November and unfortunately we had a very warm fall. However, I found a track south of me that opens up on Feb 1st Maybe I can make some runs in weather cooler than mid 70s this time
Dave
#48
Originally posted by d_98SE
No one doubted the extra 33hp/29lb-ft the 3.5 put out. Now i can just see cl-s owners with their panties in tighter wads than before.
On a side note a few cl-s owner's have vehmently denied that an auto can't do 14's let's see what they have to say now.
No one doubted the extra 33hp/29lb-ft the 3.5 put out. Now i can just see cl-s owners with their panties in tighter wads than before.
On a side note a few cl-s owner's have vehmently denied that an auto can't do 14's let's see what they have to say now.
They still deny that the 2k2 can beat them. Some people just can't handle the truth
#49
Originally posted by ScreamingVQ
They still deny that the 2k2 can beat them. Some people just can't handle the truth
They still deny that the 2k2 can beat them. Some people just can't handle the truth
#51
If you look at cl.com, there is a section strictly for broken trannies. At Edmunds there are a lot of posts on CLS/TLS problems. Some guy said his was a POS and told people not to buy.
Nevertheless, the car is fast, stylish, and was my second choice beside the 6 speed Max. I do like beating CLS/TLS on the street, and then giving the drive the death stare. Double whammy!!
Nevertheless, the car is fast, stylish, and was my second choice beside the 6 speed Max. I do like beating CLS/TLS on the street, and then giving the drive the death stare. Double whammy!!
#52
Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by 2K2THEMAX
My automagic 2002 with K&N cone filter ran a 14.44@95 and had numerous runs in the 14.5's - proving very good consistency. It was a great night with 4 other maxima owners at the track (to verify the times) to have an Alabama track meet. I am getting an exhaust for my Christmas present to myself; hopefully I will be able to get a 14.2 Do you guys think it's possible?
Peace,
Daniel
My automagic 2002 with K&N cone filter ran a 14.44@95 and had numerous runs in the 14.5's - proving very good consistency. It was a great night with 4 other maxima owners at the track (to verify the times) to have an Alabama track meet. I am getting an exhaust for my Christmas present to myself; hopefully I will be able to get a 14.2 Do you guys think it's possible?
Peace,
Daniel
thanx
#54
Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by SprintMax
oh its Peter my fav unbiased TL Forum Member
oh its Peter my fav unbiased TL Forum Member
My previous question stands.
#55
Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by PeterUbers
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
#56
Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by PeterUbers
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
#57
Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by PeterUbers
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
#58
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by SprintMax
I am doug on the TL board.. i don't post much but i read alot.. and yes your opinions are un-bais
I am doug on the TL board.. i don't post much but i read alot.. and yes your opinions are un-bais
Thanks, I think I'm a Max lover, in fact, in a couple years, when the Isuzu Rodeo goes over 100K miles, I'm in for the 6-spd Maxima. I like the TL-S a lot, but I'm not a fan of the auto transmission. It leaves a LOT to be desired. The 6-spd Max wasn't out when I went in on the TL-S. If Acura comes out w/ a TL-S outfitted w/ the 6-spd, it'll be a toss up. I recently test-drove the 3.5 Alty 5-spd .. loved the power and the idiot-proof clutch .. however, it was loud, many things rattled, the interior was cheesy. There was significant wheel hop under hard acceleration also .. it was rather unsettling (the whole front end shook like crazy!) I still loved it. I prefer the Altima's rear end to the Maxima's..
I've been a Maxima lover since I drove in a friend's '88 Max, so I hope no one confuses ANY of my posts for implying that the TL-S is a better car. There is more to the drive than just straightline performance, at least in a true car enthusiast's mind. However, when considering straightline performance, specifically at the track, many people fail to consider the altitude/humidity/pressure/temps... I'm curious what elevation fostered the 14.4 1/4-mile times.. Here in Illinois, my friend's stock M3 ('98 5-spd) managed a best of 14.6 in 60 degree weather with excellent track conditions.. of course we're at 4800ft.
Thanks for the welcome, I'm a long time lurker finally getting around to setting up my profile!
#59
Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by PeterUbers
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
Hmm... I'm not sure I know who you are -- but, if you're being sarcastic, let's have the record show you are instigating something I'm not getting into.
My previous question stands.
Daniel
#60
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by 2K2THEMAX
As I said in a previous post, the temperature was cold - most likely in the 40's, maybe low 50's. Also we Southern Maxima owners have an advantage because we are near the Gulf and have low altitude. I would say the altitude is 250-300 ft above sea level.
Daniel
As I said in a previous post, the temperature was cold - most likely in the 40's, maybe low 50's. Also we Southern Maxima owners have an advantage because we are near the Gulf and have low altitude. I would say the altitude is 250-300 ft above sea level.
Daniel
#61
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
I liked you more on the GS 400 posts .. i seen you smack down a couple dreaming TL members.. not particularly maxima posts got my attention
Originally posted by PeterUbers
Hey Doug,
Thanks, I think I'm a Max lover, in fact, in a couple years, when the Isuzu Rodeo goes over 100K miles, I'm in for the 6-spd Maxima. I like the TL-S a lot, but I'm not a fan of the auto transmission. It leaves a LOT to be desired. The 6-spd Max wasn't out when I went in on the TL-S. If Acura comes out w/ a TL-S outfitted w/ the 6-spd, it'll be a toss up. I recently test-drove the 3.5 Alty 5-spd .. loved the power and the idiot-proof clutch .. however, it was loud, many things rattled, the interior was cheesy. There was significant wheel hop under hard acceleration also .. it was rather unsettling (the whole front end shook like crazy!) I still loved it. I prefer the Altima's rear end to the Maxima's..
I've been a Maxima lover since I drove in a friend's '88 Max, so I hope no one confuses ANY of my posts for implying that the TL-S is a better car. There is more to the drive than just straightline performance, at least in a true car enthusiast's mind. However, when considering straightline performance, specifically at the track, many people fail to consider the altitude/humidity/pressure/temps... I'm curious what elevation fostered the 14.4 1/4-mile times.. Here in Illinois, my friend's stock M3 ('98 5-spd) managed a best of 14.6 in 60 degree weather with excellent track conditions.. of course we're at 4800ft.
Thanks for the welcome, I'm a long time lurker finally getting around to setting up my profile!
Hey Doug,
Thanks, I think I'm a Max lover, in fact, in a couple years, when the Isuzu Rodeo goes over 100K miles, I'm in for the 6-spd Maxima. I like the TL-S a lot, but I'm not a fan of the auto transmission. It leaves a LOT to be desired. The 6-spd Max wasn't out when I went in on the TL-S. If Acura comes out w/ a TL-S outfitted w/ the 6-spd, it'll be a toss up. I recently test-drove the 3.5 Alty 5-spd .. loved the power and the idiot-proof clutch .. however, it was loud, many things rattled, the interior was cheesy. There was significant wheel hop under hard acceleration also .. it was rather unsettling (the whole front end shook like crazy!) I still loved it. I prefer the Altima's rear end to the Maxima's..
I've been a Maxima lover since I drove in a friend's '88 Max, so I hope no one confuses ANY of my posts for implying that the TL-S is a better car. There is more to the drive than just straightline performance, at least in a true car enthusiast's mind. However, when considering straightline performance, specifically at the track, many people fail to consider the altitude/humidity/pressure/temps... I'm curious what elevation fostered the 14.4 1/4-mile times.. Here in Illinois, my friend's stock M3 ('98 5-spd) managed a best of 14.6 in 60 degree weather with excellent track conditions.. of course we're at 4800ft.
Thanks for the welcome, I'm a long time lurker finally getting around to setting up my profile!
#62
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 14.44@95 - auto 2k2!
Originally posted by SprintMax
I liked you more on the GS 400 posts .. i seen you smack down a couple dreaming TL members.. not particularly maxima posts got my attention
I liked you more on the GS 400 posts .. i seen you smack down a couple dreaming TL members.. not particularly maxima posts got my attention
#70
Originally posted by 95maxrider
That 14.44 made me a lot less ashamed of owning an auto...too bad I'll never make those kind of times.
That 14.44 made me a lot less ashamed of owning an auto...too bad I'll never make those kind of times.
The way I've extensively looked at it, the Max now has several advantages over the TL-S .. about 300lbs less weight, a four speed auto (probably quicker shifts) means less time lost to shifting that extra TL-S gear (this quality benefits the Buick Regal GS/Pontiac GTP in the exact same way .. both cars developing about 280ft-lbs of torque need those taller gears to keep the car pulling strong through the powerband), better rubber on the SE .. I read something about Potenza's, and your higher torque rating, and potentially lighter 17" rims. Further, the max probably puts more hp down to the wheels than the TL-S. But again, this just benefits the straightline performance. Cars rarely become noteworthy SIMPLY because of their straightline performance.
Yeah, people how talk about the GS400 being comparable to the TL-S are barking up the wrong tree and they deserve to be smacked. However, during some of the TL-S vs. pre-Max2k2 fueds on the TL-S board, I remember a few Max members stating that one of the positive attributes of the Maxima was that "it revved nothing short of a Ferrari" as stated in some C&D article. I thought that was pretty funny too (I'm directing that statement AT the few people who said that, not all maxima owners in general). So I said, well, power to you if you think you're driving a "ferrari" and wonder why you're not getting as many head turns as you'd like from drivers on the road!
#77
Originally posted by dko
i love my auto as much as the next guy, but let's get someone like theblue or briguymax in a 6spd, give 'em a week of practice and i'm sure we'll see just about 13's
i love my auto as much as the next guy, but let's get someone like theblue or briguymax in a 6spd, give 'em a week of practice and i'm sure we'll see just about 13's
Pre-01 stock M3's rarely break the 14.0 barrier, and you're saying an '02 Max will? Uh-uh. I give credit where credit is due, and the max is a great car, but I refuse to believe that one until I see the guy's timeslip... you know, the guy who you taught to drive a 6-spd in 7 days... THAT guy!
#78
Originally posted by PeterUbers
13's huh?
Pre-01 stock M3's rarely break the 14.0 barrier, and you're saying an '02 Max will? Uh-uh. I give credit where credit is due, and the max is a great car, but I refuse to believe that one until I see the guy's timeslip... you know, the guy who you taught to drive a 6-spd in 7 days... THAT guy!
13's huh?
Pre-01 stock M3's rarely break the 14.0 barrier, and you're saying an '02 Max will? Uh-uh. I give credit where credit is due, and the max is a great car, but I refuse to believe that one until I see the guy's timeslip... you know, the guy who you taught to drive a 6-spd in 7 days... THAT guy!
#79
Originally posted by dko
take things people say with a grain of salt. I'm hyperbolizing, but I would say someone like theblue would lay down a damn good time. this isn't someone who has never driven stick before, just so you know. he pulled a 14.7 in the quarter in a bone stock 4th gen 5spd.
take things people say with a grain of salt. I'm hyperbolizing, but I would say someone like theblue would lay down a damn good time. this isn't someone who has never driven stick before, just so you know. he pulled a 14.7 in the quarter in a bone stock 4th gen 5spd.
Stereodude
#80
Originally posted by Stereodude
Yanking out the seats and the space isn't bone stock. But still I think the 13's are very possible.
Stereodude
Yanking out the seats and the space isn't bone stock. But still I think the 13's are very possible.
Stereodude