Grand Prix
Grand Prix
280HP and FRONT WHEEL DRIVE in next years Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force. http://www.motortrend.com/autoshows/...o02/index.html
that'll be interesting
that'll be interesting
Re: Grand Prix
Originally posted by Kelton
280HP and FRONT WHEEL DRIVE in next years Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force. http://www.motortrend.com/autoshows/...o02/index.html
that'll be interesting
280HP and FRONT WHEEL DRIVE in next years Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force. http://www.motortrend.com/autoshows/...o02/index.html
that'll be interesting
Re: Re: Grand Prix
Originally posted by nismo2020
seems intresting. btw how come your wheels are not polished?
seems intresting. btw how come your wheels are not polished?
I just drove my friends slow Grand Prix gt (52k miles and I enjoyed the symphony of rubbing plastic parts from every direction. It doesn't handle that bad though (compared to stock Max.)
-Jeremy
97 5-speed (no squeaks or rattles at 97k miles)
Jwt pop charger, soon CAI
WSP Y-pipe
-Jeremy
97 5-speed (no squeaks or rattles at 97k miles)
Jwt pop charger, soon CAI
WSP Y-pipe
Originally posted by NmexMAX
Perfect comp for the 6sp SE. Pathetic that a s/c 3.8L will be compared to a N/A 3.5L
Perfect comp for the 6sp SE. Pathetic that a s/c 3.8L will be compared to a N/A 3.5L
-Justin
Originally posted by Badaxxima
Wonder if it's still a pushrod 2-valver? It seems as if the new horsepower war has begun. Only this time it isn't a civil war, it's a world war. The next few years will indeed be quite a ride.
-Justin
Wonder if it's still a pushrod 2-valver? It seems as if the new horsepower war has begun. Only this time it isn't a civil war, it's a world war. The next few years will indeed be quite a ride.
-Justin
Originally posted by NmexMAX
I think it is still a 2 valver, it has the same torque as last year, so they prolly just messed with the heads or somethin.
I think it is still a 2 valver, it has the same torque as last year, so they prolly just messed with the heads or somethin.
The current hp/tq ratings for the 3800 Supercharged motor are:
240hp@5200 and
280lb-ft@3200.
Since HP is dependent on torque, you can figure from the formula that torque drops to 242.4lb-ft at 5200RPM. To increase peak hp to 280, either they increased the peak RPM or raised the top-end torque curve (nearly 40lb-ft) to boost top-end HP. Those are the only ways to increase hp. Since the new motor doesn't have more than 280lb-ft, I'm guessing that they did both. Either way this car is going to run mid-high 14's stock and grab mid-low 13's with BPU (Intake/Exhaust, TC, Chip, smaller pulley, IC). The supercharger is warrantied too! Should be interesting.
-Justin
There has been a horsepower war for more than 100 years. This is nothing new.
That 280hp will serve only to break the crappy transmissions in those cars much faster. I remember seeing tons and tons of transmission failures listed on the GTP site. One guy had to replace his transmission at 3,000 miles. That's not too impressive.
That 280hp will serve only to break the crappy transmissions in those cars much faster. I remember seeing tons and tons of transmission failures listed on the GTP site. One guy had to replace his transmission at 3,000 miles. That's not too impressive.
Originally posted by Badaxxima
Since HP is dependent on torque, you can figure from the formula that torque drops to 242.4lb-ft at 5200RPM. To increase peak hp to 280, either they increased the peak RPM or raised the top-end torque curve (nearly 40lb-ft) to boost top-end HP. Those are the only ways to increase hp. Since the new motor doesn't have more than 280lb-ft, I'm guessing that they did both. Either way this car is going to run mid-high 14's stock and grab mid-low 13's with BPU (Intake/Exhaust, TC, Chip, smaller pulley, IC). The supercharger is warrantied too! Should be interesting.
-Justin
Since HP is dependent on torque, you can figure from the formula that torque drops to 242.4lb-ft at 5200RPM. To increase peak hp to 280, either they increased the peak RPM or raised the top-end torque curve (nearly 40lb-ft) to boost top-end HP. Those are the only ways to increase hp. Since the new motor doesn't have more than 280lb-ft, I'm guessing that they did both. Either way this car is going to run mid-high 14's stock and grab mid-low 13's with BPU (Intake/Exhaust, TC, Chip, smaller pulley, IC). The supercharger is warrantied too! Should be interesting.
-Justin
BPU = Basic Power Upgrades?
TC = ?????
Does a smaller pully or other Mods void the factory warranty?
Originally posted by Anachronism
IC = InterCooler
BPU = Basic Power Upgrades?
TC = ?????
Does a smaller pully or other Mods void the factory warranty?
IC = InterCooler
BPU = Basic Power Upgrades?
TC = ?????
Does a smaller pully or other Mods void the factory warranty?
Shouldn't unless it specifically causes a problem with the car. Thrasher already sells an IC for them, worth ~30hp last time I checked. The 4T60-E transaxle in the 3800 SC cars are only rated to 300hp. I don't know what the torque rating is, but stock 3800 SC's make 280lb-ft@3200RPM. That's why they have transmission trouble. If GM was smart they'd use the 4T80-E from the 300hp Northstar Caddies, but that would probably upstage Caddies' claim to fame of being the most powerful front drivers. GM is so stupid.
IMHO...
It'd be neat if GM used the 3.5L DOHC V6 from the Olds Intrigue. With less displacement, and under natural aspiration, it only makes 25hp less than the supercharged 3.8L OHV V6.
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
Re: IMHO...
Originally posted by Black VQ
It'd be neat if GM used the 3.5L DOHC V6 from the Olds Intrigue. With less displacement, and under natural aspiration, it only makes 25hp less than the supercharged 3.8L OHV V6.
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
It'd be neat if GM used the 3.5L DOHC V6 from the Olds Intrigue. With less displacement, and under natural aspiration, it only makes 25hp less than the supercharged 3.8L OHV V6.
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
My friend had a GP-GT, and went through 4 engines in 5 months. 1 engine was N/A and the others were GTP/Rivera engines, talk about stealthy, he'd pull up to an unsuspecting victim with his grand prix gt badging and with his intake on that s/ced engine WoW
sounded really mean.He still didn't have evertthing set up perfect, b/c when he racd a real GTP, he'd lose. He raped me from a dead stop, but on a roll, I stayed surprisingly even w/ him.
Actually, the new GTP's(280hp) will be 4th gens for lunch, but not the 2G-5thGen's.

"Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force
With the G-Force "concept," Pontiac offers a look at the next-generation Grand Prix's styling and performance. Pushing boundaries on both counts, the 2+2 sedan is wrapped in bold sheetmetal and has the goods to back it. The performance goals were a 155-mph top speed and 0.85 g of lateral acceleration, putting it in elite company with premium European sedans. For motivation, the G-Force uses a supercharged 3800 V-6, like today's top Grand Prix models, that has been tuned to put out 280 horsepower. Potent output for a front-driver, the engine is reined in by electronic drive-by-wire throttle and a manually controlled automatic transmission, dubbed TACshift. Other high-tech goodies include four-channel StabiliTrak system and dynamically adjusting shocks.
DAMMIT.... everything keeps getting faster and faster... It's no point in trying to buy the faster/newer car since in a couple of years you better be sure they will make something faster.. I give up on performance.. time to rice it out
Re: IMHO...
Originally posted by Black VQ
It'd be neat if GM used the 3.5L DOHC V6 from the Olds Intrigue. With less displacement, and under natural aspiration, it only makes 25hp less than the supercharged 3.8L OHV V6.
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
It'd be neat if GM used the 3.5L DOHC V6 from the Olds Intrigue. With less displacement, and under natural aspiration, it only makes 25hp less than the supercharged 3.8L OHV V6.
If GM S/C'd the 3.5L, it'd be a great move in the right direction. It's all about evolution of the species, right?
Re: Grand Prix
Originally posted by Kelton
280HP and FRONT WHEEL DRIVE in next years Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force. http://www.motortrend.com/autoshows/...o02/index.html
that'll be interesting
280HP and FRONT WHEEL DRIVE in next years Pontiac Grand Prix G-Force. http://www.motortrend.com/autoshows/...o02/index.html
that'll be interesting
Re: Re: Grand Prix
Originally posted by 2M0A0X2
ur point is? i still like my max better.....or is it the fact that i don't like domestics?
ur point is? i still like my max better.....or is it the fact that i don't like domestics?
Re: Re: IMHO...
Originally posted by NmexMAX
Actually, the new GTP's(280hp) will be 4th gens for lunch, but not the 2G-5thGen's.
Actually, the new GTP's(280hp) will be 4th gens for lunch, but not the 2G-5thGen's.
Re: Re: Re: IMHO...
Lots of 4-gens are about 15.0 stock and low 14's w/ just intake and Y.
Originally posted by IH8RICE
The 240 HP ones take 4th gens... they are mid to high 14 sec. stock... what are the 1/4 times for the 5th gens???
The 240 HP ones take 4th gens... they are mid to high 14 sec. stock... what are the 1/4 times for the 5th gens???
Re: Re: Re: Re: IMHO...
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Lots of 4-gens are about 15.0 stock and low 14's w/ just intake and Y.
Lots of 4-gens are about 15.0 stock and low 14's w/ just intake and Y.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: IMHO...
\There are a few guys that are bone stock that have done a 15.0 I belive. But then again, less than 1/2 of us even go to the track. That's the reason for the lack of track times.
Originally posted by IH8RICE
right.... and so are GTP's... see what I'm getting at? I haven't seen too many guys on here w/ stock 15.0's... most have mods... I may be wrong but it's what I've seen... go check out the 4th gen forum.. I'm not calling you out.. but I haven't seen a whole lot in the high 14's w/ no work...
right.... and so are GTP's... see what I'm getting at? I haven't seen too many guys on here w/ stock 15.0's... most have mods... I may be wrong but it's what I've seen... go check out the 4th gen forum.. I'm not calling you out.. but I haven't seen a whole lot in the high 14's w/ no work...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: IMHO...
Originally posted by Jeff92se
\There are a few guys that are bone stock that have done a 15.0 I belive. But then again, less than 1/2 of us even go to the track. That's the reason for the lack of track times.
\There are a few guys that are bone stock that have done a 15.0 I belive. But then again, less than 1/2 of us even go to the track. That's the reason for the lack of track times.
give you .3 more litres... take away 12 of your valves & 3 cams, give you about 400-500lbs of dead plastic weight, take away the 6 speed and give you a crappy auto tranny (that shifts about 5,700 rpms) then put a few constrictive intake and exhaust things in and slap a SC on and give it about half the boost it could handle (GRRR@GM) Then when the really WEAK roller rockers come in from GM you can put that in and you're finished. Roller rockers ALONE cost the GTP about 20HP!!!! I don't get some car manufacturers.. my car is lightly modded... it's definately faster than stock AND I get better gas mileage than before WTF!!! It sounds better too!
The 280HP engine is just a tuned version of the current supercharged 3.8. It probably makes more torque than 280 but since it is using the current tranny rated at 280 foot pounds of torque they didn't want to say that. The reason they don't use the caddy tranny is because it is only rated at 300 foot pounds of torque, which is only 20 more than the stock SC 3.8 puts out. Modifications should void your warranty like it will with any manufacturer, but there are mod-friendly dealerships. Sorry if I missed anything.
As far as it being an auto; it's still a prototype, you never know. It very well could be an AWD with 6 speed.
That really doesn't matter though, because there are bigger things in the works.....
http://www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=1597 http://www.holden.com.au/app/serve?p...&cartype=18001
As far as it being an auto; it's still a prototype, you never know. It very well could be an AWD with 6 speed.
That really doesn't matter though, because there are bigger things in the works.....
http://www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=1597 http://www.holden.com.au/app/serve?p...&cartype=18001
The other thing to think about is...
Way back in the day, before the current Grand Prix was even introduced, Pontiac had a GTP concept with 300hp. And look at the production GTP;It only has 240hp. Who knows if the next GTP will really even have 280hp or not, since this 'G Force' is just a concept as well.
The 300hp concept was the cover car in an issue of MT(around 95 I think). I'll try to find the issue and scan the cover.
The 300hp concept was the cover car in an issue of MT(around 95 I think). I'll try to find the issue and scan the cover.
In warmer weather I liked my poor man's cai better than the JWT. I don't care what people say, my car had more torque below 3500 rpm with the cai. For races off the line, I'll take the JWT, but the cai was more fun. I didn't like the "under bumper" intake area though because too much dirt got sucked in.
- Jeremy
- Jeremy
Originally posted by ivolley
-Jeremy
97 5-speed (no squeaks or rattles at 97k miles)
Jwt pop charger, soon CAI
Are you sure you want to get rid of the JWT and get a CAI? Most 5sp prefer the JWT over the CAI.
-Jeremy
97 5-speed (no squeaks or rattles at 97k miles)
Jwt pop charger, soon CAI
Are you sure you want to get rid of the JWT and get a CAI? Most 5sp prefer the JWT over the CAI.
I wanna thank you guys for keeping this post civil.. it's gotten nasty in the past... if you wanna see all you'll ever neet to know about my slug got to:
http://www.chesserx.com/ih8rice/
look at Grand Prix 101.txt
http://www.chesserx.com/ih8rice/
look at Grand Prix 101.txt
Originally posted by SOLOBLAZER
The 280HP engine is just a tuned version of the current supercharged 3.8. It probably makes more torque than 280 but since it is using the current tranny rated at 280 foot pounds of torque they didn't want to say that. The reason they don't use the caddy tranny is because it is only rated at 300 foot pounds of torque, which is only 20 more than the stock SC 3.8 puts out.
The 280HP engine is just a tuned version of the current supercharged 3.8. It probably makes more torque than 280 but since it is using the current tranny rated at 280 foot pounds of torque they didn't want to say that. The reason they don't use the caddy tranny is because it is only rated at 300 foot pounds of torque, which is only 20 more than the stock SC 3.8 puts out.
Originally posted by Badaxxima
The 4T60-E is rated at 300hp, not lb-ft. That is what currently powers the GTP. The 4T80-E is is under the 300hp, 295lb-ft, and 275hp, 300lb-ft, Caddy Northstar. There's no way GM is rating the Caddy transaxle to only 300lb-ft as you claim, or 300hp for that matter. Did you see the "Project Blackfin" Seville STS? 350hp and ~350lb-ft. Again, the Caddy tranny is rated for a lot more than 300lb-ft. The 4T60-E under the 3800 Supercharged motors is the tranny that's rated for 300hp, which explains all the transmission problems for GTP's that are drag-raced. The 4T80-E Caddy Transaxle's controller won't communicate with the 3800 SC's ECU. If GM put the 4T80-E under the 3800 Supercharged motors, they would have the potential to become reliable, 300hp front-drivers. Thus stealing Caddy's bragging rights for being the most powerful front drive automobiles in the world.
The 4T60-E is rated at 300hp, not lb-ft. That is what currently powers the GTP. The 4T80-E is is under the 300hp, 295lb-ft, and 275hp, 300lb-ft, Caddy Northstar. There's no way GM is rating the Caddy transaxle to only 300lb-ft as you claim, or 300hp for that matter. Did you see the "Project Blackfin" Seville STS? 350hp and ~350lb-ft. Again, the Caddy tranny is rated for a lot more than 300lb-ft. The 4T60-E under the 3800 Supercharged motors is the tranny that's rated for 300hp, which explains all the transmission problems for GTP's that are drag-raced. The 4T80-E Caddy Transaxle's controller won't communicate with the 3800 SC's ECU. If GM put the 4T80-E under the 3800 Supercharged motors, they would have the potential to become reliable, 300hp front-drivers. Thus stealing Caddy's bragging rights for being the most powerful front drive automobiles in the world.
4T80-E specs for the current caddy
Originally posted by SOLOBLAZER
4T65-E specs for current GTP tranny
4T80-E specs for the current caddy
4T65-E specs for current GTP tranny
4T80-E specs for the current caddy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xUNIxPanther
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
6
Aug 27, 2015 10:09 PM
NissLover
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
Aug 22, 2015 10:26 AM




