S/C Oil Cooler done
Re: Re: Re: S/C Oil Cooler done
Originally posted by Chunger
You should see the portion i flipped backwards....
You should see the portion i flipped backwards....
I still have the Permacool Dual Pass one, sitting in my room. I'm gonna use that one for engine oil and power steering (I have to remove the original PS "cooler" in order to get the oil cooler in. Dang connectors/8AN lines are expensive.
Yep, the S/C cooler is the Permacool 24" Frame rail cooler with 06AN connectors.
Kevin... I got the smaller pulley today. Now just gotta decide: FMIC, AWIC or Water Injection... then it's a couple of days of downtime.
BTW... those of you with a Permacool sandwich adaptor... What filter are you guys using? Do I have to get a shorter one? It looks like it would stick out a lot with the 1.5" sandwich adapter + new filter.
Yep, the S/C cooler is the Permacool 24" Frame rail cooler with 06AN connectors.
Kevin... I got the smaller pulley today. Now just gotta decide: FMIC, AWIC or Water Injection... then it's a couple of days of downtime.
BTW... those of you with a Permacool sandwich adaptor... What filter are you guys using? Do I have to get a shorter one? It looks like it would stick out a lot with the 1.5" sandwich adapter + new filter.
Originally posted by Chunger
Kevin... I got the smaller pulley today. Now just gotta decide: FMIC, AWIC or Water Injection... then it's a couple of days of downtime.
BTW... those of you with a Permacool sandwich adaptor... What filter are you guys using? Do I have to get a shorter one? It looks like it would stick out a lot with the 1.5" sandwich adapter + new filter.
Kevin... I got the smaller pulley today. Now just gotta decide: FMIC, AWIC or Water Injection... then it's a couple of days of downtime.
BTW... those of you with a Permacool sandwich adaptor... What filter are you guys using? Do I have to get a shorter one? It looks like it would stick out a lot with the 1.5" sandwich adapter + new filter.

Use the shorter filter they recomend in the Permacool kit. Its a snug fit but it works
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
BTW... those of you with a Permacool sandwich adaptor... What filter are you guys using? Do I have to get a shorter one? It looks like it would stick out a lot with the 1.5" sandwich adapter + new filter. [/B][/QUOTE]
If this is for your oil filter I use the oil filter from Mobil 1 part # M1-204 , just cross reference it when you go to the stores and it will give you the other name brand oil filters that are the same.
If this is for your oil filter I use the oil filter from Mobil 1 part # M1-204 , just cross reference it when you go to the stores and it will give you the other name brand oil filters that are the same.
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
Or J&S Ultra Safeguard... I'm running one with 10psi and no intercooler. Soon to be 2.62" and no intercoler
Use the shorter filter they recomend in the Permacool kit. Its a snug fit but it works
Or J&S Ultra Safeguard... I'm running one with 10psi and no intercooler. Soon to be 2.62" and no intercoler

Use the shorter filter they recomend in the Permacool kit. Its a snug fit but it works
Jay, thanks for the Mobile part#... I assume that's the shorter version? It's hard to find someone that carries Permacool locally. I don't know of too many American Speedshops here in L.A.
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
Jay, thanks for the Mobile part#... I assume that's the shorter version? It's hard to find someone that carries Permacool locally. I don't know of too many American Speedshops here in L.A.
Yes thats a shorter oil filter and wont bulge out, the diameter is still same nice and fat. Hope that helps.
Yes thats a shorter oil filter and wont bulge out, the diameter is still same nice and fat. Hope that helps.
Originally posted by Chunger
Have you done a writeup on your results yet? I did a search and haven't found anything. I was wondering if for FI guys, it wouldn't be better to apply the $600 to an intercooler so the timing doesn't have to be retarded (assumption being that retarding = decreased potential power).
Have you done a writeup on your results yet? I did a search and haven't found anything. I was wondering if for FI guys, it wouldn't be better to apply the $600 to an intercooler so the timing doesn't have to be retarded (assumption being that retarding = decreased potential power).
At 9psi or less its not really necessarry to do either an intercooler or timing control. Sure cooler air will make more power. Sure more timing will make more power to a point. After 9psi that its your choice on how you want to hold it together. Personally I have more faith in a unit that will retard timing if somthing goes wrong and you do detonate, then an intercooler. Cooler plugs are one choice but the cause a loss of low and mid range power. FMIC will lose excessive pressure that you cant regain with a SC, so IMHO its not worth it unless you are turbo'd and can just dial up the boost controller for some more boost. Water injection will hold back detonation but from what I have seen and heard it has a little power loss. My track numbers went down a few tenths with it operating and Pablo lost power on when he last dynoed with it. (unless he has tried again that I dont know about?) Kev can you post your dyno files again or e-mail me the files showing with and with out WI on the same days? I think WI is more effective on mega boost turbos then low boost SC set ups. That leaves AWIC, good luck building one that is sized properly for under $1100 DIY, if you have a shop do it it will be $1500 easy. I may eventually do this DIY just so I can use ice at the track.
I really feel its better to be safe than sorry. Thats why I went with the J&S SafeGuard first. I will be going with the 2.62" pulley which shuld give me ~13psi peak with my old V1. I think it would detonate with out timing control, I cant say if an intercooler would be able to handle it on a 10:1 motor anyways, so safety first. The J&S will show me if it does knock and retard the timing to protect it. After I see that it knocked I just dial in some timing retard and will be good to go. Plus if I ever get a tank of bad gas it will pull the timing necessary to save the motor. As a matter of fact the designer of the J&S told me to try a tank of midgrade fuel to see how well his product worked. I didnt think that was a good idea, but he has major faith in his product.
I am going to install a G-Force NA ECU this weekend just to see if I pick up power or not, I'm sure the J&S will intervene if the timing is too much. I think some mid range torque will be picked up for sure!
WOW what a rant! Leme know if I can be of help.
M
Does the Oil cooler actually help the charger, I thought that it was more pertinant on a turbo then on a charger??
I am thinking of getting a charger soon because I can't stand being slow.. I have no interest in going nuts, vb mod, turbo timer (more for looks and too keep things as cool as possible), smaller pulley and maybe a variable intake... but none of this more than 9psi nonsense, the max is still my daily driver.
jason
I am thinking of getting a charger soon because I can't stand being slow.. I have no interest in going nuts, vb mod, turbo timer (more for looks and too keep things as cool as possible), smaller pulley and maybe a variable intake... but none of this more than 9psi nonsense, the max is still my daily driver.
jason
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
My track numbers went down a few tenths with it operating and Pablo lost power on when he last dynoed with it. (unless he has tried again that I dont know about?) Kev can you post your dyno files again or e-mail me the files showing with and with out WI on the same days? I think WI is more effective on mega boost turbos then low boost SC set ups.
My track numbers went down a few tenths with it operating and Pablo lost power on when he last dynoed with it. (unless he has tried again that I dont know about?) Kev can you post your dyno files again or e-mail me the files showing with and with out WI on the same days? I think WI is more effective on mega boost turbos then low boost SC set ups.
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno4.jpg
Jane's car with water injection:
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno5.jpg
My car without water injection (11 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc1.jpg
My car with water injection (somehow dropped to 9 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc3.jpg
The reason why Pablo dropped in power was because of the S-AFC. Once I told him the workaround, he bumped back up to 322 hp.
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Jane's car without water injection:
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno4.jpg
Jane's car with water injection:
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno5.jpg
My car without water injection (11 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc1.jpg
My car with water injection (somehow dropped to 9 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc3.jpg
Jane's car without water injection:
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno4.jpg
Jane's car with water injection:
http://boostedmaximas.com/jane97se/i...ynos/dyno5.jpg
My car without water injection (11 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc1.jpg
My car with water injection (somehow dropped to 9 psi):
http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im...s/dyno_sc3.jpg
On Janes plot 03 and 07 plot notice ho much leaner the car is from 6000-6500, that is worth a few ponies. Were any adjustments made to her FMU or anything? Cause the WI should make it richer I thought?
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
The reason why Pablo dropped in power was because of the S-AFC. Once I told him the workaround, he bumped back up to 322 hp.
The reason why Pablo dropped in power was because of the S-AFC. Once I told him the workaround, he bumped back up to 322 hp.
Kev if you have the dyno files could you send them to me? I will send you mine?
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
...
WOW what a rant! Leme know if I can be of help.
M
...
WOW what a rant! Leme know if I can be of help.
M
I'll keep an eye out on the J&S deal.
The S/C oil cooler is just more of a precaution than anything else. I haven't had time to check if it actually lowers intake temps through the S/C. I probably does, but slightly.
I just picked up the K&N Gold #2004 filter (cross ref with Mobil1 204)... Thanks!
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
I am going to install a G-Force NA ECU this weekend just to see if I pick up power or not, I'm sure the J&S will intervene if the timing is too much. I think some mid range torque will be picked up for sure!
WOW what a rant! Leme know if I can be of help.
M
I am going to install a G-Force NA ECU this weekend just to see if I pick up power or not, I'm sure the J&S will intervene if the timing is too much. I think some mid range torque will be picked up for sure!
WOW what a rant! Leme know if I can be of help.
M
Personally I think an IC would be ideal paired with a J&S. The J&S unit is reactive, you can't predict detonation-- it occurs then you compensate to adjust. The IC would not only provide cooler intake charge and lower the risk of detonation, but would also gain you some power provided you didn't go oversized. Velocity loss is negligable since an SC runs directly off the motor not off air intake/exhaust. Less pressure also means less stress on your internals and seals. It's better to be proactive than reactive I say..
Keep in mind this is all opinion based on what i've gathered reading about FI in various applications. I'm no guru and none of this is from personal experience.
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
I dont doubt these dyno's Kev and I trust your word also. I would just like to see dynos done one behind the other with the WI on and the WI off done on the same day. Even though the power readings are SAE their are still allot of variables that come into play. I dont expect you to run out and re-dyno or anything I guess Im just sceptical.
I dont doubt these dyno's Kev and I trust your word also. I would just like to see dynos done one behind the other with the WI on and the WI off done on the same day. Even though the power readings are SAE their are still allot of variables that come into play. I dont expect you to run out and re-dyno or anything I guess Im just sceptical.

Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
On Janes plot 03 and 07 plot notice ho much leaner the car is from 6000-6500, that is worth a few ponies. Were any adjustments made to her FMU or anything? Cause the WI should make it richer I thought?
On Janes plot 03 and 07 plot notice ho much leaner the car is from 6000-6500, that is worth a few ponies. Were any adjustments made to her FMU or anything? Cause the WI should make it richer I thought?
Check out my overlay of w/WI and w/o WI: http://boostedmaximas.com/y2kevse/im..._sc3_total.jpg
The dyno guy and I played mostly with points 5500, 6000, and 6500. As you can see, WI gave me a whole lot of mid range power back, but the peak power wasn't impressive, like Jane's.
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
IIRC. Yes Pablo's horse power went up from ~280 to 322 after the AFC adjustments to the HI LO points. But, he told me that after he got that straight he tried the WI and lost power. All the tuning from 280 to 322 was with out WI. He thought it might be becuse he was running 50/50 mix of regular alcahol and water, so he was supposed to re dyno and try wore water with denatured alcahol. I dont know if he did this yet or not. I'll link him to this to see if he can elaborate.
Kev if you have the dyno files could you send them to me? I will send you mine?:-D
IIRC. Yes Pablo's horse power went up from ~280 to 322 after the AFC adjustments to the HI LO points. But, he told me that after he got that straight he tried the WI and lost power. All the tuning from 280 to 322 was with out WI. He thought it might be becuse he was running 50/50 mix of regular alcahol and water, so he was supposed to re dyno and try wore water with denatured alcahol. I dont know if he did this yet or not. I'll link him to this to see if he can elaborate.
Kev if you have the dyno files could you send them to me? I will send you mine?:-D
) power. I don't think he tuned the car at that point, so 50/50 would make him run a bit rich, thus, losing peak power and then some.I have my RAW files. Drop me an email and I'll give you everything.
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
Hmm, interesting. However I don't think it would be a good idea, N/A ECU upgrages usually involve leaning out stock fuel maps in certain places and advancing timing where appropriate to push more power out of an N/A motor. This might not be a great idea on a boost application. At best your J&S will negate the timing advances made by the G-force, but the fuel maps will still be optimized for an N/A motor. At worst, the G-Force overrides the J&S's attempts at timing control and you detonate big time. You probably know more about this than I do but that's my overall impression. Why not go with the FI ECU? or better yet a standalone like haltech or speedpro?
Hmm, interesting. However I don't think it would be a good idea, N/A ECU upgrages usually involve leaning out stock fuel maps in certain places and advancing timing where appropriate to push more power out of an N/A motor. This might not be a great idea on a boost application. At best your J&S will negate the timing advances made by the G-force, but the fuel maps will still be optimized for an N/A motor. At worst, the G-Force overrides the J&S's attempts at timing control and you detonate big time. You probably know more about this than I do but that's my overall impression. Why not go with the FI ECU? or better yet a standalone like haltech or speedpro?
Unless the person tuning my FI ECU is doing it on a dyno with my car, they are just guessing. JWT's guess's are quiet conservative, they havent impressed me yet with a boosted Maxima. Look at the JWT Eiback Maxima, or I30Krab, both of these have mega money invested in mods and neither put down high power numbers relative to the money spent IMHO.
Standalone like Haltech is $1200 just to start, plus lots of time and some extras. If I had the time I would like to do this. I'll pass for now. If somthing like the Hondata system comes out for the Maxima I will take a serious look at it.
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
It worked just fine. ... It did feel a bit stronger in the mid rpms which is really what I am looking for. Hopefully I can get it dynoed to see if it actually helps, I think it does.
Standalone like Haltech is $1200 just to start, plus lots of time and some extras. If I had the time I would like to do this. I'll pass for now. If somthing like the Hondata system comes out for the Maxima I will take a serious look at it.
It worked just fine. ... It did feel a bit stronger in the mid rpms which is really what I am looking for. Hopefully I can get it dynoed to see if it actually helps, I think it does.
Standalone like Haltech is $1200 just to start, plus lots of time and some extras. If I had the time I would like to do this. I'll pass for now. If somthing like the Hondata system comes out for the Maxima I will take a serious look at it.
I still maintain that the fact that J&S adjusts timing post knock is scary to me, but if it works for you that's great.Hmm, I JWT didn't occur to me.. Have you considered speedpro? it's supposed to be easier to tune than Haltech, my shop highly recommends it. Or you could try BCRS or whatever that is hogan's working on. I was under the impression that G-Force had a FI program for your car..
Have you considered adding either WI or a FMIC? Just curious I think either would work great in concert with the J&S. Problem is, you've now added another variable in your tuning
more dyno time!So when are we going to see some 12's from ya?
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
Glad it all worked out for you
I still maintain that the fact that J&S adjusts timing post knock is scary to me, but if it works for you that's great.
Hmm, I JWT didn't occur to me.. Have you considered speedpro? it's supposed to be easier to tune than Haltech, my shop highly recommends it. Or you could try BCRS or whatever that is hogan's working on. I was under the impression that G-Force had a FI program for your car..
Have you considered adding either WI or a FMIC? Just curious I think either would work great in concert with the J&S. Problem is, you've now added another variable in your tuning
more dyno time!
So when are we going to see some 12's from ya?
Glad it all worked out for you
I still maintain that the fact that J&S adjusts timing post knock is scary to me, but if it works for you that's great.Hmm, I JWT didn't occur to me.. Have you considered speedpro? it's supposed to be easier to tune than Haltech, my shop highly recommends it. Or you could try BCRS or whatever that is hogan's working on. I was under the impression that G-Force had a FI program for your car..
Have you considered adding either WI or a FMIC? Just curious I think either would work great in concert with the J&S. Problem is, you've now added another variable in your tuning
more dyno time!So when are we going to see some 12's from ya?
All that aside I think you missed the fact that after I adjusted the boost referenced ignition timing retard setting on the J&S to pull the appropriate amount of timing it dosent detonate anymore. The J&S is a great ignition tuning device because it will let you run timing as much advance as possible with out worring about knock. When you see that it is knocking you simply pull the timing back and you are set perfectlly! Optimal ignition timing is key to getting every last bit of power out of your motor.
Cut from the J&S Product Page...
Subarus Love J&S Ultra SafeGuard!
"J&S Safeguard Solved my Pesky Detting. Wahoo!"
"Hats off to John Pizzuto for his ingenious device. I had always been skeptical about whether or not it could detect my subtle high-frequency detting, but sure enough it does. Fantastic! To tune it, I first disabled the SC and had set the J&S for 'retard all' (cylinders). Then I let her rip WOT in third to 6000RPM, each time increasing the sensitivity until the unit barely retards timing. Next, I hooked up the SC and let her rip; The J&S retarded the timing by about 16 to 18 degrees – yes! I heard no detting. At first I was a little disappointed with the consequent slight drop in power – but that was before I set the J&S for individual cylinder retard. Once the set to 'individual'… wow! I’ve got all my power. She pulls smoothly, like mad. This is great. It’s cool to see the monitor in action; LEDs show whether one or several of the cylinders are having their timing retarded. In one particular instance I saw one LED showing about 12 degrees (probably my aberrant #3) while another indicated 2 degrees of timing retard at some other enigmatic cylinder. What’s amazing is that the J&S can do this, all the while my add-ons have been disconnected – no Aquamist WI, no RRFPR, and no Haltech SFC. I heartily recommend the J&S, with no reservations. My next step is to install a boost gauge restrictor (the needle rattles) and check my WOT A/F ratio with a wideband sensor, to make certain I’m running rich enough. If not, I can always hook up my Haltech and tune for more fuel. I’m finally this >< close to having a sorted SC system."
Regards, Ed.
"J&S Safeguard Solved my Pesky Detting. Wahoo!"
"Hats off to John Pizzuto for his ingenious device. I had always been skeptical about whether or not it could detect my subtle high-frequency detting, but sure enough it does. Fantastic! To tune it, I first disabled the SC and had set the J&S for 'retard all' (cylinders). Then I let her rip WOT in third to 6000RPM, each time increasing the sensitivity until the unit barely retards timing. Next, I hooked up the SC and let her rip; The J&S retarded the timing by about 16 to 18 degrees – yes! I heard no detting. At first I was a little disappointed with the consequent slight drop in power – but that was before I set the J&S for individual cylinder retard. Once the set to 'individual'… wow! I’ve got all my power. She pulls smoothly, like mad. This is great. It’s cool to see the monitor in action; LEDs show whether one or several of the cylinders are having their timing retarded. In one particular instance I saw one LED showing about 12 degrees (probably my aberrant #3) while another indicated 2 degrees of timing retard at some other enigmatic cylinder. What’s amazing is that the J&S can do this, all the while my add-ons have been disconnected – no Aquamist WI, no RRFPR, and no Haltech SFC. I heartily recommend the J&S, with no reservations. My next step is to install a boost gauge restrictor (the needle rattles) and check my WOT A/F ratio with a wideband sensor, to make certain I’m running rich enough. If not, I can always hook up my Haltech and tune for more fuel. I’m finally this >< close to having a sorted SC system."
Regards, Ed.
Take the time to fully read this...
http://www.jandssafeguard.com/safeguard.html
I have tried WI and I lost a few tenths at the drag stip when using it.
I have considered an AWIC, check my homepage for my research project about it.
Track time is not easy for me to get, I have a family and they come first. So 12's can wait, I know the car is capable of it.
whoah! I'm not trying to bash J&S! I understand the product and think it's great. I also understand detonation. Excessive pressure or temperature of the intake charge lead to premature ignition of the air/fuel mixture in the combustion chambers. This causes pressures on your valves, valve stems, cylinder walls, rods, bearings, pistons, and crank, that are out of sync with the natural harmonics of your engine! Granted a little detonation here and there is not going to hurt you much. But in the long run it could cause damage. I was just saying that combined with a preventive element such as an intercooler, your J&S unit could provide you with real peace of mind!
Maybe I misunderstand you, but the J&S alone is all the preventive measure that is needed to protect the motor from detonation. It just sounds like you think the slightest detonation will cause damage. If the detonation is left uncontrolled it will, but using the J&S it will be put under control long before it reaches damaging levels. With out the J&S you would never know it was detonating till you could hear it which is usually the point at wich damage starts.
An intercooler is a luxury to me because it will not save the motor if it does start to detonate, the J&S will save the motor if it starts to detonate. This why I got it before I add more boost or juice. As far as detonation in the long run goes you are far more safe to use just a J&S then just an intercooler.
You are correct that a good intercooler and a J&S SafeGuard would be the ultimate! I really wish I was turbo charged because with the J&S and a good intercooler I could run the boost up allot more then I can with a Super Charger.
An intercooler is a luxury to me because it will not save the motor if it does start to detonate, the J&S will save the motor if it starts to detonate. This why I got it before I add more boost or juice. As far as detonation in the long run goes you are far more safe to use just a J&S then just an intercooler.
You are correct that a good intercooler and a J&S SafeGuard would be the ultimate! I really wish I was turbo charged because with the J&S and a good intercooler I could run the boost up allot more then I can with a Super Charger.
Like Matt said earlier, my horsepower did drop a few from about 322fwhp to about 311fwhp with the WI. I was also running a 50/50 water & alcohol mixture and a .09mm jet. Im also assuming that maybe fine tunning the WI I could prob regain some of those lost ponies. What I have done since is down the jet to .07mm and also change the mixture from 50/50 to 20/80. Hopefully on Monday I'll go back to the shop to try another dyno as soon as my new plugs go in as well. But I am seriously thinking of trying the retard box to prevent knocking and detonation. One downside of the WI that I ran into is that I cannot run the nitrous with the WI, assumptions that I may freeze the water running into the motor. I will do some more tunning on Monday or Tuesday, if the car responds well to the WI adjustments and the new plugs I will up the nitrous shot to a 50. Ill keep you guys informed.
Group deal on the J&S Electronics Ultra SafeGuard.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=130453
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=130453
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Dec 20, 2021 06:57 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
05RLS2
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Apr 14, 2016 11:49 AM





:
