speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
Originally posted by see5
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
...
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
...
BuddyWh
Re: Re: speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
Originally posted by BuddyWh
What was the difference between the GPS miles traveled and the vehicle's odometer reading?
BuddyWh
What was the difference between the GPS miles traveled and the vehicle's odometer reading?
BuddyWh
Re: speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
Originally posted by see5
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
I get between 2-3 mph difference at 60mph just from the ECU and the speedometer. I think at 70mph it's pretty much right at 3mph.
It's built into the system to account for MANY variables such as tire pressure, mechanical degradation, extreme climates, and MANY MANY more variables. Each variable is given a +/- percent of the TOTAL mph of the speedometer NOT the actual speed. Therefore, it has NOTHING to due with "power to weight ratio" just our 160mph(?) max speedometer value.
Of course manufacturers also leave a margin to prevent lawsuits for speeding tickets.
Re: speedo,vs trip vs GPS readings
Originally posted by see5
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
On a trip back from Chicago yesterday on the flatlands of WI I ran the following test:
Set the cruise at 70 MPH
Reset the AVG mph
Reset the MPG
Ran GPS on laptop
Ran for 45 min.
Results:
GPS showed 71.2 mph
AVG mph showed 68 MPH
MPG showed 32.5 MPG
And the speedo was steady @ 70 mph.
This pretty much confirms a recent article in Car and Driver and shows why the MPG is not accurate although not bad for the power to weight ratio of the 02 Max.
The online version of the article you're referring to is at http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caran...peedometer.xml. They have some extra graphs in the online version but are also missing a couple nice charts that were in the print mag.
Maybe your results are diff from mine since you have an SE (which probably has 17" wheels) while I've got a GXE w/the stock 16" wheels.
yeah...
I have had several GPS units. All have consistantly given the maxima at about 67 @ 70 on the speedo. Our pathfinder reads 3 mph slower as well. I realize that hills and turns would skew the GPS reading, but I've driven ALOT with a GPS and this is pretty consistant. I was in a Suburban that was reading 7mph too slow, and he was getting tickets ALL the time.
When I put on 2k2 SE rims (from my GLE 16's), I calculated that I would gain 2mph at 70. My GPS confirmed this. I'm dead on now. This actually a bad thing because for the last few years, I've been cruising a few mph over and knew I wasnt in danger of getting a ticket. Now when I set it on 75+, I'm really doing that. :/
When I put on 2k2 SE rims (from my GLE 16's), I calculated that I would gain 2mph at 70. My GPS confirmed this. I'm dead on now. This actually a bad thing because for the last few years, I've been cruising a few mph over and knew I wasnt in danger of getting a ticket. Now when I set it on 75+, I'm really doing that. :/
Re: yeah...
Originally posted by TimW
I have had several GPS units. All have consistantly given the maxima at about 67 @ 70 on the speedo. Our pathfinder reads 3 mph slower as well.
I have had several GPS units. All have consistantly given the maxima at about 67 @ 70 on the speedo. Our pathfinder reads 3 mph slower as well.
I figure if I go +1 on my tires next time around, my speedo will be right on...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Oct 2, 2022 02:13 PM
Andy29
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 29, 2015 05:32 AM





