5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Has The Turning Radius Improved…2k2,2k3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 09:17 PM
  #1  
i•maxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 179
Has The Turning Radius Improved…2k2,2k3

Just wondering if the turning radius has improved any from the 2K1 model …which sucks badly . I still feel like i'm driving a truck while parking!
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #2  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
its worse.
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 09:33 PM
  #3  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by slickrick
its worse.
You know this how?
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 09:46 PM
  #4  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
2k2 maxima brochure. its 40.0 for 2k2 se. it was less than that for 2k1.
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 10:08 PM
  #5  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by slickrick
2k2 maxima brochure. its 40.0 for 2k2 se. it was less than that for 2k1.
Nissan is really getting things right now!
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 10:23 PM
  #6  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
i cant stand the turning radius. what exactly causes a bad turning radius? each time i drive i lock my steering wheel at least twice, when making normal turns to.
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 10:41 PM
  #7  
2k2.6spd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 84
the 17's are what make the crappy turning radius..i cant even make u turns cuz i cant make the turn..i have t resort to pulling into small lots, then turning around..i still love my max though, sh--ty turning radius and all.
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 10:50 PM
  #8  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
thats exactly what i do about the u turn thing. its so embarrasing because girls think im lost when im really looking for a place to turn into to eventually go the other way. but if its only the 17's, do all cars with 17's have this prob. what about ricers with 17's? do they turn like buses.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 12:33 AM
  #9  
F8Lmax's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 84

I think its actually really good...seems better than my old mustang
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:30 PM
  #10  
raynist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 306
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by F8Lmax

I think its actually really good...seems better than my old mustang
My 89 Mustang GT has the worst turning radius out of any car or tricj I have ever owned.

I am not sure what all the fuss is about the turning radius. My Maxima has a better turning radius than my co-workers 2001 Civic. Actually, my boss drove my Maxima once and commented on how small the turning radius was as he had to made a 180 on a dead end road. I have the GXE with 15 inch rims though and maybe that makes all the difference??

--Ray
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:41 PM
  #11  
SHPatel's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 195
Originally posted by slickrick
thats exactly what i do about the u turn thing. its so embarrasing because girls think im lost when im really looking for a place to turn into to eventually go the other way. but if its only the 17's, do all cars with 17's have this prob. what about ricers with 17's? do they turn like buses.
That's what I was wondering. I know that being FWD has alot to do with it but does the Acura TL Type-S with 17's have the same problem?
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:47 PM
  #12  
sagaynor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 85

Turning radius was a huge shock for me when I picked my car up last month. I can't get into/out of my garage without a rediculous broken k turn! My previous vehicle was an Explorer (granted it's RWD) but the turning radius was 10 times better!!!
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:48 PM
  #13  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
my old explorer (95) had WAY better turning radius than my maxima.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #14  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
the gxe's have a better turning radius.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
y2KAOSMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 603
Originally posted by 2k2.6spd
the 17's are what make the crappy turning radius..i cant even make u turns cuz i cant make the turn..i have t resort to pulling into small lots, then turning around..i still love my max though, sh--ty turning radius and all.
Not true... I have a GXE and with my 16's the turning radius is exactly the same as with my 18's.. One thing I did notice is that my old car (95 Dodge Neon) has almost the same exact turning radius..
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 03:46 PM
  #16  
3.5Max's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 22
my a4 would turn on a dime....thats my biggest gripe about the max... but the engine more than makes up for it!
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 03:55 PM
  #17  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
Originally posted by Newman
my old explorer (95) had WAY better turning radius than my maxima.
what about your old max vs new max or old max vs explorer?
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 04:12 PM
  #18  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
Originally posted by costcowholesale


what about your old max vs new max or old max vs explorer?
explorer vs 2002 maxima = explorer hands down
1996 maxima vs 2002 maxima = 1996 by far
explorer vs 1996 maxima = its VERY close but i feel like the maxima may have been a little better. but that may just be because its smaller and it felt a little easier getting into parking spots.

if i recall correctly the radius for my explorer was 36.5 feet i think. not sure what the old maxima was though.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 04:48 PM
  #19  
brandon101's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 19
Originally posted by 3.5Max
my a4 would turn on a dime....thats my biggest gripe about the max... but the engine more than makes up for it!
Yep, I was about to say my friend has an a4 with 17" rims and he can make turns that I can't even believe. Based on that, we can't really blame it on the rims, now can we...

Old Sep 19, 2002 | 04:50 PM
  #20  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
I don't think it has too much to do with rim diameter. **** what happens when you put on 19's?

My Grand Cherokee has a better turning radius than my 2K2
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 04:53 PM
  #21  
Stereodude's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,617
From: Detroit Metro Area
Originally posted by Triple8Sol
I don't think it has too much to do with rim diameter. **** what happens when you put on 19's?

My Grand Cherokee has a better turning radius than my 2K2
No, but it has to do with the extra bump stop Nissan puts on the cars that are sold from the factory with 17" rims. That's why SE's have the poor turning radius for 2k2 and 2k3. It has nothing to do with the actual size of the wheel.

Stereodude
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:02 PM
  #22  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
maybe your 16's had higher profile tires and by going plus sizing with your rims, the low profile tires make up for diameter of your18 inch rims.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:33 PM
  #23  
MetaOrbit's Avatar
Got Projectors?
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,532
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally posted by SHPatel


That's what I was wondering. I know that being FWD has alot to do with it but does the Acura TL Type-S with 17's have the same problem?
I don't think FWD has much to do with it at all. My previous car, a 1997 Chevy Lumina was a REAL boat, much larger, FWD, yet still had a much better turning radius.

John
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #24  
releasedtruth's Avatar
rilla dope
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,152
I can spin my T-bird 180 in about 5 ft if I play it right, tremendous torque, take and peel out the back end and voila, goin the other direction
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 05:42 PM
  #25  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
my 94 tbird, eventhough it was a v6, could do exactly qhat you said. i loved the turning radius on that. just dont touch the gas when making u turns in the rain, or else your spinning like a record.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 08:15 PM
  #26  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
Originally posted by Newman


explorer vs 2002 maxima = explorer hands down
1996 maxima vs 2002 maxima = 1996 by far
explorer vs 1996 maxima = its VERY close but i feel like the maxima may have been a little better. but that may just be because its smaller and it felt a little easier getting into parking spots.

if i recall correctly the radius for my explorer was 36.5 feet i think. not sure what the old maxima was though.
maxima is like 35.4 something like that, imo its shiet all my friend can park thier smaller cars so easily & i can't! the 2k2 must be BAD
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 08:34 PM
  #27  
SHPatel's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 195
What about the TL???
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:00 PM
  #28  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
Originally posted by costcowholesale


maxima is like 35.4 something like that, imo its shiet all my friend can park thier smaller cars so easily & i can't! the 2k2 must be BAD
the 2k2 is just about 40.0 if i am not mistaken.

it is rediculous.
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 09:12 PM
  #29  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
i know for a fact the 2k2 se is 40.0
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 10:30 PM
  #30  
p010sp0rt8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 39
what i found out about the turning radius, is the all the cars with stock 17's have worse turning radius than those with 16's.. this is because nissan put a lock on how much you can turn.. the max and the tl-type s both have 40ft turning radius's... not very good at all... the 16's on the max have a 35.4ft radius... when i had my bimmer it had a 32 ft radius.. now that's good turning!!!
oh.. btw.. nissan put the lock so that the tire would not hit the inside well when turning.. i don't know how this works with people who had the 16's and put on 18's or 19's...
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 04:02 AM
  #31  
pvaudo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 156
Originally posted by p010sp0rt8
oh.. btw.. nissan put the lock so that the tire would not hit the inside well when turning..
This topic has been covered here before, but....

Does anyone have info on the bump-stops, like where are they, and are they removable? I wouldn't mind dealing with the rubbing possibility myself if I could make the turning radius 5 feet smaller.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 06:18 AM
  #32  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
Originally posted by pvaudo


This topic has been covered here before, but....

Does anyone have info on the bump-stops, like where are they, and are they removable? I wouldn't mind dealing with the rubbing possibility myself if I could make the turning radius 5 feet smaller.
someone removed the bump stops. the turning radius did not improve by very much, if at all. do a search. you'll find the thread. it has pictures too.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:37 AM
  #33  
y2KAOSMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 603
I wish the Max would have as good a turning radius as a Lexus GS. I test drove the 300 a few months back and made a U turn, usually I swing out far, so I did it in the GS and to my surprise I was almost back into the on comming lane in no time. I came no where near the curb. I was so surprise I did it again, then again.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #34  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
I just checked edmunds, it says GXE 35.2 SE 40

is the bump stop really that big??
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 12:14 PM
  #35  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
Originally posted by costcowholesale
I just checked edmunds, it says GXE 35.2 SE 40

is the bump stop really that big??
no. the bumpstop isnt really what prevents you from turning the wheel all the way. at least that is my speculation. the bump stops look like they are only 1.5-2 inches long.

the pictures on this thread dont work anymore but here it is for anyone who wants to read it.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....5&pagenumber=2
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 12:20 PM
  #36  
Kojiro_FtT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
It's not the rim size that affects it, it's the overall tire diameter. I don't know if GXE and SE have same overall diameter, but the SE/GLE do have lower profile tires than GXE.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 04:28 PM
  #37  
mightima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 183
I did a search in the forum and there were some threads mentioned about removing the "door stop" thing do improve the turning radius. The idea sounds good but wondering is there any issue to do that?
The experience from those who have done this mod is highly appreciated.
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 12:10 PM
  #38  
Young04's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 534
ditto the IS300...i drove one with 17's and it had a 32.x ft turning radius...ridiculously nimble...

Originally posted by y2KAOSMax
I wish the Max would have as good a turning radius as a Lexus GS. I test drove the 300 a few months back and made a U turn, usually I swing out far, so I did it in the GS and to my surprise I was almost back into the on comming lane in no time. I came no where near the curb. I was so surprise I did it again, then again.
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #39  
Maxima06071
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well I don't know about you guys but my max turns brillantly. I have no trouble making U-turns what so ever. So you'll heard no complaints from me.
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 11:14 PM
  #40  
ICELANDIC MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 594
Big grandma turn here



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:32 PM.