89 Se Auto vs 91 mr2 non turbo
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 298
Originally posted by Spazz
MAXIMA, Non turbo MR2's are gutless the turbos arn't much better unless there modded to ****. MR2 if raining, race it and find out.
I have ****ed heaps of them.
MAXIMA, Non turbo MR2's are gutless the turbos arn't much better unless there modded to ****. MR2 if raining, race it and find out.
I have ****ed heaps of them.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 298
Originally posted by Logan91VE
the mr2 would win anyway, maximas are slower.
the mr2 would have an advantage in the rain becuase being rwd it would have more traction than the fwd maxima.
the mr2 would win anyway, maximas are slower.
the mr2 would have an advantage in the rain becuase being rwd it would have more traction than the fwd maxima.
What was I thinking!
I had a 89 MR2 (I think thats the same body as the 91) and it was an auto. DOG SLOW but very consistant for bracket racing. I made it to the final 4 in street one night. It has been a long time since I drove it but I think even an auto max VG will beat it. I have not driven a 5 speed MR2 though.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 641
Originally posted by awsm66
I had a 89 MR2 (I think thats the same body as the 91) and it was an auto. DOG SLOW but very consistant for bracket racing. I made it to the final 4 in street one night. It has been a long time since I drove it but I think even an auto max VG will beat it. I have not driven a 5 speed MR2 though.
I had a 89 MR2 (I think thats the same body as the 91) and it was an auto. DOG SLOW but very consistant for bracket racing. I made it to the final 4 in street one night. It has been a long time since I drove it but I think even an auto max VG will beat it. I have not driven a 5 speed MR2 though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM