2002 Maxima Injector flow rates
2002 Maxima Injector flow rates
First off, special thanks to Matt Pelto (Mardigrasmax) for supplying the injector and shipping it to RC Engineering for me.
Now here is the data that I just recieved via fax from RC.
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 315
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 52 psi (3.5 bar, standard in the 2002 Maxima)
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 315.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 30.00
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 36.9
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 43.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 48.0
---------------------------------------------
And the flow rates at 3.0 bar or 43 psi
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 270
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 43 psi
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 270.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 25.71
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 31.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 37.4
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 41.1
Now here is the data that I just recieved via fax from RC.
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 315
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 52 psi (3.5 bar, standard in the 2002 Maxima)
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 315.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 30.00
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 36.9
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 43.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 48.0
---------------------------------------------
And the flow rates at 3.0 bar or 43 psi
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 270
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 43 psi
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 270.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 25.71
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 31.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 37.4
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 41.1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2002 Maxima Injector flow rates
Originally posted by SR20DEN
First off, special thanks to Matt Pelto (Mardigrasmax) for supplying the injector and shipping it to RC Engineering for me.
Now here is the data that I just recieved via fax from RC.
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 315
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 52 psi (3.5 bar, standard in the 2002 Maxima)
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 315.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 30.00
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 36.9
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 43.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 48.0
---------------------------------------------
And the flow rates at 3.0 bar or 43 psi
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 270
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 43 psi
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 270.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 25.71
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 31.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 37.4
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 41.1
First off, special thanks to Matt Pelto (Mardigrasmax) for supplying the injector and shipping it to RC Engineering for me.
Now here is the data that I just recieved via fax from RC.
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 315
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 52 psi (3.5 bar, standard in the 2002 Maxima)
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 315.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 30.00
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 36.9
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 43.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 48.0
---------------------------------------------
And the flow rates at 3.0 bar or 43 psi
Injector Type : SAT 14.9
Injector make : JECS
STDF : 270
Part# : FBJC1101 001 1705
Test Pressure: 43 psi
INJ.#1
CC/MIN 270.0
Pattern Excellent
LBS. / HR. - STATIC: 25.71
Horsepower @ 80% Duty Cycle at listed BSFC
@ B.S.F.C OF .65 31.6
@ B.S.F.C OF .55 37.4
@ B.S.F.C OF .50 41.1
Re: Re: 2002 Maxima Injector flow rates
Originally posted by Cumalittle
i'm pretty sure this is all good info...too bad i dunnoe wat all the numbers means...
i'm pretty sure this is all good info...too bad i dunnoe wat all the numbers means...

Can you break this down into layman’s terms for us common folks?
Using 3.0BAR
95-99 Injectors are ~240cc
300ZX TT Injectors are 370CC
So 270cc is pretty good for a NA application even at 3.0BAR
At 3.5BAR they could support 288bhp at 80% duty cycle(open time)
95-99 Injectors are ~240cc
300ZX TT Injectors are 370CC
So 270cc is pretty good for a NA application even at 3.0BAR
At 3.5BAR they could support 288bhp at 80% duty cycle(open time)
I posted the data while at work and didn't have time to elaborate. And I figured if I left anything out I would get grilled.
The way I presented the data is easier to read than the papers I got from RC which would confuse you even more. These responses are funny because just as Matt sent the injector off I had about ten different people ask me if I knew how much these things flowed and at the time I had told no one what we were doing.
Just as Mardi said, @ 3.5 bar (52psi) these injectors are good for roughly 288 crank hp under very good conditions. 30 pounds per hour static flow rate is pretty big for a stock NA motor. Usually boosted engines have injectors that large.
But the interesting thing is that they're almost maxed out already. The last time Scott dynoed his car I hooked up a dwell meter and monitored the duty cycle of his injectors. His VQ35 took the injectors all the way to 80% duty cycle at 6300 rpm which is way too much fuel (see 288hp). And he only put down about 214hp at the wheels. He suspected that his car was running too rich and this partially proves that. He and I both ordered Apexi S AFC-II's to install and tune our cars hoping to improve the gas mileage.
As for the laymans terms check the numbers in bold.
VQ35 injecters. 30 lbs. 315cc or whatever floats yer boat.
The way I presented the data is easier to read than the papers I got from RC which would confuse you even more. These responses are funny because just as Matt sent the injector off I had about ten different people ask me if I knew how much these things flowed and at the time I had told no one what we were doing.
Just as Mardi said, @ 3.5 bar (52psi) these injectors are good for roughly 288 crank hp under very good conditions. 30 pounds per hour static flow rate is pretty big for a stock NA motor. Usually boosted engines have injectors that large.
But the interesting thing is that they're almost maxed out already. The last time Scott dynoed his car I hooked up a dwell meter and monitored the duty cycle of his injectors. His VQ35 took the injectors all the way to 80% duty cycle at 6300 rpm which is way too much fuel (see 288hp). And he only put down about 214hp at the wheels. He suspected that his car was running too rich and this partially proves that. He and I both ordered Apexi S AFC-II's to install and tune our cars hoping to improve the gas mileage.
As for the laymans terms check the numbers in bold.
VQ35 injecters. 30 lbs. 315cc or whatever floats yer boat.
Those are pretty good numbers, but we can't use the injectors in our car because they are a different type right?
Also since the Z/G have more hp would it lead one to believe that they have even bigger injectors to compensate for the extra power?
I'm really interested in the potential power for both VQ30DEs as well as VQ35DEs, but I'm still beginning to understand all the variables involved.
-hype
Also since the Z/G have more hp would it lead one to believe that they have even bigger injectors to compensate for the extra power?
I'm really interested in the potential power for both VQ30DEs as well as VQ35DEs, but I'm still beginning to understand all the variables involved.
-hype
Originally posted by xHypex
Those are pretty good numbers, but we can't use the injectors in our car because they are a different type right?
Also since the Z/G have more hp would it lead one to believe that they have even bigger injectors to compensate for the extra power?
I'm really interested in the potential power for both VQ30DEs as well as VQ35DEs, but I'm only beginning to understand all the variables involved.
-hype
Those are pretty good numbers, but we can't use the injectors in our car because they are a different type right?
Also since the Z/G have more hp would it lead one to believe that they have even bigger injectors to compensate for the extra power?
I'm really interested in the potential power for both VQ30DEs as well as VQ35DEs, but I'm only beginning to understand all the variables involved.
-hype
For those of you who really want to know about this stuff I highly recommend 'Auto Math' by John Lawlor. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books
It's a good read that one can learn alot from. I bought this book years ago and I still refer to it from time to time.
Originally posted by DA-MAX
am I undertanding you right that Nissan makes the 2k2 run rich stock??
am I undertanding you right that Nissan makes the 2k2 run rich stock??
Originally posted by DA-MAX
am I undertanding you right that Nissan makes the 2k2 run rich stock??
am I undertanding you right that Nissan makes the 2k2 run rich stock??
Originally posted by Cutlr7
YOU need to buy my car addae
YOU need to buy my car addae
you're telling me....I'm starting to go into modding withdrawl, plus riding the bus with these stanky *** crackheads is no fun
gimme till June I should be back on the road in something!
Originally posted by 2k2SEmax
I can't speak for other 2k2 / 2k3 max's, however my car is running extremely rich. You can view my air / fuel graph HERE. Of course the Apexi SAFC II that I just ordered will change this!
I can't speak for other 2k2 / 2k3 max's, however my car is running extremely rich. You can view my air / fuel graph HERE. Of course the Apexi SAFC II that I just ordered will change this!
Originally posted by Lordrandall
Wow, dang. Is 14.7 optimal?
Wow, dang. Is 14.7 optimal?
And just for a reference top fuel engines dump twice as much fuel into the chamber than there is air to burn. It literally takes that much extra fuel to avoid melting the aluminum.
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Since he's probably going WOT, that's the Nissan closed loop ecu defaults? Man that is very rich.
Since he's probably going WOT, that's the Nissan closed loop ecu defaults? Man that is very rich.
How is your mileage? If it sucks, I would seriously consider letting Nissan run a Consult diagnostic. Mods allow more air so if anything, it would be running leaner not richer. Plus the ecu and injectors should be able to compensate for any na mod you could throw at it. Maybe your base or WOT fuel pressure is off(ie.. too high)
Originally posted by 2k2SEmax
I don't think it's Nissan's 'default' for the ECU. I have not seen anyone else's A/F ratio diagrams that look as bad as mine do. I just think with the combination of all my mods the ECU is 'confused' or something. Who knows. All I know is the SAFC II will help me fix this.
I don't think it's Nissan's 'default' for the ECU. I have not seen anyone else's A/F ratio diagrams that look as bad as mine do. I just think with the combination of all my mods the ECU is 'confused' or something. Who knows. All I know is the SAFC II will help me fix this.
Originally posted by Jeff92se
How is your mileage? If it sucks, I would seriously consider letting Nissan run a Consult diagnostic. Mods allow more air so if anything, it would be running leaner not richer. Plus the ecu and injectors should be able to compensate for any na mod you could throw at it. Maybe your base or WOT fuel pressure is off(ie.. too high)
How is your mileage? If it sucks, I would seriously consider letting Nissan run a Consult diagnostic. Mods allow more air so if anything, it would be running leaner not richer. Plus the ecu and injectors should be able to compensate for any na mod you could throw at it. Maybe your base or WOT fuel pressure is off(ie.. too high)
Originally posted by 2k2SEmax
I'm confident the SAFC II will yield similar results for me.
I'm confident the SAFC II will yield similar results for me.
And just you wait to let me show you all the cool things we're gonna do with them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Finkle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
13
Sep 27, 2015 09:53 PM
Nintensity
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
Aug 13, 2015 05:41 PM
fastcarny
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Aug 12, 2015 03:50 PM
yat70458
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Aug 3, 2015 01:16 PM






