5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2K3 Accord faster than the 2k2/3 Max

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
xfirepwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 612
2K3 Accord faster than the 2k2/3 Max

I was just reading the stats on C&D and it says that Maxima's 1/4 is 14.7 and that the new accord 0-60 in 5.9 sec and 1/4 mile 14.5. Could someone please explain this to me. Our cars have more HP and a lot mor torque and still the accord supposedly can outperform us in 1/4 mile.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #2  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Accord Coupe
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
xfirepwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 612
Originally Posted by blubyu2k2
Accord Coupe
Yes the Coupe EX v-6
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Originally Posted by xfirepwr1
I was just reading the stats on C&D and it says that Maxima's 1/4 is 14.7 and that the new accord 0-60 in 5.9 sec and 1/4 mile 14.5. Could someone please explain this to me. Our cars have more HP and a lot mor torque and still the accord supposedly can outperform us in 1/4 mile.
Unless the cars were run at the VERY SAME TIME, on the VERY SAME TRACK, under the VERY SAME CONDITIONS, etc.....then who gives a **** about 2 tenths of a second in a magazine?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by xfirepwr1
Yes the Coupe EX v-6

yes they are quick but don't trust C&D....plus they are not in the same class etc...
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
like every other honda we killem from a roll-
the coupe is alot lighter though
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
xfirepwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 612
Originally Posted by blubyu2k2
yes they are quick but don't trust C&D....plus they are not in the same class etc...
U r correct about not trusting C&D since it said that they tested the 6 spd and they ran a 14.7. I ran that with my auto first time I took it to the track and that was my best run. I was running 14.8 all night. I think that with a little more practice and cooler weather I could get it down to 14.5, that is my next goal with a stock max.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #8  
Maxxxed's Avatar
tEh Hope
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 543
I drove inside my cousins Accord Coupe the other day and I must say the interior kicks ***... I don't know if he was BS'ing but he said climate control, cd-changer etc are all standard. It seemed pretty fast but it constantly had a nagging sound when accelerating and it didn't feel as smooth as our Max... it a 3.0 btw. I would still take a Max anyday!
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #9  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MannyNJ2k2max
like every other honda we killem from a roll-
the coupe is alot lighter though
no no, you're mixed up. Hondas have no torque so Nissans, Toyotas, Kias, etc, all kill them from a stop. They're much stronger from a roll.

Maxima 6spd 14.1-14.3 > Accord 6spd 14.5-14.7
Maxima auto 14.6-14.7 > Accord auto 15.0-15.3

above = real times, not mag times.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #10  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
are u sayin' that that accord coupe pulls harder than the 3.5 max 2nd-3rd gear? I do not believe it
"theres no replacement for displacement"
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #11  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
their advantage (coupe) is weight /taller gearing
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
chigga's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
no no, you're mixed up. Hondas have no torque so Nissans, Toyotas, Kias, etc, all kill them from a stop. They're much stronger from a roll.

Maxima 6spd 14.1-14.3 > Accord 6spd 14.5-14.7
Maxima auto 14.6-14.7 > Accord auto 15.0-15.3

above = real times, not mag times.
i wanna have a go at the new coupe. almost happened but all of a sudden cops and traffic appeared the nerve..so the 6 speed is no slouch huh??
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Originally Posted by MannyNJ2k2max
their advantage (coupe) is weight /taller gearing
You may want to reconsider part of this statement. Go to edmunds and take a look, you will find those coupes can be pretty heavy.


http://www.edmunds.com/new/2003/hond...enav..8.Honda*

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2003/niss...nav..8.Nissan*
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 10:59 AM
  #14  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
....still don't know why Honda didnt have the 5sp manual option for the V6 sedan.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #15  
xfirepwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 612
Originally Posted by MannyNJ2k2max
their advantage (coupe) is weight /taller gearing
Our advantage is more HP and a lot more TQ, that should give us an edge over the new Accord.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #16  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by xfirepwr1
Our advantage is more HP and a lot more TQ, that should give us an edge over the new Accord.
Actually, in reality, the Maxima has LESS horsepower.

Maxima 6spd: 200-205 fwhp stock
Accord 6spd: 215-220 fwhp stock

But way more torque...

Maxima 6spd: 225 fwtq stock
Accord 6spd: 195 fwtq stock


Torque is what you need for daily driving and 1/4 mile performance, but on the highway the 6spd Accord will really rip. I wouldn't be surprised if it could take out a 6spd Maxima from say a 50-70 mph roll.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #17  
bigdo26's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,223
ya the times magazines get are definatly off for some cars. I've run my auto Max at 14.6: faster than magazine times for a 6 speed. Hondas make great cars, but like everyone else says, the torque isnt there.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:46 AM
  #18  
VMaximus02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Actually, in reality, the Maxima has LESS horsepower.

Maxima 6spd: 200-205 fwhp stock
Accord 6spd: 215-220 fwhp stock

But way more torque...

Maxima 6spd: 225 fwtq stock
Accord 6spd: 195 fwtq stock


Torque is what you need for daily driving and 1/4 mile performance, but on the highway the 6spd Accord will really rip. I wouldn't be surprised if it could take out a 6spd Maxima from say a 50-70 mph roll.

Your fwhp figures of both cars were from some dyno run? Why does the Maxima (claimed 255-hp) looses so much power on dyno vs the Honda (240-hp) engine? With that saying, any updates on Nissan's false advertisement claimed of horsepower on the Maxima?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #19  
xfirepwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 612
Originally Posted by VMaximus02
Your fwhp figures of both cars were from some dyno run? Why does the Maxima (claimed 255-hp) looses so much power on dyno vs the Honda (240-hp) engine? With that saying, any updates on Nissan's false advertisement claimed of horsepower on the Maxima?
That is exactly what I was asking, but for some reason it did not post it.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #20  
wild willy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 869
Originally Posted by xfirepwr1
I was just reading the stats on C&D and it says that Maxima's 1/4 is 14.7 and that the new accord 0-60 in 5.9 sec and 1/4 mile 14.5. Could someone please explain this to me. Our cars have more HP and a lot mor torque and still the accord supposedly can outperform us in 1/4 mile.

Thank God it still can't beat the Altima
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #21  
Trance Artur's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 740
Accord = 2 door / Maxima = 4 door
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #22  
chigga's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by xfirepwr1
That is exactly what I was asking, but for some reason it did not post it.
i was wondering the same but didn't want to be the 1st to ask on it. thanx xfirepwr1
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 12:01 PM
  #23  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Here is a stock "255 HP" Maxima 6spd on the dyno... Dyno source: www.nissanperformancemag.com

205 fwhp / 220 fwtq



Here is a stock "240 HP" Accord 6spd on the same type of dyno... Dyno source: www.vtec.net

217 fwhp / 195 fwtq



The 3.5L Nissan has significantly extra power in the low-end and mid-range because it has the extra displacement and because that's how it was designed to operate. It'll still give superior performance off the line and through the 1/4 mile. But the 3.0L Honda rules at the top-end. If you are on the highway, that motor will cook. It doesn't have anything on a VQ35 at lower speeds, though.

The crossover point is 5500 rpm where both are at about 200 fwhp but the Maxima's power has crested but the Honda's is still building. So an Accord V6 6spd will be able to take out a Maxima 6spd, but only if it can keep its revs above 5500 rpm solidly. The only place that will happen is at high (illegal) speeds. Weights are similar between the two cars so that would not be a factor.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #24  
chigga's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,181
wasn't doubtin ya stevo, so those dyno numbers are at the crank right?? sorry not really into dyno'n and all that. has anyone ever ran against one to see 1st hand?? and the honda driver would have to basically know how to run his car to beat a max in top end racing.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #25  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Dynos are at the wheels, not at the crank.

Divide numbers by about 0.83 to get a rough estimate of the equivalent crank numbers.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #26  
Luquire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,144
Yes but think how many after market oppurtunities there are for the accord. It would be a lot cheaper and easier to sup it up. you get take car of the low end with a few good mods.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #27  
chigga's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,181
you get take car of the low end with a few good mods.
i would rather take a max and have all that lovely low end and just get exhaust and intake done for starters. tq is harder to get from mods (from what i've seen) so all we would need is a lil extra to get our top end up....thanx for the info stevtec..
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 02:54 PM
  #28  
bigdo26's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,223
i agree that I'd rather have more torque, seeing as hp at 6000 rpms is rarely used. But those honda interiors are real nice... any you seen them?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #29  
wild willy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 869
Originally Posted by bigdo26
i agree that I'd rather have more torque, seeing as hp at 6000 rpms is rarely used. But those honda interiors are real nice... any you seen them?
Yes they are excellent..Imagine how I feel with the Altima interior....which cost more too
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #30  
Quicksilver's Avatar
OT n00bs FTMFCSL
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,412
Originally Posted by wild *****
Yes they are excellent..Imagine how I feel with the Altima interior....which cost more too
You probably feel like you got raped...poor guy
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #31  
maximadave's Avatar
detailerdaveb@gmail.com
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,242
From: Portland, OR
The Accord is a butt ugly looking car IMO. Maximas rule!!! Who gives a crap if a Honduh Accord is a few tenths faster than our Maximas. There is alot more to a car than 1/4 mile times. At least you will not see a Maxima at every street corner like a Honduh.

Just look at my avatar
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 04:25 PM
  #32  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
First of all it doesnt matter , because its a honda. If you drive one, win or lose you still look like a RETARD !

Second of all, with that tight a comparison, it will be a drivers race. Most manual transmission drivers dont know how to race their cars anyway, so if you are savy with your Max , you should be far ahead !
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 04:54 PM
  #33  
KL99SEA's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 299
Am I the only one to call BS on a 6 speed stock Max at 14.1-14.3?????? Show me one time slip of a Stock max at 14.3 or better. I saw one 14.3 with a stripped interior and a 14.1 with a CAI but the actual average is 14.5 and up. I bet if you averaged all the 6 speed times in the 1/4 mile form its even higher. I think a AV6 (new) 6 speed is a drivers race with the both cars even. 14.1 out of a stock 6 speed....now come on. (yes with slicks...)
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #34  
maximadave's Avatar
detailerdaveb@gmail.com
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,242
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by KL99SEA
Am I the only one to call BS on a 6 speed stock Max at 14.1-14.3?????? Show me one time slip of a Stock max at 14.3 or better. I saw one 14.3 with a stripped interior and a 14.1 with a CAI but the actual average is 14.5 and up. I bet if you averaged all the 6 speed times in the 1/4 mile form its even higher. I think a AV6 (new) 6 speed is a drivers race with the both cars even. 14.1 out of a stock 6 speed....now come on. (yes with slicks...)
who cares?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #35  
wild willy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 869
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
You probably feel like you got raped...poor guy
I did...but sometimes it's fun.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #36  
3.0HO
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Actually, in reality, the Maxima has LESS horsepower.

Maxima 6spd: 200-205 fwhp stock
Accord 6spd: 215-220 fwhp stock

But way more torque...

Maxima 6spd: 225 fwtq stock
Accord 6spd: 195 fwtq stock


Torque is what you need for daily driving and 1/4 mile performance, but on the highway the 6spd Accord will really rip. I wouldn't be surprised if it could take out a 6spd Maxima from say a 50-70 mph roll.

What does the V6 accord coupe weigh? 4 door?

Are their any NA bolt on mods that do anything significant power wise as of yet? Or are they tuned nicely from the factory?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #37  
MaximaDisciple's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 686
Like the saying goes..."horsepower is for bragging rights, torque is what gets you down the road"
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #38  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
Originally Posted by KL99SEA
Am I the only one to call BS on a 6 speed stock Max at 14.1-14.3?????? Show me one time slip of a Stock max at 14.3 or better. I saw one 14.3 with a stripped interior and a 14.1 with a CAI but the actual average is 14.5 and up. I bet if you averaged all the 6 speed times in the 1/4 mile form its even higher. I think a AV6 (new) 6 speed is a drivers race with the both cars even. 14.1 out of a stock 6 speed....now come on. (yes with slicks...)
I personally saw Chinkzilla run a 14.2 , and my friend Leftcoast who no longer has his Max also ran a 14.2 here at Carlsbad Raceway.
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #39  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
205 fwhp / 220 fwtq


36-secs. and 40-secs. between runs. Look how much the extra 4-secs. added between the 2nd-3rd vs. 1st-2nd.

That is exactly how NOT to dyno a car. Look at the heat soak affect due to no cool down. Maximas don't like that!

I'm still calling on the peak numbers, since dynolab actually uses a cooling fan when we know Stillen doesn't and heat soak had a 10hp/6wtq effect.

Got any better stock dynos Stevo?
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 06:17 PM
  #40  
Necco's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Actually, in reality, the Maxima has LESS horsepower.

Maxima 6spd: 200-205 fwhp stock
Accord 6spd: 215-220 fwhp stock

But way more torque...

Maxima 6spd: 225 fwtq stock
Accord 6spd: 195 fwtq stock


Torque is what you need for daily driving and 1/4 mile performance, but on the highway the 6spd Accord will really rip. I wouldn't be surprised if it could take out a 6spd Maxima from say a 50-70 mph roll.
Guys!!!! u r talkin bout a ****en coupe vs a full size sedan! still i think the maxima can take it, but look at the logics.... it the freakin sport coupe hence the word sport! its in a different class of cars so just look at how much better the maxima is..... its a sedan! and still either beats the accord coupe or comes close! is have no clue how the accord wieghts more when its smaller but hey, who knows what they put in it! i would pick the maxi and day over the accord! proly better handling and just all around better performance then the accord, so i doubt the accord outperfoms the maxima! Aiight peace!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 AM.